Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T08:03:44.550Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 4 - Pharmacology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2015

By
Claude Abdallah ,
Richard D. Urman  and
Johan Raeder
Edited by
Johan Raeder  and
Richard D. Urman
Johan Raeder
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo
Richard D. Urman
Affiliation:
Harvard Medical School
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Practical Ambulatory Anesthesia , pp. 35 - 52
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdallah, C, Hannallah, R. Inhalation versus intravenous anesthetics. Curr Rev Clin Anesth 2009;30(3):25–36.Google Scholar
Einarsson, SG, Cerne, A, Bengtsson, A, et al. Respiration during emergence from anaesthesia with desflurane/N2O vs. desflurane/air for gynaecological laparoscopy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1998;42:1192–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katoh, T, Ikeda, K. The effects of fentanyl on sevoflurane requirements for loss of consciousness and skin incision. Anesthesiology 1998;88:18–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Albertin, A, Dedola, E, Bergonzi, PC, et al. The effect of adding two target-controlled concentrations (1–3 ng ml−1) of remifentanil on MAC BAR of desflurane. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006;23:510–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inagaki, Y, Sumikawa, K, Yoshiya, I. Anesthetic interaction between midazolam and halothane in humans. Anesth Analg 1993;76:613–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minto, CF, Schnider, TW, Egan, TD, et al. Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. I. Model development. Anesthesiology 1997;86:10–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoymork, SC, Raeder, J. Why do women wake up faster than men from propofol anaesthesia? Br J Anaesth 2005;95:627–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kazama, T, Ikeda, K, Morita, K, et al. Comparison of the effect-site k(eO)s of propofol for blood pressure and EEG bispectral index in elderly and younger patients. Anesthesiology 1999;90:1517–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Absalom, AR, Struys, MRF. An overview of TCI and TIVA. Ghent: Academia Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Hoymork, SC, Raeder, J, Grimsmo, B, Steen, PA. Bispectral index, predicted and measured drug levels of target-controlled infusions of remifentanil and propofol during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and emergence. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000;44:1138–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minto, CF, Schnider, TW, Shafer, SL. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. II. Model application. Anesthesiology 1997;86:24–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Urman, RD, Maurer, WG. Computer-assisted personalized sedation: friend or foe? Anesth Analg 2014;119:207–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mjaland, O, Raeder, J, Aasboe, V, et al. Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1997;84:958–61.Google ScholarPubMed
Beskow, A, Westrin, P. Sevoflurane causes more postoperative agitation in children than does halothane. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1999;43:536–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seitsonen, ER, Yli-Hankala, AM, Korttila, KT. Similar recovery from bispectral index-titrated isoflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia after outpatient gynecological surgery. J Clin Anesth 2006;18:272–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raeder, JC, Misvaer, G. Comparison of propofol induction with thiopentone or methohexitone in short outpatient general anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1988;32:607–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, JS, Gonzalez, ML, Chuang, SK, Perrott, DH. Comparison of methohexital and propofol use in ambulatory procedures in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:1996–2003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carollo, DS, Nossaman, BD, Ramadhyani, U. Dexmedetomidine: a review of clinical applications. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2008;21:457–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, RD, Maze, M. Alpha2-adrenoceptor agonists. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 2007;8:25–33.Google ScholarPubMed
Lenz, H, Raeder, J, Hoymork, SC. Administration of fentanyl before remifentanil-based anaesthesia has no influence on post-operative pain or analgesic consumption. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008;52:149–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raeder, JC, Hole, A. Alfentanil anaesthesia in gall-bladder surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1986;30:35–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raeder, J. Remifentanil, a new age in anaesthesia? In: Vuyk, J, Engbers, F, Groen-Mulder, S, eds. On the Study and Practice of Intravenous Anaesthesia. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 2000: 249–60.Google Scholar
Raeder, JC, Stenseth, LB. Ketamine: a new look at an old drug. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2000;13:463–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenz, H, Sandvik, L, Qvigstad, E, et al. A comparison of intravenous oxycodone and intravenous morphine in patient-controlled postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic hysterectomy. Anesth Analg 2009;109:1279–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandin, RH, Enlund, G, Samuelsson, P, Lennmarken, C. Awareness during anaesthesia: a prospective case study. Lancet 2000;355:707–11.Google ScholarPubMed
McNeil, IA, Culbert, B, Russell, I. Comparison of intubating conditions following propofol and succinylcholine with propofol and remifentanil 2 μg kg−1 or 4 μg kg−1. Br J Anaesth 2000;85:623–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mencke, T, Echternach, M, Kleinschmidt, S, et al. Laryngeal morbidity and quality of tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology 2003;98:1049–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, JB, Wheatley, L. Tracheal intubation in ambulatory surgery patients: using remifentanil and propofol without muscle relaxants. Anesth Analg 1998;86:45–49.Google ScholarPubMed
Harboe, T, Guttormsen, AB, Irgens, A, et al. Anaphylaxis during anesthesia in Norway: a 6-year single-center follow-up study. Anesthesiology 2005;102:897–903.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berg, H, Roed, J, Viby-Mogensen, J, et al. Residual neuromuscular block is a risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications. A prospective, randomised, and blinded study of postoperative pulmonary complications after atracurium, vecuronium and pancuronium. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1997;41:1095–103.Google ScholarPubMed
Eriksson, LI, Sundman, E, Olsson, R, et al. Functional assessment of the pharynx at rest and during swallowing in partially paralyzed humans: simultaneous videomanometry and mechanomyography of awake human volunteers. Anesthesiology 1997;87:1035–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirkegaard, H, Heier, T, Caldwell, JE. Efficacy of tactile-guided reversal from cisatracurium-induced neuromuscular block. Anesthesiology 2002;96:45–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lovstad, RZ, Thagaard, KS, Berner, NS, Raeder, JC. Neostigmine 50 μg kg−1 with glycopyrrolate increases postoperative nausea in women after laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001;45:495–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strayer, RJ, Nelson, LS. Adverse events associated with ketamine for procedural sedation in adults. Am J Emerg Med 2008;26:985–1028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedberg, BL. Propofol-ketamine technique. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1993;17:297–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedberg, BL. Propofol ketamine anesthesia for cosmetic surgery in the office suite. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2003;41:39–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Messenger, DW, Murray, HE, Dungey, PE, et al. Subdissociative-dose ketamine versus fentanyl for analgesia during propofol procedural sedation: a randomized clinical trial. Acad Emerg Med 2008;15:877–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aouad, MT, Moussa, AR, Dagher, CM, et al. Addition of ketamine to propofol for initiation of procedural anesthesia in children reduces propofol consumption and preserves hemodynamic stability. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008;52:561–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goel, S, Bhardwaj, N, Jain, K. Efficacy of ketamine and midazolam as co-induction agents with propofol for laryngeal mask insertion in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2008;18:628–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slavik, VC, Zed, PJ. Combination ketamine and propofol for procedural sedation and analgesia. Pharmacotherapy 2007;27:1588–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Kock, MF, Lavand’homme, PM. The clinical role of NMDA receptor antagonists for the treatment of postoperative pain. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2007;21:85–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stubhaug, A, Breivik, H, Eide, PK, et al. Mapping of punctuate hyperalgesia around a surgical incision demonstrates that ketamine is a powerful suppressor of central sensitization to pain following surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1997;41:1124–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, RF, Dahl, JB, Moore, RA, Kalso, E. Peri-operative ketamine for acute post-operative pain: a quantitative and qualitative systematic review (Cochrane review). Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005;49:1405–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elia, N, Tramér, MR. Ketamine and postoperative pain – a quantitative systematic review of randomised trials. Pain 2005;113:61–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kwok, RF, Lim, J, Chan, MT, et al. Preoperative ketamine improves postoperative analgesia after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. Anesth Analg 2004;98:1044–49, table.Google ScholarPubMed
Roytblat, L, Korotkoruchko, A, Katz, J, et al. Postoperative pain: the effect of low-dose ketamine in addition to general anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1993;77:1161–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathisen, LC, Aasbo, V, Raeder, J. Lack of pre-emptive analgesic effect of (R)-ketamine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1999;43:220–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×