Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T02:00:25.298Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Language Choice in a Multilingual Society: A View from Complexity Science1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 July 2017

Salikoko S. Mufwene
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Christophe Coupé
Affiliation:
Université Lumière Lyon II
François Pellegrino
Affiliation:
Université Lumière Lyon II
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Complexity in Language
Developmental and Evolutionary Perspectives
, pp. 187 - 217
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, Daniel M., and Strogatz, Steven H.. 2003. Modeling the dynamics of language death. Nature 424, 900.Google Scholar
Albert, Réka, and Barabási, Albert-Lászlo. 2002. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Review of Modern Physics 74, 4797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Philip. 1972. More is different. Science 177, 393–6.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1997. The dissemination of culture: A model with local convergence and global polarization. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 41(2), 203–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayestaran Aranaz, Margarita, and Alonso, Justo de la Cueva. 1974. Las familias de la provincia de Pontevedra (Galleguidad y conflicto lingüístico). Sevilla: Instituto de Ciencias de la Familia.Google Scholar
Ball, Philip. 2004. Critical Mass: How One Thing Leads to Another. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Ball, Philip. 2012. Why Society is a Complex Matter. Meeting Twenty-First Century Challenges with a New Kind of Science. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Barabási, Albert-Lászlo. 2002. Linked: The new science of networks. Cambridge: Perseus.Google Scholar
Barabási, Albert-Lászlo. 2005. The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics. Nature 435, 207–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baronchelli, Andrea; Loreto, Vittorio; and Tria, Francesca. 2012. Language dynamics. Advances in Complex Sytems 15(3–4), 1203002.Google Scholar
Blondel, Vincent; Guillaume, Jean-Loup; Lambiotte, Renaud; and LeFebvre, Etienne. 2008. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics P10008.Google Scholar
Blythe, Richard and Croft, William. 2010. Can a Science–Humanities Collaboration Be Successful? Adaptive Behavior 18, 1220.Google Scholar
Boccaletti, Stefano; Latora, Vito; Moreno, Yamir; Chavez, Martin and Hwang, D.-U.. 2006. Complex Networks: Structure and Dynamics. Physics Reports 424, 175308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgatti, Stephen P.; Mehra, Ajay; Brass, Daniel J.; and Labianca, Giuseppe. 2009. Network analysis in the social sciences. Science 323, 892–5.Google Scholar
Javier, Borge-Holthoefer; Rivero, Alejandro; García, Íñigo; Cauhé, Elisa; Ferrer, Alfredo; Ferrer, Darío; Francos, David; Iñíguez, David; Pérez, María Pilar; Ruiz, Gonzalo; Sanz, Franciso; Serrano, Fermín; Viñas, Cristina; Tarancón, Alfonso; and Moreno, Yamir. 2011. Structural and Dynamical Patterns on Online Social Networks: The Spanish May 15th Movement as a Case Study. PLoS ONE 6(8), e23883. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023883.Google Scholar
de Bot, Kees, and Stoessel, Saskia (eds.). 2002. Language change and social networks. [Special issue]. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 153.Google Scholar
Bradley, David, and Bradley, Maya (eds.). 2002. Language Endangerment and Language Maintenance. London/New York: Routledge Curzon.Google Scholar
Carro, Adrian; Vazquez, Federico; Toral, Raúl; and Miguel, Maxi San. 2014. Fragmentation transition in a coevolving network with link-state dynamics. Physical Review E, 89(6): 062802.Google Scholar
Castelló, Xavier. 2010. Collective Phenomena in Social Dynamics: Consensus problems, ordering dynamics and language competition. Ph.D. dissertation. IFISC (Institute for Cross-Disciplinary Physics and Complex Systems, CSIC-UIB), Palma de Mallorca, Spain. Available online at http://ifisc.uib-csic.es/publications/publication-detail.php?indice=2103, accessed 8 November 2012.Google Scholar
Castelló, Xavier; Eguíluz, Víctor M.; and Miguel, Maxi San. 2006. Ordering dynamics with two non-excluding options: Bilingualism in language competition. New Journal of Physics 8, 308–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castelló, Xavier; Loureiro-Porto, Lucía; Eguíluz, Víctor M.; and Miguel, Maxi San. 2007a. The fate of bilingualism in a model of language competition. Advancing social simulation. The First World Congress, ed. by Takahashi, Shingo, Sallach, David and Rouchier, Juliette, 8394. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Castelló, Xavier; Toivonen, Riitta; Eguíluz, Víctor M.; Saramäki, Jari; Kaski, Kimmo; and Miguel, Maxi San. 2007b. Anomalous lifetime distributions and topological traps in ordering dynamics. Europhysics Letters 79, 66006–1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castelló, Xavier; Toivonen, Riitta; Eguíluz, Víctor M.; Loureiro-Porto, Lucía; Sarmäki, Jari; Kaski, Kimmo; and Miguel, Maxi San. 2008. Modelling language competition: Bilingualism and complex social networks. The Evolution of Language. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference (EVOLANG7), ed. by Smith, Andrew D. M., Smith, Kenny and Cancho, Ramon Ferrer i, 5966. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Castelló, Xavier; Vazquez, Federico; Eguíluz, Víctor M.; Loureiro-Porto, Lucía; Miguel, Maxi San; Chapel, Laetitia; and Deffuant, Guillaume. 2011. Viability and Resilience in the Dynamics of Language Competition. Viability and Resilience of Complex Systems. Concepts, Methods and Case Studies from Ecology and Society, ed. by Deffuant, Gillaume and Gilbert, Nigel, 4984. Boston/Dordrecht/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Castelló, Xavier; Loureiro-Porto, Lucía; and Miguel, Maxi San. 2013. Agent-based models of language competition. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 221, 2151.Google Scholar
Centola, Damon; González-Avella, Juan Carlos; Eguíluz, Víctor M.; and Miguel, Maxi San. 2007. Homophily, Cultural Drift and the Co-Evolution of Cultural Groups. Journal of Conflict Resolution 51, 905–29.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 1997. English as a Global Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 2000. Language Death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dorogovtsev, Sergey, and Mendes, José Fernando Ferreira. 2002. Evolution of networks. Advances in Physics 51, 1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorogovtsev, Sergey N.; Goltsev, Alexander V.; and Mendes, José Fernando Ferreira. 2008. Critical phenomena in complex networks. Review of Modern Physics 80, 1275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehala, Martin. 2010. Ethnolinguistic vitality and intergroup processes. Multilingua 29, 203–21.Google Scholar
Ehala, Martin, and Niglas, Katrin. 2007. Empirical evaluation of a mathematical model of ethnolinguistic vitality: The case of Võro. Journal of Multilingual and Cultural Development 28(6), 427–44.Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick C., and Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2009. Language as a complex adaptive system. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Erdős, Paull, and Rényi, Alfréd. 1959. On Random Graphs. I. Publicationes Mathematicae 6, 290–97.Google Scholar
Fernández-Gracia, Juan; Eguíluz, Víctor M.; and Miguel, Maxi San. 2011. Update rules and interevent time distributions: Slow ordering vs. no ordering in the Voter Model. Physical Review E 84, 015103.Google Scholar
Fernández-Gracia, Juan; Castelló, Xavi; Eguíluz, Víctor M.; and Miguel, Maxi San. 2012. Dynamics of link states in complex networks: The case of a majority rule. Physical Review E 86.066113(18).Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. 1991. Reversing language shift: Theoretical and empirical foundations of assistance to threatened languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. (ed.). 2001. Can Threatened Languages Be Saved? Reversing Language Shift Revisited: A 21st-Century Perspective. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Richard, and Appenzeller, Tim. 1999. Beyond reductionism. Science 284, 79.Google Scholar
Girvan, M. and Newman, M. E. J.. 2002. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 99(12), 7821–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
González-Avella, Juan Carlos; Cosenza, Mario G.; Klemm, Konstantin; Eguíluz, Víctor M.; and Miguel, Maxi San. 2007. Information Feedback and Mass Media Effects in Cultural Dynamics. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 10, 117.Google Scholar
González-Avella, Juan Carlos; Cosenza, Mario G.; Eguíluz, Víctor M.; and Miguel, Maxi San. 2010. Spontaneous ordering against an external field in nonequilibrium systems. New Journal of Physics 12, 013010.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology 78, 1360–80.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark S. 1978. Threshold Models of Collective Behavior. The American Journal of Sociology 83–1420–43.Google Scholar
Grenoble, Lenore A., and Whaley, Lindsay J. (eds.). 1998. Endangered Languages: Current Issues and Future Prospects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Grenoble, Lenore A., and Whaley, Lindsay J.. 2006. Saving Languages: An Introduction to Language Revitalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hamers, Josiane F., and Blanc, Michel H. A.. 1989. Bilinguality and Bilingualism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hinton, Leanne, and Hale, Kenneth Locke. 2001. The green book of language revitalization in practice. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Horgan, John. 1995. From complexity to perplexity. Scientific American 272(6), 104–9.Google Scholar
Kandler, Anne; Unger, Roman; and Steele, James. 2010. Language shift, bilingualism and the future of Britain's Celtic languages. Philological Transactions of the Royal Society B 365, 3855–64.Google Scholar
Ke, Jinyun; Gong, Tao; and Wang, William S-Y. 2008. Language Change and Social Networks. Communications in Computational Physics 3(4), 935–49.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Matters. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Leskovec, Jure, and Horvitz, Eric. 2007. Worldwide Buzz: Planetary-Scale Views on an Instant-Messaging Network. Microsoft Research Technical Report MSR-TR-2006–186, Microsoft Research, June 2007. Available online at http://research.microsoft.com/apps/pubs/default.aspx?id=70389, accessed 8 November 2012.Google Scholar
Leskovec, Jure, and Horvitz, Eric. 2008. Planetary-Scale Views on a Large Instant-Messaging Network. Proceedings of WWW 2008 Beijing, China, ed. by Huai, Jinpeng and Chen, Robin 695704. Available online at wwwconference.org/www2008/papers/Proceedings.html, accessed 8 November 2012.Google Scholar
Levey, David. 2008. Language Change and Variation in Gibraltar. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Loreto, Vittorio, and Steels, Luc. 2007. Emergence of language. Nature Physics 3, 758–60.Google Scholar
Manley, Marilyn S. 2008. Quechua language attitudes and maintenance in Cuzco, Peru. Language Policy 7, 323–44.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley. 1980. Language and Social Networks. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Minett, James W., and Wang, William S-Y.. 2008. Modelling endangered languages: The effects of bilingualism and social structure. Lingua 118, 1945.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Melanie. 2009. Complexity: A Guided Tour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moreno, Jacob L. 1934. Who shall survive? Washington DC: Mental Disease Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution (Cambridge Approaches to Language Contact 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 2003. Language Endangerment: What Have Pride and Prestige Got to Do With It? When languages collide. Perspectives on Language Conflict, Language Competition and Language Coexistence, ed. by Joseph, Brian, 324–46. Ohio: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 2004. Language birth and death. Annual Review of Anthropology 33; 201–22.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 2008. Language Evolution. Contact, Competition and Change. London/New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Nettle, Daniel. 1999a. Using social impact theory to simulate language change. Lingua 108, 95117.Google Scholar
Nettle, Daniel. 1999b. Is the rate of linguistic change constant? Lingua 108, 119–36.Google Scholar
Nettle, Daniel, and Romaine, Suzanne. 2000. Vanishing Voices: The Extinction of the World's Languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nowak, Andrzej; Szamrej, Jacek; and Latané, Bibb. 1990. From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamical theory of social impact. Psychological Review 97, 362–76.Google Scholar
Onnela, Jukka-Pekka; Saramäki, Jari; Hyvönen, Jörkki; Szabó, Gábor; Lazer, David; Kaski, Kimmo; Kertész, Janos; and Barabási, Albert-Lászlo. 2007. Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 104, 7332–36.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. 1989. Bilingualism. Oxford/New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
San Miguel, Maxi. 2012. Fenómenos colectivos sociales. Revista Española de Física 26, 5663.Google Scholar
San Miguel, Maxi; Johnson, Jeffrey H.; Kertesz, Janos; Kaski, Kimmo; Díaz-Guilera, Albert; MacKay, Robert S.; Loreto, Vittorio; Erdi, Peter; and Helbing, Dirk. 2012. Challenges in Complex Systems Science. European Physical Journal Special Topics 214, 245–71.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas. 1978. Micromotives and Macrobehaviour. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Schulze, Christian, and Stauffer, Dietrich. 2006. Recent developments in computer simulations of language competition. Computing in Science and Engineering 8(3), 60–7.Google Scholar
Schulze, Christian; Stauffer, Dieter; and Wichmann, Soeren. 2008. Birth, survival and death of languages by Monte Carlo simulation. Communications in Computational Physics 3, 271–94.Google Scholar
Steels, Luc. 1995. A self-organizing spatial vocabulary. Artificial Life 2, 319–32.Google Scholar
The “Five Graces” Group (Beckner, Clay, Blythe, Richard, Bybee, Joan, Christiansen, Morten H., Croft, William, Ellis, Nick C., Holland, John, Ke, Jinyun, Larsen-Freeman, Diane and Schoenemann, Tom). 2009. Language is a complex adaptive system: A position paper. In Ellis & Larsen-Freeman, 126.Google Scholar
Toivonen, Riitta; Onnela, Jukka-Pekka; Saramäki, Jari; Hyvönen, Jörkki; and Kaski, Kimmo. 2006. Model for social networks. Physica A 371, 851–60.Google Scholar
Travers, Jeffrey, and Milgram, Stanley. 1969. An experimental study of the Small World problem. Sociometry 32, 425–43.Google Scholar
Tsunoda, Tasaku. 2005. Language endangerment and language revitalisation. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
UNESCO. 2003. Language vitality and language endangerment. UNESCO (Ad Hoc Expert Group on Endangered Languages). Available online at www.unesco.org/culture/ich/doc/src/00120-EN.pdf, accessed 7 July 2014.Google Scholar
Vazquez, Federico; Castelló, Xavier; and Miguel, Maxi San. 2010. Agent-based models of language competition: Macroscopic descriptions and order-disorder transitions. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, P04007.Google Scholar
Wang, William S.-Y., and Minett, James W.. 2005. The invasion of language: emergence, change and death. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20(5), 263–9.Google Scholar
Watts, Duncan. 2003. Six degrees: The science of a connected age. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Watts, Duncan. 2011. Everything Is Obvious: How Common Sense Fails Us. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
Watts, Duncan J., and Strogatz, Steven H.. 1998. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684), 409–10.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1953. Languages in contact. Findings and Problems. New York: Linguistic Circle.Google Scholar
Wölck, Wolfgang. 2004. Universals of language maintenance, shift and change. Collegium Antropologicum 28(1), 512.Google Scholar
Wu, Ye; Zhou, Changsong; Xiao, Jinghua; Kurths, Jürgen; and Schellnhuber, Hans Joachim. 2010 Evidence for a bimodal distribution in human communication. Proceedings National Academy of Sciences (USA), 107, 18803–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×