Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T07:05:33.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - States, Knowledge and Ignorance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2023

By
Christina Boswell
Edited by
Christina Boswell  and
Emile Chabal
Christina Boswell
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Emile Chabal
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access

Summary

Most accounts of states and knowledge see knowledge as crucial to realising state governing projects and for underpinning the ‘epistemic authority’ of the state. This chapter questions the underlying assumptions these accounts make about state motivation or rationality. Building on theories of state legitimation, it argues that we should see knowledge production as highly selective and contingent. The chapter then elaborates on the three lenses for exploring ignorance: (a) omission, inspired by theories of bounded rationality and information processing; (b) strategy, building on sociological and anthropological notions of strategic ignorance and (c) ascription, building on theories of social movements and focusing on processes of claims-making and political contestation that expose state ignorance.

Keywords

ignorancestateknowledgemigrationimmigrationgovernance
Type
Chapter
Information
States of Ignorance
Governing Irregular Migrants in Western Europe
 , pp. 33 - 58
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ajana, Btihaj. 2015. ‘Augmented Borders: Big Data and the Ethics of Immigration Control’. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 13(1): 58–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, Howard E., and Pfeffer, Jeffrey. 1976. ‘Environments of Organizations’. Annual Review of Sociology 2: 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, William L., and Vollmer, Bastian A.. 2018. ‘Clean Skins: Making the e-Border Security Assemblage’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 36(1): 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amara, Nabil, Mathieu, Ouimet, and Réjean, Landry. 2004. ‘New Evidence on Instrumental, Conceptual and Symbolic Utilization of University Research in Government Agencies’. Science Communication 26(1): 75–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bache, Ian, and Flinders, Matthew. 2004. ‘Multi-Level Governance and the Study of the British State’. Public Policy and Administration 19(1): 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Bevir, Mark, and Rhodes, R. A. W.. 2003. Interpreting British Governance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Sidney. 1982. The Permanent Campaign. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Boswell, Christina. 2009. The Political Uses of Expert Knowledge: Immigration Policy and Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boswell, Christina, and Rodrigues, Eugénia. 2016. ‘Policies, Politics and Organisational Problems: Multiple Streams and the Implementation of Targets in UK Government’. Policy & Politics 44(4): 507–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broeders, Dennis. 2007. ‘The New Digital Borders of Europe: EU Databases and the Surveillance of Irregular Migrants’. International Sociology 22(1): 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromley, Patricia, and Powell, Walter W.. 2012. ‘From Smoke and Mirrors to Walking the Talk: Decoupling in the Contemporary World’. The Academy of Management Annals 6(1): 483–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Mark B. 2015. ‘Politicizing Science: Conceptions of Politics in Science and Technology Studies’. Social Studies of Science 45(1): 3–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brunsson, Nils. 2002. The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations. Copenhagen: Abstrakt and Liber.Google Scholar
Caplan, Jane, and John, Torpey, eds. 2001. Documenting Individual Identity: The Development of State Practices in the Modern World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Caplan, Nathan. 1978. ‘A Minimal Set of Conditions Necessary for the Utilization of Social Science Knowledge in Policy Formulation at National Level’. In Using Social Research in Public Policy Making, ed. Weiss, Carol H., 183–97. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Cetina, Karin Knorr. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, John, and Newman, Janet. 2017. ‘“People in This Country Have Had Enough of Experts”: Brexit and the Paradoxes of Populism’. Critical Policy Studies 11(1): 101–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Michael D., March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1972. ‘A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice’. Administrative Science Quarterly 17(1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daft, Richard L., and Weick, Karl E.. 1984. ‘Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems’. Academy of Management Review 9(2): 284–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dedieu, François, Jouzel, Jean-Noel, and Prete, Giovanni. 2015. ‘Governing by Ignoring’. In Routledge International Handbook of Ignorance Studies, eds. Gross, Matthias, and McGoey, , 297–307. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dery, David. 1986. ‘Knowledge and Organizations’. Policy Studies Review 6(1): 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J., and Powell, Walter W.. 1983. ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’. American Sociological Review 48: 147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elstub, Stephen, and Escobar, Oliver. 2019. Handbook of Democratic Innovation and Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Frank. 1990. Technocracy and the Politics of Expertise. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Fischer, Frank. 2009. Democracy and Expertise: Reorienting Policy Inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitoussi, Jean-Paul, and Martine, Durand. 2018. Beyond GDP Measuring What Counts for Economic and Social Performance: Measuring What Counts for Economic and Social Performance. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–77, ed. Faubion, James D.. New York: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1994. ‘Governmentality’. In Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, ed. Foucault, Michel, 201–22. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael. 2017. ‘After the Brexit Referendum: Revisiting Populism as an Ideology’. Journal of Political Ideologies 22(1): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geuss, Raymond. 2001. History and Illusion in Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1985. The Nation-State and Violence. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gieryn, Thomas F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gross, Matthias. 2010. ‘Ignorance, Research and Decisions about Abandoned Opencast Coal Mines’. Science and Public Policy 37(2): 125–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Matthias, and McGoey, Linsey. 2015. Routledge International Handbook of Ignorance Studies. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Juergen. 1976. Legitimation Crisis. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Hall, John A. 1993. ‘Ideas and the Social Sciences’. In Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change, eds. Goldstein, Judith, , Robert O. Keohane, , 31–54. Ithaca, and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hay, Colin. 1996. ‘Narrating Crisis: The Discursive Construction of the Winter of Discontent’. Sociology 30(2): 253–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, Colin. 2007. Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Heclo, Hugh. 1974. Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden: From Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven, and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Herbst, Susan. 2003. ‘Political Authority in a Mediated Age’. Theory and Society 32(4): 481–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holzner, B., Knorr, K. D., and Strasser, H.. 1983. Realizing Social Science Knowledge. The Political Realization of Social Science Knowledge and Research: Toward New Scenarios. Vienna: Physica Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasanoff, Sheila S. 2004. ‘The Idiom of Co-Production’. In States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, ed. Jasanoff, Sheila, 1–12. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Bryan D. 2001. Politics and the Architecture of Choice: Bounded Rationality and Governance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Bryan D., and Baumgartner, Frank R.. 2005. The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert P. 1986. ‘Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies’. British Journal of Political Science 16(1): 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 1995. 5 New Social Movements in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Lacey, Michael J., and Furner, Mary O.. 1993. ‘Social Investigation, Social Knowledge, and the State: An Introduction’. In The State and Social Investigation in Britain and the United States, eds. Lacey, Michael J. and Furner, Mary O., 3–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewandowsky, Stephan, Ecker, Ullrich K. H., and Cook, John. 2017. ‘Beyond Misinformation: Understanding and Coping with the “Post-Truth” Era’. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 6(4): 353–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1981. Political Theory in the Welfare State. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1986. ‘The Self-Reproduction of Law and Its Limits’. In Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State, ed. Teubner, Gunter, 111–27. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1998. Observations on Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 2002. ‘The Modernity of Science’. In Theories of Distinction: Redescribing the Descriptions of Modernity, ed. Niklas Luhmann, 61–75. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 2005. ‘The Autopoiesis of Social Systems’. In Niklas Luhmann and Organizational Studies, eds. Seidl, David and Becker, Kai Helge, 64–82. Copenhagen: Liber.Google Scholar
Mallard, Grégoire, and McGoey, Linsey. 2018. ‘Strategic Ignorance and Global Governance: An Ecumenical Approach to Epistemologies of Global Power’. The British Journal of Sociology 69(4): 884–909.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P.. 1976. Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.Google Scholar
McGoey, Linsey. 2012a. ‘Strategic Unknowns: Towards a Sociology of Ignorance’. Economy and Society 41(1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGoey, Linsey. 2012b. ‘The Logic of Strategic Ignorance’. The British Journal of Sociology 63(3): 533–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGoey, Linsey. 2019. The Unknowers: How Strategic Ignorance Rules the World. London: Zed Books Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1987. ‘Three Fragments from a Sociologist’s Notebooks: Establishing the Phenomenon, Specified Ignorance, and Strategic Research Materials’. Annual Review of Sociology 13(1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, John W., and Brian, Rowan. 1977. ‘Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony’. American Journal of Sociology 83(2): 340–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Thomas. 2002. Media Democracy: How the Media Colonize Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Wilbert E., and Tumin, Melvin M.. 1949. ‘Some Social Functions of Ignorance’. American Sociological Review 14(6): 787–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordlinger, Eric A. 1981. On the Autonomy of the Democratic State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nutley, Sandra M., Walters, Isabel, and Davies, Huw T. O.. 2007. Using Evidence: How Research Can Inform Public Services. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Alice. 2001. Poverty Knowledge: Social Science, Social Policy, and the Poor in Twentieth-Century U.S. History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offe, Claus. 1972. Strukturprobleme des kapitalistischen Staates. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Orton, J. Douglas, and Weick, Karl E.. 1990. ‘Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization’. The Academy of Management Review 15(2): 203–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, Jeffrey. 1984. ‘The Micropolitics of Organizations’. In Environments and Organizations, ed. Meyer, Marshall W., 29–50. San Francisco: Kossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, Jeffrey, and Salancik, G. R.. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Approach. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.Google Scholar
Poggi, Gianfranco. 1990. The State: Its Nature, Development and Prospects. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Rappert, Brian. 2012. ‘States of Ignorance: The Unmaking and Remaking of Death Tolls’. Economy and Society 41(1): 42–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayner, Steve. 2012. ‘Uncomfortable Knowledge: The Social Construction of Ignorance in Science and Environmental Policy Discourses’. Economy and Society 41(1): 107–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. W. 1997. Understanding Governance. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda. 1996. ‘Conclusion’. In States, Social Knowledge, and the Origins of Modern Social Policies, eds. Rueschemeyer, Dietrich and Skocpol, Theda, 296–312. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien. 2008. ‘Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse’. Annual Review of Political Science 11: 303–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. 1972. ‘Theories of Bounded Rationality’. Decision and Organization 1(1): 161–76.Google Scholar
Smith, K. 2013. Beyond Evidence Based Policy in Public Health: The Interplay of Ideas. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somin, Ilya. 2015. ‘Rational Ignorance’. In Routledge International Handbook of Ignorance Studies, eds. Matthias Matthias, and Linsey McGoey, 274–81. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiegelhalter, David. 2017. ‘Trust in Numbers’. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 180(4): 948–65.Google Scholar
Stenum, Helle. 2012. ‘Making Migrants Governable’. Nordic Journal of Migration Research 2(4): 280–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoker, Gerry. 2006a. ‘Explaining Political Disenchantment: Finding Pathways to Democratic Renewal’. The Political Quarterly 77(2): 184–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoker, Gerry. 2006b. Why Politics Matters: Making Democracy Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney G. 2011. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topf, Richard. 1993. ‘Science, Public Policy and the Authoritativeness of the Governmental Process’. In The Politics of Expert Advice: Creating, Using and Manipulating Scientific Knowledge for Public Policy, eds. Barker, Anthony, and Peters, B. Guy, 103–17. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Torpey, John. 2000. The Invention of the Passport: Surveillance, Citizenship and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vaughan-Williams, Nick. 2010. ‘The UK Border Security Continuum: Virtual Biopolitics and the Simulation of the Sovereign Ban’. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28(6): 1071–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voß, Jan-Peter, and Richard, Freeman. 2016. ‘Introduction: Knowing Governance’. In Knowing Governance: The Epistemic Construction of Political Order, eds. Jan-Peter Voß and Richard Freeman, 1–33. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1970. ‘Politics as a Vocation’. In Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, eds. Gerth, H. H. and Wright Mills, C., 77–128. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. 2nd ed. Vol. 2. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weick, Karl E. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Weick, Karl E. 1998a. ‘Foresights of Failure: An Appreciation of Barry Turner’. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 6(2): 72–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, Karl E. 1998b. ‘The Attitude of Wisdom: Ambivalence as the Optimal Compromise’. In Organizational Wisdom and Executive Courage, eds. Suresh, Srivastva and Cooperrider, David L., 40–64. San Francisco: New Lexington Press.Google Scholar
Weingart, Peter. 1999. ‘Scientific Expertise and Political Accountability: Paradoxes of Science in Politics’. Science and Public Policy 26(3): 151–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittrock, Björn, and Peter, Wagner. 1996. ‘Social Science and the Building of the Early Welfare State: Toward a Comparison of Statist and Non-Statist Western Societies’. In States, Social Knowledge, and the Origins of Modern Social Policies, eds. Dietrich, Rueschemeyer and Theda, Skocpol, 90–113. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×