Abascal Palazón, J. M. (1995). ‘Hallazgos arqueológicos y circulación monetaria: disfunciones metodológicas en el studio de la Hispania romana’, Actas del IX Congreso Nacional de Numismática. Elche.Google Scholar

Achard, G.(ed., trad.) (1989). Rhétorique à Herennius. Paris.Google Scholar

Achard, G. (ed., trad.) (1994). Ciceron: de l’Invention. Paris.Google Scholar

Achard, G. and Ledentu, M. (eds.) (2000). Orateur, auditeurs, lecteurs: à propos de l’éloquence romaine à la fin de la République et au début du Principat. Paris.Google Scholar

Adams, J. N. (2013). Social Variation and the Latin Language. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Afzelius, A. (1941). ‘Die politische Bedeutung des jüngeren Cato’, Classica et Mediaevalia 4: 100–203.Google Scholar

Ahl, F. and Fantham, E. (ed. and trans.) (2007). Virgil. Aeneid. Oxford.Google Scholar

Alberini, C. M. (ed.) (2013). Memory Reconsolidation. Amsterdam and London.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Alcock, S. (2002). Archaeologies of the Greek Past: Landscape, Monuments, and Memories. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Alcock, S. (2005). ‘The Reconfigurations of Memory in the Eastern Roman Empire’, in Alcock, S., D’Altroy, T. N., Morrison, K. D. and Sinopoli, C. M. (eds.), Empires. Perspectives from Archaeology and History. Cambridge: 323–50.Google Scholar

Alexander, J. C. (2004). ‘Toward a Theory of Cultural Trauma’, in Alexander, J. C., Eyerman, R., Giesen, B., Smelser, N. J. and Sztompka, P. (eds.), Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity. Berkeley: 1–30.Google Scholar

Alföldy, G. (1991). ‘Augustus und die Inschriften: Tradition und Innovation. Die Geburt der imperialen Epigraphik’, Gymnasium 98: 289–324.Google Scholar

Almagro-Gorbea, M. (2009). ‘La moneda hispánica con jinete y cabeza varonil: ¿tradición indígena o creación romana?’, Zephyrvs 48: 235–66.Google Scholar

Ando, C. (2000). Imperial Ideology and Provincial Loyalty in the Roman Empire. Berkeley.Google Scholar

André, J.-M. (1992). ‘La retorica nelle prefazioni di Vitruvio: lo stato culturale della scienza, II’, in Scivoletto, N. (ed.), Prefazioni, Prologhi, Proemi di opera tecnico-scientifiche latine, II. Freiburg im Breisgau and Rome: 861–916.Google Scholar

Anguissola, A. (2014). ‘Remembering with Greek Masterpieces. Observations on Memory and Roman Copies’, in Galinsky, K. (ed.), Memoria Romana: Memory in Rome and Rome in Memory. Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome, Suppl. 10. Ann Arbor: 117–36.Google Scholar

Anselm, S. (2004). Struktur und Transparenz. Eine literaturwissenschaftliche Analyse der Feldherrnviten des Cornelius Nepos. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Arciniega, A. P. and del Hoyo, A. Ñ. (1999). ‘Moneda e historia monetaria en la Hispania republicana: economía, política, fiscalidad?’, Studia historica. Historia Antigua 17: 193–242.Google Scholar

Arena, V. (2012). Libertas and the Practice of Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Arend, W. (1933). Die typischen Scenen bei Homer. Berlin.Google Scholar

Arkins, B. T. (1989). ‘Language in Propertius 4.6’, Philologus: Zeitschrift für antike Literatur und ihre Rezeption 133: 246–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arnaud-Portelli, A. (2004). ‘Carthage, le fonctionnement d’une métropole régionale à l’époque romaine’, Cahiers de la Méditerranée 64: 23–37.Google Scholar

Arnott, W. G. (1979). Menander. Vol. I (Loeb Classical Library). Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar

Arweiler, A. H. and Gauly, B. M. (eds.) (2008). Machtfragen. Zur kulturellen Repräsentation und Konstruktion von Macht in Antike, Mittelalter und Neuzeit. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Assmann, A. (1995). ‘Funktionsgedächtnis und Speichergedächtnis: Zwei Modi der Erinnerung’, in Platt, K. and Dabag, M. (eds.), Generation und Gedächtnis: Erinnerungen und kollektive Identitäten. Opladen: 169–85.Google Scholar

Assmann, A. (1997). ‘Gedächtnis, Erinnerung’, in Bergmann, K., Fröhlich, K. and Kuhn, A. (eds.), Handbuch der Geschichtsdidaktik. Seelze-Velber: 33–7.Google Scholar

Assmann, A. (1999). Erinnerungsräume. Formen und Wandlungen des kulturellen Gedächtnisses. Munich.Google Scholar

Assmann, A. (2008). ‘Canon and Archive’, in Erll, A. and Nünning, A. (eds.), Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook. Berlin and Boston: 97–107.Google Scholar

Assmann, A. (2010). Erinnerungsräume: Formen und Wandlungen des kulturellen Gedächtnisses, 5th edition. Munich.Google Scholar

Assmann, A. (2011a). Cultural Memory and Western Civilization: Functions, Media, Archives. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Assmann, A. (2011b). Cultural Memory and Western Civilization. Art of Memory. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Assmann, A. (2018). ‘One Land and Three Narratives: Palestinian Sites of Memory in Israel’, Memory Studies 11: 287–300.Google Scholar

Assmann, A. and Assmann, J. (1994). ‘Das Gestern im Heute. Medien und soziales Gedächtnis’, in Merten, K., Schmidt, S. J. and Weischenberg, S. (eds.), Die Wirklichkeit der Medien: eine Einführung in die Kommunikationswissenschaft. Wiesbaden: 114–40.Google Scholar

Assmann, J. (1988). ‘Kollektives Gedächtnis und kulturelle Identität’, in Assmann, J. and Hölscher, T. (eds.), Kultur und Gedächtnis. Frankfurt: 9–19.Google Scholar

Assmann, J. (1992). Das kulturelle Gedächtnis. Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen. Munich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Assmann, J. (1997). Das kulturelle Gedächtnis. Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identität in frühen Hochkulturen. Second corrected edition. Munich.Google Scholar

Assmann, J. (2001). Cultural Memory and Early Civilization: Writing, Remembrance, and Political Imagination. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Assmann, J. (2003). ‘Cultural Memory: Script, Recollection and Political Identity in Early Civilizations’, Historiography East and West 1.2: 154–77.Google Scholar

Assmann, J. (2005). ‘Das kollektive Gedächtnis zwischen Körper und Schrift. Zur Gedächtnistheorie von Maurice Halbwachs’, in Krapoth, H. and Laborde, D. (eds.), Erinnerung und Gesellschaft. Mémoire et Société. Hommage à Maurice Halbwachs (1877–1945). Wiesbaden: 65–83.Google Scholar

Assmann, J. (2006a). Religion and Cultural Memory: Ten Studies. Stanford.Google Scholar

Assmann, J. (2006b). Thomas Mann und Ägypten: Mythos und Monotheismus in den Josephsromanen. Munich.Google Scholar

Assmann, J. (2008). ‘Communicative and Cultural Memory’, in Erll, A. and Nünning, A. (eds.), Cultural Memory Studies. Berlin and New York: 109–19.Google Scholar

Assmann, J. (2011). Cultural Memory and Early Civilization: Writing, Remembrance, and Political Imagination. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar

Assmann, A. and Assmann, J. (1988). ‘Schrift, Tradition und Kultur’, in Raible, W. (ed.), Zwischen Festtag und Alltag. Zehn Beiträge zum Thema Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit. Tübingen: 25–50.Google Scholar

Assmann, J. and Czaplicka, J. (1995). ‘Collective Memory and Cultural Identity’, New German Critique 65: 125–33.Google Scholar

Astbury, R. (2002). 2. M. Terentii Varronis Saturarum Menippearum fragmenta. Munich.Google Scholar

Astin, A. E. (1978). Cato the Censor. Oxford.Google Scholar

Atsabè, A. S. (1950). ‘Exegi monumentum’, Platon 2. 2: 15–24.Google Scholar

Ax, W. (2000). ‘Dikaiarchs Bios Hellados und Varros De vita populi Romani’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 143: 337–69.Google Scholar

Azoulay, V. and Lloyd, J. (2017). The Tyrant-Slayers of Ancient Athens. A Tale of Two Statues. Oxford.Google Scholar

Babcock, C. L. (1967). ‘Horace, Carm. I. 32 and the Dedication of the Temple of Apollo Palatinus’, Classical Philology 62. 3: 189–94.Google Scholar

Backendorf, D. (1998). Römische Münzschätze des Zweiten und Ersten Jahrhunderts v. Chr. vom Italienischen Festland. Berlin.Google Scholar

Badian, E. (1984a). ‘The Death of Saturninus: Studies in Chronology and Prosopography’, Chiron 14: 101–47.Google Scholar

Badian, E. (1984b). ‘The House of the Servilii Gemini: A Study in the Misuse of Occam’s Razor’, Papers of the British School at Rome 52: 49–71.Google Scholar

Bakker, E. J. (1993). ‘Discourse and Performance: Involvement, Visualization and “Presence” in Homeric Poetry’, Classical Antiquity 12. 1: 129.Google Scholar

Bakshi, A. (2014). ‘Urban Form and Memory Discourses: Spatial Practices in Contested Cities’, Journal of Urban Design 19: 189–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, B. (1990). ‘The Date, Identity and Career of Vitruvius’, Latomus 49: 425–34.Google Scholar

Balmaceda, C. (2017). Virtus Romana: Politics and Morality in the Roman Historians. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

Balot, R. K. (1998). ‘Pindar, Virgil, and the Proem to Georgic 3’, Phoenix 52: 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barber, P. and Harper, T. (2010). Magnificent Maps: Power, Propaganda and Art. Reggio Emilia.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. (1997). The Poet and the Prince: Ovid and Augustan Discourse. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, M. (1962). Nevio Epico. Storia, Interpretazione, Edizione critica dei frammenti del primo epos latino. Padova.Google Scholar

Baroni, A. (2007). ‘La titolatura della dittatura di Silla’, Athenaeum 95: 775–92.Google Scholar

Barringer, J. (1994). ‘The Mythological Paintings in the Macellum at Pompeii’, Classical Antiquity 13: 149–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrios-Lech, P. (2016). Linguistic Interaction in Roman Comedy. Cambridge and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bartsch, S. (1994). Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Revealing Antiquity. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Basu, L. (2009). ‘Towards a Memory Dispositif: Truth, Myth and the Ned Kelly “Lieu de Memoire”’, in Erll, A. and Rigney, A. (eds.), Mediation, Remediation, and the Dynamics of Cultural Memory. Berlin and New York: 139-56.Google Scholar

Basu, L. (2012). Ned Kelly as Memory Dispositif: Media, Time, Power, and the Development of Australian Identities. Berlin and Boston.Google Scholar

Batstone, W. W. (2005). ‘Plautine Farce and Plautine Freedom: An Essay on the Value of Metatheatre’, in Batstone, W. W. and Tissol, G. (eds.), Defining Genre and Gender in Latin Literature. New York: 13–46.Google Scholar

Batstone, W. W. (2007). ‘Literature’, in N. Rostenstein and Morstein-Marx, R. (eds.), A Companion to the Roman Republic. Chichester, UK and Malden, MA: 543–64.Google Scholar

Batstone, W. W. and Damon, C. (2006). Caesar’s Civil War. New York. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baudrillard, J. (1995). The Gulf War Did not Take Place. Bloomington.Google Scholar

Beard, M. (2002). ‘Ciceronian Correspondences: Making a Book out of Letters’, in Wiseman, T. P. (ed.) (2002), Classics in Progress. Essays on Ancient Greece and Rome. Oxford: 103–44.Google Scholar

Beard, M. (2007). The Roman Triumph. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Beard, M., North, J. and Price, S. R. F. (1998a). Religions of Rome I: A History. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Beard, M., North, J., and Price, S. R. F. (1998b). Religions of Rome II: A Sourcebook. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Beck, H. and Wiemer, H. U. (2009). Feiern und Erinnern: Geschichtsbilder im Spiegel antiker Feste. Berlin.Google Scholar

Beck, H. Duplá, Jehne, A., M. and Pina Polo, F. (eds.) (2011). Consuls and res publica: Holding High Office in the Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Beltràn Lloris, F. (1999). ‘Writing, Language and Society: Iberians, Celts and Romans in Northeastern Spain in the 2nd and 1st Centuries BC’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 43. 1: 131–51.Google Scholar

Benardete, S. (1987). ‘Cicero’s De Legibus I: Its Plan and Intention’, American Journal of Philology 108. 2: 295–309.Google Scholar

Benner, H. (1987). Die Politik des P. Clodius Pulcher (Historia Einzelschriften 50). Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Benseddik, N. (2010). ‘Esculape et Hygie en Afrique’, Memoirs de l’Académie des inscriptions et belles-lettres 44. Paris.Google Scholar

Béranger, J. (1972). ‘Les jugements de Cicéron sur les Gracques’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 1: 732–63.Google Scholar

Bergk, T. (1884). ‘Anecdoton Parisinum’, in Peppmüller, R. (ed.), Kleine philologische Schriften. Halle: 1: 580–612.Google Scholar

Bergmann, B. (1995). ‘Greek Masterpieces and Roman Recreative Fictions’, HSCPh 97: 79–120.Google Scholar

Bergmann, M. (1998). Die Strahlen der Herrscher. Theomorphes Herrscherbild und politische Symbolik im Hellenismus und in der römischen Kaiserzeit. Mainz.Google Scholar

Berry, D. (2004). ‘The Publication of Cicero’s pro Roscio Amerino’, Mnemosyne 57.1: 80–7.Google Scholar

Berthold, H. (1971). ‘Cato von Utica im Urteil der Zeitgenossen’, in Kumaniecki, K. (ed.), Acta Conventus XI ‘Eirene’. Wrocław: 129–41.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. (1978). ‘Su alcuni modelli antropologici della Roma più arcaica: designazioni linguistiche e pratiche cultuali’, Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 1: 123–75.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. (1986). Antropologia e cultura romana: parentela, tempo, immagini dell’anima. Rome.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. (2000). Le orecchie di Hermes. Turin.Google Scholar

Bettini, M. (2009). Affari di famiglia, la parentela nella letteratura e nella cultura antica. Bologna.Google Scholar

Biggs, T. (2017). ‘Primus Romanorum: Origin Stories, Fictions of Primacy, and the First Punic War’, Classical Philology 112. 3: 350–67.Google Scholar

Biggs, T. (2020a). Poetics of the First Punic War. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Biggs, T. (2020b). ‘Allegory and Authority in Latin Verse-Historiography’, in Farrell, J. and Damon, C. (eds.), Ennius’ Annals: Poetry and History. Cambridge: 91–106.Google Scholar

Binder, G. (2003). ‘Verkehrte Welt: Gott Mercurius als Mensch in Rom? Gedanken zu Horaz, Carmen 1, 2’, in Binder, G., Effe, B. and Glei, R. F. (eds.), Gottmenschen: Konzepte existentieller Grenzüberschreitungen im Altertum. Trier: 45–65.Google Scholar

Blanck, H. (1969). Wiederverwendung alter Statuen als Ehrendenkmäler bei Griechen und Römern. Rome.Google Scholar

Blank, D. (2008). ‘Varro and the Epistemological Status of Etymology’, Histoire, épistémologie, langage 30: 49–73.Google Scholar

Blänsdorf, J. (1974). ‘Das Bild der Komödie in der späten Republik’, in Reinhardt, U. and Sallmann, K. (eds.), Musa Iocosa: Arbeiten über Humor und Witz, Komik und Komödie der Antike. Hildesheim: 141–57.Google Scholar

Blänsdorf, J., Büchner, K. and Morel, W. (2010). Fragmenta poetarum Latinorum epicorum et lyricorum. Berlin.Google Scholar

Blázquez, J. M. (1978). Historia económica de la Hispania romana. Madrid.Google Scholar

Blázquez, J. M. (1996). Las explotaciones mineras y la romanización de Hispania. Madrid.Google Scholar

Bloomer, W. M. (1992). Valerius Maximus and the Rhetoric of the New Nobility. Chapel Hill and London.Google Scholar

Blösel, W. (2000). ‘Mos maiorum: Von der Familientradition zum Nobilitätsethos: Die Geschichte des Begriffes mos maiorum von den Anfängen bis zu Cicero’, in Linke, B. and Stemmler, M. (eds.), Mos maiorum. Untersuchungen zu den Formen der Identitätsstiftung und Stabilisierung in der römischen Republik. Stuttgart: 25–98.Google Scholar

Blösel, W. (2003). ‘Die memoria der gentes als Rückgrat der kollektiven Erinnerung im republikanischen Rom’, in Eigler, U., Gotter, U., Luraghi, N. and Walter, U. (eds.), Formen römischer Geschichtsschreibung von den Anfängen bis Livius. Darmstadt: 53–72.Google Scholar

Bodnar, J. (1992). Remaking America: Public Memory, Commemoration, and Patriotism in the Twentieth Century. Princeton.Google Scholar

Böhme, C. (1995). Princeps und Polis. Untersuchungen zur Herrschaftsform des Augustus über bedeutende Orte Griechenlands. Munich.Google Scholar

Bollmann, B. (1998). Römische Vereinshäuser. Untersuchungen zu den Scholae der römischen Berufs-, Kult- und Augustalen-Kollegien in Italien. Mainz am Rhein.Google Scholar

Bolter, J. D. and Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation. Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Bömer, F. (1957). Die Fasten I: Einleitung, Text und Übersetzung. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Bömer, F. (1958). Die Fasten II: Herausgegeben, übersetzt und kommentiert von Franz Bömer. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Bommas, M. (ed.) (2011a). Cultural Memory and Identity in Ancient Societies. London and New York.Google Scholar

Bommas, M. (2011b). ‘Introduction’, in Bommas, M. (ed.), Cultural Memory and Identity in Ancient Societies. London and New York: 1–9.Google Scholar

Bommas, M. (2011c). ‘Pausanias’ Egypt’, in Bommas, M. (ed.), Cultural Memory and Identity in Ancient Societies. London and New York: 79–108.Google Scholar

Bonner, S. F. (1960). ‘Anecdoton Parisinum’, Hermes 88: 354–60.Google Scholar

Bookidis, N. (2005). ‘Religion in Corinth: 146 BCE to 100 CE’, in Schowalter, D. N. and Friesen, S. J. (eds.), Urban Religion in Roman Corinth. Interdisciplinary Approaches. Cambridge, MA: 141–64.Google Scholar

Börker, C. (1990). ‘Forum und Capitolium von Korinth. Zur Planung einer römischen Kolonie in Griechenland’, in Börker, C. (ed.), Das antike Rom und der Osten. Festschrift für Klaus Parlasca zum 65. Geburtstag. Erlangen: 1–18.Google Scholar

Bowditch, L. (2009). ‘Palatine Apollo and the Imperial Gaze: Propertius 2.31 and 2.32’, American Journal of Philology 130.3: 401–38.Google Scholar

Boyer, P. and Wertsch, J. V. (eds.) (2009). Memory in Mind and Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Boyle, J. A. (1969). ‘A Eurasian Hunting Ritual’, Folklore 80: 12–16.Google Scholar

Bradley, J. R. (1991). The Sources of Cornelius Nepos. Selected Lives. New York and London.Google Scholar

Braund, D. and Gill, C. (eds.) (2003). Myth, History and Culture in Republican Rome. Studies in Honour of T. P. Wiseman. Exeter.Google Scholar

Bringmann, K. (2002). ‘Von der res publica amissa zur res publica restituta. Zu zwei Schlagworten aus der Zeit zwischen Republik und Monarchie’, in Spielvogel, J. (ed.), Res publica reperta. Zur Verfassung und Gesellschaft der römischen Republik und des frühen Prinzipats (Festschrift für Jochen Bleicken zum 75. Geburtstag). Stuttgart: 113–23.Google Scholar

Brink, S. (1997). ‘Names and Naming’, in Rodriguez, J. P. (ed.), The Historical Encyclopedia of World Slavery, Vol. 1. Santa Barbara: 454–6.Google Scholar

Briscoe, J. (1991). Titi Livi Ab urbe condita. Libri XXXI–XL. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Briscoe, J. (2008). A Commentary on Livy, Books 38–40. Oxford.Google Scholar

Brittain, C. (2006). Cicero: On Academic Scepticism. Indianapolis.Google Scholar

Broughton, T. R. S. (1951–52). The Magistrates of the Roman Republic. New York.Google Scholar

Brown, F. E. (1963). ‘Vitruvius and the Liberal Art of Architecture’, Bucknell Review 9: 99–107.Google Scholar

Brown, R. D. (1991). ‘“Catonis Nobile Letum” and the List of Romans in Horace “Odes” 1.12’, Phoenix 45.4: 326–40.Google Scholar

Brunt, P. A. (1971). Italian Manpower, 225 B.C.– A.D. 14. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bruun, C. (2009). ‘Civic Rituals in Imperial Ostia’, in Hekster, O., Schmidt-Hofner, S. and Witschel, C. (eds.), Ritual Dynamics and Religious Change in the Roman Empire. Leiden and Boston: 123–41.Google Scholar

Bruun, C. (forthcoming). Population, Society, and Identities in Roman Ostia.Google Scholar

Buccheri, A (2017). ‘The Metaphorical Structuring Kinship’, in Short, W. M. (ed.), Embodiment in Latin Semantics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: 141–76.Google Scholar

Bücher, F. (2006). Verargumentierte Geschichte. Exempla Romana im politischen Diskurs der späten römischen Republik. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Buchheit, V. (1961). ‘Catull an Cato von Utica (c. 56)’, Hermes 89: 345–56.Google Scholar

Buchheit, V. (1975). ‘Ciceros Kritik an Sulla in der Rede für Roscius aus Ameria’, Hermes 24, 570–91.Google Scholar

Büchner, K. (1993). Marcus Tullius Cicero. Der Staat. Lateinisch und Deutsch. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Burckhardt, L. H. (1988). Politische Strategien der Optimaten in der späten römischen Republik. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Burden-Strevens, C. (2019). ‘The Republican Dictatorship: An Imperial Perspective’, in Osgood, J. and Baron, C. (eds.), Cassius Dio and the Late Republic. Leiden: 131–57.Google Scholar

Burgersdijk, D. W. P. and Van Waarden, J. A. (eds.), Emperors and Historiography: Collected Essays on the Literature of the Roman Empire by Daniël den Hengst. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar

Burnett, A. (2005). ‘The Roman West and the Roman East’, in Howgego, C., Heuchert, V. and Burnett, A. (eds.), Coinage and Identity in the Roman Provinces. Oxford.Google Scholar

Burton, P. J. (2000). ‘The Last Republican Historian: A New Date for the Composition of Livy’s First Pentad’, Historia 49: 429–46.Google Scholar

Butler, H. E. and Barber, E. A. (1933). The Elegies of Propertius (Edited with a Commentary). Oxford.Google Scholar

Butler, J. H. (1972). The Theatre and Drama of Greece and Rome. San Francisco.Google Scholar

Cairns, F. (1986). ‘Propertius and the Battle of Actium (4.6)’, in Woodman, T. and West, D. (eds.), Poetry and Politics in the Age of Augustus. Cambridge: 129–68.Google Scholar

Callebat, L. and Gros, P. (1999). Vitruve: de l’architecture. Livre II. Paris.Google Scholar

Calza, R. (1964). I ritratti I. Ritratti greci e romani fino a 160 circa d.C. (Scavi di Ostia V). Rome.Google Scholar

Calza, R. (1978). I ritratti II. Ritratti romani dal 160 circa alla metà del III secolo d.C. (Scavi di Ostia IX). Rome.Google Scholar

Cancik, H. (2014). Humanismus – Ein Offenes System: Beiträge Zur Humanistik. Aschaffenburg.Google Scholar

Cancik, H. and Mohr, H. (1990). ‘Erinnerung / Gedächtnis’, in Cancik, H., Gladigow, B. and Laubscher, M. (eds.), Handbuch religionswissenschaftlicher Grundbegriffe, Vol. 2. Stuttgart, Berlin and Cologne: 299–323.Google Scholar

Caplan, H. (1954). [Cicero] Rhetorica ad Herennium, trans. and introduction. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Cardauns, B. (1976). Marcus Terentius Varro. Antiquitates Rerum Divinarum. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar

Cardauns, B. (2001). Marcus Terentius Varro. Einführung in sein Werk. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Carlsen, J. (2006). The Rise and Fall of a Roman Noble Family. The Domitii Ahenobarbi 196 BC–AD 68. Odense.Google Scholar

Caruso, C. and Papi, C. (2005). ‘L’iscrizione di Porta Romana a Ostia: verifiche e proposte’, Archeologia Classica 56: 461–9.Google Scholar

Cary, E. (1971) [1940]. Dionysius of Halicarnassus. Roman Antiquities III, Book V–VI. (Loeb edition). Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar

Cavaggioni, F. (1998). L. Apuleio Saturnino. Tribunus plebis seditiosus. Memoria presentata dal s. c. Maria Capozza nell’adunanza ordinaria del 24 maggio 1997. Venice.Google Scholar

Cave, T. (1988). Recognitions: A Study in Poetics. Oxford.Google Scholar

Cèbe, J. P. (1996). Varron. Satires Ménippées 11. Rome and Paris.Google Scholar

Cébeillac-Gervasoni, M., Caldelli, M. L. and Zevi, F. (2010). Epigrafia latina. Ostia: cento iscrizioni in contesto. Rome.Google Scholar

Chaves Tristán, F. (1990). ‘Los hallazgos numismáticos y el desarrollo de la Segunda Guerra Púnica en el sur de la Península Ibérica’, Latomus 49: 613–22.Google Scholar

Chaves Tristán, F. (1996). Los tesoros en el sur de Hispania: conjuntos de denarios y objetos de plata durante los siglos II y I aC Fundación el Monte. Sevilla.Google Scholar

Chiu, A. (2016). Ovid’s Women of the Year: Narratives of Roman Identity in the Fasti. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Chrissanthos, S. G. (2004). ‘Freedom of Speech and the Roman Republican Army’, in Sluiter, I. and Rosen, R. M. (eds.), Free Speech in Classical Antiquity. Leiden: 341–68.Google Scholar

Christenson, D. M. (2000). Plautus: Amphitruo. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Christenson, D. M. (2010). Roman Comedy: Five Plays by Plautus and Terence, transl. with introd. and notes. Newburyport, MA.Google Scholar

Christenson, D. M. (2019). Plautus: Casina. London.Google Scholar

Citroni, M. (2000). ‘The Memory of Philippi in Horace and the Interpretation of Epistle 1.20.23’, The Classical Journal 96 .1: 27–56.Google Scholar

Claridge, A. (2010). Rome: An Oxford Archaeological Guide. Oxford.Google Scholar

Clark, A. J. (2007). Divine Qualities: Cult and Community in Republican Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar

Clarke, J. (1991). The Houses of Roman Italy, 100 B.C.–A.D. 250. Ritual, Space, and Decoration. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Clarke, M. L. (1981). Brutus: The Noblest Roman. London.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. (1986). ‘Cicero and the New Poetry’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology. 90: 159–70.Google Scholar

Clini, P. (ed.) (2014). Vitruvio e l’archeologia. Venice.Google Scholar

Coarelli, F. (1981). L’Area sacra di Largo Argentina. Rome.Google Scholar

Coarelli, F. (1985). Il Foro Romano: Periodo repubblicano e augusteo. Rome.Google Scholar

Coarelli, F. (1996). Il Campo Marzio: Dalle origini alla fine della Repubblica. Rome.Google Scholar

Coarelli, F. (1996a). ‘Iuppiter Feretrius, Aedes’, in Steinby, E. M. (ed.), Lexicon Topographicum Urbis Romae. vol 3.: 135–6.Google Scholar

Coarelli, F. (1996b). ‘Lares Permarini, Aedes’, in Steinby, E. M. (ed.), Lexicon Topographicum Urbis Romae. vol 3.: 174–5.Google Scholar

Coarelli, F. (2012). Palatium. Rome.Google Scholar

Coarelli, F. (2021). Ostia repubblicana. Rome.Google Scholar

Cole, S. (2013). Cicero and the Rise of Deification at Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Collart, J. (1954). Varron. De lingua latina. Livre V. Paris.Google Scholar

Connerton, P. (1989). How Societies Remember. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Connerton, P. (2009). How Modernity Forgets. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Connor, P. J. (1978). ‘The Actian Miracle. Propertius 4.6’, Ramus. Critical Studies in Greek and Latin Literature 7: 1–10.Google Scholar

Connor, C. (2005). ‘Epic Allusions in Roman Satire’, in Freudenburg, K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Roman Satire. Cambridge: 123–45.Google Scholar

Connors, C. (2016). ‘Nothing to Do with Fides?: Female Networks and the Reproduction of Citizenship in Plautus’ Casina’, in Frangoulidis, S., Harrison, S. and Manuwald, G. (eds.), Roman Drama and its Contexts. Berlin and Boston: 275–88.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. (ed.) (2011). Virgil: Georgics. Berlin.Google Scholar

Cooley, A. E. (2012). The Cambridge Manual of Latin Epigraphy. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Corbeill, A. (2002). ‘Rhetorical Education in Cicero’s Youth’, in May, J. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric. Leiden: 197–218.Google Scholar

Corbeill, A. (2005). ‘Gesture in Early Roman Law: Empty Forms or Essential Formalities?’, in Cairns, D. (ed.), Body Language in the Greek and Roman Worlds. Swansea: 157–73.Google Scholar

Corbeill, A. (2015). Sexing the World: Grammatical Gender and Biological Sex in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar

Corbier, M. (2006). Donner à voir, donner à lire: Mémoire et communication dans la Rome ancienne. Paris.Google Scholar

Cornell, T. J. (1986). ‘The Formation of the Historical Tradition of Early Rome’, in Moxon, I., Smart, J. and Woodman, A. (eds.), Past Perspectives: Studies in Greek and Roman Historical Writing. Cambridge: 67–86.Google Scholar

Cornell, T. J. (1995). Beginnings of Rome. London.Google Scholar

Cornell, T. J. (2009). ‘Cato the Elder and the Origins of Roman Autobiography’, in Smith, C. and Powell, A. (eds.), The Lost Memoirs of Augustus and the Development of Roman Autobiography. Swansea: 15–40.Google Scholar

Cornell, T. J. (ed.) (2013). The Fragments of the Roman Historians. 3 volumes. Oxford.Google Scholar

Corning, A. and Schuman, H. (2015). Generations and Collective Memory. Chicago.Google Scholar

Corrigan, K. (2015). Brutus: Caesar’s Assassin. Barnsley.Google Scholar

Courrént, M. (1998). ‘Vitruve lecteur de Cicéron: le “De Oratore” et la définition vitruvienne de l’architecture comme ars’, Euphrosyne 26: 25–34.Google Scholar

Courrént, M. (2001). ‘La construction du savoir par la confrontation interdisciplinaire: l’imaginaire vitruvien’, in Courrént, M. and Thomas, J. (eds.), Imaginaire et modes de construction du savoir antique dans les textes scientifiques et techniques. Perpignan: 123–43.Google Scholar

Courrént, M. (2005). ‘Demonstrare atque explicare: la fonction de l’ecrit dans le De Architectura de Vitruve’, Pallas 69: 299–306.Google Scholar

Courrier, C. (2014). La plèbe de Rome et sa culture (fin du IIe siècle av. J.-C.-fin du Ier siècle ap. J.-C.). Rome.Google Scholar

Courtney, E. (1993). The Fragmentary Latin Poets. Oxford.Google Scholar

Cowan, R. (2007). The Headless City: The Decline and Fall of Capua in Silius Italicus’ Punica. Oxford University Research Archive.Google Scholar

Cowan, R. (2015). ‘240 BCE and All That: The Romanness of Republican Tragedy’, in Harrison, G. W. M. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Roman Tragedy. Leiden: 63–92.Google Scholar

Craig, C. (1986). ‘Cato’s Stoicism and the Understanding of Cicero’s Speech for Murena’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 116: 229–39.Google Scholar

Crawford, J. W. (1994). M. Tullius Cicero. The Fragmentary Speeches. 2nd ed. Atlanta.Google Scholar

Crawford, M. H. (1973). ‘Foedus and Sponsio’, Papers of the British School at Rome 41: 1–7.Google Scholar

Crawford, M. H. (1974). Roman Republican Coinage. Vol. 1. London and New York.Google Scholar

Crawford, M. H. (1985). Coinage and Money under the Roman Republic. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Crawford, M. H. (1996). ‘Roman Statutes II’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies of the University of London Suppl. 64.2. London.Google Scholar

Crawford, M. H. (2011). Imagines Italicae. London.Google Scholar

Crinson, M. (2005). ‘Urban Memory: An Introduction’, in Crinson, M. (ed.), Urban Memory: History and Amnesia in the Modern City. London and New York: XI–XX.Google Scholar

Csapo, E. (1987). ‘Is the Threat-Monologue of the “Servus Currens” an Index of Roman Authorship?’ Phoenix 41.4: 399–419.Google Scholar

Cugusi, P. and Sblendorio Cugusi, M. T. (2001). Opere di Marco Porcio Catone Censore, Vol. II. Turin.Google Scholar

Curchin, L. (1990). The Local Magistrates of Roman Spain. Toronto.Google Scholar

Curchin, L. (1991). Roman Spain: Conquest and Assimilation. London.Google Scholar

Curchin, L. (1995). ‘Literacy in the Roman Provinces: Qualitative and Quantitative Data from Central Spain’, American Journal of Philology 116 .3: 461–76.Google Scholar

Damon, C. (2010). ‘Déjà vu or déjà lu? History as Intertext’, in Cairns, F. and Griffin, M. (eds.), Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar XIV, Florida and Cambridge: 375–88.Google Scholar

Dart, C. J. and Vervaet, F. J. (2011). ’The Significance of the Naval Triumph in Roman History (260–29 BCE)’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 176: 267–80.Google Scholar

David, J.-M. (1980). ‘Maiorum exempla sequi: l’exemplum historique dans les discours judiciaires de Cicéron’, Mélanges de l’école française de Rome 92: 67–86.Google Scholar

David, J.-M. (1998a). ‘Les enjeux de l’exemplarité à la fin de la République et au début du Principat’, in David, J.-M. (ed.), Valeurs et mémoire à Rome. Valère Maxime ou la vertu recompose. Paris: 9–17.Google Scholar

David, J.-M. (1998b). ‘Valère Maximus et l’histoire de la République romaine’, in David, J.-M. (ed.), Valeurs et mémoire à Rome. Valère Maxime ou la vertu recomposée, Paris: 119–30.Google Scholar

Davies, P. (2017). Architecture and Politics in Republican Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Davis, S. (2010). ‘Carthage, Corinth, and 146 BCE: Shifting Paradigms of Roman Imperium’, in Digeser, E. and Thomas, C. (eds.), Beyond Borders: Selected Proceedings of the 2010 Ancient Borderlands International Graduate Student Conference. Santa Barbara: 1–12.Google Scholar

De Angeli, S. (1996). ‘Iuppiter Optimus Maximus Capitolinus, Aedes (Fasi Tardo–Repubblicane e di Età Imperiale)’, in E. M. Steinby (ed.), Lexicon Topographicum Urbis Romae. vol 3: 148–53.Google Scholar

De Martino, M. (2018). Flāmen-brahmán: La forza montante della fiamma sacra. Rome.Google Scholar

De Robertis, F. M. (1955). Il fenomeno associativo nel mondo romano. Dai collegi della Repubblica alle corporazioni del Basso Impero. Rome.Google Scholar

Degrassi, A. (1931–63). Inscriptiones Italiae. 13 vols. Rome.Google Scholar

Degrassi, A. (1954). Fasti Capitolini. Turin.Google Scholar

Degrassi, A. (1963). Inscriptiones Italiae: Fasti et Elogia, Vol. 13.2. Rome.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G. (1992). ‘What Is a Dispositif?’, in Armstrong, T. J. (ed.), Michel Foucault, Philosopher: Essays. New York: 159–68.Google Scholar

Del Giovane, B. (2021). ‘“Non è una città per vecchi.” Per una rilettura del Sexagessis di Varrone’, Aevum Antiquum N.S. 21: 207–43.Google Scholar

Delignon, B. (2012), ‘Mythes archaïques et mythes alexandrins dans les Odes d’Horace: valeur politique d’une double réception’, in Cusset, C., Levin, F. and Le Meur, N. (eds.), Mythe et pouvoir à l’époque hellénistique. Leuven: 453–68.Google Scholar

Delignon, B. (2019). La morale de l’amour dans les Odes d’Horace. Poésie, philosophie et politique. Paris.Google Scholar

Delle Corte, F. (1986). Virgilio. Le Georgiche. 2 vols. Genova.Google Scholar

Deneauve, J. (1990). ‘Le centre monumental de Carthage. Un ensemble cultuel sur la colline de Byrsa’, in Carthage et son territoire dans l’antiquité. Actes du 4e colloque international sur l’histoire et l’archéologie de l’Afrique du Nord, Strasbourg, 5-9 avril 1988. Paris: 143–55.Google Scholar

Dettenhofer, M. H. (2000). Herrschaft und Widerstand im augusteischen Prinzipat. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Dickenson, C. P. (2017). On the Agora. The Evolution of a Public Space in Hellenistic and Roman Greece (c. 323 BC to 267 AD). Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar

Dijkstra, T. D., Kuin, I. N. I, Moser, M. and Weidgenannt, D. (eds.) (2017). Strategies of Remembering in Greece under Rome (100 BC–100 AD). Publications of the Netherlands Institute at Athens VI. Leiden.Google Scholar

Dinter, M. T. (2011). ‘Inscriptional Intermediality in Latin Elegy’, in Keith, A. (ed.), Latin Elegy and Hellenistic Epigram: A Tale of Two Genres at Rome. Cambridge: 7–18.Google Scholar

Dinter, M. T. (2012). Anatomizing Civil War: Studies in Lucan’s Epic Technique. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Dinter, M. T. (2013a). ‘Inscriptional Intermediality in Latin Literature’, in Liddel, P. and Low, P. (eds.), Inscriptions and their Uses in Greek and Latin Literature. Oxford: 303–16.Google Scholar

Dinter, M. T. (2013b). ‘Intermediality in Latin Epic: en video quaecumque audita’, in Lovatt, H. and Vout, C. (eds.), Epic Visions: Visuality in Greek and Latin Epic and Its Reception. Cambridge: 122–38.Google Scholar

Dinter, M. T. (2020). ‘Comic Technique in Plautus’ Asinaria and Casina’, in Dutsch, D. and Franko, G. F. (eds.), A Companion to Plautus: Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World. Hoboken: 269–86.Google Scholar

Dinter, M. T. and Khoo, A. (2019). ‘Messenger Scenes in Greek Epic’, in Reitz, C. and Finkmann, S. (eds.), Structures of Epic Poetry. Berlin and Boston: 481–500.Google Scholar

Dinter, M. T. and Reitz-Joosse, B. (eds.) (2019). ‘Intermediality – Special Issue’, Trends in Classics 11(1).Google Scholar

Dionisotti, A. C. (1988). ‘Nepos and the Generals’, Journal of Roman Studies 78: 35–49.Google Scholar

Docter, R. F., Boussoffara, R. and Ter Keurs, P. (eds.) (2015). Carthage. Fact and Myth. Leiden.Google Scholar

Dolganov, A. (2008). ‘Constructing Author and Authority: Generic Discourse in Cicero’s De Legibus’, Greece and Rome 55: 23–38.Google Scholar

Domingo Gygax, M. (2016). Benefactors and Rewards in the Ancient City. The Origins of Euergeticism. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Douglas, A. E. (1960). ‘Clausulae in the Rhetorica ad Herennium as Evidence of its Date’, Classical Quarterly 10: 65–78.Google Scholar

Dowling, M. (2006). Clemency and Cruelty in the Roman World. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Dragstedt, A. (1969). ‘Cato’s Politeuma’, Agon 3: 69–96.Google Scholar

Drogula, F. K. (2019). Cato the Younger: Life and Death at the End of the Roman Republic. Oxford.Google Scholar

Duckworth, G. (1971). The Nature of Roman Comedy: A Study in Popular Entertainment. Princeton.Google Scholar

Duff, J. D. (1928). Lucan. Pharsalia (‘The Civil War’). Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Dugan, J. (2014). ‘Non sine causa sed sine fine: Cicero’s Compulsion to Repeat His Consulate’, The Classical Journal 110: 9–22.Google Scholar

Dumézil, G. (1935). Flamen-Brahman. Paris.Google Scholar

Dumézil, G. (1970). Archaic Roman Religion. Chicago.Google Scholar

Dumézil, G. (1988). Mitra-Varuna. Chicago.Google Scholar

Duncan-Jones, R. (1974). The Economy of the Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Duplá, A. (2011). ‘Consules populares’, in Beck, H., Duplá, A Jehne, M and Polo, F.Pina (eds.), Consuls and Res Publica: Holding High Office in the Roman Republic. Cambridge: 279–98.Google Scholar

Dyck, A. R. (2002). ‘The “Other” Pro Milone Reconsidered’, Philologus 146: 182–5.Google Scholar

Dyck, A. R. (2003). ‘Evidence and Rhetoric in Cicero’s Pro Roscio Amerino: the case against Sextus Roscius’, The Classical Quarterly 53.1, 235–46.Google Scholar

Dyck, A. R. (2004). A Commentary on Cicero’s De Legibus. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Dyck, A. R. (2010). Cicero Pro Roscio Amerino. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Ebel, D. (1976). Transalpine Gaul: The Emergence of a Roman Province. Leiden.Google Scholar

Ebeling, K. (2010). ‘Historischer Raum: Archiv und Erinnerungsort’, in Günzel, S. (ed.), Raum. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch. Stuttgart and Weimar: 121–33.Google Scholar

Eck, W. (2016). ‘The Emperor, the Law and Imperial Administration’, in du, P. J. Plessis, C. Ando and Tuori, K. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society. Oxford: 98–110.Google Scholar

Eckert, A. (2014). ‘Remembering Cultural Trauma. Sulla’s Proscriptions, Roman Responses and Christian Perspectives’, in Becker, E., Dochhorn, J. and Holt, E. (eds.), Trauma and Traumatization in Individual and Collective Dimensions. Insights from Biblical Studies and Beyond. Göttingen: 262–74.Google Scholar

Eckert, A. (2016a). Lucius Cornelius Sulla in der antiken Erinnerung: Jener Mörder, der sich Felix nannte. Berlin and Boston.Google Scholar

Eckert, A. (2016b). ‘“There Is Nobody Who Does Not Hate Sulla”: Emotion, Persuasion and Cultural Trauma’, in Sanders, E. and Johncock, M. (eds.), Emotion and Persuasion in Classical Antiquity. Stuttgart: 133–45.Google Scholar

Eckert, A. (2018a). ‘Roman Orators between Greece and Rome. The Case of Cato the Elder, L. Crassus and M. Antonius’, in Gray, C., Balbo, A., Marshall, R. M. A. and Steel, C. E. W. (eds.), Reading Republican Oratory. Reconstructions, Contexts and Receptions. Oxford: 19–32.Google Scholar

Eckert, A. (2018b). ‘Good Fortune and the Public Good: Disputing Sulla’s Claim to be Felix’, in van der Blom, H., Gray, C. and Steel, C. E. W. (eds.), Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome. Speech, Audience and Decision. Cambridge: 283–98.Google Scholar

Eckert, A. (2019). ‘Reconsidering the Sulla Myth’, in Eckert, A. and Thein, A. (eds.), Sulla: Politics and Reception. Berlin and Boston: 159–72.Google Scholar

Edmonds, J. M. (1957). The Fragments of Attic Comedy, I, Leiden.Google Scholar

Edmondson, J. (2002). ‘Public Spectacles and Roman Social Relations’, in Basarrate, T. N. (ed.), Ludi romani: Espectaculos en hispania romana. Madrid: 21–43.Google Scholar

Edmunds, J. and Turner, B. S. (eds.) (2002). Generational Consciousness, Narrative, and Politics. Lanham.Google Scholar

Edmunds, L. (1992). From a Sabine Jar: Reading Horace, Odes 1.9. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

Edwards, C. (1996). Writing Rome: Textual Approaches to the City. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Edwards, C. (2003). ‘Incorporating the Alien: The Art of Conquest’, in Edwards, C. and Woolf, G. (eds.), Rome the Cosmopolis. Cambridge: 158–76.Google Scholar

Edwards, C. (2007). Death in Ancient Rome. New Haven.Google Scholar

Edwards, C. (ed. and trans.) (2008). Suetonius. Lives of the Caesars. Oxford.Google Scholar

Ehlich, K. (2007). ‘Textualität und Schriftlichkeit’, in Morenz, L. and Schorch, S. (eds.), Was ist ein Text? – Ägyptologische, altorientalistische und alttestamentliche Perspektiven. Berlin: 3–17.Google Scholar

Eicks, M. (2011), Liebe und Lyrik. Zur Funktion des erotischen Diskurses in Horazens erster Odensammlung. Berlin.Google Scholar

Eigler, H., Gotter, U., Luraghi, N. and Walter, U. (eds.) (2003). Formen römischer Geschichtsschreibung von den Anfängen bis Livius. Gattungen. Autoren. Kontexte. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Eilers, C. (2002). Roman Patrons in Greek Cities. Oxford.Google Scholar

Eisenhut, W. (1973). Virtus Romana: Ihre Stellung im römische Wertsystem. Munich.Google Scholar

Eliade, M. (2009). Rites and Symbols of Initiation. Putnam.Google Scholar

Elliott, J. (2013). Ennius and the Architecture of the Annales. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. (1995). Art and the Roman Viewer: The Transformation of Art from the Pagan World to Christianity. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar

Elsner, J. (1997). ‘Inventing Imperium: Texts and the Propaganda of Monuments in Augustan Rome’, in Elsner, J. (ed.), Art and Text in Roman Culture. Cambridge: 32–53.Google Scholar

Erll, A. (2008). ‘Cultural Memory Studies: An Introduction’, in Erll, A. and Nünning, A. (eds.), Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook. Berlin and Boston: 1–15.Google Scholar

Erll, A. (2011). Memory in Culture. Basingstoke.Google Scholar

Erll, A. (2018a). ‘Media and the Dynamics of Memory: From Cultural Paradigms to Transcultural Mediation’, in Wagoner, B. (ed.), Handbook of Culture and Memory. Oxford: 305–24.Google Scholar

Erll, A. (2018b). ‘Homer: A Relational Mnemohistory’, Memory Studies 11: 274–86.Google Scholar

Erll, A. and Nünning, A. (eds.), (2008). Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook. Berlin and Boston.Google Scholar

Erll, A. and Nünning, A. (2010). A Companion to Cultural Memory Studies. Berlin.Google Scholar

Erll, A. and Rigney, A. (eds.) (2009). Mediation, Remediation, and the Dynamics of Cultural Memory. Berlin and Boston.Google Scholar

Erll, A. and Rigney, A. (2009a). ‘Introduction: Cultural Memory and its Dynamics’, in Erll, A. and Rigney, A. (eds.), Mediation, Remediation, and the Dynamics of Cultural Memory. Berlin and Boston: 411.Google Scholar

Epstein, D. F. (1987). Personal Enmity in Roman Politics, 218–43 B.C. London and New York.Google Scholar

Evans, R. J. and Kleijwegt, M. (1992). ‘Did the Romans Like Young Men? A Study of the Lex Villia Annalis: Causes and Effects’, ZPE 92: 181–95.Google Scholar

Evans, J. D. (2013). ‘Coins and the Archaeology of Roman Republic’, in D. Evans, J. (ed.), A Companion to the Archaeology of the Roman Republic. Chichester.Google Scholar

Faber, R. A. (2018). ‘Intermediality and Ekphrasis in Latin Epic Poetry’, Greece & Rome 65.1: 1–14.Google Scholar

Fairclough, H. R. (1926). Horace. Satires. Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (1997). ‘Images of the City’, in Habinek, T. and Schiesaro, A. (eds.), The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge: 122–35.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (2003). ‘Three Wise Men and the End of the Roman Republic’, in Cairns, F. and Fantham, E. (eds.), Caesar Against Liberty? Perspectives on His Autocracy. Cambridge: 96–117.Google Scholar

Fantham, E. (2004). The World of Cicero’s De Oratore. Oxford.Google Scholar

Favro, D. (1988). ‘The Roman Forum and Roman Memory’, Places 5: 17–24.Google Scholar

Favro, D. (1993). ‘Reading the Augustan City’, in Holliday, P. J. (ed.), Narrative and Event in Ancient Art. New York: 230–57.Google Scholar

Favro, D. (1994). ‘The Street Triumphant: The Urban Impact of Roman Triumphal Parades’, in Favro, D., Zeynep, Ç and Ingersoll, R. (eds.), Streets: Critical Perspectives on Public Space. London: 151–64.Google Scholar

Favro, D. (1996). The Urban Image of Augustan Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. (2006). ‘Review of Goldberg: Constructing Literature in the Roman Republic: Poetry and its Reception (2005)’, Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2006.08.45.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1991). The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. Oxford.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (1998). Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts, and Beliefs. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (2005). ‘The Beginnings of a Literature in Latin’, Journal of Roman Studies 95: 226–40.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (2007a). Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley and London.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (2007b). ‘On Not Forgetting the “Literatur” in “Literatur und Religion”: Representing the Mythic and the Divine in Roman Historiography’, in Bierl, A., Lämmle, R. and Wesselmann, K. (eds.), Literatur und Religion 2: Wege zu einer mythisch-rituellen Poetik bei den Griechen. Berlin and New York: 173–202.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. (2016). Beyond Greek: The Beginnings of Latin Literature. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Fehrle, R. (1983). Cato Uticensis. Darmstadt.Google Scholar

Feltovich, A. (2015). ‘The Many Shapes of Sisterhood in Roman Comedy’, in Dutsch, D., James, S. and Konstan, D. (eds.), Women in Roman Republican Drama. Madison, Wisconsin: 128–54.Google Scholar

Fenton, A. (2008). ‘The Forest and the Trees: Pattern and Meaning in Horace, “Odes” 1’, American Journal of Philology 129. 4: 559–80.Google Scholar

Fentress, E. (2007). ‘Museum Review: Around the Temple: The New Galleries of the Capitoline Museum’, American Journal of Archaeology 111: 365–9.Google Scholar

Fentress, J. and Wickham, C. (1992). Social Memory: New Perspectives on the Past. Oxford.Google Scholar

Ferri, R. (2014). ‘The Reception of Plautus in Antiquity’, in Fontaine, M. and Scafuro, A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Comedy. Oxford: 767–81.Google Scholar

Fishwick, D. (1995). ‘De la Carthage punique à la Carthage romaine. La levée de l’interdit’, in Trousset, P. (ed.), Monuments funéraires. Institutions autochtones. L’Afrique du Nord antique et médiévale. VIe Colloque international sur l’histoire et l’archéologie de l’Afrique du Nord. Pau, octobre 1993. Paris: 235–44.Google Scholar

Fleury, P., Callebat, L., Gros, P. and Soubiran, J. (1969–93). Vitruve, De l’architecture. Paris.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (1995). ‘Fabulae Praetextae in Context: When were Plays on Contemporary Subjects performed in Republican Rome?’, Classical Quarterly 45: 170–90.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (1996). Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture. Oxford.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (2006). The Art of Forgetting. Disgrace and Oblivion in Roman Political Culture. Chapel Hill.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (2010). Roman Republics. Princeton.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (2015). ‘Sulla’s Memoirs as an Account of Individual Religious Experience’, Religion in the Roman Empire 1: 297–320.Google Scholar

Flower, H. I. (2017). The Dancing Lares and the Serpent in the Garden: Religion at the Roman Street Corner. Princeton.Google Scholar

Flügel, C., Dolenz, H., Schmidt, K. and Baur, C. (2018). ‘Die augusteische Gründungsphase der Colonia Carthago Magnae in Vestigiis Carthaginis’, Römische Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 124: 353–423.Google Scholar

Fontaine, M. (2010). Funny Words in Plautine Comedy. Oxford.Google Scholar

Formisano, M. (2016). ‘Reading Dismemberment: Vitruvius, Dinocrates, and the Macrotext’, Arethusa 49: 145–59.Google Scholar

Fornis, C. (2008). ‘La construcción de la identidad romana en Corinto’, Habis 38: 205–24.Google Scholar

Fortenbaugh, W. F. and Schütrumpf, E. (eds.) (2001). Dicaearchus of Messana: Text, Translation, and Discussion. New Brunswick and London.Google Scholar

Fouquet, J. and Gaitonou, L. (eds.) (2013). Im Schatten der Alten? Ideal und Lebenswirklichkeit im römischen Griechenland. 3. Heidelberger Altertumswissenschaftliches Studierendenkolloquium, 8–10. November 2013. Mainz.Google Scholar

Fowler, H. N. (1914–27). Plato with an English Translation by H.N. Fowler. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Fowler, H. N. (1999). Plato: Euthyphro. Apology. Crito. Phaedo. Phaedrus. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Fox, M. (2007). Cicero’s Philosophy of History. Oxford.Google Scholar

Fraccaro, P. (1907). Studi Varroniani. De gente populi romani libri IV. Padua.Google Scholar

Fraenkel, E. (2007). Plautine Elements in Plautus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Francese, C. (2007). Ancient Rome in So Many Words. New York.Google Scholar

Fraschetti, A. (2005). The Foundation of Rome. Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Fratantuono, L. (2012). Madness Triumphant: A Reading of Lucan’s Pharsalia. Lanham.Google Scholar

Frears, J. R. (1981). ‘The Cults of Virtutes and Roman Imperial Propaganda’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II.17.2: 889–939.Google Scholar

Freese, J. H. (1930). Cicero Orations. Pro Quinctio, Pro Roscio Amerino, Pro Roscio Comoedo, On the Agrarian Law. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar

Freyberger, K. S. and Ertel, C. (2007). ‘Neue Forschungen zur Basilica Aemilia auf dem Forum Romanum. Ein Vorbericht’, Mitteilungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts, Römische Abteilung 113: 493–552.Google Scholar

Frézouls, E. (1989). ‘Grammaire et rhétorique chez Vitruve’, Ktema 14: 227–45.Google Scholar

Frisch, H., H. (1946). Cicero’s Fight for the Republic. Copenhagen.Google Scholar

Fuhrmann, M. (1987). ‘Erneuerung als Wiederherstellung des Alten. Zur Funktion antiquarischer Forschung im Spätrepublikanischen Rom’, in Herzog, R. and Koselleck, R. (eds.), Epochenschwelle und Epochenbewusstsein. Munich: 131–51.Google Scholar

Fussell, P. (1977). Cultural paradigms and traumatic testimony. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Gabba, E. (1980). ‘La praefatio di Vitruvio e la Roma augustea’, Acta Classica Debrecensis 16: 49–52.Google Scholar

Gagé, J. (1936). ‘Actiaca’, Mélanges d’Archéologie et d’Histoire, 53: 37–100.Google Scholar

Gagé, J. (1955). Apollon romain. Essai sur le culte d’Apollon et le développement du « ritus Graecus » à Rome des origines à Auguste. Rome.Google Scholar

Gaillard, J. (1975). ‘Que représentent les Gracques pour Cicéron?’, Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé 34: 499–529.Google Scholar

Galinsky, K. (1996). Augustan Culture: An Interpretive Introduction. Princeton.Google Scholar

Galinsky, K. (2007). ‘Continuity and Change: Religion in the Augustan Semi-Century’, in Rüpke, J. (ed.), A Companion to Roman Religion. Oxford and Malden: 71–82.Google Scholar

Galinsky, K. (ed.) (2014a). Memoria Romana: Memory in Rome and Rome in Memory. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Galinsky, K. (2014b). ‘Introduction’, in Galinsky, K. (ed.), Memoria Romana: Memory in Rome and Rome in Memory. Ann Arbor: 1–12.Google Scholar

Galinsky, K. (2016a). Memory and Forgetting in the Age of Augustus. Sydney.Google Scholar

Galinsky, K. (2016b). Memory in Ancient Rome and Early Christianity. Oxford.Google Scholar

Galinsky, K. (2016c). ‘Introduction’, in Galinsky, K. (ed.), Memory in Ancient Rome and Early Christianity. Oxford and New York: 1–39.Google Scholar

Galinsky, K. and Lapatin, K. D. S. (eds.) (2015). Cultural Memories in the Roman Empire. Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Galli, F. (1987–88). ‘L’iscrizione trionfale di Ti. Sempronio Gracco’, Annali dell’Istituto Universitario orientale di Napoli. Sezione filologico-letteraria 9–10: 135–8.Google Scholar

Gallia, A. B. (2012). Remembering the Roman Republic: Culture, Politics, and History under the Principate. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gallina Zevi, A. and Humphrey, J. (eds.) (2004). Ostia, Cicero, Gamala, Feasts and the Economy. Papers in Memory of J. H. D’Arms, Journal of Roman Archaeology Suppl. 57. Portsmouth.Google Scholar

Garcia-Bellido, M. P. (1986). ‘Nuevos documentos sobre minería y agricultura romanas en Hispania’, Archivo Español de Arqueología 59.153: 13–46.Google Scholar

Garde-Hansen, J. (2011). Media and Memory. Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Gäth, S. (2011). Die Literarische Rezeption des Cato Uticensis. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Gebhard, E. R. (2005). ‘Rites for Melikertes-Palaimon in the Early Roman Corinthia’, in Schowalter, D. N. and Friesen, S. J. (eds.), Urban Religion in Roman Corinth. Interdisciplinary Approaches. Cambridge, MA: 164–203.Google Scholar

Gedi, N. and Elam, Y. (1996). ‘Collective Memory – What Is It?’, History and Memory 8. 1: 30–50.Google Scholar

Gee, E. (2013). ‘Cicero’s Poetry’, in Steel, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero. Cambridge: 88–107.Google Scholar

Geertman, H. (1994). ‘Teoria e attualita della progettistica architettonica di Vitruvio’, in Le Projet de Vitruve: Objet, Destinaires et Réception du de Architectura. Collection de l’École française de Rome 192. Paris: 7–30.Google Scholar

Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretations of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York.Google Scholar

Geiger, J. (1979). ‘Munatius Rufus and Thrasea Paetus on Cato the Younger’, Athenaeum 57: 48–72.Google Scholar

Geiger, J. (1985). Cornelius Nepos and Ancient Political Biography. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Geiger, J. (2008). The First Hall of Fame. A Study of the Statues in the Forum Augustum. Leiden.Google Scholar

Geiger, J. (2011). ‘The Augustan Age’, in Marasco, G. (ed.), Political Autobiographies and Memoirs in Antiquity. Leiden: 233–66.Google Scholar

Gelzer, M. (1968). Caesar: Politician and Statesman (trans. P. Needham). Oxford.Google Scholar

Gerrish, J. (2019). Sallust’s Histories and Triumviral Historiography. Abingdon.Google Scholar

Giannelli, G. (1993). ‘Arx’, in Steinby, E. M. (ed.), Lexicon Topograhicum Urbis Romae. vol. 1: 127–9.Google Scholar

Giannelli, G. (1996). ‘Iuno Moneta, Aedes’, in Steinby, E. M. (ed.), Lexicon Topographicum Urbis Romae. vol 1: 123–5.Google Scholar

Gibson, R. and Steel, C. (2010). ‘The Indistinct Literary Careers of Cicero and Pliny the Younger’, in Hardie, P. and Moore, H. (eds.), Classical Literary Careers and their Reception. Cambridge: 118–37.Google Scholar

Gilbert, N. (2015). Among Friends: Cicero and the Epicureans. PhD Diss. University of Toronto.Google Scholar

Gildenhard, I. (2011). Creative Eloquence. The Construction of Reality in Cicero’s Speeches. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gilloch, G. and Kilby, J. (2005). ‘Trauma and Memory in the City. From Auster to Austerlitz’, in Crinson, M. (ed.), Urban Memory. History and Amnesia in the Modern City. London and New York: 1–19.Google Scholar

Goar, R. J. (1983). The Legend of Cato Uticensis from the First Century B.C. to the Fifth Century A.D. Brussels.Google Scholar

Godzich, W. (1994). The Culture of Literacy. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. M. (1982/83) ‘Terence and the Death of Comedy’, Comparative Drama, 16: 312–24, rpt. in Drama and the Classical Heritage, ed. C. Davidson et al. (New York 1993): 52–64.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. M. (1983). ‘Terence, Cato, and the Rhetorical Prologue’, Classical Philology, 78: 198–211.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. M. (1995). Epic in Republican Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. M. (2005a). Constructing Literature in the Roman Republic: Poetry and its Reception. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. M. (2005b). ‘Early Republican Epic’, in Foley, J. M. (ed.), A Companion to Ancient Epic. Oxford: 429–39.Google Scholar

Goldberg, S. M. (2010). ‘Fact, Fiction, and Form in Early Roman Epic’, in Konstan, D. and Raaflaub, K. A. (eds.), Epic and History. Chichester and Malden: 167–84.Google Scholar

Goldschmidt, N. (2013). Shaggy Crowns: Ennius’ Annales and Virgil’s Aeneid. Oxford.Google Scholar

Goldschmidt, N. (2017). ‘Textual Monuments: Reconstructing Carthage in Augustan Literary Culture’, Classical Philology 112: 368–83.Google Scholar

Gotter, U. (1996). Der Diktator ist tot! Politik in Rom zwischen den Iden des März und der Begründung des Zweiten Triumvirats. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Gowers, E. (2002). ‘Blind Eyes and Cut Throats: Amnesia and Silence in Horace Satires 1.7’, Classical Philology 97.2: 145–61.Google Scholar

Gowing, A. M. (2000). ‘Memory and Silence in Cicero’s Brutus’, Eranos 98: 39–64.Google Scholar

Gowing, A. M. (2005). Empire and Memory: The Representation of the Roman Republic in Imperial Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gowing, A. M. (2013). ‘Tully’s Boat: Responses to Cicero in the Imperial Period’, in Steel, C. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Cicero. Cambridge: 233–50.Google Scholar

Gowing, A. M. (2016). ‘Memory as a Motive in Tacitus’, in Galinsky, K. (ed.), Memory in Ancient Rome and Early Christianity. Oxford: 43–64.Google Scholar

Graindor, P. (1927). Athènes sous Auguste. Cairo.Google Scholar

Granger, F. S. (1931). Vitruvius: On Architecture I. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Granger, F. S. (1934). Vitruvius: On Architecture II. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Gratwick, A. S. (1993). Plautus: Menaechmi. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Graver, M. (2016). ‘Honor and the Honorable: Cato’s discourse in De Finibus 3’, in Annas, J. and Betegh, G. (eds.), Cicero’s De Finibus: Philosophical Approaches. Cambridge: 118–46.Google Scholar

Green, W. M. (1963). Augustine. City of God, Volume II: Books 4–7. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. (1973). ‘The Tribune C. Cornelius’, Journal of Roman Studies 63: 196–213.Google Scholar

Grillo, L. (2012). The Art of Caesar’s Bellum Civile: Literature, Ideology, and Community. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Gros, P. (1973). ‘Hermodoros et Vitruve’, Mélanges d’Archéologie et d’Histoire de l’école Française de Rome, Antiquité 85: 137–61.Google Scholar

Gros, P. (1975). ‘Structures et limites de la compilation vitruvienne dans les livres III et IV du De Architectura’, Latomus 34: 986–1009.Google Scholar

Gros, P. (1990). ‘Le premier urbanisme de la Colonia Iulia Carthago. Mythes et réalités d’une fondation césaro-augustéenne’, in L’Afrique dans l’Occident romain, Ier s. av. J.C. IV e s. ap. J.C., Actes du Colloque de Rome sur la romanisation de l’Afrique. Rome: 547–73.Google Scholar

Gros, P. (1992). Vitruve, de l’architecture, livre IV. Paris.Google Scholar

Gros, P. (1994). ‘Munus non ingratum: le traité vitruvien et la notion de service’, in Le Projet de Vitruve: Objet, Destinaires et Reception du de Architectura. Collection de l’École française de Rome 192. Paris: 75–90.Google Scholar

Gros, P. (1996). ‘Iuppiter Tonans, Aedes’, in Steinby, E. M. (ed.), Lexicon Topographicum Urbis Romae. vol 3: 159–60.Google Scholar

Gros, P. (2000). ‘Carthage romaine. Résurrection d’une capitale’, in Nicolet, C. (ed.), Mégapoles méditerranéennes. Géographie urbaine rétrospective. Actes du colloque, Rome 8-11 mai 1996. Paris: 534–44.Google Scholar

Gros, P. (2006). Vitruve et la tradition des traités d’architecture: fabrica et ratiocinatio. Paris.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. S. (1974). The Last Generation of the Roman Republic. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. (1992). Culture and National Identity in Republican Rome. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Gualandi, G. (1982). ‘Plinio e il collezionismo d’arte’, in Alfonsi, L. (ed.), Plinio il Vecchio sotto il profilo storico e letterario (Atti Convegno Como 1979). Como: 259–99.Google Scholar

Guérin, C. (2015). La Voix de la vérité. Témoin et témoignage dans les tribunaux romains du I^er siècle avant J.-C. Paris.Google Scholar

Habicht, C. (1995). Athen. Die Geschichte der Stadt in hellenistischer Zeit. Munich.Google Scholar

Habinek, T. (1998). The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity, and Empire in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar

Haffter, H. (1954). ‘Die römische Humanitas’, Neue Schweizer Rundschau 21: 719–31.Google Scholar

Halbwachs, M. (1925). Les cadres sociaux de la mémoire. Paris.Google Scholar

Halbwachs, M. (1941). La topographie légendaire des évangiles en terre sainte: étude de mémoire collective. Paris.Google Scholar

Halbwachs, M. (1950). La mémoire collective. Paris. [Published in English as Coser, L. A. (ed. and trans. ) (1992). Maurice Halbwachs. On Collective Memory. Chicago.]Google Scholar

Halbwachs, M. (1997). La mémoire collective: Édition critique établie par Gérard Namer. Paris.Google Scholar

Halbwachs, M. and Closer, L. (1992). On Collective Memory. Chicago.Google Scholar

Hall, J. B. (1995). Ovid. Tristia. Stuttgart-Leipzig.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. (1995). Aristotle: Poetics. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Haltenhoff, A. (1998). ‘Kritik der akademischen Skepsis. Ein Kommentar zu Cicero, Lucullus 1-62’, in Studien zur klassischen Philologie 113. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Hanchey, D. (2014). ‘Days of Future Passed: Fiction Performing Fact in Cicero’s Dialogues’, Classical Journal 110: 61–75.Google Scholar

Hanses, M. (2020). The Life of Comedy after the Death of Plautus and Terence. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Hanson, J. A. (ed. and trans.) (1989–96). Apuleius. Metamorphoses. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. (1989). Virgil’s Aeneid: Cosmos and Imperium. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hardie, P. (1991). ‘The Janus Episode in Ovid’s Fasti’, Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 26: 47–64.Google Scholar

Harl, K. (1996). Coinage in the Roman Economy, 300 BC to AD 700. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J. (2014). Horace, New Surveys in the Classics 42. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Harrison, S. J. (2017). Horace: Odes Book II. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hartkamp, R. F. (2004). Von ‘leno’ zu ‘ruffiano’: die Darstellung, Entwicklung und Funktion der Figur des Kupplers in der römischen Palliata und in der italienischen Renaissancekomödie. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Haselberger, L. and Thein, A. (2007). Urbem adornare: die Stadt Rom und ihre Gestaltumwandlung unter Augustus = Rome’s Urban Metamorphosis under Augustus, Journal of Roman Archaeology. Suppl. 64. Portsmouth.Google Scholar

Häussler, R. (1976). Das historische Epos der Griechen und Römer bis Vergil: Studien zum historischen Epos der Antike Teil I: Von Homer zu Vergil. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Hayden, D. (1997). The Power of Place. Urban Landscapes as Public History. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Heftner, H. (2006). ‘Der Beginn von Sullas Proskriptionen’, Tyche 21: 33–52.Google Scholar

Heinemann, I. (1931). ‘Humanitas’, Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft Suppl. 5: 282–310.Google Scholar

Hekster, O. (2006). ‘Descendants of Gods: Legendary Geneaologies in the Roman Empire’, in de Blois, L., Funke, P. and Hahn, J. (eds.), The Impact of Imperial Rome on Religions, Ritual and Religious Life in the Roman Empire. Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop of the International Network Impact of Empire (Roman Empire, 200 B.C.-AD.476), Münster, June 30–July 4, 2004. Leiden and Boston: 24–35.Google Scholar

Hemmen, W. (1954). Das Bild des M. Porcius Cato Uticensis in der antiken Literatur. PhD Diss. University of Göttingen.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (1994). ‘On Getting Rid of Kings: Horace, Satire 1.7’, Classical Quarterly 44: 146–70, repr. (1998). Fighting for Rome: Poets and Caesars, History, and Civil War. Cambridge: 73–107.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. (2004). Morals and Villas in Seneca’s Letters. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar

Henderson, M. I. (1951). ‘The Process “De Repetundis”’, Journal of Roman Studies 41: 71–88.Google Scholar

Hermansen, G. (1982). Ostia. Aspects of Roman City Life. Edmonton.Google Scholar

Herz, P. (1994). ‘Kollegien in Ostia. Gedanken zu den Inschriften CIL XIV 250 und 251’, in Günther, R. and Rebenich, S. (eds.), E fontibus haurire. Beiträge zur römischen Geschichte und zu ihren Hilfswissenschaften. Paderborn: 295–325.Google Scholar

Herzog, R. and Koselleck, R. (eds.) (1987). Epochenschwelle und Epochenbewusstsein. Munich.Google Scholar

Heurgon, J. (1964). ‘L. Cincius et la loi du clavus annalis’, Athenaeum 42: 432–7.Google Scholar

Heyworth, S. J. (2007). Propertius. Elegiae. Oxford Classical Texts. Oxford.Google Scholar

Heyworth, S. J. (1984). ‘Two Conjectures’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 30: 72–3.Google Scholar

Highbarger, E. (1942). ‘Vergil and Roman Art’, The Classical Weekly 36:8, 87–9.Google Scholar

Hilder, J. (2015). Recontextualising the Rhetorica ad Herennium. PhD Diss. University of Glasgow.Google Scholar

Himmelmann, N. (1959). ‘Spendende Götter.’ Antaios 1: 173–8.Google Scholar

Hinard, F. (1985). Les Proscriptions de la Rome républicaine (Collection de l’École française de Rome LXXXIII). Rome.Google Scholar

Hirsch, M. (1997). Family Frames: Photography, Narrative, and Postmemory. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Hirsch, M. (2012). The Generation of Postmemory: Writing and Visual Culture After the Holocaust. New York.Google Scholar

Ho Tai, H.-T. (2001). ‘Remembered Realms: Pierre Nora and French National Memory’, The American Historical Review 106: 906–22.Google Scholar

Hobsbawm, E. (1983). ‘Introduction: Inventing Traditions’, in Hobsbawm, E. and Ranger, T. (eds.), The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: 1–14.Google Scholar

Hobsbawm, E. J. and Ranger, T. (eds.) (1983). The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hobuß, S. (2011). ‘Aspects of Memory Acts: Transnational Cultural Memory and Ethics’, Journal of Aesthetics & Culture 3: 1–6.Google Scholar

Hodgman, A. (1902). ‘Noun Declensions in Plautus’, Classical Review 16: 294–305.Google Scholar

Hoelscher, S. and Alderman, D. H. (2004). ‘Memory and Place: Geographies of a Critical Relationship’, Social & Cultural Geographies 5: 347–55.Google Scholar

Hoff, M. C. (1989a). ‘The Early History of the Roman Agora in Athens’, in Walker, S. and Cameron, A. (eds.), The Greek Renaissance in the Roman Empire. Papers from the Tenth British Museum Classical Colloquium. London: 1–8.Google Scholar

Hoff, M. C. (1989b). ‘Civil Disobedience and Unrest in Augustan Athens’, Hesperia 58: 267–76.Google Scholar

Hoff, M. C. (1997). ‘Laceratae Athenaea: Sulla’s Siege of Athens in 87/86 BC and its Aftermath’, in Hoff, M. C. and Rotroff, S. I. (eds.), The Romanization of Athens. Proceedings of an International Conference held at Lincoln, Nebraska (April 1996). Oxford: 33–51.Google Scholar

Hoff, M. C. (2001). ‘An Equestrian Statue of Lucius Caesar in Athens Reconsidered’, Archäologischer Anzeiger 4: 583–99.Google Scholar

Hoff, M. C. (2005). ‘Athens Honors Pompey the Great’, in de Blois, L., Bons, J., Kessels, T. and Schenkeveld, D. (eds.), The Statesman in Plutarch’s Works: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the International Plutarch Society, Nijmegen/Castle Hernen, May 1–5, 2002. Vol. II: The Statesman in Plutarch’s Greek and Roman Lives. Leiden: 327–66.Google Scholar

Hoffman, E. 2004. After Such Knowledge: Memory, History and the Legacy of the Holocaust. New York.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2001). ‘Capitol, Comitium, und Forum. Öffentliche Räume, sakrale Topographie und Erinnerungslandschaften der römischen Republik’, in Faller, S. (ed.), Studien zu antiken Identitäten. Würzburg: 97–128.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2004). Senatus Populusque Romanus. Die politische Kultur der Republik – Dimension und Deutungen. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2006). ‘History and Collective Memory in the Middle Republic’, in Rosenstein, N. and Morstein-Marx, R. (eds.), A Companion to the Roman Republic. Oxford: 478–95.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2008). ‘Hierarchie und Konsens. Pompae in der politischen Kultur der römischen Republik’, in Arweiler, A. and Gauly, B. (eds.), Machtfragen: Zur kulturellen Repräsentation und Konstruktion von Macht in Antike, Mittelalter und Neuzeit. Stuttgart: 79–126.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2012). ‘Im Gewebe der Geschichte(n). Memoria, Monumente und ihre mythhistorische Vernetzung’, Klio 94: 380–414.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2013). ‘Review of Gallia 2012’, Gnomon 85: 137–45.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2014). ‘In Defense of Concepts, Categories, and other Abstractions. Remarks on a Theory of Memory (in the Making)’, Galinsky, K. (ed.), Memoria Romana. Memory in Rome and Rome in Memory, Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome Suppl. 10, Ann Arbor: 63–70.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2016a). ‘In the Web of (Hi-)Stories: Memoria, Monuments and Their Myth-Historical “Interconnectedness”’, in Galinsky, K. (ed.), Memory in Ancient Rome and Early Christianity. Oxford: 169–213.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2016b). ‘Prestige en construction dans la République romaine: la classe dirigeante et ses stratégies de représentation publique’, in Baudry, R. and Hurlet, F. (eds.), Le prestige à Rome à la fin de la République et au début du Principat. Paris: 21–37.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2018). ‘Memoria by Multiplication: The Cornelii Scipiones in Monumental Memory’, in Smith, C. J. and Sandberg, K. (eds.), Omnium Annalium Monumenta: Historical Writing and Historical Evidence in Republican Rome. Leiden: 422–76.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. and Stein-Hölkeskamp, E. (2017). ‘Erinnerungsorte der griechischen und römischen Welt – Zur Anwendung eines modernen Konzepts auf die antike Welt’, in von Hesberg, H., Kunow, J. and Otten, T. (eds.), Stadt – Erinnerung – Wertstiftung. Aspekte der Validierung im europäischen Vergleich. Worms: 83-91.Google Scholar

Hölkeskamp, K.-J. and Heitmann-Gordon, H. (trans.) (2010). Reconstructing the Roman Republic. An Ancient Political Culture and Modern Research. Princeton and Oxford.Google Scholar

Holleran, C. (2003). ‘The Development of Public Entertainment Venues in Rome and Italy’, in Lomas, K. and Cornell, T. (eds.), ‘Bread and Circuses’. Eugertism and Municipal Patronage. London: 46–61.Google Scholar

Holliday, P. J. (2002). The Origins of Roman Historical Commemoration in the Visual Arts. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hollstein, W. (1994). ‘Apollo und Libertas in der Münzprägung des Brutus und Cassius’, Jahrbuch für Numismatik und Geldgeschichte 44: 113–33.Google Scholar

Hölscher, T. (1984). ‘Actium und Salamis’, Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 99: 187–214.Google Scholar

Hölscher, T. (1985). ‘Denkmäler der Schlacht von Actium. Propaganda und Resonanz’, Klio 67: 81–102.Google Scholar

Hölscher, T. (2001). ‘Die Alten vor Augen. Politische Denkmäler und öffentliches Gedächtnis im republikanischen Rom’, in Melville, G. (ed.), Institutionalität und Symbolisierung. Verstetigungen kultureller Ordnungsmuster in Vergangenheit und Gegenwart. Cologne: 183–211.Google Scholar

Hölscher, T. (2004). The Language of Images in Roman Art. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hölscher, T. (2006). ‘Greek Styles and Greek Art in Augustan Rome: Issues of the Present versus Records of the Past’, in Porter, J. I. (ed.), Classical Pasts. The Classical Traditions of Greece and Rome. Princeton and Oxford: 237–59.Google Scholar

Holzberg, N. (1989). ‘Literarische Tradition und politische Aussage in den Feldherrn-Viten des Cornelius Nepos’, Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft 15: 159–73.Google Scholar

Hooper, W. D. and Ash, H. B. (ed. and trans.) (1934). Cato, Varro. On Agriculture. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (1988). ‘Patronage of Art in the Roman World’, Prudentia 20: 9–28.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (1995). A Companion to the Study of Virgil, Mnemosyne Suppl. 151, Leiden.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (1996). ‘The Cultural Horizons of the Plebs Romana’, Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome 41: 101–19.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (2003). The Culture of the Roman Plebs. London.Google Scholar

Horsfall, N. (2006). Virgil, Aeneid 3: A Commentary. Leiden.Google Scholar

Hout, M. P. J. van den. (1988). M. Cornelii Frontonis epistulae schedis tam editis quam ineditis. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Howgego, C., Heuchert, V. and Burnett, A. (eds.) (2005). Coinage and Identity in the Roman Provinces. Oxford.Google Scholar

Howley, J. (2018). Aulus Gellius and Roman Reading Culture: Text, Presence, and Imperial Knowledge in the Noctes Atticae. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hubbard, T.K. (1984), ‘Art and Vision in Propertius 2.31/32’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 114: 281–97.Google Scholar

Hubbell, H. M. (1949). Cicero: on Invention; The Best Kind of Orator; Topics. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Hulton, A.O. (1972). ‘“Exegi monumentum”: Horace on his Poetry’, Latomus 31: 497–502.Google Scholar

Humm, M. (2017). ‘Les normes sociales dans la République romaine d’après le regimen morum des censeurs’, in Le Doze, P. and Itgenshorst, T. (eds.), La norme sous la République et le Haut-Empire romains: élaboration, diffusion et contournements. Bordeaux: 301–17.Google Scholar

Hurbánková, S. (2010). ‘Characters and Comic Situations in Roman Comedy: The Atellan Farce and Mime’, Graeco-Latina Brunensia 15: 69–80.Google Scholar