Part III - Resisting Rule
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 June 2023
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Rule in International Politics , pp. 187 - 268Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
References
Ackerman, Gary A. 2003. “Beyond Arson? A Threat Assessment of the Earth Liberation Front.” Terrorism and Political Violence 15(4): 143–170.Google Scholar
Andretta, Massimiliano, della Porta, Donatella, Mosca, Lorenzo, and Reiter, Herbert. 2006. Globalization from Below: Transnational Activists and Protest Networks. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1977. Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1986 [1951]. Elemente und Ursprünge totaler Herrschaft. München: Piper.Google Scholar
Armstrong, David, Farrell, Theo, and Maiguashca, Bice (eds.). 2003. Governance and Resistance in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
AU. 2009. Decision on the Meeting of African State Parties to the Rome Statue of the International Criminal Court (ICC), https://reliefweb.int/report/sudan/decision-meeting-african-state-parties-rome-statue-international-criminal-court-icc-doc [last access 05/28/19].Google Scholar
Ayres, Jeffrey M. 2003. “Global Governance and Civil Society Collective Action: The Challenge of Complex Transnationalism.” International Journal of Political Economy 33(4): 84–100.Google Scholar
Badescu, Christina G., and Weiss, Thomas G.. 2010. “Misrepresenting R2P and Advancing Norms: An Alternative Spiral?” International Studies Perspectives 11(4): 354–374.Google Scholar
Bailey, Jennifer L. 2008. “Arrested Development: The Fight to End Commercial Whaling as a Case of Failed Norm Change.” European Journal of International Relations 14(2): 289–318.Google Scholar
Bailey, Jennifer L. 2009. “Norway, the United States, and Commercial Whaling: Political Culture and Social Movement Framing.” The Journal of Environment & Development 18(1): 79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael, and Duvall, Raymond. 2005. “Power in International Politics.” International Organization 59(1): 39–75.Google Scholar
Bleiker, Roland. 2005. “Seattle and the Struggle for a Global Democratic Ethos,” in Eschle, Catherine, and Maiguashca, Bice (eds.), Critical Theories, International Relations and “Anti-Globalisation Movement.” Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 195–212.Google Scholar
Brands, Hal. 2007. “Non-proliferation and the Dynamic of the Middle Cold War: The Superpowers, the MLF, and the NPT.” Cold War History 7(3): 389–423.Google Scholar
Buckel, Sonja, and Fischer-Lescano, Andreas. 2007. “Hegemonie im globalen Recht – Zur Aktualität der Gramscianischen Rechtstheorie,” in Buckel, Sonja, and Fischer-Lescano, Andreas (eds.), Hegemonie gepanzert mit Zwang. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 84–105.Google Scholar
Caygill, Howard. 2013. On Resistance: A Philosophy of Defiance. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Chacko, Priya, and Davis, Alexander E. 2018. “Resignifying ‘Responsibility’: India, Exceptionalism and Nuclear Non-proliferation.” Asian Journal of Political Science 26 (3): 352–370.Google Scholar
Clark, John D., and Themudo, Nuno S.. 2006. “Linking the Web and the Street: Internet-Based ‘Dotcauses’ and the ‘Anti-globalization’ movement.” World Development 34(1): 50–74.Google Scholar
Crossley, Nick. 2002. “Global Anti-corporate Struggle: A Preliminary Analysis.” British Journal of Sociology 53(4): 667–691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daase, Christopher. 2003. “Der Anfang vom Ende des nuklearen Tabus. Zur Legitimitätskrise der Weltnuklearordnung” Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 10(1): 7–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daase, Christopher, and Deitelhoff, Nicole. 2019. “Opposition and Dissidence: Two Modes of Resistance against International Rule.” Journal of International Political Theory 15(1): 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1965. “Reflections on Opposition in Western Democracies.” Government and Opposition 1(1): 7–24.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (ed.). 1966. Political Oppositions in Western Democracies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Deitelhoff, Nicole. 2006. Überzeugung in der Politik: Grundzüge einer Diskurstheorie Internationalen Regierens, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Deitelhoff, Nicole. 2009. “The Discursive Process of Legalization: Charting Islands of Persuasion in the ICC Case.” International Organization 63(1): 33–65.Google Scholar
Deitelhoff, Nicole. 2020. “What’s in a Name? Contestation and Backlash against International Norms and Institutions.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 22 (4): 715–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deitelhoff, Nicole, Anderl, Felix, and Hack, Regina. 2019. “Divide and Rule: The Politics of Self-Legitimation in the WTO,” in Anderl, Felix, Christopher Daase, , Deitelhoff, Nicole, Jannik Pfister, , Kempf, Victor, and Wallmeier, Philip (eds.), The Transnationalization of Rule and Resistance: Contestation, Escalation, Exit. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Deitelhoff, Nicole, and Zimmermann, Lisbeth. 2020. “Things We Lost in the Fire. How Different Types of Contestation Affect the Validity of Norms.” International Studies Review 22(1): 51–76.Google Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella. 1995. Social Movements, Political Violence, and the State: A Comparative Analysis of Italy and Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 2009. “Rethinking Political Structures: From ‘Ordering Principles’ to ‘Vertical Differentiation’ – and Beyond.” International Theory 1(1): 49–86.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. 1966. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Du Plessis, M. 2010. “The International Criminal Court That Africa Wants.” ISS Monograph 172. Pretoria: Institute for Security Studies.Google Scholar
Egeland, Kjolv. 2017. The Road to Prohibition: Nuclear Hierarchy and Disarmament, 1968–2017. DPhil Dissertation, Oxford University.Google Scholar
Falk, Richard. 2000. “Resisting ‘Globalization-from-Above’ through Globalization-from-Below,” in Gills, Barry K. (ed.), Globalization and the Politics of Resistance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 46–56.Google Scholar
Gibson, John. 2008. “The Myth of the Multitude: The Endogenous Demise of Alter-Globalist Politics.” Global Society 22(2): 253–275.Google Scholar
Gill, Stephen. 2000. “Toward a Postmodern Prince? The Battle of Seattle as a Moment in the New Politics of Globalisation.” Millennium 29(1): 131–140.Google Scholar
Gill, Stephen. 2003. Power and Resistance in the New World Order. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Guzzini, Stefano. 2005. “The Concept of Power. A Constructivist Analysis.” Millennium 33(3): 495–521.Google Scholar
Hardt, Michael, and Negri, Antonio. 2000: Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hedlund, Gunnar, and Rolander, Dag. 1990. “Actions in Heterarchies: New Approaches to Manage the MNC,” in Bartlett, Christopher, Yves Doz, , and Hedlund, Gunnar (eds.), Managing the Global Firm, London: Routledge, pp. 15–46.Google Scholar
Helms, Ludger. 2004. “Five Ways of Institutionalizing Political Opposition: Lessons from the Advanced Democracies.” Government and Opposition 39(1): 22–54.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Higgott, Richard. 2000. “Contested Globalization: The Changing Context and Normative Challenges.” Review of International Studies 26: 131–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, Liesbet, and Marks, Gary. 2015. “Delegation and Pooling in International Organizations,” Review of International Organizations 10(3): 305–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoover, Dean, and Kovalewski, David. 1992. “Dynamic Models of Dissent and Repression.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 36(1): 150–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 2007. After Anarchy. Legitimacy and Power in the United Nations Security Council. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 2012. “Almost Saving Whales: The Ambiguity of Success at the International Whaling Commission.” Ethics & International Affairs 26(1): 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, Jagdish P. (ed.). 1974. India and Disarmament: Nehru Era, Vol. I. New Dehli: Radiant Publisher.Google Scholar
Jalloh, Charles C. 2017. “The African Union, the Security Council, and the International Criminal Court,” in Jalloh, Charles C., and Bantekas, Ilias (eds.), The International Criminal Court and Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 181–213.Google Scholar
Juris, Jeffrey S. 2005. “Violence Performed and Imagined: Militant Action, the Black Bloc and the Mass Media in Genoa.” Critique of Anthropology 25(4): 413–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalland, Arne. 2009. Unveiling the Whale: Discourses on Whales and Whaling. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Kapur, Ashok. 1978. “The Canada-India Nuclear Negotiations: Some Hypotheses and Lessons.” The World Today 34(8): 311–320.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith. 2007. “Who Keeps International Commitments and Why? The International Criminal Court and Bilateral Nonsurrender Agreements.” American Political Science Review 101(3): 573–589.Google Scholar
Kirchheimer, Otto. 1957. “The Waning of Political Opposition in Parliamentary Regimes.” Social Research 25: 381–414.Google Scholar
Lake, David. 2009. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Langbein, Hermann. 1986. “Dem brutalsten Terror zum Trotz. Widerstand in den nationalsozialistischen Konzentrationslagern 1939–1945,” in politische Bildung, Bundeszentrale für (ed.), Widerstand und Exil 1933–1945, Bonn: Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung, pp. 159–168.Google Scholar
Sarah, Lieberman, Tim, Gray, Groom, A. J. R. 2011. “Moratoria in International Politics: A Comparative Analysis of the Moratoria on Genetically Modified Products and Commercial Whaling.” The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 14(4): 518–533.Google Scholar
Meyer, Paul, and Sauer, Tom. 2018. “The Nuclear Ban Treaty: A Sign of Global Impatience.” Survival, 60(2): 61–72.Google Scholar
Mills, Kurt, and Bloomfield, Allan. 2017. “African Resistance to the International Criminal Court: Halting the Advance of the Anti-impunity Norm.” Review of International Studies 44(1): 101–127.Google Scholar
Nagtzaam, Gary. 2017. From Environmental Action to Ecoterrrorism? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brien, Robert, Goetz, Amme M., Scxholte, Jan A., and Williams, Marc. 2000. Contesting Global Governance. Multilateral Economic Institutions and Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Offe, Claus, and Preuss, Ulrich K.. 2006. “The Problem of Legitimacy in the European Polity: Is Democratization the Answer?” Conweb Papers 6: 1–37.Google Scholar
O’Grady, Siobhán. 2016. “Gambia: The ICC Should Be Called the International Caucasian Court: Gambia Is the Latest Country to Leave the ICC.” Foreign Policy 10/26/16, https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/10/26/gambia-the-icc-should-be-called-the-international-caucasian-court/ [last access 05/28/19].Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas, and Klink, Frank F.. 1989. “Anarchy, Authority, Rule.” International Studies Quarterly 33(2):149–173.Google Scholar
Ottaway, Marina. 2001. “Corporatism Goes Global: International Organizations, Nongovernmental Organization Networks, and Transnational Business.” Global Governance 7: 265–292.Google Scholar
Paul, T. V. 2009. The Tradition of Non-Use of Nuclear Weapons. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Sakaguchi, Isao. 2013. “The Roles of Activist NGOs in the Development and Transformation of IWC Regime: The Interaction of Norms and Power.” Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 3(2), 194–208.Google Scholar
Schabas, William A. 2017. An Introduction to the International Criminal Court. 5th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 61–65.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1983 [1908]. Soziologie: Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Ssenyonjo, Manisuli. 2017. “State Withdrawals of the Rome Statue of the International Criminal Court,” in Jalloh, Charles C., and Ilias Bantekas, I (eds.), The International Criminal Court and Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 214–246.Google Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas, Sommerer, Thomas, Squatrito, Theresa, and Jönsson, Christer. 2013. The Opening up of International Organizations: Transnational Access in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tannenwald, Nina. 2007. The Nuclear Taboo. The United States and the Non-Use of Nuclear Weapons Since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Worth, Owen, and Buckley, Karen. 2009. “The World Social Forum: Postmodern Prince or Court Jester?” Third World Quarterly 30(4): 649–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 2012. “Autorität und Legitimität in der postnationalen Konstellation,” in Anna Geis, Anna, Nullmeier, Frank, Daase, Christopher (eds.), Der Aufstieg der Legitimitätspolitik. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 41–62.Google Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 2015. “Jenseits der Anarchie: Autorität und Herrschaft in der Global Governance.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 56(2): 319–333.Google Scholar
Zürn, Michael, Binder, Martin, and Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias. 2012. “International Authority and Its Politicization.” International Theory 4(1): 69–106.Google Scholar
References
Alter, Karen J. 2006. “Delegation to International Courts and the Limits of Recontracting Power,” in Hawkins, Darren, David A. Lake, , Daniel Nielson, , and Tierney, Michael J. (eds.), Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 312–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Karen J. 2008. “Agent or Trustee: International Courts in Their Political Context.” European Journal of International Relations 14(1): 33–63.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J. 2014. The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J. 2018a. “Critical Junctures and the Future of International Courts.” iCourts Working Paper Series 140: 31.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J. 2018b. “The Future of International Law,” in Ayton-Shenker, Diana (ed.), The New Global Agenda. Lahnham: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 25–42.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J. 2018c. “National Perspectives on International Constitutional Review: Diverging Optics,” in: Delaney, Erin and Dixon, Rosalind, Comparative Judicial Review. United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 244–272.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J. 2021. “When and How to Legally Challenge Economic Globalization: A Comment on the German Constitutional Court’s False Promise.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 19(1): 269–284.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J., and Helfer, Laurence R. 2017. Transplanting International Courts: The Law and Politics of the Andean Tribunal of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J, Helfer, Laurence R. and Madsen, Mikael Rask. (eds.) 2018. International Court Authority. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J., and Li, Ji. 2022. “Chinese and Western Perspectives on the Rule of Law and Their International Implications,” forthcoming in de la Rasilla, Ignacio and Congyan, Cai (eds.), Cambridge Handbook on China and International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J., and Raustiala, Kal. 2018. “The Rise of International Regime Complexity.” The Annual Review of Law and Social Science 14: 329–349.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J., and Zürn, Michael. 2020a. “Conceptualizing Backlash Politics: Introduction to a Special Issue on Backlash Politics in Comparison.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 22(4): 563–584.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J., and Zürn, Michael. 2020b. “Theorising Backlash Politics: Conclusion to a Special Issue on Backlash Politics in Comparison.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 22(4): 739–752.Google Scholar
Anghie, Antony. 2005. Imperialism, Sovereignty, and the Making of International Law. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Auld, Graeme, and Green, Jessica F.. 2012. “Unbundling the Regime Complex: The Effects of Private Authority.” Osgoode Hall Law School Research Paper Series 15.Google Scholar
Becker Lorca, Arnulf. 2014. Mestizo International Law: A Global Intellectual History 1842–1933. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal. 2008. “Reclaiming Democracy: The Strategic Uses of Foreign and International Law by National Courts.” American Journal of International Law 102(2): 241–276.Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal, and Harel, Alon. 2017. “Embracing the Tension between National and International Human Rights Law: The Case for Discordant Parity.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 15(1): 36–59.Google Scholar
Bork, Robert. 1989/90. “The Limits of ‘International Law’.” The National Interest 18: 3–10.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1987. “Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field.” Hastings Law Journal 38(July): 805–853.Google Scholar
Brunnée, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen. 2011. “Interactional International Law: An Introduction.” International Theory 3(2): 307–318.Google Scholar
Brunee, Jutta, and Toope, Stephen J.. 2017. “Interactional Legal Theory, the International Rule of Law and Global Constitutionalism,” in Lane, Antony F. and Wieder, Antje (eds.), Handbook on Global Constitutionalism. Cheltanham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 170–182.Google Scholar
Capps, Patrick, and Palmer Olsen, Henrik. 2018. Legal Authority beyond the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram. 1974. The Cuban Missile Crisis: International Crises and the Role of Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chimni, Bhupinder, S. 2018. “Customary International Law: A Third World Perspective,” American Journal of International Law 112(1): 1–46.Google Scholar
Cottier, Thomas, Sieber-Gasser, Charlotte, and Wermelinger, Gabriela. 2015. “The Dialectical Relationship of Preferential and Multilateral Trade Agreements” in Dür, Andreas and Elsig, Manfred, Trade Cooperation: The Purpose, Design and Effects of Preferential Trade Agreement World Trade Forum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 465–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottee, Simon. 2017. “What Isis Really Wants” Revisited: Religion Matters in Jihadist Violence, but How? Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 40(6): 439–454.Google Scholar
De Búrca, Gráinne, Keohane, Robert O., and Sabel, Charles. 2014. “Global Experimentalist Governance.” British Journal of Political Science 44(3): 477–486.Google Scholar
Delisle, Jacques. 2000. China’s Approach to International Law: A Historical Perspective. Washington: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G.. 1996. Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order, Language and Legal Discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G.. 2006. “From the Cold War to Kosovo: The Renewal of the Field of International Human Rights.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2:231–255.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Rask Madsen, Mikael. 2012. “The Force of Law and Lawyers: Pierre Bourdieu and the Reflexive Sociology of Law.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 8(1): 433–452.Google Scholar
Dodge, William S. 2015. “International Comity in American Law.” Columbia Law Review 115(8): 2071–2141.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 1999. “Are Legal Norms Distinct?” Journal of International Law and Politics 32: 699–706.Google Scholar
Gehring, Thomas, and Faude, Benjamin. 2013. “The Dynamics of Regime Complexes: Microfoundations and Systemic Effects.” Global Governance 19(1): 119–130.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. 2020. “Authoritarian International Law?” American Journal of International Law 114(2): 221–260.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, and Moustafa, Tamir. 2008. Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, Jack L., and Posner, Eric A.. 2005. The Limits of International Law. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Green, James A. 2016. The Persistent Objector Rule in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, Macintyre, Andrew, and Tiede, Lydia. 2008. “The Rule of Law and Economic Development.” Annual Review of Political Science 11(1): 205–234.Google Scholar
Hakimi, Monica. 2017. “Constructing an International Community.” American Journal of International Law 111(2): 317–356.Google Scholar
Hathaway, Oona, and Shapiro, Scott J.. 2011. “Outcasting: Enforcement in Domestic and International Law.” Yale Law Journal 121(2): 252–469.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence. 2004. “Regime Shifting: The TRIPS Agreement and the New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Making.” Yale Journal of International Law 29: 1–81.Google Scholar
Hestermeyer, Holger. 2007. Human Rights and the WTO: The Case of Patents and Access to Medicines. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hull, Isabel V. 2014. A Scrap of Paper: Breaking and Making International Law during the Great War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kalb, Marvin L. 2015. Imperial Gamble: Putin, Ukraine, and the New Cold War. Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, Judith. 2007. “Who Keeps International Commitments and Why? The International Criminal Court and Bilateral Nonsurrender Agreements.” American Political Science Review 101(3): 573–589.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., and Victor, David G.. 2011. “The Regime Complex for Climate Change.” Perspectives on Politics 9(1): 7–23.Google Scholar
Kittrie, Orde F. 2016. Lawfare: Law as a Weapon of War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koinova, Maria, Deloffre, Maryam Zarnegar, Frank Gadinger, , Mencutek, Zeynep Sahin, Scholte, Jan Aart, and Steffek, Jens. 2021. “It’s Ordered Chaos: What Really Makes Polycentrism Work.” International Studies Review 23(4): 1988–2018.Google Scholar
Krisch, Nico. 2017. “Liquid Authority in Global Governance.” International Theory 9(2): 237–260.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 2009. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Madsen, Michael Rask. 2009. “Legal Diplomacy: Law Politics and the Genesis of Postwar European Human Rights,” in Hoffmann, Stefan-Ludwig (ed.), Human Rights in the Twentieth Century: A Critical History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 62–84.Google Scholar
Madsen, Mikael Rask. 2013. “Unpacking Legal Network Power: The Structural Construction of Transnational Legal Expert Networks,” in Fenwick, Mark, Van Uytsel, Stephen, and Wrbka, Stephen (eds.), Networked Governance, Transnational Business and the Law. Berlin: Springer Verlag, pp. 39–56.Google Scholar
Mälksoo, Lauri. 2015. Russian Approaches to International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marchuk, Iryna. 2017. “Flexing Its Muscles (Once Again): The Russian Constitutional Court’s Defiance of the Authority of the ECtHR in the Yukos Case.” EJIL: Talk! 02/13/17, www.ejiltalk.org/flexing-muscles-yet-again-the-russian-constitutional-courts-defiance-of-the-authority-of-the-ecthr-in-the-yukos-case/ [last access 05/12/19].Google Scholar
Merryman, John Henry, and Pérez-Perdomo, Rogelio. 2007. The Civil Law Tradition. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Morse, Julia, and Keohane, Robert. 2014. “Contested Multilateralism.” The Review of International Organizations 9(4): 385–412.Google Scholar
Natarajan, Usha, Reynolds, John, Bhatia, Amar, and Xavier, Sujith. 2016. “Introduction: TWAIL – on Praxis and the Intellectual.” Third World Quarterly 37(11): 1946–1956.Google Scholar
Ohlin, Jens David. 2015. The Assault on International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ohnesorge, John K. M. 2007. “The Rule of Law.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science (3): 99–114.Google Scholar
Peters, Anne. 2017. “The Refinement of International Law: From Fragmentation to Regime Interaction and Politicization.” I•CON 15(3): 671–704.Google Scholar
Posner, Eric, and Sykes, Alan. 2011. “Efficient Breach of International Law: Optimal Remedies, ‘Legalized Noncompliance,’ and Related Issues.” Michigan Law Review 110: 243–294.Google Scholar
Pratt, Tyler. 2018. “Deference and Hierarchy in International Regime Complexes.” International Organization 72(3): 561–590.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2011. “Obligation through Practice.” International Theory 3(2): 339–347.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2000. “‘Lets Argue’: Communicative Action in World Politics.” International Organization 34(1): 1–39.Google Scholar
Roberts, Anthea. 2017. Is International Law International? New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sanahuja, José Antonio. 2012. “Post-Liberal Regionalism in South America: The Case of Unasur.” EUI Working Papers 2012/05.Google Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane. 2018. “Autocratic Legalism.” University of Chicago Law Review 85(2): 545–583.Google Scholar
Sirleaf, Matiangai. 2017. “The African Justice Cascade and the Malabo Protocol.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 11(1): 71–91.Google Scholar
Sloss, David. 2016. The Death of Treaty Supremacy: An Invisible Constitutional Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Specia, Megan, Takkunen, Mikko 2018. “South China Seas Photos Suggest a Military Building Spree from China.” The New York Times 02/08/18, www.nytimes.com/2018/02/08/world/asia/south-china-seas-photos.html [last access 05/12/19].Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec, and Brunell, Thomas. 2013. “Trustee Courts and the Judicialization of International Regimes: The Politics of Majoritarian Activism in the ECHR, the EU and the WTO.” Journal of Law and Courts 1(1): 61–88.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang, and Thelen, Kathleen Ann. 2005. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sutherland, Peter, Bhagwati, Jagdish, Botchwey, Kwesi, Fitzgerald, Niall, Hamada, Koichi, Jackson, John H., Lafer, Celso, and de Montbrial, Theirry. 2004. The Future of the WTO: Addressing Institutional Challenges in the New Millennium. Lausanne: The World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, Brian Z. 2004. On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Teles, Stephen M. 2009. The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement: The Battle for Control of the Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation. 2016. The Declaration of the Russian Federation and the People’s Republic of China on the Promotion of International Law, www.mid.ru/en/foreign_policy/position_word_order/-/asset_publisher/6S4RuXfeYlKr/content/id/2331698 [last access 05/28/19].Google Scholar
UN Office of Legal Affairs. 2019. International Law Commission, http://legal.un.org/ilc/ [last access 05/12/19].Google Scholar
Venzke, Ingo. 2018. “Semantic Authority, Legal Change and the Dynamics of International Law,” in Capps, Patrick, and Palmer Olsen, Henrik (eds.), Legal Authority beyond the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 102–126.Google Scholar
Winters, Alan I. 2015. “The WTO and Regional Trade Agreements: Is It All Over for Multilateralism?” in Elsig, Manfred, Hoekman, Bernard, and Pauwelyn, Joost (eds.), Assessing the World Trade Organization: Fit for Purpose. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 344–375.Google Scholar
WTO 2001. Declaration on the TRIPS Agreement and Public Health, www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/minist_e/min01_e/mindecl_trips_e.htm, [last access 05/12/19].Google Scholar
References
ALBA. 2018. What Is the ALBA? https://albainfo.org/what-is-the-alba/ (last access July 19, 2022).Google Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan. 2000. “Hard and Soft Law in International Governance.” International Organization 54(3): 421–456.Google Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W., Genschel, Philipp, Snidal, Duncan, and Zangl, Bernhard (eds.). 2015. International Organizations as Orchestrators. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Adelman, Jeremy. 2017. “A More Dangerous Globalism.” The Japan Times: Opinion Section 03/26/19, www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2017/03/26/commentary/world-commentary/a-more-dangerous-globalism/ (last access July 19, 2022).Google Scholar
Alter, Karen, and Meunier, Sophie. 2009. “The Politics of International Regime Complexity.” Perspectives on Politics 7(1): 13–24.Google Scholar
Bach, David, and Newman, Abraham L.. 2007. “The European Regulatory State and Global Public Policy: Micro-institutions, Macro-influence.” Journal of European Public Policy 14(6): 827–846.Google Scholar
Baczynska, Gabriela. 2018. “EU Rejects Three-Pronged British Approach to New Ties after Brexit.” Reuters 02/22/18, www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu-baskets/eu-rejects-three-pronged-british-approach-to-new-ties-after-brexit-idUSKCN1G61VM. (last access July 19, 2022).Google Scholar
Barbero, Michele. 2021. “Europe’s Far-Right Seeks to Unite.” Foreign Policy 4/23/21, https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/04/23/europe-far-right-division-european-parliament-poland-hungary/. (last access July 19, 2022).Google Scholar
Bershidsky, Leonid. 2018. “Hungary Is Winning Its War on Muslim Immigrants.” Bloomberg 04/13/18, www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-04-13/hungary-is-winning-its-war-on-muslim-immigrants (last access July 19, 2022).Google Scholar
Betts, Alexander. 2013. “Regime Complexity and International Organizations: UNHCR as a Challenged Institution.” Global Governance 19(1): 69–81.Google Scholar
Bexell, Magdalena, Tallberg, Jonas, and Uhlin, Anders. 2010. “Democracy in Global Governance: The Promises and Pitfalls of Transnational Actors.” Global Governance 16(1): 81–101.Google Scholar
Breuilly, John. 2016. “Nationalism and Brexit.” Oxford University Press Blog 12/18/16, https://blog.oup.com/2016/12/nationalism-brexit-identity-referendum/ (last access July 19, 2022).Google Scholar
Brummer, Chris. 2010. “Why Soft Law Dominates International Finance – and Not Trade.” Journal of International Economic Law 13(3): 623–643.Google Scholar
Busch, Marc L. 2007. “Overlapping Institutions, Forum Shopping, and Dispute Settlement in International Trade.” International Organization 61(4): 735–761.Google Scholar
Büthe, Tim and Mattli, Walter. 2011. The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carrel-Billiard, Francois, and Wing, Christine. 2010. Nuclear Energy, Nonproliferation, and Disarmament: Briefing Notes for the 2010 NPT Review Conference. New York: International Peace Institute.Google Scholar
Copeland, Dale. 2015. Economic Interdependence and War. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Daalder, Ivo. H. and Lindsay, James. 2004. “An Alliance of Democracies.” The Washington Post 05/23/04.Google Scholar
Dai, Xinyuan. 2007. International Institutions and National Policies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Christina L. and Morse, Julia C.. 2018. “Protecting Trade by Legalizing Political Disputes: Why Countries Bring Cases to the International Court of Justice.” International Studies Quarterly 62(4): 709–722.Google Scholar
Einhorn, Robert. 2017. “Non-proliferation Challenges Facing the Trump Administration.” Arms Control and Non-proliferation Series 15. Washington, DC: Brookings.Google Scholar
Foot, Rosemary. 2007. “The United Nations, Counter Terrorism and Human Rights: Institutional Adaptation and Embedded Ideas.” Human Rights Quarterly 29(2): 489–514.Google Scholar
Ganley, Elaine. 2017. “Le Pen’s world: French nationalism at heart of her campaign.” AP News 12/01/17, https://apnews.com/237b06a4076e4f4184d3338f6f22241f (last access July 19, 2022).Google Scholar
Gutteridge, Nick. 2017. “‘This Won’t End Well’ EU Judges REJECT Eastern European Case against Migrant Quota Scheme.” Sunday Express 09/06/17, www.express.co.uk/news/politics/850538/Migrant-crisis-ECJ-rejects-Hungary-Slovakia-claim-refugee-quotas (last access July 19, 2022).Google Scholar
Hall, Rodney Bruce, and Biersteker, Thomas J. (eds.). 2002. The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. 2004. “Regime Shifting: The TRIPs Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking.” Yale Journal of International Law 29(1): 1–83.Google Scholar
Helfer, Laurence R. 2009. “Regime Shifting in the International Intellectual Property System.” Perspectives on Politics 7(1): 39–44.Google Scholar
HRIC. 2011. “Counter-Terrorism and Human Rights: The Impact of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.” Human Rights in China Whitepaper: www.hrichina.org/sites/default/files/publication_pdfs/2011-hric-sco-whitepaper-full.pdf (last access July 19, 2022).Google Scholar
Hurd, Ian. 1999. “Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics.” International Organization 53(2): 379–408.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2000. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, Matthew. 2017. “Pretextual Protectionism? The Perils of Invoking the WTO National Security Exception.” Lawfare 07/21/17, www.lawfareblog.com/pretextual-protectionism-perils-invoking-wto-national-security-exception (last access July 19, 2022).Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E. and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., and Victor, David G.. 2011. “The Regime Complex for Climate Change.” Perspectives on Politics 9(1): 7–23.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph, S. Nye Jr. 2000. “Introduction,” in Nye, Joseph S., and Donahue, John D. (eds.), Governance in a Globalizing World. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 1–44.Google Scholar
Keppler, Elise. 1 February 2017. “AU’s ‘ICC Withdrawal Strategy’ Less than Meets the Eye.” Human Rights Watch, www.hrw.org/news/2017/02/01/aus-icc-withdrawal-strategy-less-meets-eye (last access June 25, 2022).Google Scholar
Kreuder-Sonnen, Christian, and Zangl, Bernhard. 2016. “Varieties of Contested Multilateralism: Positive and Negative Consequences for the Constitutionalization of Multilateral Institutions.” Global Constitutionalism 5(3): 327–343.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 2010. “Rightful Rules: Authority, Order, and the Foundations of Global Governance.” International Studies Quarterly 54(3): 587–613.Google Scholar
Legler, Thomas. 2013. “Post-hegemonic Regionalism and Sovereignty in Latin America: Optimists, Skeptics, and an Emerging Research Agenda.” Contexto Internacional 35(2): 325–352.Google Scholar
Lesage, Dries, and van de Graaf, Thijs. 2013. “Thriving in Complexity? The OECD System’s Role in Energy and Taxation.” Global Governance 19(1): 83–92.Google Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2010. “A Theory of Gradual Institutional Change,” in Mahoney, James, and Thelen, Kathleen (eds.), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–37.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., and Pevehouse, Jon C.. 2000. “Trade Blocs, Trade Flows, and International Conflict.” International Organizations 54(4): 775–808.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward, and Pollins, Brian (eds.). 2003. Economic Interdependence and International Conflict. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Martill, Benjamin. 2021. “Prisoners of Their Own Device: Brexit as a Failed Negotiating Strategy.” The British Journal of International Relations, online first, https://doi.org/10.1177%2F13691481211044645.Google Scholar
McBride, James. 2018. “What Is the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)?” Council on Foreign Relations, 05/15/18, www.cfr.org/backgrounder/what-trans-pacific-partnership-tpp (last access July 19, 2022).Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Daniel. 2018. “Hungarian NGOs Fear Crackdown as Orban Prepares for New Term.” The Irish Times 05/07/18, www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/hungarian-ngos-fear-crackdown-as-orban-prepares-for-new-term-1.3487116 (last access July 19, 2022).Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2004. “Is There a ‘Democratic Deficit’ in World Politics? A Framework for Analysis.” Government and Opposition 39(2): 336–363.Google Scholar
Morse, Julia C., and Keohane, Robert O.. 2014. “Contested Multilateralism.” Review of International Organizations 9(4): 385–412.Google Scholar
Nye Jr., Joseph S. 2001. “Globalization’s Democratic Deficit: How to Make International Institutions More Accountable.” Foreign Affairs 80(4): 2–6.Google Scholar
Orsini, Amandine, Morin, Jean-Frédéric, and Young, Oran. 2013. “Regime Complexes: A Buzz, a Boom, or a Boost for Global Governance?” Global Governance 19: 27–39.Google Scholar
Pelc, Krzysztof J. 2014. “The Politics of Precedent in International Law: A Social Network Application.” American Political Science Review 108(3): 547–564.Google Scholar
Perlez, Jane. 2015. “China Creates a World Bank of Its Own, and the US Balks.” The New York Times 12/04/15, www.nytimes.com/2015/12/05/business/international/china-creates-an-asian-bank-as-the-us-stands-aloof.html (last access July 19, 2022).Google Scholar
Pratt, Tyler. 2017. “Angling for Influence.” Working Paper, https://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/tylerpratt/files/influence_aug25.pdf (last access May 14, 2019).Google Scholar
Pratt, Tyler. 2018. “Deference and Hierarchy in International Regime Complexes.” International Organization 72(3): 561–590.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal, and Victor, David G.. 2004. “The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources.” International Organization 58(2): 277–309.Google Scholar
Reisen, Helmut. 2015. “Will the AIIB and the NDB Help Reform Multilateral Development Banking?” Global Policy 6(3): 297–304.Google Scholar
Riggirozi, Pía. 2012. "Reconstructing Regionalism: What Does Development Have to Do with It?" in Riggirozi, Pía and Tussie, Diana (eds.). The Rise of Post-Hegemonic Regionalism. New York: Springer, 17–39.Google Scholar
Riggirozzi, Pia. 2012. “Region, Regionness and Regionalism in Latin America: Towards a New Synthesis.” New Political Economy 17(4): 421–443.Google Scholar
Riggirozzi, Pia, and Tussie, Diana (eds.). 2012. The Rise of Post-Hegemonic Regionalism: The Case of Latin America. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Russett, Bruce, and Oneal, John. 2001. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Sandford, Alasdair. 2022. “Post-Brexit Guide: Where Are We Now – and How Did We Get Here?” EuroNews 2/14/2022. www.euronews.com/my-europe/2021/06/23/brexit-draft-deal-first-of-many-hurdles-to-a-smooth-exit (last access February 28, 2022).Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory C., and Pollack, Mark A.. 2010. “Hard Vs. Soft Law: Alternatives, Complements, and Antagonists in International Governance.” Minnesota Law Review 94: 706–799.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ssenyonjo, Manisuli. 2018. “State Withdrawal Notifications from the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: South Africa, Burundi, and the Gambia.” Criminal Law Forum 29: 63–119.Google Scholar
Stevis-Gridneff, Matina, Pronczuk, Monika, and Novak, Benjamin. 16 Feb 2022. “Top European Court Rules EU Can Freeze Aid to Poland and Hungary.” The New York Times www.nytimes.com/2022/02/16/world/europe/eu-court-funds-hungary-poland.html (last access January 20, 2023).Google Scholar
Stone, Randall W. 2011. Controlling Institutions: International Organizations and the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
The White House. 2017. Remarks by President Trump to the 72nd Session of the United Nations General Assembly, www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-72nd-session-united-nations-general-assembly/ (last access 05/28/19).Google Scholar
Tussie, Diana. 2016. “Presidential Diplomacy in UNASUR: Coming Together for Crisis Management or Marking Tufts?” in Mace, Gordon, Jean-Philippe Therien, , Tussie, Diana, and Dabene, Olivier (eds.), Summits & Regional Governance: The Americas in Comparative Perspective. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Von Borzyskowski, Inken and Vabulas, Felicity. 2022. “When Do Withdrawal Threats Achieve Reform in Intergovernmental Organizations.” Working Paper.Google Scholar
Weiffen, Brigitte, Wehner, Leslie, and Nolte, Detlef. 2013. “Overlapping Regional Security Institutions in South America: The Case of OAS and UNASUR.” International Area Studies Review 16(4): 370–389.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Nicholas J. 2000. “Reflections on the Legality and Legitimacy of NATO’s Intervention in Kosovo.” The International Journal of Human Rights 4(3): 144–163.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Tracy. 2017. “U.S. Struggles to Unite Countries in Condemning Venezuela.” LA Times 06/20/17, www.latimes.com/nation/la-fg-trump-latin-america-20170620-story.html (last access July 19, 2022).Google Scholar
Wittner, Lawrence. 2005. “Does the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty Have a Future?”, Nuclear Age Peace Foundation, www.wagingpeace.org/does-the-nuclear-non-proliferation-treaty-have-a-future/ (last access July 19, 2022).Google Scholar
Bank Group, World, and Trade Organization, World. 2015. The Role of Trade in Ending Poverty. Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar