Abbas, Nabila (2019), Das Imaginäre und die Revolution, Tunesien in revolutionären Zeiten, Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar

Abers, Rebecca (2000), Inventing Local Democracy: Grassroots Politics in Brazil, Boulder/London: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abizadeh, Arash (2019), “Representation, Bicameralism, Political Equality, and Sortition: Reconstituting the Second Chamber as a Randomly Selected Assembly,” Perspectives on Politics, 18 (1), December, pp. 1059–1078.Google Scholar

Abramson, Jeffrey B. (2003), We the Jury. The Jury System and the Ideal of Democracy, Cambridge (MA)/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Adams, John (1976), Adams Papers, III. Thoughts on Government, April 1776, https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Adams/06-04-02-0026-0004.Google Scholar

Aguilar Rivera, José Antonio (2015), “Las razones de la tómbola,” Nexos, 1 April.Google Scholar

Aguiton, Christophe and Cardon, Dominique (2007), “The Strength of Weak Cooperation. An Attempt to Understand the Meaning of Web 2.O,” Communication & Strategies, 65, pp. 51–65.Google Scholar

Alciato, Andrea (1615), Les Emblèmes, English edition: Book of Emblems, www.mun.ca/alciato/index.html.Google Scholar

Allen, Robert (2005), Les Tribunaux criminels sous la Révolution et l’Empire, 1792–1811, Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar

Allswang, John (2000), The Initiative and Referendum in California, 1898–1998, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Andersen, Ida-Elisabeth and Jaeger, Birgit (1999), “Danish Participatory Models. Scenario Workshops and Consensus Conferences: Towards More Democratic Decision-Making,” Science and Public Policy, 26 (5), pp. 331–340.Google Scholar

ANONYMOUS (1654), Le règlement du Sort, contenant la forme et la manière de procéder à l’élection des officiers de la ville de Marseille, Marseille: Claude Garcin.Google Scholar

ANONYMOUS (1720), Memoriale der Geistlichkeit zu Basel, wegen Einfuehrung eines Looses, zu Hintertreibung der Pratiquen, und Verheutung dess Meineyds dorten vor Raeth und Burger proponirt Anno 1714, Bern: S. Küpffer.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas (1963), Liber de sortibus ad dominum lacobum de Tonengo (1270–1271), trans. Peter Bartholomew Carey, Dover: Dominican House of Philosophy.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas (2010), Summa Theologica (1269–1272), trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Claremont: Coyote Canyon Press.Google Scholar

Aristotle, (1962), The Politics, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Aristotle, (1984), The Athenian Constitution, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Armillas, José Antonio and Sesma, José Ángel (1991), La Diputación de Aragón. El Gobierno aragonés, del Reyno a la Comunidad Autónoma, Zaragoza: Oroel.Google Scholar

Avila, Alfredo (1999), En nombre de la nación. La formación del gobierno representativo en México (1808–1824), Mexico: Taurus/CIDE.Google Scholar

Avritzer, Leonardo (2002), Democracy and the Public Space in Latin America, Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Azoulay, Vincent (2014), “Rethinking the Political in Ancient Greece,” Annales Histoire, Sciences, Sociales, 69 (3), pp. 385–408.Google Scholar

Bächtiger, André and Steiner, Jürg (2015), “How to Measure the Quality of Deliberation? The Discourse Quality Index (DQI) as a Possible Tool,” in Coleman, Stephen, Przybylska, Anna, and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Deliberation and Democracy: Innovative Processes and Institutions Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 173–186.Google Scholar

Bagnasco Gianni, Giovanna (2001), “Le sortes etrusche,” in Cordano, Federica and Grottanelli, Cristiano (eds.), Sorteggio Pubblico e Cleromanzia dall’Antichità all’Età Moderna, Milan: Edizioni Et, pp. 197–219.Google Scholar

Baiocchi, Gianfranco (2005), Militants and Citizens. The Politics of Participatory Democracy in Porto Alegre, Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Baker, Keith M. (1990), Inventing the French Revolution: Essays on French Political Culture in the Eighteenth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Balibar, Etienne (1989), “Spinoza, the Anti-Orwell: The Fear of the Masses,” Rethinking Marxism, 2 (3), pp. 104–139.Google Scholar

Balibar, Etienne (1998), Droit de cité. Culture et politique en démocratie, Paris: L’Aube.Google Scholar

Balibar, Etienne (2001), Nous, citoyens d’Europe? Les frontières, l’État, le peuple, Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Barat, Raphaël (2018), “Les élections que fait le peuple”. République de Genève, vers 1680–1707, Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar

Barat, Raphaël (2020), “The Introduction of Sortition in the Republic of Geneva (1691)”, in Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Sortition and Democracy, Exeter: Imprint Academics, pp. 260–261.Google Scholar

Barber, Benjamin (1984), Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age, Berkeley/London: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Barnes, Marian (1999), Building a Deliberative Democracy. An Evaluation of Two Citizens’ Juries, London: Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar

Baron, Hans (1966), The Crisis of the Early Italian Renaissance, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bar-On, Shraga (2020), Lot Casting, God, and Man in Jewish Literature: From the Bible to the Renaissance. Ramat-Gan: Bar-Ilan University Press/Jerusalem: Shalom Hartman Institute, 2020 [in Hebrew].Google Scholar

Barrio Barrio, Juan Antonio (1991) [1427], “La introducción de la insaculación en la Corona de Aragón. Xátiva, transcripción documental,” Anales de la Universidad de Alicante. Historia Medieval, 1991 (8), pp. 99–114. https://rua.ua.es/dspace/bitstream/10045/6982/1/HM_08_05.pdfGoogle Scholar

Beaud, Stéphane and Pialoux, Michel (1999), Retour sur la condition ouvrière, Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar

Beck, Ulrich (1992), Risk Society, London: Sage.Google Scholar

Bell, Daniel (2020), “Dialogue on Sortition with Professors Wang Shaoguang and Yves Sintomer,” https://danielabell.com/2020/08/25/dialogue-on-sortition-with-professors-wang-shaoguang-and-yves-sintomer/.Google Scholar

Belmas, Elisabeth (2006), Jouer autrefois. Essai sur le jeu dans la France moderne (XVI–XVII siècle), Seyssel: Champ Vallon.Google Scholar

Benjamin, Walter (1974), “Goethes Wahlverwandtschaften,” in Tiedemann, R. and Schweppenhäuser, H. (eds.), Gesammelte Schriften. Vol. I, 1. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, pp. 125–201.Google Scholar

Berger, Joël, Osterloh, Margit, Rost, Katja, and Ehrmann, Thomas (2020), “How to prevent leadership hubris? Comparing competitive selections, lotteries, and their combination”, The Leadership Quarterly, 31 (5), October, 101388.Google Scholar

Berthout, Augustin (2017), “Le sort est un Dieu. Aux origines du tirage au sort politique à Athènes,” Jus politicum, 17 (January), pp. 709–778.Google Scholar

Biville, Frédérique (2020), “Sors, sortiri, sortitio. Pratiques et lexique du tirage au sort dans le monde romain,” in Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Tirage au sort et démocratie. Histoire, instruments, théories, Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck, 2019, pp. 139–156.Google Scholar

Blackstone, William (1765–1769), Commentaries on the Laws of England, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Bleicken, Jochen (1994), Die Athenische Demokratie, Paderborn: Schöning.Google Scholar

Bloch, Marc (1973), The Royal Touch, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Blok, Josine (2014), “Participatory Governance: The Case for Allotment,” Etnofoor (Participation), 26 (2), pp. 73–80.Google Scholar

Blok, Josine (2017), Citizenship in Ancient Athens, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Blok, Josine (forthcoming), “The Lot and the Ancient Democracy,” in Irad Malkin (forthcoming), Drawing Lots with Ancient Greeks.Google Scholar

Blondiaux, Loïc (1998), La fabrique de l’opinion. Une histoire sociale des sondages, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Blondiaux, Loïc (2008), Le nouvel esprit de la démocratie, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Blondiaux, Loïc and Sintomer, Yves (2002), “Démocratie et délibération,” Politix, 15 (57), pp. 17–35.Google Scholar

Blösel, Wolfgang (2020), “The Sortition of Consular and Praetorian Provinces in the Roman Republic,” in Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Sortition and Democracy, Exeter: Imprint Academics, pp. 169–181.Google Scholar

Bobbio, Luigi (2006), “Dilemmi della democrazia partecipativa,” Democrazia e diritto, 4, pp. 11–26.Google Scholar

Bobbio, Luigi and Giannetti, Daniela (2007), Rivista Italiana di Politiche Pubbliche, 2, August, thematic issue on citizens’ juries.Google Scholar

Boltanski, Luc and Chiapello, Eve (2007), The New Spirit of Capitalism, London: Verso.Google Scholar

Bonneuil, Christophe (2006), “Cultures épistémiques et engagement public des chercheurs dans la controverse OGM,” Natures Sciences Sociétés, 14 (3), pp. 257–268.Google Scholar

Bonin, Hugo (2020), Du régime mixte à la ‘vraie démocratie’: une histoire conceptuelle du mot democracy en Grande-Bretagne, 1770–1920, PhD thesis, Paris 8 University/UQAM, October.Google Scholar

Bonin, Hugo, Baeckelandt, Simon, and Wöthrich, Zélie (2021), “‘A Breath of Fresh Air’? Sortition in the Rejuvenation of the French Economic, Social and Environmental Council,” Doctoral and postdoctoral workshop “Sortition in Politics: History, Sociology, Philosophy,” Oxford, February 15, 2021.Google Scholar

Bothorel, Julie (2020), “Civic Sortition in Republican and Imperial Rome. Physical Instruments and Technical Logistics,” in Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane, Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Sortition and Democracy, Exeter: Imprint Academics, pp. 151–168.Google Scholar

Bothorel, Julie (2022), Le tirage au sort des provinces sous la République, Rome: Collection de l’Ecole française de Rome.Google Scholar

Bouricius, Terrill G. (2013), “Democracy Through Multi-Body Sortition: Athenian Lessons for the Modern Day,” Journal of Public Deliberation, 9 (1), article 11.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre (1984), Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre (1993), Sociology in Question, London: Sage.Google Scholar

Bourg, Dominique et al. (2011), Pour une sixième République écologique, Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar

Bourg, Dominique and Boy, Daniel (2005), Conférences de citoyens, mode d’emploi, Paris: Charles Léopold Mayer/Descartes & Cie.Google Scholar

Brand, Patricia and Guanzini, Catherine (2018), “Rôle du tirage au sort dans les pratiques électorales au XVIIIe siècle. Le cas d’Yverdon et des villes vaudoises,” in Chollet, Antoine and Fontaine, Alexandre (eds.), Expériences du tirage au sort en Suisse et en Europe, Bern: Bibliothek am Guisanplatz, pp. 145–172.Google Scholar

Braudel, Fernand (1993), La Méditerranée et le monde méditerranéen à l'époque de Philippe II, Paris: Le Livre de Poche.Google Scholar

Brucker, Gene A. (1968), “The Ciompi Revolution,” in Rubinstein, N. (ed.), Florentine Studies. Politics and Society in Renaissance Florence. London: Faber, pp. 314–356.Google Scholar

Brucker, Gene A. (1977), The Civic World of Early Renaissance Florence, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Brucker, Gene A. (1998), Florence: The Golden Age, 1138–1737, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Bruni, Leonardo (1987a), “On the Florentine Constitution” [1439, original in Greek], in Griffiths, G., Hankins, J., and Thompson, D. (eds.), The Humanism of Leonardo Bruni. Selected Texts. Binghamton, NY: Center for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies, State University of New York.Google Scholar

Bruni, Leonardo (1987b), “Oration for the Funeral of Nanni Strozzi” [1428, original in Latin], in Griffiths, G., Hankins, J., and Thompson, D. (eds.), The Humanism of Leonardo Bruni. Selected Texts. Binghamton, NY: Center for Medieval and Early Renaissance Studies, State University of New York.Google Scholar

Bruni, Leonardo (2001–2004), Historiae Florentini Populi, 3 vols, Hankins, James (ed.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Bruni, Leonardo (2005), In Praise of Florence, Amsterdam: Olive Press.Google Scholar

Buchstein, Hubertus (2009), Demokratie und Lotterie, Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar

Buonarroti, Philippe (1869) [1828], Gracchus Babeuf et la conjuration des égaux, Paris: Armand Le Chevalier.Google Scholar

Buonocore, Mauro (2006), “Un weekend deliberativo all’ombra del Partenone,” Reset, 96, July–August, pp. 6–8.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund (1775) [1774], “Speech to the Electors of Bristol,” November 3, 1774, in Mr. Burke’s Speeches at His Arrival at Bristol and at The Conclusion of the Poll, London: J. Dodsley (2nd edition).Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund (1854–1856) [1770], “Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents,” 1770, in The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke, London, Henry G. Bohn, 1854–56, vol. 1, pp. 347–349.Google Scholar

Burnheim, John (1985), Is Democracy Possible?, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Buttay-Jutier, Florence (2008), Fortuna. Usages politiques d’une allégorie morale à la Renaissance, Paris: Presses Universitaires Paris-Sorbonne.Google Scholar

Cadoni, Giorgio (1999), Lotte politiche e riforme istituzionali a Firenze tra il 1494 e il 1502, Rome: Istituto storico italiano per il medio evo.Google Scholar

Caillois, Roger (1967), Les Jeux et les Hommes, Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Callenbach, Ernest and Phillips, Michael (2008) [1985], A Citizen Legislature, Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar

Callon, Michel, Lascoumes, Pierre, and Barthe, Yannick (2011), Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy (Inside Technology), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Caluwaerts, Didier (2012), Confrontation and Communication: Deliberative Democracy in Divided Belgium, Brussels: European Interuniversity Press.Google Scholar

Cardon, Dominique (2010), La Démocratie Internet. Promesses et limites, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Carson, Lyn, Gastil, John, Hartz-Karp, Janette, and Lubensky, Ron (eds.) (2013), The Australian Citizens’ Parliament and the Future of Deliberative Democracy, University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Carson, Lyn and Martin, Brian (1999), Random Selection in Politics, Westport: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar

Casey, James (1979), The Kingdom of Valencia in the Seventeenth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cassirer, Ernst (1983), Individu et Cosmos dans la philosophie de la Renaissance, Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar

Castoriadis, Cornelius (1984), Crossroads in the Labyrinth, Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar

Castoriadis, Cornelius (1986), Domaines de l’homme, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Castoriadis, Cornelius (1987), The Imaginary Institution of Society, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Castoriadis, Cornelius (2008), La cité et les lois. Ce qui fait la Grèce 2, séminaires 1983–1983, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Cavalcanti, Giovanni (1944), Istorie Fiorentine, Milan: Ed. di Pino.Google Scholar

Celli, Roberto (1980), Pour l’histoire des origines du pouvoir populaire. L’expérience des villes-États italiens (XIème–XIIème siècles), Louvain-la-Neuve: Publications de l’Institut d’études médiévales, 2nd series, 3.Google Scholar

Chakrabarty, Dipesh (2007), Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Chambers, Simone (2009), “Rhetoric and the Public Sphere: Has Deliberative Democracy Abandoned Mass Democracy?,” Political Theory, 37 (3), pp. 323–350.Google Scholar

Champeaux, Jacqueline (1982–1987), Fortuna. Recherches sur le culte de la Fortune à Rome, 2 volumes, Rome: French School of Rome.Google Scholar

Cheng, Joseph, Sheh, Yu, and Li, Fan (2015), “Local Government’s Consultative Budgetary Reforms in China: A Case Study of Wenling City,” China International Journal, 13 (1), pp. 115–118.Google Scholar

Chiarelli, Giorgio et al. (1978), Florenz und die große Zeit der Renaissance, Leben und Kultur in einer europäischen Stadt, Würzburg: Georg Popp.Google Scholar

Chojnacki, Stanley (1997), “La formazione della nobiltà dopo la Serrata,” in Storia di Venezia. Dalle origini alla caduta della Serenissima, vol. III, Rome: Istituto della Enciclopedia italiana, pp. 641–725.Google Scholar

Chollet, Antoine and Fontaine, Alexandre (eds.) (2018), Expériences du tirage au sort en Suisse et en Europe (XVIe-XXIe siècles). Bern: Publications en série de la bibliothèque Am Guisanplatz, 74.Google Scholar

Chollet, Antoine and Manin, Bernard (2019), “Les postérités inattendues de Principes du gouvernement représentatif: une discussion avec Bernard Manin,” Participations, thematic issue “Le tirage au sort au XXIe siècle,” 1, 23, pp. 171–192.Google Scholar

Christin, Olivier (2014), Vox populi. Une histoire du vote avant le suffrage universel, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Cicero, (1923), De Divinatione, Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library/Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Cirone, Alessandra and Coppenolle, Brenda van (2019), “Bridging the Gap. Lottery-Based Procedures in Early Parliamentarization,” World Politics, 71 (2), pp. 197–235.Google Scholar

Clastres, Pierre (1980), Recherches d’anthropologie politique, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Clastres, Pierre (1987), Society against the State: Essays in Political Anthropology, New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar

Claverie, Elisabeth (1984), “De la difficulté de faire un citoyen: les ‘acquittements scandaleux’ du jury dans la France provinciale du début du XIX^e siècle,” Études rurales, 95–96, July–December, pp. 143–166.Google Scholar

Cocteau, Jean (1998), Bacchus, Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Cohen, Léo (2020), “Ils réussiraient là où nous avons échoué,” Revue XXI, 52, Fall, pp. 118–131.Google Scholar

Condorcet, (1986), Sur les élections et autres textes, Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar

Conso, Giovanni (2001), “Séance d’ouverture,” Revue internationale de droit pénal, 72 (1–2), pp. 15–18.Google Scholar

Constant, Benjamin (1988), “The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with the Moderns,” in Political Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 309–328.Google Scholar

Contarini, Gasparo (2020) [1543], The Republic of Venice. De magistratibus et republica Venetorum, Toronto/Buffalo/London: The University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Cook, Kimberly J. and Powell, Chris (2003), “Unfinished Business: Aboriginal Reconciliation and Restorative Justice in Australia,” Contemporary Justice Review, 6 (3), September, pp. 279–291.Google Scholar

Coote, Anna and Lenaghan, Jo (1997), Citizen’s Juries: Theory into Practice, London: Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar

Cordano, Federica and Grottanelli, Cristiano (eds.) (2001), Sorteggio Pubblico e Cleromanzia dall’Antichità all’Età Moderna, Milan: Edizioni Et.Google Scholar

Cordier, Lionel (2020), “Crise démocratique et mutations contemporaines de la représentation politique : l’exemple islandais (2008–2017),” PhD thesis, University Lumière Lyon 2/University of Iceland.Google Scholar

Cordier, Lionel (2021), “Échapper à la conflictualité? Le tirage au sort comme outil de management et d’union nationale,” Raisons politiques, 82, May, pp. 91–105.Google Scholar

Costa Delgado, Jorge (2017a), “Resistencias a la introducción del sorteo entre el asamblearismo y la institucionalización: el caso de Podemos Cádiz,” Daimon. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 72, September–December, pp. 221–237.Google Scholar

Costa Delgado, Jorge, Moreno Pestaña, José-Luis, Perez-Rabatel, Lilane, and Sintomer, Yves (2017b), Sorteo y democracia/Sortition and Democracy, thematic issue, Daimon. Revista Internacional de Filosofia, Ediciones de la Universidad de Murcia, 72, September–December.Google Scholar

Coulanges, Fustel de (1891), “Nouvelles recherches sur le tirage au sort appliqué à la nomination des archontes athéniens,” Nouvelles Recherches sur quelques problèmes d’histoire. Paris: Hachette, pp. 147–179.Google Scholar

Courant, Dimitri (2019), “Délibération et tirage au sort au sein d’une institution permanente. Le Conseil Supérieur de la Fonction Militaire (1968–2016),” Participation, 1, 23, pp. 61–92.Google Scholar

Courant, Dimitri (2020a), “Des mini-publics délibératifs pour sauver le climat? Analyses empiriques de l’Assemblée citoyenne irlandaise et de la Convention citoyenne française,” Archives de philosophie du droit, 62 (1), pp. 487–507.Google Scholar

Courant, Dimitri (2020b), “From Kleroterion to Cryptology: The Act of Sortition in the 21st Century, Instruments and Practices,” in Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Sortition and Democracy, Exeter: Imprint Academics, pp. 343–371.Google Scholar

Courant, Dimitri (2021), “Citizens’ Assemblies for Referendums and Constitutional Reform: Is There an ‘Irish Model’ for Deliberative Democracy?” Frontiers in Political Science, 8 January.Google Scholar

Courcelle, Pierre (1953), “L’enfant et les ‘sorts bibliques’,” Vigiliae Christianae, Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Cracco, Giorgio (1979), “Patriziato e oligarchia a Venezia nel Tre-Quattrocento,” in Bertelli, Sergio, Rubinstein, Nicolai, and Smyth, Craig Hugh (eds.), Florence and Venice: Comparisons and Relations. Vol. I: Quattrocento, Florence: La Nuova Italia, pp. 71–98.Google Scholar

Crosby, Ned (1975), In Search of the Competent Citizen, Working Paper, Plymouth: Center for New Democratic Processes.Google Scholar

Crosby, Ned and Nethercut, Doug (2005), “Citizens Juries: Creating a Trustworthy Voice of the People,” in Gastil, John and Levine, Peter (eds.), The Deliberative Democracy Handbook, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 111–119.Google Scholar

Crouch, Colin (2004), Post-Democracy. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Crozier, Michel, Huntington, Samuel, and Watanuki, Joji (1975), The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission, New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Cumont, Franz (1897), “Les Actes De Saint Dasius,” Analecta Bollandiana, 16, pp. 5–16.Google Scholar

Curato, Nicole, Vrydagh, Julien, and Bächtiger, André (eds.) (2020), “Democracy without Shortcuts,” Journal of Deliberative Democracy, Special Issue, 16.Google Scholar

Curti, Léopold (1797), Lettres sur la Suisse, vol. I, Altona: Chez Jean David Adam Eckart.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A (1970), After the Revolution? Authority in a Good Society, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert A (1989), Democracy and its Critics, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Dalarun, Jacques (2012), Gouverner c’est servir: Essai de démocratie médiévale, Paris: Alma Éditeur.Google Scholar

Dalton, Russell J. and Wattenberg, Martin P. (2002), Parties without Partisans: Political Changes in Advanced Industrial Societies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dante, (2003), The Divine Comedy: The Inferno, The Purgatorio, and The Paradiso, London: Dutton/Signe.Google Scholar

Dartmann, Christoph, Wassilowsky, Günther, and Weller, Thomas (eds.) (2010), Technik und Symbolik vormoderner Wahlverfahren (Beihefte der Historischen Zeitschrift). Munich: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar

Daverio Rocchi, Giovanna (2001), “Spazi e forme del sorteggio democratico,” in Federica, Cordano, and Cristiano, Grottanelli (eds.), Sorteggio Pubblico e Cleromanzia dall’Antichità all’Età Moderna, Milan: Edizioni Et, pp. 95–106.Google Scholar

Decretum magistri Gratiani. (1879), Editio Lipsiensis secunda, post Aemilii Ludovici Richteri curas, ad librorum manu scriptorum et editionis Romanae fidem recognovit et adnotatione critica instruxit Aemilius Friedberg. Leipzig: B. Tauchnitz (Corpus iuris canonici; 1).Google Scholar

Delannoi, Gil and Dowlen, Oliver (eds.) (2010), Sortition. Theory and Practice, Exeter (UK): Imprint-Academic.Google Scholar

Déloye, Yves and Ihl, Olivier (2008), L’acte de vote, Paris: Presses de Sciences.Google Scholar

Demont, Pau (2000), “Lots héroïques: remarques sur le tirage au sort de l’Iliade aux Sept contre Thèbes,” Revue des Études Grecques, 113 (2), pp. 299–325.Google Scholar

Demont, Paul (2010), “Tirage au sort et démocratie en Grèce ancienne,” La Vie des idées, 22 June.Google Scholar

Demont, Paul (2020), “Selection by Lot in Ancient Athens: From Religion to Politics,” in Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Sortition and Democracy, Exeter: Imprint Academics, pp. 112–129.Google Scholar

Desrosières, Alain (2000), La politique des grands nombres. Histoire de la raison statistique, Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Destutt De Tracy, Antoine (1819), Commentaire sur l’Esprit des lois de Montesquieu, Paris: Th. Desoer.Google Scholar

Dewey, John (1954), The Public and Its Problems, Athens, OH: Swallow Press/Ohio University Press.Google Scholar

Di Salvatore, Massimo (2001), “Il sorteggio tra politica e religione. Un caso tessalico,” in Cordano, Federica and Grottanelli, Cristiano (eds.), Sorteggio Pubblico e Cleromanzia dall’Antichità all’Età Moderna, Milan: Edizioni Et, pp. 119–130.Google Scholar

Dick, Philip K. (1955), Solar Lottery, New York: Ace Books.Google Scholar

Dienel, Hans-Liudger (2010), “Les jurys citoyens : pourquoi sont-ils encore si rarement utilisés?” in Bacqué, Marie-Hélène and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), La démocratie participative inachevée. Genèse, adaptations et diffusions, Paris: Yves Michel, pp. 101–114.Google Scholar

Dienel, Peter (1970), “Techniken bürgerschaftlicher Beteiligung an Planungsprozessen,” Offene Welt, 101, pp. 144–156.Google Scholar

Dienel, Peter C. (1997), Die Planungszelle, Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar

Dienel, Peter C. (2009), Demokratisch, praktisch, gut: Merkmale, Wirkungen und Perspektiven von Planungzellen und Bürgergutachte, Berlin: Dietz.Google Scholar

Dienel, Peter C. and Renn, Ortwin (1995), “Planning Cells: A Gate to ‘Fractal’ Mediation,” in Renn, Ortwin, Webler, Thomas, and Weidemann, Peter (eds.), Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation – Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, pp. 117–140.Google Scholar

Dowlen, Oliver (2008), The Political Potential of Sortition. A Study of the Random Selection of Citizens for Public Offices, Exeter, UK/Charlottesville, VA: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar

Druey, Henri (1828), “Essai sur les nouveaux principes politiques,” Le Nouvelliste Vaudois, 40, May 16.Google Scholar

Dryzek, John (1990), Discursive Democracy. Politics, Policy and Political Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dubois, Laurent (1989), Inscriptions grecques dialectales de Sicile, 206, Rome: Publications de l’École française de Rome.Google Scholar

Dupuis, Aurèle (2021), “Aristocratie distributive et traditions républicaines : une histoire comparative des usages du tirage au sort en politique dans trois cantons suisses d’Ancien Régime (17e–18e siècles),” PhD thesis, Lausanne: Lausanne University.Google Scholar

Dupuis-Déri, Francis (2013), Démocratie, histoire politique d'un mot aux États-Unis et en France, Montréal: Lux.Google Scholar

Ehrenberg, Victor (1923), “Losung”, in Paulys Real-Enzyklopädie der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft. Stuttgart, pp. 1451–1504.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon (ed.) (1988), Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon (1991), Arguing and Bargaining in Two Constituent Assemblies, New Haven, CT: Yale Law School.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon (2008), “Le tirage au sort, plus juste que le choix rationnel,” July 2, 2008, https://laviedesidees.fr/Le-tirage-au-sort-plus-juste-que-le-choix-rationnel.html.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon (2013), Securities Against Misrule. Juries, Assemblies, Elections, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Esping-Andersen, Gota (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Farrar, Cynthia and Fishkin, James (2005), “Deliberative Polling. From Experiment to Community Resource,” in Gastil, John and Levine, Peter (eds.), The Deliberative Democracy Handbook, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 68–79.Google Scholar

Farrell, David, Harris, Clodagh, and Suiter, Jane (2016), “The Irish Constitutional Convention: A Case of ‘High Legitimacy’?” in Reuchamps, Min and Suiter, Jane (eds.), Constitutional Deliberative Democracy in Europe, Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 33–52.Google Scholar

Farrell, David M., Suiter, Jane, Harri, Clodagh, and Cunningham, Kevin (2020), “The Effects of Mixed Membership in a Deliberative Forum: The Irish Constitutional Convention of 2012–2014,” Political Studies, 68 (1), pp. 54–73.Google Scholar

Felicetti, Andrea and Della Porta, Donatella (2019), “Joining Forces: The Sortition Chamber from a Social-Movement Perspective,” in Gastil, John and Wright, Erik Olin (eds.), Legislature by Lot, London: Verso, pp. 145–165.Google Scholar

Ferrer, Magín (1843), Las leyes fundamentales de la monarquía española, según fueron antiguamente y según sean en la época actual, Barcelona: Imprimería y librería de Pablo Riera.Google Scholar

Feuchtwang, Stephan (2003), “Peasants, Democracy and Anthropology: Questions of Local Loyalty,” Critique of Anthropology, 23 (1), pp. 93–120.Google Scholar

Finley, Moses I. (1991), The Invention of Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fischer, Frank (2003), Reframing Public Policy, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fishkin, James (1991), Democracy and Deliberation, New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Fishkin, James (1995), The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy, New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Fishkin, James (2009), When the People Speak : Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fishkin, James (2015), “Reviving Deliberative Democracy: Reflections on Recent Experiments,” in Coleman, Stephen, Przybylska, Anna, and Sintomer, Yves (eds.) Deliberation: Values, Processes, Institutions, Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang, pp. 99–108.Google Scholar

Fishkin, James (2018), Democracy When the People Are Thinking: Revitalizing Our Politics Through Public Deliberation, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fishkin, James, He, Baogang, Luskin, Robert C., and Siu, Alice (2010), “Deliberative Democracy in an Unlikely Place: Deliberative Polling in China,” British Journal of Political Science, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar

Flaig, Egon (2004), Ritualisierte Gesten. Zeichen, Gesten und Herrschaft im alten Rom, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck.Google Scholar

Flamand, Amélie (2011), “La fabrique d’un public régional : Observation participante du premier jury citoyen en Poitou-Charentes,” in Talpin, Julien and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), La démocratie participative au-delà de la proximité : Le Poitou-Charentes et l’échelle régionale, Rennes: Presses universitaires de Rennes, pp. 75–90.Google Scholar

Joan, Font (2001), Ciudadanos y decisiones públicas, Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar

Jean-Louis, Fournel (2020), “Du parlamento au Grand conseil florentin (1494–1530). Le passage de la représentation des citoyens d’une place publique à une salle fermée,” in Hayat, Samuel, Péneau, Corinne, and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), La représentation avant le gouvernement représentatif, Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, pp. 151–174.Google Scholar

Fourniau, Jean-Michel (2020), “The Selection of Deliberative Minipublics: Sortition, Motivation, and Availability,” in Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Sortition and Democracy, Exeter: Imprint Academics, pp. 372–399.Google Scholar

Fourniau, Jean-Michel (2021), “Gouverner une Assemblée citoyenne? Retour sur le rôle du comité de gouvernance de la CCC,” conference “Toward Citizen-Legislators? The Case of the French Citizen’ Convention for Climate (2019–2021),” Yale University, May 19, 20, and 21.Google Scholar

Fournier, Patrick, Van Der Kolk, Henk, Carty, R. Kenneth, Blais, André, and Rose, Jonathan (2011), When Citizens Decide. Lessons from Citizens Assemblies on Electoral Reform, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fraser, Nancy (1997), “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy,” in Justice Interruptus. Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. New York/London: Routledge, pp. 11–40.Google Scholar

Frazer, James G. (1900), The Golden Bough, 3 vol., 2nd edition, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund (2002), Civilization and Its Discontents, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Fukuyama, Francis (2012) [1992], The End of History and the Last Man, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Funes, María F., Talpin, Julien, and Rull, Mathias (2014), “The Cultural Consequences of Engagement in Participatory Processes,” in Font, Joan, Della Porta, Donatella and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Local Participation in Southern Europe: Causes, Characteristics and Consequences, Washington, DC: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 151–189.Google Scholar

Fung, Archon (2005), “Deliberation before the Revolution: Toward an Ethics of Deliberative Democracy in an Unjust World,” Political Theory, 33 (3), pp. 397–419.Google Scholar

Fung, Archon and Wright, Erik Olin (eds.) (2003), Deepening Democracy. Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance, London/New York: Verso.Google Scholar

Gaborit, Maxime (2021), “The French Citizens’ Convention on Climate in its Ecosystem. Climate Democracy and Social Movements,” doctoral and postdoctoral workshop titled “Sortition in Politics: History, Sociology, Philosophy,” Oxford, February, 15.Google Scholar

Ganuza, Ernesto and Baiocchi, Gianpaolo (2012), “The Power of Ambiguity: How Participatory Budgeting Travels the Globe,” Journal of Public Deliberation, 8 (2), article 8.Google Scholar

Garin, Eugenio (1993), L’umanesimo italiano, Rome: Laterza.Google Scholar

Garrigou, Alain (1992), Le vote et la vertu. Comment les Français sont devenus électeurs, Paris: Presses de la FNSP.Google Scholar

Garrigou, Alain (2002), Histoire sociale du suffrage universel en France. 1848–2000, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Gastil, John (2000), By Popular Demand: Revitalizing Representative Democracy through Deliberative Elections, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Gastil, John and Levine, Peter (2005), The Deliberative Democracy Handbook. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Gastil, John and Knobloch, Katherine (2010), Evaluation Report to the Oregon State Legislature on the 2010 Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review, Seattle: University of Washington.Google Scholar

Gastil, John, Knobloch, Katherine, and Reitman, Tyrone (2015), “Connecting Micro-Deliberation to Electoral Decision-Making Institutionalizing the Oregon Citizens’ Initiative,” in Coleman, Stephen, Przybylska, Anna, and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Deliberation: Values, Processes, Institutions, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 21–40.Google Scholar

Gastil, John and Wright, Erik Olin (eds.) (2018), Politics and Society, 46 (3): Special Issue: Legislature by Lot: Transformative Designs for Deliberative Governance.Google Scholar

Gastil, John and Wright, Erik Olin (eds.) (2019a), Legislature by Lot. An Alternative Design for Deliberative Governance, London: Verso.Google Scholar

Gataker, Thomas (2008) [1619–1627], Of the Nature and Use of Lots: A Treatise Historicall and Theologicall, Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar

Gaxie, Daniel (1978), Le cens caché, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Genro, Tarso and De Souza, Ubiratan (1997), Orçamento Participativo. A experiência de Porto Alegre, São Paulo: Editoria Fundação Perseu Abramo.Google Scholar

Gandhi, Mahatma (1968), The Selected Works of Mahatma Gandhi, ed. Narayan, Shriman, vol. V: The Voice of Truce, Ahmedabad: Navajivan Publishing House. p. 303.Google Scholar

Giannini, Guglielmo (2002) [1945], La Folla. Seimila anni di lotta contro la tirannide, Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.Google Scholar

Giannotti, Donato (1974) [1526–1533], Della Repubblica de’ Viniziani, in Furio Diaz (ed.), Opere politiche, Milan: Marzorati, vol. I, pp. 28–152.Google Scholar

Gibson, Gordon (2007), “Deliberative Democracy and the B.C. Citizens’ Assembly,” speech delivered on February 23 2007, www.ccfd.ca/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=409&Itemid=284 (site of the Citizens’ Centre for Freedom and Democracy).Google Scholar

Gide, André (1930), Souvenirs de la Cour d’assises, Paris: Éditions de la Nouvelle Revue française.Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, Gerd, Swijtink, Zeno, Porter, Theodore, Daston, Lorraine, Beatty, John and Kruger, Lorenz (1989), The Empire of Chance: How Probability Changed Science and Everyday Life¸ Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gilbert, Felix (1968), “The Venetian Constitution in Florentine Political Thought,” in Rubinstein, N. (ed.), Florentine Studies. Politics and Society in Renaissance Florence. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, pp. 463–500.Google Scholar

Gillier, Dominique (2021), Rapport et recommandations du groupe de retour d’expérience de la Convention citoyenne pour le climat, Paris: CESE, MarchGoogle Scholar

Ginzburg, Carlo (1990), Ecstasies, Deciphering the Witches’ Sabbath, London: Hutchinson Radius.Google Scholar

Ginzburg, Carlo (2006), “Spie. Radici di un paradigmo indizario,” in Il filo e le trace. Vero, falso, finto. Milan: Feltrinelli, pp. 281–293.Google Scholar

Gissinger-Bosse, Celia (2017), Être juré populaire en cour d’assises. Faire une expérience démocratique, Paris: Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme.Google Scholar

Glotz, Gustave (2005), The Greek City and Its Institutions, London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von (2008), Elective Affinities: A Novel, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Goodin, Robert E. and Dryzeck, John (2006), “Deliberative Impacts. The Macro-Political Uptake of Minipublics,” Politics and Society, 34 (2), pp. 219–244.Google Scholar

Goodrich, Carrington L. and Fang, Chaoying (1976), Dictionary of Ming Biography 1368–1644, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Barbara (2012), Justice by Lottery, New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar

Goppold, Uwe (2007), Politische Kommunikation in den Städten der Vormoderne. Zürich und Münster im Vergleich, Cologne/Weimar/Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar

Gorz, André (1968), “Reform and Revolution,” The Socialist Register, 5, pp. 111–143, https://socialistregister.com/index.php/srv/article/view/5272/2173Google Scholar

Gracia, Eugenio Benedicto (2006), “Documentos acerca del funcionamiento del sistema de insaculación en la aljama judía de Huesca (siglo XV),” Sefarad, 66 (2), pp. 309–344.Google Scholar

Green, Thomas A. (1987), “The English Criminal Trial Jury on the Eve of the French Revolution,” in Padoa Schioppa, Antonio (ed.), The Trial Jury in England, France, Germany, 1700–1900, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 41–74.Google Scholar

Gret, Marion and Sintomer, Yves (2004), The Porto Alegre Experiment: Learning Lessons for a Better Democracy, New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar

Grottanelli, Cristiano (1993), “Bambini e divinazione,” in Niccoli, Ottavia (ed.), Infanzie: funzioni di un gruppo liminale dal mondo classico all'eta moderna. Florence: Ponte alle Grazie, pp. 23–72.Google Scholar

Grottanelli, Cristiano (2001), “La cléromancie ancienne et le dieu Hermès,” in Cordano, Federica and Grottanelli, Cristiano (eds.), Sorteggio Pubblico e Cleromanzia dall’Antichità all’Età Moderna, Milan: Edizioni Et, pp. 155–196.Google Scholar

Gossez, Rémi (1967), Les ouvriers de Paris. Livre premier. L’organisation, 1848–1851, La Roche-sur-Yon: Imprimerie centrale de l’Ouest.Google Scholar

Gu, Yanwu (1834), Rizhi lu jishi日知錄集釋 [1670], edited by Huang Rucheng, reproduction in Sibu beiyao.Google Scholar

Gualtieri, Piero (2009), Il Comune di Firenze tra Due e Trecento, Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar

Gueniffey, Patrice (1993), Le nombre et la raison. La Révolution française et les élections, Paris: EHESS.Google Scholar

Guerra, François-Xavier (2009), Modernidad e independencias: Ensayos sobre las revoluciones hispánicas, Madrid: Encuentro.Google Scholar

Guha, Ranajit (ed.) (1982–1985), Subaltern Studies. Writing on South Asian History and Society, Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Guicciardini, Francesco (1932), Dialogo e discorsi del reggimento di Firenze. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar

Guicciardini, Francesco (1984), Antimachiavelli, Rome: Editori Riuniti.Google Scholar

Guicciardini, Francesco (1994), Dialogue on the Government of Florence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Guicciardini, Francesco (1997), “How the Popular Government Should Be Reformed,” in Kraye, J. (ed.), Cambridge Translations of Renaissance Philosophical Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 201–37.Google Scholar

Guidi, Guidubaldo (1981), Il governo della città-repubblica di Firenze del primo quattrocento, 2 vol., Florence: Leo S. Olschki.Google Scholar

Guidorizzi, Luiz (2001), Um Curso de Cálculo, Rio de Janeiro: Gen-LTC (Livros Tecnicos E Cientificos Editora).Google Scholar

Guizot, François (1821), Histoire des origines du gouvernement représentatif en Europe, Paris: Didier.Google Scholar

Guston, David H. (1999), “Evaluating the First U.S. Consensus Conference: The Impact of Citizens’ Panel on Telecommunications and the Future of Democracy,” Science, Technology, & Human Values, 24 (4), pp. 451–482.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen (1975), Legitimation Crisis, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen (1989), The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen (1995), “Reconciliation Through the Public use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls’s Political Liberalism,” The Journal of Philosophy, 92, 3, March, pp. 109–131.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen (1996), Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Hacking, Ian (1990), The Taming of Chance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hammersley, Rachel (2005), “The Commonwealth of Oceana de James Harrington: un modèle pour la France révolutionnaire?,” Annales historiques de la Révolution française, 342, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar

Hammond, Marit and Smith, Graham (2017): Sustainable Prosperity and Democracy: A Research Agenda, CUSP Working Paper No 8, Guildford: University of Surrey.Google Scholar

Hankins, James (ed.) (2000), Renaissance Civic Humanism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hansen, Mogens H. (1991), Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Hardt, Michael and Negri, Antonio (2001), Empire, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Harivel, Maud (2019), Les élections politiques dans la République de Venise (XVIe–XVIIIe siècle). Entre justice distributive et corruption, Paris: Les Indes savantes, 2019.Google Scholar

Harrington, James (1977), The Political Works of James Harrington (edited by Pocock, J. G. A.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Harrington, James (1992), The Commonwealth of Oceana and A System of Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hartog, François (2015), Presentism and Experiences of Time, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Hattler, Claus (2008), “…‘und es regiert der Würfelbecher’ – Glückspiel in der Antike,” in Karlsruhe, Badisches Landesmuseum, Volles Risiko! Glückspiel von der Antike bis heute. Karlsruhe: Badisches Landesmuseum Catalogue, pp. 221–241.Google Scholar

Hayat, Samuel (2014), 1848. Quand la République était révolutionnaire. Citoyenneté et représentation, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Hayat, Samuel (2018a), “Incarner le peuple souverain: les usages de la représentation-incarnation sous la Seconde République,” Raisons politiques, 72 (November), pp. 137–164.Google Scholar

Hayat, Samuel (2018b), “Les Gilets jaunes et la question démocratique,” Contretemps, December 26, www.contretemps.eu.Google Scholar

Hayat, Samuel, Péneau, Corinne, and Sintomer, Yves (eds.) (2018), Raisons politiques, thematic issue: La représentation incarnation, 72, November.Google Scholar

Hayat, Samuel (2019), “La carrière militante de la référence à Bernard Manin dans les mouvements français pour le tirage au sort,” Participations, Special issue, pp. 437–451.Google Scholar

Hayat, Samuel, Péneau, Corinne, and Sintomer, Yves (eds.) (2020), La représentation avant le gouvernement représentatif, Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar

He, Baogang (2011), “Participatory Budgeting in China. An Overview,” in Sintomer, Yves, Traub-Merz, Rudolf, and Zhang, Junhua (eds.), Participatory Budgeting in Asia and Europe. Key Challenges of Deliberative Democracy, Hong Kong: Palgrave, pp. 89–101.Google Scholar

Headlam, James W. (1891) [1931], Election by lot in Athens, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1952) [1821], Philosophy of Right, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich (1971) [1830], Philosophy of Mind, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Held, David (2006), Models of Democracy, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Hendriks, Carolyn M. (2005), “Consensus Conferences and Planning Cells,” in Gastil, John and Levine, Peter (eds.), The Deliberative Democracy Handbook, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 80–110.Google Scholar

Henneman, Inge G., Bell, Christophe, Frattarola, Mirina, Van Den Broeck, Lieve, and Van Reybrouck, David (2012), G 1000, le rapport final. L’innovation démocratique mise en pratique, Brussels: Fondation pour les générations futures.Google Scholar

Henriquet, Paul (1921), “Les loteries et les emprunts à lots,” Ph.D. diss., Paris: Law Faculty, University of Paris.Google Scholar

Herath, R. B. (2007), Real Power to the People. A Novel Approach to Electoral Reform in British Columbia, Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar

Herrmann, Irène (2006), “Genève (canton). La vie politique à Genève aux XIX^e et XX^e siècles,” in Dictionnaire historique de la Suisse. Hauterive: Gilles Attinger, pp. 460–465; 470–473.Google Scholar

Herodotus, (2008), The Histories, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hobsbawm, Eric (1987), The Age of Empire: 1875–1914, London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar

Hobsbawm, Eric (1994), The Age of Extremes. A History of the World, 1914–1991, New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Hobsbawm, Eric and Ranger, Terence (1992), The Invention of Tradition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hofmann, Hasso (2003), Repräsentation. Studien zur Wort- und Begriffsgeschichte von der Antike bis ins 19. Jahrhundert, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar

Hollard, Virginie (2010), Le rituel du vote. Les assemblées romaines du peuple, Paris: Presses du CNRS.Google Scholar

Hollard, Virginie (2020), “Elections and Sortition in Ancient Rome: Was There Such a Thing as a Roman Democracy,” in Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Sortition and Democracy, Exeter: Imprint Academics, pp. 130–150.Google Scholar

HOMER, (s.d.), Iliad, http://classics.mit.edu/Homer/iliad.htmlGoogle Scholar

HOMER, (s.d.), The Odyssey, http://classics.mit.edu/Homer/odyssey.htmlGoogle Scholar

Hurlet, Frédéric (2006), Le proconsul et le prince d’Auguste à Dioclétien, Bordeaux: Ansonius Editions.Google Scholar

Hurlet, Frédéric (2012), “Démocratie à Rome? Quelle démocratie? En relisant Millar (et Hölkeskamp),” in Benoist, S. (ed.), Rome, A City and Its Empire in Perspective. The Impact of the Roman World through Fergus Millar’s Research. Leiden/Boston: Brill, pp. 19–43.Google Scholar

Ingimundarson, Valur, Urfalino, Philippe, and Erlinsdottir, Irma (eds.) (2016), Iceland’s Financial Crisis: The Politics of Blame, Protest, and Reconstruction, London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Isaacs, Ann Katherine (2001), “Il sorteggio politico negli stati italiani fra medioevo ed età moderna,” in Cordano, Federica and Grottanelli, Cristiano (eds.), Sorteggio Pubblico e Cleromanzia dall’Antichità all’Età Moderna, Milan: Edizioni Et, pp. 139–153.Google Scholar

Ismard, Paulin (2010), La cité des réseaux. Athènes et ses associations, VIe-Ier siècle av. J.C., Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.Google Scholar

Ismard, Paulin (2015), La démocratie contre les experts. Les esclaves publics en Grèce ancienne, Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Jacquet, Vincent and Reuchamps, Min (2016), “Les ‘méthodologues’ de la démocratie délibérative. Entre activisme citoyen et recherche scientifique au sein du G1000 et du G100,” Participations, 3 (16), pp. 45–65.Google Scholar

Jacquet, Vincent, Moskovic, Jonathan, Caluwaerts, Didier, and Reuchamps, Min (2016), “The Macro Political Uptake of the G1000 in Belgium,” in Reuchamps, Min and Suiter, Jane (eds.), Constitutional Deliberative Democracy in Europe, Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 53–74.Google Scholar

Jaffrelot, Christophe (2003), India’s Silent Revolution – The Rise of the Lower Castes in North India, New York: Columbia University Press; London: Hurst; New Delhi: Permanent Black.Google Scholar

Jaume, Lucien (1997), L’individu effacé ou le paradoxe du libéralisme français, Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar

Jeanpierre, Laurent (2019), In Girum: Les leçons politiques des ronds-points, Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Jehne, Martin (2010), “Die Dominanz des Vorgangs über den Ausgang. Struktur und Verlauf der Wahlen in der römischen Republik,” in Dartmann, Christoph, Wassilowsky, Günther, and Weller, Thomas (eds.), Technik und Symbolik vormoderner Wahlverfahren, Munich: Oldenbourg, pp. 17–34.Google Scholar

Joss, Simon and Bellucci, Sergio (eds.) (2003), Participatory Technology Assessment: European Perspectives, London: Center for the Study on Democracy.Google Scholar

Joss, Simon and Durant, John (eds.) (1995), Public Participation in Science. The Role of Consensus Conference in Europe, London: Science Museum.Google Scholar

Judde De Larivière, Claire (2014), La révolte des boules de neige. Murano contre Venise, 1511, Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar

Judde De Larivière, Claire (2020), “Ducal Elections, Institutional Usages, and Popular Practices. Drawing Lots in the Republic of Venice,” in Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Sortition and Democracy, Exeter: Imprint Academics, pp. 219–234.Google Scholar

Kahane, David (2016), Thinking Systemically about Deliberative Democracy and Climate Change, London: Foundation for Democracy and Sustainable Development.Google Scholar

Keller, Hagen (1988), “‘Kommune’: Städtische Selbstregierung und mittelalterliche ‘Volksherrschaft’ im Spiegel italienischer Wahlverfahren des 12.-14. Jahrhunderts,” in Althoff, Gerd, Geuenich, Dieter, Oexle, Otto Gerhard, and Wollasch, Joachim (eds.), Person und Gemeinschaft im Mittelalter. Karl Schmid zum 65. Geburtstag. Sigmaringen: Jan Thorbecke, pp. 573–616.Google Scholar

Keller, Hagen (2014), “Electoral Systems and Conceptions of Community in Italian Communes (12th–14th Centuries),” Revue française de science politique, 64 (6), English version.Google Scholar

Klein, Gérard (1968), Le sceptre du hasard, Paris: Fleuve Noir.Google Scholar

Knobloch, Katherine, Gastil, John, and Reedy, Justin (2013a), “Did They Deliberate? Applying an Evaluative Model of Democratic Deliberation to the Oregon Citizens’ Initiative Review,” Journal of Applied Communication Research, 41 (2), pp. 105–125.Google Scholar

Knobloch, Katherine, Gastil, John, Richards, Robert, and Feller, Traci (2013b), Evaluation Report on the 2012 Citizens’ Initiative Reviews for the Oregon CIR Commission, State College: Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar

Köger, Annette (2008), “Spielkarten und Glückspiel,” in Landesmuseum Karlsruhe, Badisches, Volles Risiko! Glückspiel von der Antike bis heute. Karlsruhe: Badisches Landesmuseum Catalogue, pp. 268–270.Google Scholar

Konrad, George (1984), Antipolitics, San Diego, CA: Harcourt.Google Scholar

Koselleck, Reinhart (2004), Futures Past. On the Semantics of Historical Times, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Kuper, Richard (1997), “Deliberating Waste: the Hertfordshire Citizens’ Jury,” Local Environment, 2 (2), pp. 139–153.Google Scholar

Landemore, Hélène (2012), Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Landemore, Hélène (2015), “Inclusive Constitution-Making: The Icelandic Experiment,” The Journal of Political Philosophy, 23 (2), pp. 166–191.Google Scholar

Landemore, Helene (2020), Open Democracy: Reinventing Popular Rule for the Twenty-first Century, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Langbein, John H. (1987), “The English Criminal Trial Jury on the Eve of the French Revolution,” in Padoa Schioppa, Antonio (ed.), The Trial Jury in England, France, Germany, 1700–1900, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 14–40.Google Scholar

Lafont, Cristina (2020), Democracy without Shortcuts, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Landa, Dimitri and Pevnick, Ryan (2021), “Is Random Selection a Cure for the Ills of Electoral Representation?”, Journal of Political Philosophy, 29 (1) pp. 46–72.Google Scholar

Lane, Frederic C. (1973), Venice: A Maritime Republic, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Lang, Amy (2007), “But Is it for Real? The British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly as a Model of State-Sponsored Citizen Empowerment,” Politics & Society, 35 (1), pp. 35–70.Google Scholar

Lang, Andrew (2005), Magic and Religion, New York: Cosimo Inc (London, 1901).Google Scholar

Lanthenas, François-Xavier (2013) [1792], “Des élections et du mode d’élire par listes épuratoires,” January 1792, in Kersaint, Guy (ed.), De la Constitution et du gouvernement qui pourroient convenir à la République françoise, Paris: Hachette/BNF.Google Scholar

Le Bras, Hervé (2000), Naissance de la mortalité. L’origine politique de la statistique et de la démographie, Paris: Gallimard/Le Seuil.Google Scholar

Lee, Ken and Greenstone, Michael (2021), Air Quality Life Index, Annual Update, Chicago: Energy Policy Institute at the University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Leroux, Pierre (1848), Projet d’une constitution démocratique et sociale, Paris: Gustave André.Google Scholar

Leti, Gregorio (1697), Critique historique, politique, morale, économique et comique, sur les lotteries anciennes et modernes, spirituelles et temporelles des états et des églises, Amsterdam: Chez les amis de l’auteur.Google Scholar

Leveque, Pierre and Vidal-Naquet, Pierre (1983), Clisthène l’athénien, Paris: Macula.Google Scholar

Lévi-strauss-strauss, Claude (1952), “Le père Noël supplicié,” Les Temps modernes, March, pp. 1572–1590 (reprint: Sables, Pin-Balma, 1996).Google Scholar

Levy, David (1989), “The Statistical Basis of Athenian-American Constitutional Democracy,” The Journal of Legal Studies, 18 (1), January, pp. 79–103.Google Scholar

Levy, Leonard W. (1999), The Palladium of Justice. Origins of the Trial by Jury, Chicago: Ivan R. Dee.Google Scholar

Lignereux, Yann (2020), “The Drawing of Lots versus the State: Fate, Divine Inspiration, and the Vocation of Town Magistrates in 17th-Century France,” in Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Sortition and Democracy, Exeter: Imprint Academics, pp. 235–252.Google Scholar

Lilti, Antoine (2015), The World of the Salons: Sociability and Worldliness, New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lintott, Andrew (1999) The Constitution of the Roman Republic, Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane (2020), “Drawing Lots in Ancient Greece. Vocabulary and Tools,” in Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Sortition and Democracy, Exeter: Imprint Academics, pp. 53–94.Google Scholar

Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane and Sintomer, Yves (eds.) (2020), Sortition and Democracy. Practices, Tools, Theories, Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar

Loraux, Nicole (1997), La Cité divisée, Paris: Payot.Google Scholar

Loriol, Romain (2020), “Sortition and Divination in Ancient Rome. Were the Gods Involved in Casting Lots?” in Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Sortition and Democracy, Exeter: Imprint Academics, pp. 182–195.Google Scholar

Lousteau, Guillermo H., Covarrubias, Ignacio, Reyes, Xavier, and Salazar, Pedro (2012), El nuevo constitucionalismo latino-americano, The Democracy Papers, 5, InterAmerican Institute for Democracy, August.Google Scholar

Löwy, Michael (1988), Rédemption et utopie: le judaïsme libertaire en Europe centrale: une étude d’affinité élective, Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Lucardie, Paul (2019), “Sortitionist Experiments in the Netherlands: From noncommittal Advice to Modest Decision-Making Power,” paper presented at the conference “Le tirage au sort en politique: état des lieux et perspectives contemporaines,” Lyon, November 10, 2019.Google Scholar

Lukin, Pavel (2017), “Consensus et représentation en Russie, XIIe–XVIe siècles: une introduction,” in Genet, Jean-Philippe, Le Page, Dominique, and Mattéoni, Olivier (eds.), Consensus et représentation, Paris/Rome: Publications de la Sorbonne/Ecole française de Rome.Google Scholar

Luhmann, Niklas (2013), Legitimation durch Verfahren, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp (8th ed.).Google Scholar

Machiavelli, Niccolò (1988), Florentine Histories, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Machiavelli, Niccolò (1989), The Chief Works and Others, trans. Allan, Gilbert, Durham and London: Duke University Press, vol. II.Google Scholar

Macpherson, C. B. (1977), Life and Times of Liberal Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Madison, James (1982), “To the People of the State of New York,” in Hamilton, A., Madison, J., and Jay, M., The Federalist Papers (1787–1788). New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar

Maffi, Alberto (2001), “Nomina per sorteggio degli ambasciatori nel mondo romano,” in Cordano, Federica and Grottanelli, Cristiano (ed.), Sorteggio Pubblico e Cleromanzia dall’Antichità all’Età Moderna, Milan: Edizioni Et, pp. 137–138.Google Scholar

Maire-Vigueur, Jean-Claude, and Faini, Enrico (2010), Il sistema politico dei comuni italiani (secoli XII–XIV), Milan: Mondadori.Google Scholar

Maissen, Thomas (2006), Die Geburt der Republic. Staatsverständnis und Repräsentation in der frühneuzeitlichen Eidgenossenschaft, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar

Malecz, Ek, Werner (1990), “Abstimmungsarten,” in Schneider, Reinhard and Zimmermann, Harald (eds.), Wahlen und Wählen im Mittelalter, Sigmaringen: Jan Thorbecke, p. 130.Google Scholar

Malkin, Irad (forthcoming), Drawing Lots with Ancient Greeks: The Values of a Horizontal Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mailipiero, Domenico (1843), “Annali Veneti,” Archivio Storico Italiano, VII.Google Scholar

Mallarmé, Stéphane (1897), “Un coup de dés jamais n’abolira le hasard,” Cosmopolis, 6 (17).Google Scholar

Manin, Bernard (1987), “On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation,” Political Theory, 15 (3), pp. 338–368.Google Scholar

Manin, Bernard (1997), Principles of Representative Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Manin, Bernard (2005), “Democratic Deliberation: Why We Should Promote Debate Rather Than Discussion,” paper delivered at the Program in Ethics and Public Affairs Seminar, Princeton University, October 13: https://as.nyu.edu/content/dam/nyu-as/faculty/documents/delib.pdf.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane (1999), “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes’,” Journal of Politics, 61 (3), pp. 628–657.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane (2019), “Accountability and the Constituent-Representative Relationship,” in Gastil, John and Wright, Erik Olin (eds.), Legislature by Lot, London: Verso, pp. 189–204.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane and Parkinson, John (eds.) (2012), Deliberative Systems, Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane et al. (2010) “Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy,” The Journal of Political Philosophy, 18 (1), pp. 64–100.Google Scholar

Mao, Zedong (1957), “On the Correct Handling of Contradictions among the People,” February 27: www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-5/mswv5_58.htm.Google Scholar

Mao, Zedong (1944), “Serve the People,” September 8: www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/selected-works/volume-3/mswv3_19.htm.Google Scholar

Marchione Di Coppo, Stefani (1903–1905), Cronaca Fiorentina, Rodolico, Niccolò (ed.), Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar

Martucci, Roberto (1997), “La robe en question: Adrien du Port et le jury criminel (29–30 mars 1790),” La Revue Tocqueville, XVIII, 2, pp. 25–47.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl (1907), The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte, Chicago: Charles H. Kerr.Google Scholar

Marx, Karl (1975), “Critique of Hegel’s Doctrine of the State,” Early Writings, Harmondsworth: PenguinGoogle Scholar

Meier, Christian (1956), “Praerogativa Centuria,” in Paulys Real-Enzyklopädie der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft. Munich: Supplement volume VIII, pp. 569–598.Google Scholar

Melliet, Laurent (1628), Discours politiques et militaires sur Corneille Tacite, Lyon: Antoine Chard.Google Scholar

Mellado RodrÍguez, Joaquín (1990), “Los textos del fuero de Córdoba y la regulación de los oficios municipales,” Boletín de la Real Academia de Córdoba de Ciencias, Bellas Letras y Nobles Artes, 61 (118), pp. 9–74.Google Scholar

Mellado RodrÍguez, Joaquín (2000), “El fuero de Córdoba: edición citica y traducción,” Albor, CLXVI (654), June, pp. 191–231.Google Scholar

Mellina, Maxime (2019), “Tirage au sort et associations étudiantes: une expérience démocratique à l’université de Lausanne,” Participations, thematic issue “Le tirage au sort au XXIe siècle,” 1,(23), pp. 147–170.Google Scholar

Mellina, Maxime (2021), “Le Sort ou la Raison. Persistance et disparition du tirage au sort en Suisse (1798–1831),” 2 volumes, PhD thesis, Lausanne: Lausanne University.Google Scholar

Mellina, Maxime, Dupuis, Aurèle, and Chollet, Antoine (2020), Tirage au sort et politique. Une histoire suisse, Lausanne: Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes.Google Scholar

Mercader I Riba, Juan (1957), “El fin de la insaculación fernandina en los municipios y gremios catalanes,” Actas del V Congreso de Historia de la Corona de Aragón, Saragoza: Institución Fernando el Católico, pp. 343–353.Google Scholar

Michels, Robert (1962), Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Michon, Pierre (1998), Le roi du bois, Paris: Verdier.Google Scholar

Milano, Lucio (2020), “Fate, Sortition, and Divine Will in Ancient Near Eastern Societies,” in Lopez-Rabatel, Liliane and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Sortition and Democracy, Exeter: Imprint Academics, pp. 29–52.Google Scholar

Miller, Jeff (2022), Democracy in Crisis. Lessons from Ancient Athens, Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar

Milner, Henry (2005), “Electoral Reform and Deliberative Democracy in British Columbia,” National Civic Review, 94 (1), pp. 3–8.Google Scholar

Mirabeau, Comte de (1835), “Discours devant les états de Provence,” January 30, 1789, in Œuvres VII, Paris: Lecointe et Pougain/Didier.Google Scholar

Mommsen, Theodor (1952), Römisches Staatsrecht [1887–1888], Volume I, 41, Basel: Benne Schwab & Co.Google Scholar

Monneron, Frédéric (1800), Essai sur les nouveaux principes politiques, Lausanne: Chez Henri Vincent.Google Scholar

Monnier, Victor and Kölz, Alfred (2002), Bonaparte et la Suisse: travaux préparatoires de l’Acte de Médiation (1803): Procès-verbal des assemblées générales des députés helvétiques et des opérations de la Commission nommée par le Premier Consul pour conférer avec eux, Geneva: Helbing & Lichtenhahn.Google Scholar

Montesquieu, (1721), Persian Letters, https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Persian_LettersGoogle Scholar

Montesquieu, (1949) [1748], The Spirit of the Laws, New York: Hafner.Google Scholar

Moreno Pestaña, José Luis (2019), Retorno a Atenas. La democracia como principio antioligárquico, Madrid: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar

Moser, Friedrich Carl von (1774), “Gebrauch des Looses in Staats-Sachen,” Juristisches Wochenblatt, 3, August, pp. 615–652.Google Scholar

Moulin, Leo (1998), “Les origines religieuses des techniques électorales et délibératives modernes,” Politix, Vol. 11 (43), pp. 117–162.Google Scholar

Mowbray, Miranda and Gollmann, Dieter (2007), “Electing the Doge of Venice: Analysis of a 13th-Century Protocol,” IEEE Computer Security Foundations Symposium, July 6–8, Venice, Italy.Google Scholar

Mueller, Denis C., Tollison, Robert D., and Willet, Thomas (1972), “Representative Democracy via Random Selection,” Public Choice, 12, pp. 57–68.Google Scholar

Muir, Edward (1981), Civic Ritual in Renaissance Venice, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Müller, Jan-Werner (2017), What Is Populism?, New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Nagy, Agnès A., Prescendi, Francesca (eds.) (2013), Sacrifices humains: discours et réalités, Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar

Najemy, John N. (1982), Corporatism and Consensus in Florentine Electoral Politics, 1280–1400, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Näther, Ulrike (2008), “‘Das Große Los’ – Lotterie und Zahlenlotto,” in Badisches Landesmuseum Catalogue, Volles Risiko! Glückspiel von der Antike bis heute, Karlsruhe: Badisches Landesmuseum Catalogue, pp. 277–283.Google Scholar

Nicolet, Claude and Azedine, Beschaouch (1991), “Nouvelles observations sur la ‘Mosaïque des chevaux’ et son édifice à Carthage,” in Comptes rendus des séances de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres. 135rd year (3), pp. 471–507.Google Scholar

Niessen, Christoph and Reuchamps, Min (2019), Designing a Permanent Deliberative Dialogue: The Ostbelgien Modell in Belgium, Canberra: University of Canberra, Centre for Deliberative Democracy and Global, Working Paper Series, 2019/6.Google Scholar

Nilsson, Martin Persson (1923), “Saturnalia,” in Wissowa, Georg, Pauly, August, Kroll, GeWilhelm, Witte, Kurt, Mittelhaus, Karl, and Ziegler, Konrat (eds.), Paulys Real-Enzyklopädie der klassischen Altertumswissenschaft. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, 1923.Google Scholar

Norwich, John Julius. (1982), A History of Venice, Penguin: Allen Lane.Google Scholar

Ober, Josiah (2008), Democracy and Knowledge: Learning and Innovation in Classical Athens, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Ober, Josiah (2015), The Rise and Fall of Classical Greece, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Ober, Josiah (2021), “Classical Athens As an Epistemic Democracy,” in Piovan, Dino and Giorgini, Giovanni (eds.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Athenian Democracy. From the Late Middle Ages to the Contemporary Era, Leiden/Boston: Brill, pp. 453–489.Google Scholar

Ochs, Peter (1797), Geschichte der Stadt und Landschaft Basel, vol. 7, Basel: Schweizhauserschen Buchhandlung.Google Scholar

Ochs, Peter (1937), “Note sur l’intervention du sort” [1802], in Steiner, Gustav (ed.), Korrespondenz des Peter Ochs (1752–1821), vol. 3, Ausgang der Helvetik, Mediation und Restauration. 1800–1821, Basel: von Emil Birkhäuser & Cie, pp. 73–75.Google Scholar

Odonkhuu, Munkhsaikhan (2017), “Mongolia’s (Flawed) Experiment with Deliberative Polling in Constitutional Reform,” 29 June 2017: www.constitutionnet.org/news/mongolias-flawed-experiment-deliberative-polling-constitutional-reform.Google Scholar

OECD (2020), Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions. Catching the Deliberative Wave, Paris: OECD Publishing: https://doi.org/10.1787/339306da-en.Google Scholar

Offe, Claus (1987), “Challenging the Boundaries of Institutional Politics: Social Movements since the 1960s,” in Maier, Charles S. (ed.), Changing Boundaries of the Political (Essays on the Evolving Balance Between the State and Society, Public and Private in Europe). New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 63–105.Google Scholar

Offerlé, Michel (2002), Un homme, une voix ? Histoire du suffrage universel, Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Oppenheim, A. L. (1977) Ancient Mesopotamia. Portrait of a Dead Civilization, Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Osterhammel, Jürgen (2013), Die Verwandlung der Welt, Eine Geschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts, Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar

Ostrogorski, Mosei (1902), Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties, 2 vols., New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Owen, David and Smith, Graham (2019), “Sortition, Rotation, and Mandate: Conditions for Political Equality and Deliberative Reasoning,” in Gastil, John and Wright, Erik Olin (eds.), Legislature by Lot, London: Verso, pp. 3–38.Google Scholar

Palmer, C. J. (1856), The History of Great Yarmouth, Yarmouth/London: L.A. Mead & Russel-Smith.Google Scholar

Papadopoulos, Yannis (1998), Démocratie directe, Paris: Economica.Google Scholar

Pardieu, Esuirou de (1865), Trattato delle imposte considerate sotto l’aspetto storico, economico e politico in Francia ed all’estero, Turin: Stamperia dell’unione tipografico-editrice.Google Scholar

Parmentier, Léon (1987), “Le roi des Saturnales,” Revue de Philologie, 21, pp. 143–153.Google Scholar

Pasquino, Pasquale (2010), “Democracy Ancient and Modern: Divided Power,” in Hansen, Mogens H.. (ed.) Démocratie athénienne – démocratie moderne: tradition et influences. Geneva: Fondation Hardt, pp. 1–49.Google Scholar

Pateman, Carole (1970), Participation and Democratic Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pech, Thierry (2021), Le Parlement des citoyens. La convention citoyenne pour le climat, Paris: Seuil/La République des idées.Google Scholar

Pestre, Dominique (2003), Science, Argent et Politique, Paris: INRA éditions.Google Scholar

Phillips, Anne (1995), The Politics of Presence, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Pickering, Frederick P. (1980), “Notes on Fate and Fortune,” in Essays on Medieval German Literature and Iconography, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 95–109.Google Scholar

Piketty, Thomas (2014), Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Pilet, Jean-Benoit, Bedock, Camille, and Vandamme, Pierre-Etienne (eds.) (2021), “Improving, Bypassing or Overcoming Representation?”, Frontiers in Political Science, December.Google Scholar

Pillinger, Renate (1988), Das Martyrium des Heiligen Dasius, Vienna: Österreichchische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar

Piovan, Dino and Giorgini, Giovanni (eds.) (2020), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Athenian Democracy. From the Late Middle Ages to the Contemporary Era, Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar

Pirenne, Henri (1939), Les villes et les institutions urbaines, Paris: Félix Alcan.Google Scholar

Pitkin, Hannah (1972), The Concept of Representation, Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

PLATO (s.d.1), Laws, http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/laws.htmlGoogle Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. (1975), The Machiavellian Moment. Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Podlech, Adalbert (2004), “Repräsentation,” in Koselleck, R., Conze, W., and Bruner, O. (eds.), Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland (vol. 5). Stuttgart: Ernst Klett, pp. 509–547.Google Scholar

Poertner, Mathias (in press), “Does Political Representation Increase Participation? Evidence from Party Candidate Lotteries in Mexico,” American Political Science Review.Google Scholar

Polo MartÍn, Regina (1999), “Los Reyes Católicos y la insaculación en Castilla,” Studia historica. Historia medieval, 17, pp. 137–197.Google Scholar

Polybius, (1922), Histories, Book VI: “The Roman Military System,” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Pomeranz, Kenneth (2001), The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Prescendi, Francesca (2013), “Du sacrifice du roi des Saturnales à l’exécution de Jésus,” in Nagy, Agnès A. and Prescendi, Francesca (eds.), Sacrifices humains: discours et réalités, Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 231–247.Google Scholar

Pudal, Bernard (1989), Prendre parti. Pour une sociologie historique du PCF, Paris: Presses de la FNSP.Google Scholar

Raines, Dorit (1991), “Office Seeking, broglio, and the Pocket Political Guidebooks in cinquecento and seicento Venice,” Studi veneziani, XXII, pp. 137–194.Google Scholar

Ramaswamy, Vijaya (2017), Historical Dictionary of the Tamils, New Delhi: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Rambert, Eugène (1889), Études historiques et nationales, Lausanne: Librairie F. Rouge.Google Scholar

Ramble, Charles (2008), The Navel of the Demoness: Tibetan Buddhism and Civil Religion in Highland Nepal, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rana, Aziz (2014), The Two Faces of American Freedom, Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rancière, Jacques (2009), Hatred of Democracy, London: Verso.Google Scholar

Rawls, John (1995), “Political Liberalism: Reply to Habermas,” The Journal of Philosophy, 92 (3), March, pp. 132–180.Google Scholar

Read, Rupert (2012), Guardians of the Future. A Constitutional Case for Representing and Protecting Future People, Weymouth: Green House.Google Scholar

Reglá, Juan (1972), Temas medievales, Valencia: Anúbar.Google Scholar

Robespierre, Maximilien de (1791), Principes de l’organisation des jurés et réfutation du système proposé par M. Duport au nom des comités de judicature et de constitution, Paris, January 20.Google Scholar

Röcke, Anja (2005), Losverfahren und Demokratie. Historische und demokratietheoretische Perspektiven, Munster: LIT.Google Scholar

Röcke, Anja and Sintomer, Yves (2005), “Les jurys de citoyens berlinois et le tirage au sort,” in Bacqué, Marie-Hélène, Rey, Henry, and Sintomer, Yves (eds.), Gestion de proximité et démocratie participative, Paris: La Découverte, pp. 139–160.Google Scholar

Rocquain, Félix (1880), “Les sorts des saints ou des apôtres,” Bibliothèque de l’école des chartes, 41, pp. 457–474.Google Scholar

Rosanvallon, Pierre (1992), Le Sacre du citoyen. Histoire du suffrage universel en France, Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Rosanvallon, Pierre (1998), Le peuple introuvable. Histoire de la représentation démocratique en France, Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Rosanvallon, Pierre (2000), La Démocratie inachevée. Histoire de la souveraineté du peuple en France, Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Rosanvallon, Pierre (2008), Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rosanvallon, Pierre (2011), Democratic Legitimacy: Impartiality, Reflexivity, Proximity, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Rosenstein, Nathan (1995), “Sorting Out the Lot in Republican Rome,” The American Journal of Philology, 116 (1), pp. 43–75.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent and Wong, R. Bin (2011), Before and Beyond Divergence, Cambridge, MA/London, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1978) [1762], On the Social Contract, New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar

Rubinstein, Nicolai (ed.) (1968), Florentine Studies. Politics and Society in Renaissance Florence, London: Faber.Google Scholar

Rubinstein, Nicolai (1986), “Florentina libertas,” Rinascimento, Florence: Leo S. Olschki, second series, vol. XXVI.Google Scholar

Rubinstein, Nicolai (1997), The Government of Florence Under the Medici (1434 to 1494), Oxford/New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rubinstein, Nicolai (2015), “The Early Years of Florence’s Grand Council (1494–1499),” Revue française de science politique, 64 (6), pp. 1157–1186.Google Scholar

Réckleben, Gisela (1969) “Rat und Bürgerschaft in Hamburg 1595–1686. Innere Bindungen und Gegensätze,” PhD thesis, Marburg University.Google Scholar

Ruffini, Edoardo (1977), “I Sistemi di deliberazione collettiva nel medioevo italiano,” in La ragione dei più. Ricerche sulla storia del principio magoritario, Bologna: Il Mulino, pp. 220–316.Google Scholar

Ruzé, Françoise (1997), Délibération et pouvoir dans la cité grecque de Nestor à Socrate, Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.Google Scholar

Saint, Augustine, (1909) [397–400], The Confessions of Saint Augustine, Edinburgh: PF Collier & Sons.Google Scholar

Sallust, (1921), Sallust,Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Sanchez, Jordi (ed.) (2000), Participació ciutadana i govern local: els Consells Ciutadans, Barcelona: Mediterrània.Google Scholar

Santos, Boaventura de Sousa (ed.) (2005), Democratizing Democracy. Beyond the Liberal Democratic Canon, London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar

Schädler, Ulrich (2008), “Von der Kunst des Würfelns,” in Volles Risiko! Glückspiel von der Antike bis heute. Karlsruhe: Badisches Landesmuseum Catalogue, pp. 221–241.Google Scholar

Schemiel, Yves (1999), La politique dans l’ancien Orient, Paris: Presses de Science Po.Google Scholar

Schioppa, Antonio Padoa (1987), The Trial Jury in England, France, Germany, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar

Schläppi, Daniel (2007), “Das Staatswesen als kollektives Gut: Gemeinbesitz als Grundlage der politischen Kultur in der frühneuzeitlichen Eidgenossenschaft,” Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, Special Issue, p. 169–202.Google Scholar

Schmitter, Philippe C. and Trechsel, Alexander H. (2004), The Future of Democracy in Europe, A Green Paper for the Council of Europe. Brussells: Council of Europe.Google Scholar

Schnapper, Bernard (1987), “Le jury français aux XIXe et XXe siècles,” in Padoa Schioppa, Antonio (ed.), The Trial Jury in England, France, Germany, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 165–240.Google Scholar

Schneider, Reinhard and Zimmermann, Harald (eds.) (1990), Wahlen und Wählen im Mittelalter, Sigmaringen: Jan Thorbecke.Google Scholar

Schumacher, Maria Dagmar (2008), “Würfelglück im Mittelalter,” in Landesmuseum Catalogue, Badisches, Volles Risiko! Glückspiel von der Antike bis heute, Karlsruhe: Badisches Landesmuseum Catalogue, pp. 255–267.Google Scholar

Sclove, Richard (1995), Democracy and Technology, New York and London: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Scott, James C. (2009), The Art of Not Being Governed. An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia, New Haven CT/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Serafin Castro, Alexei Daniel (2019), “Représentation politique et usage du tirage au sort au Mexique (1808–1857),” Participations, special issue: Tirage au sort et démocratie: Histoire, instruments, théorie, pp. 283–299.Google Scholar

Sesma, José Ángel (1978), La Diputación del reino de Aragón en la época de Fernando II (1479–1516), Zaragoza: Imprenta librería general.Google Scholar

Shah, Alpa (2010), In the Shadows of the State. Indigenous politics, Environmentalism, and Insurgency in Jharkhand, India, Durham/London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Shah, Alpa (2020), “What if We Selected our Leaders by Lottery? Democracy by Sortition, Liberal Elections and Communist Revolutionaries,” Development Change Distinguished Lecture 2020, The Hague: Institute of Social Studies.Google Scholar

Shen, Defu (1997), Wanli yehuo bian 萬歷野獲編 [1606], Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar

Shī, NÀi’ān (2010), The Water Margin: Outlaws of the Marsh, North Clarendon: Tuttle Publishing.Google Scholar

Sieyes, Emmanuel-Joseph (1985), Ecrits politiques, Paris: Édition des archives contemporaines.Google Scholar

Sintomer, Yves (1999), La démocratie impossible? Politique et modernité chez Weber et Habermas, Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Sintomer, Yves (2002), “Empujar los limites de la democracia participativa?” in Verle, João and Brunet, Luciano (eds.), Costruindo um Novo Mundo. Avaliação da experiência do Orçamento Participativo em Porto Alegre, Brasil. Porto Alegre: Guayi, pp. 57–67.Google Scholar

Sintomer, Yves (2007), Le pouvoir au peuple. Jurys citoyens, tirage au sort et démocratie participative, Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar

Sintomer, Yves (2008), “Du savoir d’usage au métier de citoyen?” Raisons politiques, 31, pp. 115–134.Google Scholar

Sintomer, Yves (2010), “Random Selection, Republican Self-Government, and Deliberative Democracy,” Constellations, 17 (3), pp. 472–487.Google Scholar

Sintomer, Yves (2011), “Délibération et participation: affinité élective ou concepts en tension?” Participations, 1, pp. 239–276.Google Scholar

Sintomer, Yves (2014a), “Prendre les décisions autrement. Réflexions à partir des conférences de citoyens,” in Rosanvallon, Pierre (ed.), Science et démocratie. Paris: Odile Jacob, pp. 239–263.Google Scholar

Sintomer, Yves (2014b), “The Meanings of Political Representation: Uses and Misuses of a Notion,” Raisons politiques, English edition, pp. 13–34.Google Scholar

Sintomer, Yves (2018), “A Child Drawing Lots: The ‘Pathos Formula’ of Political Sortition?” in Chollet, Antoine and Fontaine, Alexandre (eds.), Expériences du tirage au sort en Suisse et en Europe, Bern: Publications en série de la bibliothèque Am Guisanplatz, 74, pp. 223–256.Google Scholar

Sintomer, Yves (2021), “Sortition and Politics: From Radical to Deliberative Democracy ̶ and Back?” in Piovan, Dino and Giorgini, Giovanni (eds.), Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Athenian Democracy, Leiden: Brill, pp. 490–521.Google Scholar

Sintomer, Yves (2022), “Un Parlement des citoyens pour la démocratie du 21e siècle,” January 10, https://tnova.fr/democratie/nouvelles-pratiques-democratiques/un-parlement-des-citoyens-pour-la-democratie-du-21e-siecle/.Google Scholar

Sintomer, Yves, Herzberg, Carsten, and Röcke, Anja (2016), Participatory Budgeting in Europe: Democracy and Public Governance, London: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Sirmans, M. Eugene (1966), Colonial South Carolina – A Political History. 1663–1763, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin (1978), The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Graham (2009), Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation, Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Graham (2021), Can Democracy Safeguard the Future?, Cambridge/Medford USA: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Graham and Wales, Corinne (1999), “The Theory and Practice of Citizens’ Juries,” Policy & Politics, 27 (3), pp. 295–308.Google Scholar

Soto, Pablo (2018), “Oui, on peut concilier démocratie radicale et gestion efficace,” Mouvements, 2 (94), pp. 66–74.Google Scholar

Spinoza, Baruch (1670), Tractatus Theologico-Politicus.Google Scholar

Spinoza, Baruch (1675–76), Tractatus Politicus.Google Scholar