Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T22:18:58.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Measurement-Based Care and Applying Statistical Concepts to the Individual Patient

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2024

Joseph F. Goldberg
Affiliation:
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York
Stephen M. Stahl
Affiliation:
University of California San Diego
Get access

Summary

“Measurement-based care” (MBC) refers to the systematic assessment of patients’ symptoms over the course of some observation period in order to glean information about likely treatment effects. The concept grew mainly from the world of clinical trials and US Food and Drug Administration registration studies, where efforts to judge the efficacy of an intervention depended on reliable quantifiable measures to track changes in symptoms or clinical status over time. In this chapter, our interest in MBC pertains mainly to describing the ways in which it can impact hypothesis-testing, decision-making, and outcome-tracking in clinical practice rather than in research settings.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiken, CB, Weisler, RH, Sachs, GS.The Bipolarity Index: A clinician-rated measure of diagnostic confidence. J Affect Disord 2015; 177: 5964CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, text revision (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association.Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2013Google Scholar
Andreasen, NC.The Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS). Iowa City, Iowa: The University of Iowa, 1983Google Scholar
Andreasen, NC.The Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS). Iowa City, Iowa: The University of Iowa, 1984Google Scholar
Barnes, TR.A rating scale for drug-induced akathisia. Br J Psychiatry 1989; 154: 672676CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, AT, Steer, RA, Ball, R, et al.Comparison of Beck Depressive Inventories -IA and II in psychiatric outpatients. J Personality Assess 1996; 67: 588597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, IH, Rush, AJ, Carmody, TJ, et al.Clinical versus self-report versions of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms in a public sector sample. J Psychiatr Res 2007; 41: 239246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, DD, Weathers, FW, Nagy, LM, et al.A clinician rating scale for assessing current and lifetime PTSD: The CAPS-1. Behav Therap 1990; 13: 187188Google Scholar
Bobes, J, Rubio, G, Téran, A, et al.Pregabalin for the discontinuation of long-term benzodiazepines use: An assessment of its effectiveness in daily clinical practice. Eur Psychiatry 2012; 27: 301307CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bondolfi, G, Germann, F, Weber Rouget, B, et al.Self- and clinician-rated Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale: Evaluation in clinical practice. J Affect Disord 2010; 121: 268272CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burdick, KE, Endick, CJ, Goldberg, JF.Assessing cognitive deficits in bipolar disorder: Are self-reports valid? Psychiatry Res 2005; 136: 4350CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chamberlain, SR, Cortese, S, Grant, JE.Screening for adult ADHD using brief rating tools: What can we conclude from a positive screen? Some caveats. Compr Psychiatry 2021; 106: 152224CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Del Fabro, L, Bondi, E, Serio, F, et al.Machine learning methods to predict outcomes of pharmacological treatment in psychosis. Transl Psychiatry 2023; 13(1): 75CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derogatis, LR, Savitz, KL.The SCL-90-R, Brief Symptom Inventory, and matching clinical rating scales. In Maruish, ME (ed.), The Use of Psychological Testing for Treatment Planning and Outcomes Assessment. New York: Routledge, 2000, pp. 679724Google Scholar
Endicott, J, Nee, J, Harrison, W, et al.Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire: A new measure. Psychopharmacol Bull 1993; 29: 321326Google ScholarPubMed
Fekadu, A, Wooderson, S, Donaldson, C, et al.A multidimensional tool to quantify treatment resistance in depression: The Maudsley Staging Method. J Clin Psychiatry 2009; 70: 177184CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, JF.Perspectives on the success rate of current antidepressant pharmacotherapy. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2022; 23: 17811791CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, JF, Garakani, A, Ackerman, SH.Clinician-rated versus self-rated screening for bipolar disorder among inpatients with mood symptoms and substance misuse. J Clin Psychiatry 2012; 73: 15251530CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, WK, Price, LH, Rasmussen, SA, et al.The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale. I. Development, use, and reliability. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1989; 46: 10061011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, KL, Brown, GK, Jager-Hyman, S, et al.The predictive validity of the Beck Depression Inventory suicide item. J Clin Psychiatry 2015; 76: 16831686CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, T, Xiang, Y-T, Xiao, L, et al.Measurement-based care versus standard care for major depression: A randomized controlled trial with blind raters. Am J Psychiatry 2015; 172: 10041013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guy, W.Clinical Global Impressions. In ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology – Revised. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1976a, pp. 218222Google Scholar
Guy, W.Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS). In ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology – Revised. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, 1976b, pp. 534537Google Scholar
Hadley, SJ, Mandel, FS, Schweizer, E.Switching from long-term benzodiazepine therapy to pregabalin in patients with generalized anxiety disorder: A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Psychopharmacol 2012; 26: 461470CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, M.The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol 1959; 32: 5055CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamilton, M.A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neursurg Psychiatry 1960; 23: 5662CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirschfeld, RMA, Holzer, C, Calabrese, JR, et al.Validity of the Mood Disorder Questionnaire: A general population study. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160: 178180CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hohagen, A, Münchau, N, Hiss, H, et al.Combination of behaviour therapy with fluvoxamine in comparison with behaviour therapy and placebo. Results of a multicentre study. Br J Psychiatry Suppl 1998; 35: 7178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johns, MW.A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: The Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Sleep 1991; 14: 540545CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kay, SR, Fiszbein, A, Opler, LA.The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schiz Bull 1987; 13: 261276CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koutsouleris, N, Dwyer, DB, Degenhardt, F, et al.Multimodal machine learning workflows for prediction of psychosis in patients with clinical high-risk syndromes and recent-onset depression. JAMA Psychiatry 2021; 78: 195209CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroenke, K, Spitzer, RL, Williams, JB.The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Int Med 2001; 16: 606613CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leucht, S, Kane, JM, Kissling, W, et al.What does the PANSS mean? Schizophr Res 2005a; 79: 231238CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leucht, S, Kane, JM, Kissling, W.Clinical implications of Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale scores. Br J Psychiatry 2005b; 187: 366371CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, CC, Boyd, M, Puspitasari, A, et al.Implementing measurement-based care in behavioral health: A review. JAMA Psychiatry 2019; 76: 324335CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liebowitz, MR.Social phobia. Mod Probl Pharmacopsychiatry 1987; 22: 141173CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGahuey, CA, Gelenberg, AJ, Laukes, CA, et al.The Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX): Reliability and validity. J Sex Marital Ther 2000; 26: 2540Google ScholarPubMed
McIntyre, RS, Patel, MD, Masand, PS, et al.The Rapid Mood Screener (RMS): A novel and pragmatic screener for bipolar I disorder. Curr Med Res Opin 2021; 37: 135144CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montgomery, SA, Åsberg, M.A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry 1979; 134: 382389CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nasreddine, ZS, Phillips, NA, Bédirian, V, et al.The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53: 695699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, CJ, Baumann, P, Delucchi, K, et al.A systematic review and meta-analysis of lithium augmentation of tricyclic and second generation antidepressants in major depression. J Affect Disord 2014; 168: 269275CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Overall, JE, Gorham, DR.The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Psychol Rep 1962; 10: 799812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, JH, Stanford, MS, Barratt, ES.Factor structure of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. J Clin Psychol 1995; 51: 7687743.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, K, Anderson, J, Bourne, D.Evidence brief: Use of patient reported outcome measures for measurement based care in mental health shared decision making. Washington, DC: Department of Veterans Affairs (US), 2018Google ScholarPubMed
Posner, K, Brown, GK, Stanley, B, et al.The Columbia–Suicide Severity Rating Scale: Initial validity and internal consistency findings from three multisite studies with adolescents and adults. Am J Psychiatry 2011; 168, 12661277CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rojo, E, Pino, O, Guilera, G, et al.Neurocognitive diagnosis and cut-off scores of the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP-S). Schizophr Res 2010; 116: 243251CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosa, AR, Sánchez-Moreno, J, Martínez-Aran, A, et al.Validity and reliability of the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST) in bipolar disorder. Clin Pract Epidemiol Mental Health 2007; 3: 5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruhé, HG, van Rooijen, G, Spijker, J, et al.Staging methods for treatment resistant depression. A systematic review. J Affect Disord 2012; 137: 3545CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rush, AJ, Trivedi, MH, Ibrahim, HM, et al.The 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), clinician-rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): A psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression. Biol Psychiatry 2003; 54: 573583CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salem, S, Huynh, T, Topolski, N, et al.Temporal multi-step predictive modeling of remission in major depressive disorder using early stage treatment data: STAR*D based machine learning approach. J Affect Disord 2023; 324: 286293CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saunders, JB, Aasland, OG, Babor, TF, et al.Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption – II. Addiction 1993; 88: 791804CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheehan, DV, Harnett-Sheehan, K, Raj, BA.The measurement of disability. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 1996; 11 (Suppl 3): 8995CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simpson, GM, Angus, JWS.A rating scale for extrapyramidal side effects. Acta Psychiatr Scand (Suppl) 1970; 212: 1119CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snaith, RP, Hamilton, M, Morley, S, et al.A scale for the assessment of hedonic tone the Snaith–Hamilton Pleasure Scale. Br J Psychiatry 1995; 167: 99103CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spielberger, CD, Gorsuch, RL, Lushene, RE, et al.Manual for the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1983Google Scholar
Spitzer, RL, Kroenke, K, Williams, JB, et al.A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Arch Int Med 2006; 166: 10921097CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taubitz, FS, Büdenbender, B, Alpers, GW.What the future holds: Machine learning to predict success in psychotherapy. Behav Res Ther 2022; 156: 104116CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tenneij, NH, van Megen, HJGM, Denys, DA, et al.Behavior therapy augments response of patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder responding to drug treatment. J Clin Psychiatry 2005; 66: 11691175CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tondo, L, Burrai, C, Scamonatti, L, et al.Comparison between clinician-rated and self-reported depressive symptoms in Italian psychiatric patients. Neuropsychobiology 1988; 19: 15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ustun, B, Adler, LA, Rudin, C, et al.The World Health Organization Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder self-report screening scale for DSM-5. JAMA Psychiatry 2017; 74: 520526CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weathers, FW, Litz, BT, Keane, TM, et al.The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Boston, MA: National Center for PTSD, 2013Google Scholar
Wisniewski, SR, Rush, AJ, Balasubramani, GK, et al.Self-rated global measure of the frequency, intensity, and burden of side effects. J Psychiatr Pract 2006; 12: 7179CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization.WHO Psychiatric Disability Assessment Schedule. Geneva: WHO; 1988Google Scholar
Wu, C-S, Luedtke, AR, Sadikova, E, et al.Development and validation of a machine learning individualized treatment rule in first-episode schizophrenia. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3(2): e1921660CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yao, L, Zhao, X, Xu, Z, et al.Influencing factors and machine learning-based prediction of side effects in psychotherapy. Front Psychiatry 2020; 11: 537442CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, RC, Biggs, JT, Ziegler, VE, et al.A rating scale for mania: Reliability, validity and sensitivity. Br J Psychiatry 1978; 133: 429435CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmerman, M, Galione, JN.Screening for bipolar disorder with the mood disorders questionnaire: A review. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2011; 19: 219228CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmerman, M, McGlinchey, JB.Why don’t psychiatrists use scales to measure outcome when treating depressed patients? J Clin Psychiatry 2008; 69: 19161919CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmerman, M, Martinez, J, Attiulah, N, et al.Why do some depressed outpatients who are in remission according to the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale not consider themselves to be in remission? J Clin Psychiatry 2012a; 73: 790795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, M, Martinez, J, Attiulah, N, et al.Why do some depressed outpatients who are not in remission according to the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale nonetheless consider themselves to be in remission? Depress Anxiety 2012b; 29: 891895CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×