Book contents
- The Augustan Space
- The Augustan Space
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 The City in Horace’s sermo
- Chapter 2 excucurristi a Neapoli
- Chapter 3 Poetic and Imperial Spaces in Propertius, Books 1–3
- Chapter 4 Horace on Sacred Space
- Chapter 5 Roman Topography, Politics and Gender
- Chapter 6 aurea nunc, olim siluestribus horrida dumis
- Chapter 7 Hippolytus and Egeria in the Woods of Aricia (Virgil, Aen. 7.761–82 and Ovid, Met. 15.479–551)
- Chapter 8 locum tua tempora poscunt
- Chapter 9 imperii Roma deumque locus
- Chapter 10 The Rise and Fall of Virgil’s Sublime Carthage
- Chapter 11 Eccentric Poetry
- Chapter 12 Virgilian Heterotopias
- Chapter 13 loci desperati
- Works Cited
- Index Locorum
- General Index
- References
Works Cited
Published online by Cambridge University Press: aN Invalid Date NaN
Book contents
- The Augustan Space
- The Augustan Space
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Notes on Contributors
- Preface
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 The City in Horace’s sermo
- Chapter 2 excucurristi a Neapoli
- Chapter 3 Poetic and Imperial Spaces in Propertius, Books 1–3
- Chapter 4 Horace on Sacred Space
- Chapter 5 Roman Topography, Politics and Gender
- Chapter 6 aurea nunc, olim siluestribus horrida dumis
- Chapter 7 Hippolytus and Egeria in the Woods of Aricia (Virgil, Aen. 7.761–82 and Ovid, Met. 15.479–551)
- Chapter 8 locum tua tempora poscunt
- Chapter 9 imperii Roma deumque locus
- Chapter 10 The Rise and Fall of Virgil’s Sublime Carthage
- Chapter 11 Eccentric Poetry
- Chapter 12 Virgilian Heterotopias
- Chapter 13 loci desperati
- Works Cited
- Index Locorum
- General Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Augustan SpaceThe Poetics of Geography, Topography and Monumentality, pp. 229 - 250Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Works Cited
Acosta-Hughes, B. and Stephens, S. A. 2012. Callimachus in Context: From Plato to the Augustan Poets. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahl, F. 1985. Metaformations: Soundplay and Wordplay in Ovid and Other Classical Poets. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Albrecht, M. von 2006. Vergil, Bucolica – Georgica – Aeneis: eine Einführung. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Albrecht, M. von 2012. ‘Properz und die Architektur des Augusteischen Rom’, in Cristofoli, R., Santini, C. and Santucci, F. (eds.), Properzio fra tradizione e innovazione. Assisi: 207–28.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. 1963. ‘The Roman Socrates: Horace and His Satire’, in Sullivan, J. P. (ed.), Critical Essays on Roman Literature. London: 1–37.Google Scholar
Aresi, L. 2013. ‘Vicende e intrecci del mito in terra d’Italia: Scilla, Glauco e Circe nelle Metamorfosi di Ovidio’, Prometheus 39: 137–64.Google Scholar
Aresi, L. 2017. Nel giardino di Pomona: le Metamorfosi di Ovidio e l’invenzione di una mitologia in terra d’Italia. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. 1986. ‘Horatius eques et scriba: Satires 1.6 and 2.7’, TAPhA 116: 255–88.Google Scholar
Augoustakis, A. 2015. ‘Campanian Politics and Poetics in Silius Italicus’ Punica’, ICS 40: 155–69.Google Scholar
Balot, R. K. 1998. ‘Pindar, Virgil, and the Proem to Georgic 3’, Phoenix 52: 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1994. Il poeta e il principe: Ovidio e il discorso augusteo. Rome and Bari.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1997. ‘Endgames: Ovid’s Metamorphoses 15 and Fasti 6’, in Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M. and Fowler, D. P. (eds.), Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature. Princeton: 181–208.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 1999. ‘Representations of Suffering and Interpretation in the Aeneid’, in Hardie, P. R. (ed.), Virgil: Critical Assessments of Classical Authors, vol. 3. London: 324–44.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 2005a. ‘Centre and Periphery’, in Harrison, S. (ed.), A Companion to Latin Literature. Malden, MA and Oxford: 394–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 2005b. ‘Learned Eyes: Poets, Viewers, Image Makers’, in Galinsky, K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus. Cambridge: 281–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 2005c. ‘The Search for the Perfect Book: A PS to the New Posidippus’, in Gutzwiller, K. (ed.), The New Posidippus: A Hellenistic Poetry Book. Oxford: 320–42.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 2008a. ‘Bellum Italicum: l’unificazione dell’Italia nell’Eneide’, in Urso, G. (ed.), Patria diversis gentibus una? Unità politica e identità etnica nell’italia antica. Pisa: 243–59.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 2008b. ‘Le Cirque du Soleil’, in Nelis-Clément, J. and Roddaz, J.‑M. (eds.), Le Cirque Romain et son image. Bordeaux: 521–37.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 2009b. ‘Senatus consultum de Lycaone: concili degli dei e immaginazione politica nelle Metamorfosi di Ovidio’, MD 61: 117–45.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. 2011. ‘Roman Callimachus’, in Acosta-Hughes, B., Lehnus, L. and Stephens, S. A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Callimachus. Leiden: 511–33.Google Scholar
Barker, E., Bouzarovski, S., Pelling, C. and Isaksen, L. (eds.) 2016. New Worlds from Old Texts: Revisiting Ancient Space and Place. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. 1998. ‘Ars and the Man: The Politics of Art in Virgil’s Aeneid’, CPh 93: 322–42.Google Scholar
Basore, J. W. (ed., tr.) 1928. Seneca: Moral Essays, vol. 1. Loeb Classical Library 214. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Becker, O. 1937. Das Bild des Weges und verwandte Vorstellungen im frühgriechischen Denken. Berlin.Google Scholar
Benoist, S., Daguet-Gagey, A. and Hoët-van Cauwenberghe, C. (eds.) 2016. Une mémoire en actes: espaces, figures et discours dans le monde romain. Villeneuve d’Ascq.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bettini, M. 2009. Affari di famiglia: la parentela nella letteratura e nella cultura antica. Bologna.Google Scholar
Bhatt, S. 2018. ‘Exiled in Rome: The Writing of Other Spaces in Tacitus’ Annales’, in Fitzgerald and Spentzou 2018: 215–33.Google Scholar
Blanchot, M. 1962. Der Gesang der Sirene: Essays zur modernen Literatur. Translated by Horst, K. A.. Munich.Google Scholar
Bleisch, P. 2003. ‘The “Regia” of Picus: Ekphrasis, Italian Identity, and Artistic Definition in Aeneid 7.152–93’, in Thibodeau, P. and Haskell, H. (eds.), Being There Together: Essays in Honor of M. C. J. Putnam. Afton, MN: 88–109.Google Scholar
Borges, J. L. 1996. ‘El idioma analítico de John Wilkins’, in Otras inquisiciones. Buenos Aires: 162–9.Google Scholar
Bowditch, L. 1994. ‘Horace’s Poetics of Political Integrity: Epistle 1.18’, AJPh 115: 409–26.Google Scholar
Bowditch, L. 2006. ‘Propertius and the Gendered Rhetoric of Luxury and Empire: A Reading of 2.16’, CLS 43: 306–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowditch, L. 2009. ‘Palatine Apollo and the Imperial Gaze: Propertius 2.31 and 2.32’, AJPh 130: 401–38.Google Scholar
Bowditch, L. 2012. ‘Roman Love Elegy and the Eros of Empire’, in Gold 2012: 119–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowie, A. M. 1990. ‘The Death of Priam: Allegory and History in the Aeneid’, CQ 40: 470–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brandão, L. 2009. Máscaras dos Césares: teatro e moralidade nas Vidas suetonianas. Coimbra.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchheit, V. 1972. Der Anspruch des Dichters in Vergils Georgika: Dichtertum und Heilsweg. Darmstadt.Google Scholar
Burke, E. 2008 [1757]. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and the Beautiful, edited by Philips, A.. London.Google Scholar
Butrica, J. 2006. ‘The Transmission of the Text of Propertius’, in Günther 2006: 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, F. 1992. ‘Propertius, 4.9: “Hercules exclusus” and the Dimension of Genre’, in Galinsky, K. (ed.), The Interpretation of Roman Poetry: Empiricism or Hermeneutics? Frankfurt: 65–95.Google Scholar
Cancik, H. 1985–6. ‘Rome as Sacred Landscape: Varro and the End of Republican Religion in Rome’, in Kippenberg, H. G. (ed.), Approaches to Iconology. Visible Religion 4–5. Leiden: 250–65.Google Scholar
Chomse, S. 2018. ‘Instability and the Sublime in Martial’s Liber spectaculorum’, in Krasne, D. A. and Donovan Ginsberg, L. (eds.), After 69 ce: Writing Civil War in Flavian Rome. Berlin: 387–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomse, S. 2019. ‘Building the Sublime Emperor in “a More Vertical Rome”’, in Citroni, M., Labate, M. and Rosati, G. (eds.), Luoghi dell’abitare, immaginazione letteraria e identità romana. Pisa: 161–84.Google Scholar
Chryssafis, G. 1981. A Textual and Stylistic Commentary on Theocritus’ Idyll xxv. London Studies in Classical Philology 1. Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cichorius, C. 1922. ‘Augustus and Virgil’, in Cichorius, C. (ed.), Römische Studien. Stuttgart: 269–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citroni, M. 2015. ‘Autocrazia e divinità: la rappresentazione di Augusto e degli imperatori del primo secolo nella letteratura contemporanea’, in Ferrary, J.‑L. and Scheid, J. (eds.), Il princeps romano: autocrate o magistrato? Fattori giuridici e fattori sociali del potere imperiale da Augusto a Commodo. Pavia: 239–91.Google Scholar
Citroni Marchetti, S. 1983. ‘Forme della rappresentazione del costume nel moralismo romano’, AFLS 4: 41–114.Google Scholar
Citroni Marchetti, S. 2004. ‘I precetti paterni e le lezioni dei filosofi: Demea, il padre di Orazio ed altri padri e figli’, MD 53: 9–63.Google Scholar
Citroni Marchetti, S. 2016. ‘Cicero as Role-Model in the Self-Definition of Pliny the Elder’, PLLS 16: 315–37.Google Scholar
Clark, G. (tr.) 1989. Iamblichus: On the Pythagorean Life. Translated Texts for Historians 8. Liverpool.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, D. 1988. ‘The Archaeology of the Temple to Juno in Carthage (Aen. 1.446–93)’, CPh 83: 195–205.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. 2004. ‘Miti di fondazione delle città italiche in Servio’, in Santini, C. and Stok, F. (eds.), Hinc Italae gentes: geopolitica ed etnografia dell’Italia nel commento di Servio all’Eneide. Pisa: 11–32.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. 1986. The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets, edited by Segal, C. P.. Ithaca, NY and London.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. 1994. Genres and Readers: Lucretius, Love Elegy, Pliny’s Encyclopedia. Translated by Most, G. W.. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Cooley, A. E. 2019. ‘From the Augustan Principate to the Invention of the Age of Augustus’, JRS 109: 71–87.Google Scholar
Cornelli, G. 2013. In Search of Pythagoreanism: Pythagoreanism as an Historiographical Category. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornish, F. W., Postgate, J. P. and Mackail, J. W. (ed., tr.) 1988. Catullus, Tibullus, Pervigilium Veneris. Revised by Goold, G. P.. Loeb Classical Library 6. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Coutelle, E. 2005. Poétique et métapoésie chez Properce: de l’Ars amandi à l’Ars scribendi. Louvain.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, P. J. E. 2004. Death and the Emperor: Roman Imperial Funerary Monuments from Augustus to Marcus Aurelius. Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Day, H. J. M. 2013. Lucan and the Sublime: Power, Representation and Aesthetic Experience. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Bolla, P. 1989. The Discourse of the Sublime: Readings in History, Aesthetics and the Subject. Oxford.Google Scholar
DeBrohun, J. B. 2003. Roman Propertius and the Reinvention of Elegy. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Cazanove, O. 2003. ‘Le lieu de culte de Méphitis dans les Ampsancti ualles: des sources documentaires hétérogènes’, in Cazanove, O. and Scheid, J. (eds.), Sanctuaires et sources. Paris: 145–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Certeau, M. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Translated by S. Rendall. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar
Delvigo, M. L. 2013. ‘Per transitum tangit historiam: Intersecting Developments of Roman Identity in Virgil’, in Farrell and Nelis 2013: 19–39.Google Scholar
Dench, E. 2005. Romulus’ Asylum: Roman Identities from the Age of Alexander to the Age of Hadrian. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deremetz, A. 2000. ‘Le livre ii de l’Énéide et la conception virgilienne de l’épopée: épopée et tragédie dans l’Énéide’, REL 78: 76–92.Google Scholar
Deremetz, A. 2001. ‘Énéide aède: tradition auctoriale et (re)fondation d’un genre’, in Schmidt, E. A. (ed.), L’histoire littéraire immanente dans la poésie latine. Fondation Hardt pour l’étude de l’antiquité classique, Entretiens 47. Geneva: 143–81.Google Scholar
Drew, D. L. 1924. ‘Virgil’s Marble Temple: Georgics iii. 10–39’, CQ 18: 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duff, J. W. and Duff, A. M. (ed., tr.) 1935. Minor Latin Poets, vol. 1. Rev. edn. Loeb Classical Library 284. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Dumézil, G. 1977. La religione romana arcaica, con una appendice sulla religione degli etruschi. Translated by Jesi, F.. Milan.Google Scholar
Dunsch, B. 2015. ‘Sortitus exitum facilem: der Tod des Augustus bei Sueton’, Philologus 159: 327–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Quesnay, I. M. Le M. 1984. ‘Horace and Maecenas: The Propaganda Value of Sermones i’, in Woodman and West 1984: 19–58.Google Scholar
Eck, W. 1984. ‘Senatorial Self-Representation: Developments in the Augustan Period’, in Millar, F. and Segal, E. (eds.), Caesar Augustus: Seven Aspects. Oxford: 129–67.Google Scholar
Edmonds, R. G. 2008. ‘Extra-Ordinary People: mystai and magoi, Magicians and Orphics in the Derveni Papyrus’, CPh 103: 16–39.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. 2003. ‘Incorporating the Alien: The Art of Conquest’, in Edwards and Woolf 2003: 44–70.Google Scholar
Edwards, C. 2018. ‘On Not Being in Rome: Exile and Displacement in Seneca’s Prose’, in Fitzgerald and Spentzou 2018: 169–94.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 1991. ‘Cult and Sculpture: Sacrifice in the Ara Pacis Augustae’, JRS 81: 50–61.Google Scholar
Fabbrini, D. 2007. Il migliore dei mondi possibili: gli epigrammi ecfrastici di Marziale per amici e protettori. Florence.Google Scholar
Fabre-Serris, J. 2013. ‘Roman gentes in Ovid’s Fasti: The Fabii and the Claudii’, in Farrell and Nelis 2013: 89–106.Google Scholar
Fairclough, H. R. (ed., tr.) 1929. Horace: Satires, Epistles and Ars poetica. Loeb Classical Library 194. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Fairclough, H. R. (ed., tr.) 1999. Virgil: Eclogues, Georgics, Aeneid i–vi. Revised by G. P. Goold. Loeb Classical Library 63. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Fairclough, H. R. (ed., tr.) 2000. Virgil: Aeneid vii–xii. Revised by G. P. Goold. Loeb Classical Library 64. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. 1997. ‘Images of the City: Propertius’ New-Old Rome’, in Habinek and Schiesaro 1997: 122–35.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. and Nelis, D. P. (eds.) 2013. Augustan Poetry and the Roman Republic. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedeli, P. 2005. Écologie antique: milieux et modes de vie dans le monde romain. Gollion.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. 1991. The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. C. 1998. ‘The Appearance(s) of Mercury and the Motivations of Aeneas’, in Burden, M. (ed.), A Woman Scorn’d: Responses to the Dido Myth. London: 105–27.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. 2007. Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley and Los Angeles.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldherr, A. 1997. ‘Metamorphosis and Sacrifice in Ovid’s Theban Narrative’, MD 38: 25–55.Google Scholar
Ferrero, L. 1955. Storia del pitagorismo nel mondo romano (dalle origini alla fine della Repubblica). Turin.Google Scholar
Fielding, I. 2014. ‘A Poet between Two Worlds: Ovid in Late Antiquity’, in Miller and Newlands 2014: 100–13.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. 1995. Catullan Provocations: Lyric Poetry and the Drama of Position. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. 2018. ‘The Space of Rome: Imperial Trajectories in Catullus and Horace’, in Fitzgerald and Spentzou 2018: 147–67.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, W. and Spentzou, E. (eds.) 2018. The Production of Space in Latin Literature. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flower, H. I. 1996. Ancestor Masks and Aristocratic Power in Roman Culture. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, D. P. 2000. Roman Constructions: Readings in Postmodern Latin. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazer, J. G. 1906–11. The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion. 2 vols. London.Google Scholar
Frazer, J. G. (ed., tr.) 1989. Ovid: Fasti. Revised by G. P. Goold. Loeb Classical Library 253. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Freudenburg, K. 2010. ‘Horatius Anceps: Persona and Self-Revelation in Satire and Song’, in Davis, G. (ed.), A Companion to Horace. Oxford: 271–90.Google Scholar
Froesch, H. H. 1968. ‘Ovids “Epistulae ex Ponto” i–iii als Gedichtsammlung.’ Diss. Bonn.Google Scholar
Fuhrer, T., Mundt, F. and Stenger, J. (eds.) 2015a. Cityscaping: Constructing and Modelling Images of the City. Berlin and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhrer, T., Mundt, F. and Stenger, J. 2015b. ‘Introduction’, in Fuhrer, Mundt and Stenger 2015a: 1–18.Google Scholar
Gagé, J. 1963. Matronalia: essai sur les dévotions et les organisations cultuelles dans l’ancienne Rome. Collection Latomus 60. Brussels.Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. 2000. Virgil on the Nature of Things: The Georgics, Lucretius and the Didactic Tradition. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, M. R. 2019. ‘Name Puns and Acrostics in Didactic Poetry: Reading the Universe’, in Canevaro, L. G. and O’Rourke, D. (eds.), Didactic Poetry of Greece, Roman and Beyond: Knowledge, Power, Tradition. Swansea: 123–50.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. 1972. The Herakles Theme: The Adaptations of the Hero in Literature from Homer to the Twentieth Century. Oxford.Google Scholar
Galinsky, K. (ed.) 2014. Memoria Romana: Memory in Rome and Rome in Memory. Memoirs of the American Academy in Rome Supplementary Volume 10. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geiger, J. 2008. The First Hall of Fame: A Study of the Statues in the Forum Augustum. Leiden and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, P. K. 2009. ‘Sex and the Modern City: English Studies and the Spatial Turn’, in Warf and Arias 2009a: 102–21.Google Scholar
Gilhuly, K. and Worman, N. 2014. Space, Place, and Landscape in Ancient Greek Literature and Culture. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giusti, E. 2014. ‘Virgil’s Carthaginians at Aen. 1.430–6: Cyclopes in Bees’ Clothing’, CCJ 60: 37–58.Google Scholar
Giusti, E. 2017. ‘Virgil’s Carthage: A Heterotopic Space’, in Rimell, V. and Asper, M. (eds.), Imagining Empire: Political Space in Hellenistic and Roman Literature. Heidelberg: 133–50.Google Scholar
Giusti, E. 2018. Carthage in Virgil’s Aeneid: Staging the Enemy under Augustus. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godel, R. 2014. ‘Ovid’s “Biography”: Novels of Ovid’s Exile’, in Miller and Newlands 2014: 454–68.Google Scholar
Gold, B. K. (ed.) 2012. A Companion to Roman Love Elegy. Malden, MA and Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, S. M. 2020. ‘Ennius and the fata librorum’, in Damon, C. and Farrell, J. (eds.), Ennius’ Annals: Poetry and History. Cambridge: 169–87.Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, N. 2013. Shaggy Crowns: Ennius’ Annales and Virgil’s Aeneid. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goold, G. P. (ed., tr.) 1999. Propertius: Elegies. Rev. edn. Loeb Classical Library 18. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Gowing, A. M. 2005. Empire and Memory: The Representation of the Roman Republic in Imperial Culture. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, C. M. C. 2007. Roman Religion and the Cult of Diana at Aricia. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
Green, S. J. 2004. Ovid, Fasti 1: A Commentary. Mnemosyne Supplement 251. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. 1976. ‘Augustan Poetry and the Life of Luxury’, JRS 66: 87–105, reprinted with revisions in Latin Poets and Roman Life (London, 1985), 1–31.Google Scholar
Gros, P. 1976. Aurea templa: recherches sur l’architecture religieuse de Rome à l’époque d’Auguste. Rome.Google Scholar
Gros, P. 1990. ‘Le premier urbanisme de la Colonia Julia Carthago’, in L’Afrique dans l’Occident Romain. CEFR 134: 547–73.Google Scholar
Gummere, R. M. (ed., tr.) 1925. Seneca: Epistles 93–124. Loeb Classical Library 77. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Haas, M. 2021. ‘ars und natura’, in Möller, M. (ed.), Ovid Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung. Stuttgart: 239–44.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. N. 1994. ‘Ideology for an Empire in the Prefaces to Cicero’s Dialogues’, Ramus 23: 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habinek, T. N. 1998. The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity, and Empire in Ancient Rome. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habinek, T. N. and Schiesaro, A. (eds.) 1997. The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Haecker, T. 1931. Vergil: Vater des Abendlands. Munich = Virgil: Father of the West. Translated by Wheen, A. W.. New York, 1934.Google Scholar
Hanson, J. A. (ed., tr.) 1989. Apuleius: Metamorphoses, Books i–vi. Loeb Classical Library 44. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Harder, A. 2012. Callimachus, Aetia: Introduction, Text, Translation and Commentary. 2 vols. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hardie, A. 2002. ‘The Georgics, the Mysteries and the Muses at Rome’, PCPhS 48: 175–208.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1992. ‘Augustan Poets and the Mutability of Rome’, in Powell, A. (ed.), Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus. London: 59–81.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 1993. ‘Vt pictura poesis? Horace and the Visual Arts’, in Rudd 1993a: 120–39.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 2007. ‘Poets, Patrons, Rulers: The Ennian Traditions’, in Fitzgerald, W. and Gowers, E. (eds.), Ennius Perennis: The Annals and Beyond. PCPhS Supplementary Volume 31. Cambridge: 129–44.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (ed.) 2009a. Paradox and the Marvellous in Augustan Literature and Culture. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 2009b. Lucretian Receptions: History, the Sublime, Knowledge. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 2013. ‘Trojan Palimpsests: The Archaeology of Roman History in Aeneid 2’, in Farrell and Nelis 2013: 107–23.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. 2014. The Last Trojan Hero: A Cultural History of Virgil’s Aeneid. London and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, E. L. 1972. ‘Why Did Venus Wear Boots? Some Reflections on Aeneid 1.314f.’, PVS 12: 10–25.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 1996. ‘Vergil Aeneid 1.286: Julius Caesar or Augustus?’, PLLS 9: 127–33.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 1998. ‘The Sword-Belt of Pallas (Aeneid x.495–506): Symbolism and Ideology’, in Stahl 1998: 223–42.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. 2006. ‘The Epic and the Monuments: Interactions between Virgil’s Aeneid and the Augustan Building Programme’, in Currie, B., Clarke, M. and Lyne, R. O. A. M. (eds.), Epic Interactions: Perspectives on Homer, Virgil, and the Epic Tradition. Oxford: 159–84.Google Scholar
Haselberger, L. (ed.) 2014a. The Horologium of Augustus: Debate and Context. JRA Supplement 99. Portsmouth, RI.Google Scholar
Haselberger, L. 2014b. ‘The “Horologium”: Where Do We Stand, and Where Should We Go?’, in Haselberger 2014a: 167–201.Google Scholar
Heil, A. 2011. ‘Princeps und poeta auf dem Palatin: eine intermediale Analyse von Properz 2,31’, in Haltenhoff, A., Heil, A. and Mutschler, F. H., Römische Werte und römische Literatur im frühen Prinzipat. Berlin and New York: 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hell, J. 2019. The Conquest of Ruins: The Third Reich and the Fall of Rome. Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, J. G. 1994. ‘Be Alert (Your Country Needs Lerts): Horace, Satires 1.9’, PCPhS 39: 67–93, reprinted in Writing Down Rome: Satire, Comedy, and Other Offences in Latin Poetry (Oxford, 1999), 202–27.Google Scholar
Henderson, J. G. 2000. ‘The Camillus Factory: per astra ad Ardeam’, Ramus 29: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzog, R. 1989. ‘Fest, Terror und Tod in Petrons Satyrica’, in Haug, W. and Warning, R. (eds.), Das Fest. Munich: 120–50.Google Scholar
Heslin, P. J. 2018. Propertius, Greek Myth, and Virgil: Rivalry, Allegory, and Polemic. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heuzé, P. 2008. ‘Quand Virgile se cite lui-même’, in Castagna, L. and Riboldi, C. (eds.), Amicitiae templa serena: studi in onore die Giuseppe Aricò, vol. 1. Milan: 781–8.Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. 1995. ‘Propertius: Division, Transmission, and the Editor’s Task’, PLLS 8: 165–85.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. 1987. The Metamorphosis of Persephone: Ovid and the Self-Conscious Muse. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. 1998. Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. 2002. ‘Landscape with Figures: Aesthetics of Place in the Metamorphoses and Its Tradition’, in Hardie, P. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ovid. Cambridge: 122–49.Google Scholar
Hopkinson, N. (ed., tr.) 2015. Theocritus, Moschus, Bion. Loeb Classical Library 28. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. 1995. ‘Virgil: His Life and Times’, in Horsfall, N. (ed.), A Companion to the Study of Virgil. Leiden, New York and Cologne: 1–26.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. K. 1984b. ‘Catullus 68: The Text as Self-Demystification’, Arethusa 17: 29–49.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. 1998. ‘Before and after Epic: Theocritus (?), Idyll 25’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F. and Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Genre in Hellenistic Poetry. Hellenistica Groningana 3. Groningen: 115–32.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. and Rutherford, I. (eds.) 2009. Wandering Poets in Ancient Greek Culture: Travel, Locality and Pan-Hellenism. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. 2010. Talking Books: Readings in Hellenistic and Roman Books of Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ingleheart, J. 2006. ‘What the Poet Saw: Ovid, the Error and the Theme of Sight in Tristia 2’, MD 56: 63–86.Google Scholar
Jackson, G. 2002. ‘Commentario al libro vi’, in Flores, E., Esposito, P., Jackson, G. and Tomasco, D. (eds.), Quinto Ennio. Annali (Libri i-viii) Commentari. Naples: 101–77.Google Scholar
Jenkins, I. 2010. ‘The Mausoleum of Halicarnassus’, in Macfarlane, F. and Morgan, C. (eds.), Exploring Ancient Sculpture. London: 121–35.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. J. 1996. ‘The Mausoleum of Augustus: Etruscan and Other Influences on Its Design’, in Hall, J. F. (ed.), Etruscan Italy. Provo, UT: 217–40.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. 2006. ‘Unravelling Foucault’s “Different Spaces”’, History of the Human Sciences 19: 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolivet, J.-C. 2001. Allusion et fiction épistolaire dans les Héroïdes: recherches sur l’intertextualité ovidienne. Rome.Google Scholar
Kambylis, A. 1965. Die Dichterweihe und ihre Symbolik: Untersuchungen zu Hesiodos, Kallimachos, Properz und Ennius. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Kaster, R. A. 2016. C. Suetoni Tranquilli De vita Caesarum libri viii et De grammaticis et rhetoribus liber. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kath, R. 2012. ‘Politiker als Schauspieler – Schauspieler als Politiker? Zur Gefahr theatralischer Elemente in der Römischen Republik’, in Popko, L., Quenouille, N. and Rücker, M. (eds.), Von Sklaven, Pächtern und Politikern: Beiträge zum Alltag in Ägypten, Griechenland und Rom. Δουλικὰ ἔργα zu Ehren von R. Scholl. Berlin and Boston: 41–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keil, H. and Hertz, M. (eds.) 1855. Grammatici Latini, vol. 2: Prisciani Institutionum grammaticarum libri i–xii. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Keith, A. 2015. ‘Cityscaping in Propertius and the Elegists’, in Fuhrer, Mundt and Stenger 2015a: 47–60.Google Scholar
Keith, A. 2016. ‘City Lament in Augustan Epic: Antitypes of Rome from Troy to Alba Longa’, in Bachvarova, M. R., Dutsch, D. and Suter, A. (eds.), The Fall of Cities in the Mediterranean: Commemoration in Literature, Folk-Song and Liturgy. Cambridge: 156–82.Google Scholar
Kellum, B. 1997. ‘Concealing/Revealing: Gender and the Play of Meaning in the Monuments of Augustan Rome’, in Habinek and Schiesaro 1997: 158–81.Google Scholar
Kirichenko, A. 2013. ‘Virgil’s Augustan Temples: Image and Intertext in the Aeneid’, JRS 103: 65–87.Google Scholar
Klodt, C. 1998. ‘Platzanlagen der Kaiser in der Beschreibung der Dichter’, Gymnasium 105: 1–38.Google Scholar
Knight, W. F. J. 1936. Cumaean Gates: A Reference of the Sixth Aeneid to the Initiation Pattern. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kofler, W. 2003. Aeneas und Vergil: Untersuchungen zur poetologischen Dimension der Aeneis. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Kölv, M. 2003. Ancient Tradition and Early Greek History: The Origins of States in Early-Archaic Sparta, Argos and Corinth. Tallinn.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 2000. ‘Self, Sex and Empire in Catullus: The Construction of a Decentered Identity’, in Bécares, V., Pordomingo, F., Cortés Tovar, R. and Fernández Corte, J. C. (eds.), Intertextualidad en las literaturas griega y latina. Madrid and Salamanca: 213–31.Google Scholar
Koortbojian, M. 2013. The Divinization of Caesar and Augustus: Precedents, Consequences, Implications. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kraggerud, E. 1998. ‘Vergil Announcing the Aeneid: On Georg. 3.1–48’, in Stahl 1998: 1–20.Google Scholar
Kraus, C. S. 2020. ‘Urban Disasters and Other Romes: The Case of Veii’, in Closs, V. M. and Keitel, E. (eds.), Urban Disasters and the Roman Imagination. Berlin and Boston: 17–32.Google Scholar
Labate, M. 1975. ‘Amore coniugale e amore “elegiaco” nell’episodio di Cefalo e Procri (Met. 7.661–865)’, ASNP 3.5: 103–28.Google Scholar
Labate, M. 1990. ‘Forme della letteratura, immagini del mondo: da Catullo a Ovidio’, in Schiavone, A. (ed.), Storia di Roma, vol. 2.1. Turin: 923–65.Google Scholar
Labate, M. 1991a. ‘La memoria impertinente e altra intertestualità ovidiana’, in Gallo, I. and Nicastri, L. (eds.), Cultura, poesia e ideologia nell’opera di Ovidio. Naples: 41–59.Google Scholar
Labate, M. 1991b. ‘Città morte, città future: un tema della poesia augustea’, Maia 43: 167–84.Google Scholar
Labate, M. 2005. ‘Poetica minore e minima: Mecenate e gli amici nelle Satire di Orazio’, MD 54: 47–63.Google Scholar
Labate, M. 2012. ‘Mecenate senza poeti, poeti senza Mecenate: la distruzione di un mito augusteo’, in Bastianini, G., Lapini, W. and Tulli, M. (eds.), Harmonia: scritti di filologia classica in onore di Angelo Casanova. Florence: 405–24.Google Scholar
La Cerda, J. L. de. 1617. P. Virgilii Maronis posteriores sex libri Aeneidos argumentis, explicationibus, notis illustrati. Lyon.Google Scholar
Lacki, G. C. 2013. ‘A Conspiracy of Love: Exile and the Double Heroides’. Diss. Oxford.Google Scholar
Laird, A. 1996. ‘Vt figura poesis: Writing Art and the Art of Writing in Augustan Poetry’, in Elsner, J. (ed.), Art and Text in Roman Culture. Cambridge: 75–102.Google Scholar
Lamotte, J. 1961. ‘Le mythe de Rome “ville éternelle” et saint Augustin’, Augustiniana 11: 226–60.Google Scholar
Larmour, D. H. J. 2007. ‘Holes in the Body: Sites of Abjection in Juvenal’s Rome’, in Larmour and Spencer 2007: 168–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larmour, D. H. J. and Spencer, D. (eds.) 2007. The Sites of Rome: Time, Space, Memory. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Rocca, E. 2014. ‘Augustus’ Solar Meridian and the Augustan Urban Program in the Northern Campus Martius: An Attempt at a Holistic View’, in Haselberger 2014a: 121–65.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. 1988. The Rhetoric of Space: Literary and Artistic Representations of Landscape in Republican and Augustan Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. 1997. ‘Horace and the Material Culture of Augustan Rome: A Revisionary Reading’, in Habinek and Schiesaro 1997: 105–21.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. 2012. ‘Rome’s Elegiac Cartography: The View from the Via Sacra’, in Gold 2012: 134–51.Google Scholar
Lee-Stecum, P. 2008. ‘Roman refugium: Refugee Narratives in Augustan Versions of Roman Prehistory’, Hermathena 184: 69–91.Google Scholar
Leigh, M. 2010. ‘Lucan’s Caesar and the Sacred Grove: Deforestation and Enlightenment in Antiquity’, in Tesoriero 2010: 201–38.Google Scholar
Levine, P. (ed., tr.) 1966. Augustine: The City of God against the Pagans, Books xii–xv. Loeb Classical Library 414. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Lieberg, G. 1982. Poeta Creator: Studien zu einer Figur der antiken Dichtung. Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, J. L. 1999. Parthenius of Nicaea: The Poetical Fragments and the Erōtika Pathēmata. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lindheim, S. H. 1998. ‘Hercules Cross-Dressed, Hercules Undressed: Unmasking the Construction of the Propertian Amator in Elegy 4.9’, AJPh 119: 43–63.Google Scholar
Loar, M. P., Murray, S. C. and Rebeggiani, S. (eds.) 2019. The Cultural History of Augustan Rome: Texts, Monuments, and Topography. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luther, A. 2003. ‘Ein Terminus ante quem für die Monobiblos des Properz’, Latomus 62: 801–6.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1998. ‘Propertius 2.10 and 11 and the Structure of Books “2A” and “2B”’, JRS 88: 21–36.Google Scholar
MacCormack, S. 1998. The Shadows of Poetry: Vergil in the Mind of Augustine. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, C. 2019. ‘Greek Poets on the Palatine: A Wild Cow Chase?’, in Loar, Murray and Rebeggiani 2019: 126–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mac Góráin, F. 2009. ‘Microcosm and the Virgilian Persona’, in F. Nau (ed.), Autoportraits de poètes: les paratopies romaines et leur postérité, Camenae 7, online at http://lettres.sorbonne-universite.fr/sites/default/files/media/2020-06/mac_gorain_microcosm_and_the_virgilian_persona.pdf.Google Scholar
Marchant, E. C. and Bowersock, G. W. (ed., tr.) 1925. Xenophon: Scripta Minora and Pseudo-Xenophon: Constitution of the Athenians. Loeb Classical Library 183. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. 1999. ‘Ruins of Rome: T. S. Eliot and the Presence of the Past’, in Edwards, C. (ed.), Roman Presences: Receptions of Rome in European Culture, 1789–1945. Cambridge: 236–55.Google Scholar
McCracken, G. E. (ed., tr.) 1957. Augustine: The City of God against the Pagans, Books i–iii. Loeb Classical Library 411. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
McGowan, M. 2009. Ovid in Exile: Power and Poetic Redress in the Tristia and Epistulae ex Ponto. Leiden and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meban, D. 2008. ‘Temple Building, primus Language, and the Proem to Virgil’s Third Georgic’, CPh 103: 150–74.Google Scholar
Meier, T., Ott, M. R. and Sauer, R. (eds.) 2015. Materiale Textkulturen: Konzepte – Materialien – Praktiken. Berlin, Munich and Boston.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. F. 2002. ‘The Fasti: Style, Structure, and Time’, in Boyd, B. W. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Ovid. Leiden, Boston and Cologne: 167–96.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. and Newlands, C. (eds.) 2014. A Handbook to the Reception of Ovid. Malden, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, P. A. 2007. ‘“I Get Around”: Sadism, Desire, and Metonymy on the Streets of Rome with Horace, Ovid, and Juvenal’, in Larmour and Spencer 2007: 138–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, W. (ed., tr.) 1914. Xenophon: Cyropaedia. 2 vols. Loeb Classical Library 51, 52. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Moles, J. 2002. ‘Poetry, Philosophy, Politics and Play: Epistles i’, in Woodman, T. and Feeney, D. (eds.), Traditions and Contexts in the Poetry of Horace. Cambridge: 141–57.Google Scholar
Moltesen, N. 1997. I Dianas hellige lund: fund fra en helligdom i Nemi = In the Sacred Grove of Diana: Finds from a Sanctuary at Nemi. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Monaco, G. 1970. ‘Spectatores, plaudite’, in Barigazzi, A., Lamacchia, R., La Penna, A., Mariotti, S., Pascucci, G., Tandoi, V. and Devoto, G. (eds.), Studia Florentina Alexandro Ronconi sexagenario oblata. Rome: 255–73.Google Scholar
Montepaone, C. 1999. Lo spazio del margine: prospettive sul femminile nella comunità antica. Rome.Google Scholar
Morgan, L. 1998. ‘Assimilation and Civil War: Hercules and Cacus (Aen. 8.185–267)’, in Stahl 1998: 175–97.Google Scholar
Mundt, F. 2012. ‘Rom als Bühne bei Cassius Dio, Herodian und in der Historia Augusta’, in Mundt, F. (ed.), Kommunikationsräume im kaiserzeitlichen Rom. Berlin and Boston: 173–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, T. 2004. Pliny the Elder’s Natural History: The Empire in the Encyclopedia. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, P. 1971. Piranesi and the Grandeur of Ancient Rome: Walter Neurath Memorial Lecture 1971. London.Google Scholar
Nauta, R. R. 2006. ‘The recusatio in Flavian Poetry’, in Nauta, Van Dam and Smolenaars 2006: 21–40.Google Scholar
Nauta, R. R., Van Dam, H.‑J. and Smolenaars, J. J. L. (eds.) 2006. Flavian Poetry. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelis, D. P. 2004. ‘From Didactic to Epic: Georgics 2.458–3.48’, in Gale, M. R. (ed.), Latin Epic and Didactic Poetry: Genre, Tradition and Individuality. Swansea: 73–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelis, D. P. 2005a. ‘Patterns of Time in Vergil: The Aeneid and the Aetia of Callimachus’, in Schwindt 2005a: 71–83.Google Scholar
Nelis, D. P. 2005b. ‘The Reading of Orpheus: The Orphic Argonautica and the Epic Tradition’, in Paschalis, M. (ed.), Roman and Greek Imperial Epic. Heraklion: 170–92.Google Scholar
Nelis, D. P. 2015. ‘Vergilian Cities: Visions of Troy, Carthage and Rome’, in Fuhrer, Mundt and Stenger 2015a: 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nethercut, W. R. 1970. ‘The Ironic Priest: Propertius’ “Roman Elegies”, iii, 1–5: Imitations of Horace and Vergil’, AJPh 91: 385–407.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C. 1991. Space, Geography, and Politics in the Early Roman Empire. Translated by H. Leclerc. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M. E. 1970. A Commentary on Horace’s Odes: Book i. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nora, P. and Jordan, D. P. (eds.) 2001–10. Rethinking France: les lieux de mémoire. 4 vols. Chicago and London.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. 1998. Poetologische Bildersprache in der frühgriechischen Dichtung. Stuttgart and Leipzig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Rourke, D. 2017. ‘Hospitality Narratives in Virgil and Callimachus: The Ideology of Reception’, CCJ 63: 118–42.Google Scholar
Östenberg, I. 2009. Staging the World: Spoils, Captives, and Representations in the Roman Triumphal Procession. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandey, N. B. 2014. ‘Reading Rome from the Further Shore: Aeneid 6 in the Augustan Urban Landscape’, Vergilius 60: 85–116.Google Scholar
Pandey, N. B. 2018. The Poetics of Power in Augustan Rome: Latin Poetic Responses to Early Imperial Iconography. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandey, N. B. 2020. ‘Shovels Out: Excavating Augustus and Partisan Historiography on the Palatine’, Mnemosyne 73: 689–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paschoud, F. 1967. Roma aeterna: études sur le patriotisme romain dans l’occident latin à l’époque des grandes invasions. Rome.Google Scholar
Pasco-Pranger, M. 2006. Founding the Year: Ovid’s Fasti and the Poetics of the Roman Calendar. Mnemosyne Supplement 276. Leiden.Google Scholar
Pasqualini, A. 2006. ‘La latinità di Ariccia e la grecità di Nemi: istituzioni civili e religiose a confronto’, Annali dell’Archeoclub Aricino-Nemorense 1: 29–38.Google Scholar
Paton, W. R. (ed., tr.) 2010. Polybius: The Histories, Books 1–2. Revised by F. W. Walbank and C. Habicht. Loeb Classical Library 128. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Pollini, J. 2012. From Republic to Empire: Rhetoric, Religion, and Power in the Visual Culture of Ancient Rome. Norman, OK.Google Scholar
Porter, J. 2001. ‘Ideals and Ruins: Pausanius, Longinus and the Second Sophistic’, in Alcock, S. E., Cherry, J. F. and Elsner, J. (eds.), Pausanias: Travel and Memory in Roman Greece. Oxford: 63–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, J. 2011. ‘Sublime Monuments and Sublime Ruins in Ancient Aesthetics’, European Review of History 18: 685–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, A. and Hardie, P. R. (eds.) 2017. The Ancient Lives of Virgil: Literary and Historical Studies. Swansea.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pucci, J. 1992. ‘Horace and Virgilian Mimesis: A Re-reading of Odes 1.3’, CW 85: 659–73.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. 1986. Artifices of Eternity: Horace’s Fourth Book of Odes. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. 2016. ‘The Sense of Two Endings: How Virgil and Statius Conclude’, ICS 41: 85–149.Google Scholar
Quenemoen, C. K. 2006. ‘The Portico of the Danaids: A New Reconstruction’, AJA 110: 229–50.Google Scholar
Quint, D. 2018. Virgil’s Double Cross: Design and Meaning in the Aeneid. Princeton and Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rackham, H. (ed., tr.) 1967. Pliny: Natural History, vol. 1. Loeb Classical Library 330. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Radice, B. (ed., tr.) 1969. Pliny: Letters, Books 1–7. Loeb Classical Library 55. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Rakob, F. 2000. ‘The Making of Augustan Carthage’, in Fentress, E. (ed.), Romanization and the City: Creation, Transformations and Failures. JRA Supplement 38. Portsmouth, RI: 73–82.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. T. and Licht, A. L. 1997. The Comet of 44 b.c. and Caesar’s Funeral Games. Atlanta.Google Scholar
Reed, J. D. 2007. Virgil’s Gaze: Nation and Poetry in the Aeneid. Princeton and Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, J. D. 2010. ‘Vergil’s Roman’, in Farrell, J. and Putnam, M. C. J. (eds.), A Companion to Vergil’s Aeneid and Its Tradition. Malden, MA and Oxford: 66–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehak, P. 2006. Imperium and Cosmos: Augustus and the Northern Campus Martius, edited by Younger, J. G.. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Reitz, B. 2012. ‘Tantae molis erat: On Valuing Roman Imperial Architecture’, in Sluiter, I. and Rosen, R. M. (eds.), Aesthetic Value in Classical Antiquity, Leiden and Boston: 315–44.Google Scholar
Reitz-Joosse, B. 2022. Building in Words: Representations of the Process of Construction in Latin Literature. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, J.-C. 1970. ‘“Mausoleum”: d’Halicarnasse à Rome, puis à Alexandrie’, Latomus 29: 370–88.Google Scholar
Ridley, R. T. 2003. The Emperor’s Retrospect: Augustus’ Res gestae in Epigraphy, Historiography and Commentary. Leuven and Dudley, MA.Google Scholar
Rimell, V. 2015. The Closure of Space in Roman Poetics: Empire’s Inward Turn. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roccos, L. J. 1989. ‘Apollo Palatinus: The Augustan Apollo on the Sorrento Base’, AJA 93: 571–88.Google Scholar
Rolfe, J. C. (ed., tr.) 1997–8. Suetonius, 2 vols. Revised by D. W. Hurley. Loeb Classical Library 31, 38. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Roller, M. B. 2018. Models from the Past in Roman Culture: A World of Exempla. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosati, G. 1983. Narciso e Pigmalione: illusione e spettacolo nelle Metamorfosi di Ovidio. Florence.Google Scholar
Rosati, G. 1992. ‘L’elegia al femminile: le Heroides di Ovidio (e altre heroides)’, MD 29: 71–94.Google Scholar
Rosati, G. 2002. ‘La scena del potere: retorica del paesaggio nel teatro di Seneca’, in Urso, G. (ed.), Hispania terris omnibus felicior: premesse ed esiti di un processo di integrazione. Pisa: 225–39.Google Scholar
Rosati, G. 2006. ‘Luxury and Love: The Encomium as Aestheticisation of Power in Flavian Poetry’, in Nauta, Van Dam and Smolenaars 2006: 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosati, G. 2012. ‘Il poeta e il principe del futuro: Ovidio e Germanico su poesia e potere’, in Citroni, M. (ed.), Letteratura e Civitas: Transizioni dalla Repubblica all’Impero, in ricordo di Emanuele Narducci. Pisa: 295–312.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, P. 1993. ‘A Cold Reception in Callimachus’ Victoria Berenices (S. H. 257–265)’, CQ 43: 206–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, A. 2000. ‘The Tears of Marcellus: History of a Literary Motif in Livy’, G&R 47: 56–66.Google Scholar
Rossi, A. 2002. ‘The Fall of Troy: Between Tradition and Genre’, in Levene, D. and Nelis, D. (eds.), Clio and the Poets: Augustan Poetry and the Traditions of Ancient Historiography. Leiden: 231–51.Google Scholar
Royo, M. 1999. Domus Imperatoriae: topographie, formation et imaginaire des palais imperiaux du Palatin (IIe siècle av. J.‑C. – Ier siècle ap. J.‑C.). Rome.Google Scholar
Rubenbauer, H., Hofmann, J. B. and Heine, R. 1995. Lateinische Grammatik, 12th edn. Bamberg and Munich.Google Scholar
Rudd, N. (ed.) 1993a. Horace 2000: A Celebration. Essays for the Bimillennium. London.Google Scholar
Rudd, N. (ed., tr.) 2004. Horace: Odes and Epodes. Loeb Classical Library 33. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Sauer, K. 1930. Untersuchungen zur Darstellung des Todes in der griechisch-römischen Geschichtsschreibung. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. 2003. The Passions in Play: Thyestes and the Dynamics of Senecan Drama. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrijvers, P. 2006. ‘Silius Italicus and the Roman Sublime’, in Nauta, Van Dam and Smolenaars 2006: 97–111.Google Scholar
Schumacher, R. 1993. ‘Three Related Sanctuaries of Poseidon: Geraistos, Kalaureia and Tainaron’, in Marinatos, N. and Hägg, R. (eds.), Greek Sanctuaries: New Approaches. London: 51–70.Google Scholar
Schwindt, J. P. (ed.) 2005a. La représentation du temps dans la poésie augustéenne: zur Poetik der Zeit in augusteischer Dichtung. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Schwindt, J. P. 2005b. ‘Zeiten und Räume in augusteischer Dichtung’, in Schwindt 2005a: 1–18.Google Scholar
Schwindt, J. P. 2009. ‘Thaumatographia, or “What Is a Theme?”’, in Hardie 2009a: 145–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwindt, J. P. 2012. ‘Rom und der Osten oder Von der Schwierigkeit, sich zu orientieren (von Catulls Odyssee zu Horaz’ Aeneis)’, Dictynna 9, online at https://journals.openedition.org/dictynna/793.Google Scholar
Schwindt, J. P. 2013a. ‘The Philology of History: How and What Augustan Literature Remembers’, in Farrell and Nelis 2013: 40–56.Google Scholar
Schwindt, J. P. 2013b. ‘Der Sound der Macht: zur onomatopoetischen Konstruktion des Mythos im Zeitalter des Augustus’, in Labate and Rosati 2013: 69–88.Google Scholar
Schwindt, J. P. 2015a. ‘Die Idee der Materialität (der Schrift) in Dichtungstexten des spätrepublikanischen und augusteischen Rom’, in Meier, Ott and Sauer 2015: 40–4.Google Scholar
Schwindt, J. P. 2016. ‘The Magic of Counting: On the Cantatoric Status of Poetry (Catullus 5 and 7; Horace Odes 1.11)’, in Hardie, P. R. (ed.), Augustan Poetry and the Irrational. Oxford: 117–33.Google Scholar
Schwindt, J. P. 2020. ‘Was weiß die Anekdote – und wie? Grundlinien einer Theorie der Lücke (nach Sueton)’, in Grandl, M. and Möller, M. (eds.), Wissen en miniature: Theorie und Epistemologie der Anekdote. Wiesbaden: 31–7.Google Scholar
Schwindt, J. P. 2021. ‘Ovid als Autor der Moderne’, in Möller, M. (ed.), Ovid-Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung. Stuttgart: 484–93.Google Scholar
Setaioli, A. 2008. ‘Stoic and Epicurean Interpretations in Servius’s Commentary on Virgil’, in Casali, S. and Stok, F. (eds.), Servio: stratificazioni esegetiche e modelli culturali. Brussels: 159–78.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (ed., tr.) 1993. Martial: Epigrams, vol. 2. Loeb Classical Library 95. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (ed., tr.) 2015. Statius: Silvae. With corrections by C. A. Parrott. Loeb Classical Library 206. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Silvestri, A. 2007–8. ‘Aricia: i culti salutari del Bosco sacro a Diana e i legami della dea con la Diana di Ariminum’, Annali dell’Archeoclub d’Italia Aricino-Nemorense 2: 97–106.Google Scholar
Simpson, C. J. 1993. ‘Horace, Carm. i,2,30–44, Apollo Palatinus and Allusions to Shrines in Octavian’s Rome’, Athenaeum 81: 632–42.Google Scholar
Soja, E. S. 1996. Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-Imagined Places. Cambridge, MA and Oxford.Google Scholar
Solodow, J. B. 1988. The World of Ovid’s Metamorphoses. Chapel Hill, NC and London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somerville, T. 2010. ‘Note on a Reversed Acrostic in Vergil Georgics 1.429–33’, CPh 105: 202–9.Google Scholar
Spencer, D. 2005. ‘Lucan’s Follies: Memory and Ruin in a Civil War Landscape’, G&R 52: 46–69.Google Scholar
Spencer, D. 2010. Roman Landscape: Culture and Identity. Greece and Rome New Surveys in the Classics 39. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Spencer, D. 2018. ‘Varro’s Roman Ways: Metastasis and Etymology’, in Fitzgerald and Spentzou 2018: 45–68.Google Scholar
Spentzou, E. 2018. ‘Propertius’ Aberrant Itineraries: Fleeting Moments in the Eternal City’, in Fitzgerald and Spentzou 2018: 23–43.Google Scholar
Squire, M. 2010. ‘Making Myron’s Cow Moo? Ecphrastic Epigram and the Poetics of Simulation’, AJPh 131: 589–634.Google Scholar
Stahl, H.-P. (ed.) 1998. Vergil’s Aeneid: Augustan Epic and Political Context. London.Google Scholar
Šterbenc Erker, D. 2013. Religiöse Rollen römischer Frauen in ‘griechischen’ Ritualen. Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, B. 2009. ‘Per gestum res est significanda mihi: Ovid and Language in Exile’, CPh 104: 162–83.Google Scholar
Strauss, L. 2013 [1961]. On Tyranny. Corrected and expanded edition, edited by Gourevitch, V. and Roth, M. S.. Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbert, R. and Broderson, K. (eds.) 2004. Space in the Roman World: Its Perception and Presentation. Münster.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. 2006. ‘Propertian Textual Criticism and Editing’, in Günther 2006: 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatum, W. J. 2000. ‘Aspirations and Divagations: The Poetics of Place in Propertius 2.10’, TAPhA 130: 393–410.Google Scholar
Ternaux-Compans, H. (tr.) 2002. Singularités du Nicaragua de Gonzalo Fernández de Oviedo (1529). Paris.Google Scholar
Thalmann, W. G. 2011. Apollonius and Rhodes and the Spaces of Hellenism. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, E. 2014. ‘On the Sublime in Architecture’, in Elsner, J. and Meyer, M. (eds.), Art and Rhetoric in Roman Culture. Cambridge: 37–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. F. 1982. Lands and People in Roman Poetry: The Ethnographical Tradition. PCPhS Supplementary Volume 7. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. 1983a. ‘Callimachus, the Victoria Berenices, and Roman Poetry’, CQ 33: 92–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topinka, R. J. 2010. ‘Foucault, Borges, Heterotopia: Producing Knowledge in Other Spaces’, Foucault Studies 9: 54–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torelli, M. 1984. Lavinio e Roma: riti iniziatici e matrimonio tra archeologia e storia. Rome.Google Scholar
Torjussen, S. 2008. ‘Metamorphoses of Myth: A Study of the “Orphic” Gold Tablets and the Derveni Papyrus’. Diss. Tromso.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. 1993. Roman Marriage: Iusti coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. Oxford.Google Scholar
Tueller, M. A. 2000. ‘Well-Read Heroes: Quoting the Aetia in Aeneid 8’, HSPh 100: 361–80.Google Scholar
Van Hooff, A. 2003. ‘The Imperial Art of Dying’, in de Blois, L., Erdkamp, P., Hekster, O., de Kleijn, G. and Mols, S. (eds.), The Representation and Perception of Roman Imperial Power. Impact of Empire 3. Amsterdam: 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Nortwick, T. 1992. Somewhere I Have Never Travelled: The Second Self and the Hero’s Journey in Ancient Epic. New York.Google Scholar
Vessey, D. W. T. C. 1982. ‘Challenge and Response’, in Kenney, E. J. and Clausen, W. V. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Classical Literature, vol. 2.4. Cambridge: 1–6.Google Scholar
Wallis, J. 2018. Introspection and Engagement in Propertius: A Study of Book 3. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, U. 2004. Memoria und res publica: zur Geschichtskultur im republikanischen Rom. Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Wardle, D. 2007. ‘A Perfect Send-Off: Suetonius and the Dying Art of Augustus (Suetonius, Aug. 99)’, Mnemosyne 60: 443–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warf, G. and Arias, S. (eds.) 2009a. The Spatial Turn: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. London and New York.Google Scholar
Warf, G. and Arias, S. 2009b. ‘Introduction: The Reinsertion of Space into the Social Sciences and Humanities’, in Warf and Arias 2009a: 1–10.Google Scholar
Welch, T. S. 2001. ‘Est locus uni cuique suus: City and Status in Horace’s Satires 1.8 and 1.9’, ClAnt 20: 165–92.Google Scholar
Welch, T. S. 2005. The Elegiac Cityscape: Propertius and the Meaning of Roman Monuments. Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Wheeler, A. L. (ed., tr.) 1988. Ovid: Tristia, Ex Ponto. Revised by Goold, G. P.. Loeb Classical Library 151. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Williams, M. F. 2003. ‘The Sidus Iulium, the Divinity of Men, and the Golden Age in Virgil’s Aeneid’, Leeds International Classical Studies 2.1: 1–29, online at https://web.archive.org/web/20141130010443/http://lics.leeds.ac.uk/2003/200301.pdf.Google Scholar
Wiltshire, S. F. 1999. ‘The Man Who Was Not There: Aeneas and Absence in Aeneid 9’, in Perkell, C. (ed.), Reading Virgil’s Aeneid: An Interpretative Guide. Norman, OK: 162–77.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 1994. Historiography and Imagination: Eight Essays on Roman Culture. Exeter.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. 2019. The House of Augustus: A Historical Detective Story. Princeton and Oxford.Google Scholar
Woodman, T. and West, D. (eds.) 1984. Poetry and Politics in the Age of Augustus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Worman, N. 2015. Landscape and the Spaces of Metaphor in Ancient Literary Theory and Criticism. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, E. 2013. ‘Homer in a Nutshell: Virgilian Miniaturization and the Sublime’, PMLA 128: 57–72.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. 1988. The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus. Translated by A. Shapiro. Ann Arbor.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziolkowski, A. 1992. The Temples of Mid-Republican Rome and Their Historical and Topographical Context. Rome.Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, T. 1993. ‘Broch’s Image of Virgil and Its Context’, in Kallendorf 1993: 87–111.Google Scholar