Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T08:51:06.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 4 - Big Data, Little Understanding

from Part I - Philosophical, Epistemological and Theoretical Considerations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2023

Boyka Simeonova
Affiliation:
University of Leicester
Robert D. Galliers
Affiliation:
Bentley University, Massachusetts and Warwick Business School
Get access

Summary

Big data has been proclaimed as revolutionary and transformative, and will alter businesses and society in fundamental ways. Such dramatic claims sound suspiciously like prior technological waves which were also promoted as metamorphic. Most of these past ‘revolutionary’ technologies have proved to be more evolutionary than revolutionary, but is the same likely to be true with big data? This chapter examines a number of the underlying assumptions associated with the supposed big data revolution. It highlights some of the fallacies and misconceptions that lie behind big data, and how these assumptions can lead to unintended and dysfunctional consequences. In particular, it explores how these dysfunctions might manifest themselves when it comes to organizational knowledge and practice. The analysis in the chapter leads to the conclusion that while big data offers promise, the hype surrounding it has obscured the potential dangers in its use. The chapter explains that it is important to take a more nuanced view of this new technology, putting safeguards in place to ensure that big data use (including big data analytics, machine learning, artificial intelligence and the algorithms they develop) does not lead to dysfunction.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbasi, A., Sarker, S. and Chiang, R. (2016). Big data research in information systems: Toward an inclusive research agenda. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(2), ixxxii.Google Scholar
Ackoff, R. (1967). Management misinformation systems. Management Science, 14(4), B147B156.Google Scholar
Alharthi, A., Krotov, V. and Bowman, M. (2017). Addressing barriers to big data. Business Horizons, 60(3), 285292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, C. (2008). The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete. Wired.Google Scholar
Baesens, B., Bapna, R., Marsden, J., Vanthienen, J. and Zhao, J. L. (2016). Transformational issues of big data and analytics in networked business. MIS Quarterly, 40(4), 807818.Google Scholar
Bell, G., Hey, T. and Szalay, A. (2009). Beyond the data deluge. Science, 323(5919), 12971298.Google Scholar
Bloom, B. (ed.) (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. New York, NY: David McKay & Co.Google Scholar
Cohen, P. (2013). How Nordstrom uses WiFi to spy on shoppers. Forbes.Google Scholar
Constantiou, I. and Kallinikos, J. (2015). New games, new rules: Big data and the changing context of strategy. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 4457.Google Scholar
Davenport, T. (2014). Big Data @ Work: Dispelling the Myths, Uncovering the Opportunities. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Dykes, B. (2016). Actionable insights: The missing link between data and business value. Forbes.Google Scholar
Ekbia, H., Mattioll, M., Kouper, I., Arave, G., Ghazinejad, A., Bowman, T. et al. (2015). Big data, bigger dilemmas: A critical review. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(8), 15231545.Google Scholar
Evenstad, L. (2018). The troublesome saga of Gov.uk Verify. ComputerWeekly, www.computerweekly.com/news/252450423/Govuk-Verify-a-troublesome-saga.Google Scholar
Feldman, D. (2016). When big data goes bad … CustomerThink, https://customerthink.com/when-big-data-goes-bad/.Google Scholar
Fricke, M. (2015). Big data and its epistemology. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(4), 651661.Google Scholar
Galliers, R. D., Newell, S., Shanks, G. and Topi, H. (2017). Datification and its human, organizational and societal effects: The strategic opportunities and challenges of algorithmic decision-making. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 26(3), 185190.Google Scholar
Gandomi, A. and Haider, M. (2015). Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods and analytics. International Journal of Information Management, 35(2), 137144.Google Scholar
Gent, E. (2016). Beware of the gaps in big data. Engineering & Technology, https://eandt.theiet.org/content/articles/2016/09/beware-of-the-gaps-in-big-data/.Google Scholar
Goes, P. B. (2014). Editor’s comments: Big data and IS research. MIS Quarterly, 38(3), iiiviii.Google Scholar
Grover, V., Lindberg, A., Benbasat, I. and Lyytinen, K. (2020). The perils and promises of big data research in information systems. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(2), 268291.Google Scholar
Harford, T. (2014). Big data: Are we making a big mistake? Financial Times Magazine, www.ft.com/content/21a6e7d8-b479-11e3-a09a-00144feabdc0#axzz2yQ2QQfQX.Google Scholar
Hirschheim, R. (2020). The attack on understanding: How big data and theory have led us astray – a comment on Gary Smith’s Data Mining Fool’s Gold. Journal of Information Technology, 36(2), 176183.Google Scholar
Hirschheim, R. (1985). Office Automation: A Social and Organizational Perspective. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. (2012). Big data + big analytics = big opportunity. Financial Executive, 28(6), 5053.Google Scholar
Johnson, S., Gray, P. and Sarker, S. (2019). Revisiting IS research practice in the era of big data. Information & Organization, 29(1), 4156.Google Scholar
Jones, M. (2019). What we talk about when we talk about (big) data. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(1), 316.Google Scholar
Kitchin, R. (2014). Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, 1(1), 112.Google Scholar
Kronz, A., Hare, J. and Krensky, P. (2020). Hype cycle for analytics and business intelligence. Gartner, www.gartner.com/doc/3988448.Google Scholar
LaValle, S., Lesser, E., Shockley, R., Hopkins, M. and Kruschwitz, N. (2011). Big data, analytics, and the path from insights to value. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(2), 2131.Google Scholar
Lazer, D., Kennedy, R., King, G. and Vespignani, A. (2014). The parable of Google Flu: Traps in big data analysis. Science, 343(6176), 12031205.Google Scholar
Lee, L. and Sobol, D. (2012). What data can’t tell you about customers. Harvard Business Review, https://hbr.org/2012/08/what-data-cant-tell-you-about.Google Scholar
Lepore, J. (2020). If Then: How the Simulmatics Corporation Invented the Future. New York, NY: Liveright.Google Scholar
Lindstrom, M. (2016). Small Data: The Tiny Clues that Uncover Huge Trends. New York, NY: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Lynn, B. (2020). The big tech extortion racket. Harper’s Magazine, https://harpers.org/archive/2020/09/the-big-tech-extortion-racket/.Google Scholar
Maass, W., Parsons, J., Purao, S., Storey, V. and Woo, C. (2018). Data-driven meets theory-driven research in the era of big data: Opportunities and challenges for information systems research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(12), 12531273.Google Scholar
Mamo, H. (2018). Taking a social media ‘nosedive’ and underrating common relationships in Black Mirror. https://medium.com/@heranmamo/taking-a-social-media-nosedive-and-underrating-common-relationships-in-black-mirror-9be23b3a5575.Google Scholar
Marr, B. (2016). Big Data in Practice: How 45 Successful Companies Used Big Data Analytics to Deliver Extraordinary Results. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
McAfee, A. and Brynjolfsson, E. (2012). Big data: The management revolution. Harvard Business Review, 90(10), 19.Google Scholar
Mnookin, S. (2020). The bumbling 1960s data scientists who anticipated Facebook and Google. The New York Times, www.nytimes.com/2020/09/15/books/review/if-then-jill-lepore.html.Google Scholar
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). (2019). 2018 fatal motor vehicle crashes: Overview. https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812826.Google Scholar
Naughton, J. (2019). ‘The goal is to automate us’: Welcome to the world of surveillance capital. The Guardian.Google Scholar
Naughton, J. (2016). Death by drone strike, dished out by algorithm. The Guardian.Google Scholar
Pigliucci, M. (2009). The end of theory in science? EMBO Reports, 10(6), 534.Google Scholar
Ribes, D. and Jackson, S. (2013). Data bite man: The work of sustaining long-term study. In Gitelman, L. (ed.), ‘Raw Data’ Is an Oxymoron. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 147166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roose, K. (2017). Facebook’s Frankenstein moment. The New York Times.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sandelands, L. (1990). What is so practical about theory? Lewin revisited. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 20(3), 235262.Google Scholar
Schrage, M. (2014). Learn from your analytics failures. Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
Siegel, E. (2013). Predictive Analytics: The Power to Predict Who Will Click, Buy, Lie or Die. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Simsek, Z., Vaara, E., Paruchuri, S., Nadkarni, S. and Shaw, J. (2019). New ways of seeing big data. Academy of Management Journal, 62(4), 971978.Google Scholar
Smith, G. (2020). Data mining fool’s gold. Journal of Information Technology, 35(3), 182194.Google Scholar
Smith, G. and Cordes, J. (2019). The 9 Pitfalls of Data Science. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stephens-Davidowitz, S. (2017). Everybody Lies: Big Data, New Data, and What the Internet Can Tell Us about Who We Really Are. New York, NY: Dey Street Books, HarperCollins.Google Scholar
US Department of Transportation (US DOT). (2018). U.S. Department of Transportation Transit, Highway, and Safety Funds. www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bicycle_pedestrian/funding/funding_opportunities.cfm.Google Scholar
US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2020a). Fact sheet – data-driven safety analysis. https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/rsdp/factsheet/datadriven_safety_analysis.pdf.Google Scholar
US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2020b). Roadway Safety Data Program – data-driven safety analysis (DDSA). https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/rsdp/ddsa.aspx.Google Scholar
US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). (2016). Guidance on state safety data systems. https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/legislationandpolicy/fast/docs/ssds_guidance.pdf.Google Scholar
Veritas. (2016). Veritas global databerg report finds 85% of stored data is either dark or redundant, obsolete, or trivial (ROT). www.veritas.com/news-releases/2016-03-15-veritas-global-databerg-report-finds-85-percent-of-stored-data.Google Scholar
Walker, R. (2015). From Big Data to Big Profits: Success with Data and Analytics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, T. (2016). Why big data needs thick data. Ethnography Matters, https://medium.com/ethnography-matters/why-big-data-needs-thick-data-b4b3e75e3d7.Google Scholar
Weinberger, D. (2012). Too Big to Know: Rethinking Knowledge Now that the Facts Aren’t the Facts, Experts Are Everywhere, and the Smartest Person in the Room Is the Room. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Wigan, M. and Clarke, R. (2013). Big data’s big unintended consequences. IEEE Computer, 46(6), 4653.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical Investigations. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Yampolskiy, R. (2017). What will happen when your company’s algorithms go wrong? Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, A. (2020). The A-level results injustice shows why algorithms are never neutral. The New Statesman.Google Scholar
Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York, NY: Public Affairs.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×