Book contents
- Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
- Cambridge Critical Guides
- Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Wittgenstein’s Impatient Reply to Russell
- Chapter 2 Modality in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus
- Chapter 3 Clarification and Analysis in the Tractatus
- Chapter 4 The Fish Tale: The Unity of Language and the World in Light of TLP 4.014
- Chapter 5 That Which ‘Is True’ Must Already Contain the Verb: Wittgenstein’s Rejection of Frege’s Separation of Judgment from Content
- Chapter 6 Solipsism and the Self
- Chapter 7 The Tractatus and the First Person
- Chapter 8 Arithmetic in the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
- Chapter 9 ‘Normal Connections’ and the Law of Causality
- Chapter 10 The Ethical Dimension of the Tractatus
- Chapter 11 “Obviously Wrong”: The Tractatus on Will and World
- References
- Index
- Cambridge Critical Guides
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 March 2024
Edited by
Book contents
- Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
- Cambridge Critical Guides
- Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Wittgenstein’s Impatient Reply to Russell
- Chapter 2 Modality in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus
- Chapter 3 Clarification and Analysis in the Tractatus
- Chapter 4 The Fish Tale: The Unity of Language and the World in Light of TLP 4.014
- Chapter 5 That Which ‘Is True’ Must Already Contain the Verb: Wittgenstein’s Rejection of Frege’s Separation of Judgment from Content
- Chapter 6 Solipsism and the Self
- Chapter 7 The Tractatus and the First Person
- Chapter 8 Arithmetic in the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
- Chapter 9 ‘Normal Connections’ and the Law of Causality
- Chapter 10 The Ethical Dimension of the Tractatus
- Chapter 11 “Obviously Wrong”: The Tractatus on Will and World
- References
- Index
- Cambridge Critical Guides
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-PhilosophicusA Critical Guide, pp. 219 - 230Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1971. An Introduction to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. 2nd ed. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Anzengruber, Ludwig. 1872. “Die Kreuzelschreiber”. In Ludwig Anzengrubers Gesammelte Werke. Stuttgart and Berlin: G. Cotta’sche Buchhandlung Nachfolger.Google Scholar
Appelqvist, Hanne. 2016. “On Wittgenstein’s Kantian Solution of the Problem of Philosophy”. The British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (4):697–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, Peter. 1979. “Untangling the Net Metaphor”. Philosophy Research Archives 5:182–199.Google Scholar
Bell, David. 1996. “Solipsism and Subjectivity”. European Journal of Philosophy 4:155–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Max. 1964. A Companion to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, Raymond. 1992. The Nature of All Being: A Study of Wittgenstein’s Modal Atomism. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, Myles. 1987. “Wittgenstein and Augustine De Magistro”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 61:1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterfield, Jeremy. 2004. Between Laws and Models: Some Philosophical Morals of Lagrangian Mechanics, https://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0409030.pdf.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 1983. “The Logicist Foundations of Mathematics”. In Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings, edited by Benacerraf, P. and Putnam, H.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 41–52.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Richard. 2003. “Russell and Moore, 1898–1905”. In The Cambridge Companion to Bertrand Russell, edited by Griffin, N.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 108–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Child, William. 2013. “Does the Tractatus Contain a Private Language Argument?”. In Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: History and Interpretation, edited by Sullivan, P. and Potter, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 143–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Anne-Marie Søndergaard. 2011. “Wittgenstein and Ethics”. In The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein, edited by Kuusela, O. and McGinn, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 796–817.Google Scholar
Church, Alonzo. 1932. “A Set of Postulates for the Foundation of Logic”. The Annals of Mathematics 33 (2):346–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, Alonzo. 1941. The Calculi of Lambda Conversion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chwistek, Leon. 1967. “Antinomies of Formal Logic”. In Polish Logic: 1920–1939, edited by McCall, S.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 338–345.Google Scholar
Conant, James. 2000. “Elucidation and Nonsense in Frege and Early Wittgenstein”. In The New Wittgenstein, edited by Crary, A. and Read, R.. London: Routledge, 174–217.Google Scholar
Conant, James. 2002. “The Method of the Tractatus”. In From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on Early Analytic Philosophy, edited by Reck, E. H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 374–462.Google Scholar
Conant, James. 2011. “Wittgenstein’s Methods”. In The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics, edited by Kuusela, O. and McGinn, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 620–645.Google Scholar
Copi, Irving M. 1958. “Objects, Properties and Relations in the Tractatus”. Mind 67:145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Cora. 1991a. “The Face of Necessity”. In The Realistic Spirit. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 243–266.Google Scholar
Diamond, Cora. 1991b. “Throwing Away the Ladder: How to Read the Tractatus”. In The Realistic Spirit. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 179–204.Google Scholar
Diamond, Cora. 1991c. “What Nonsense Might Be”. In The Realistic Spirit. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Cora. 2000a. “Does Bismarck Have a Beetle in His Box? The Private Language Argument in the Tractatus”. In The New Wittgenstein, edited by Crary, A. and Read, R.. Abingdon: Routledge, 262–292.Google Scholar
Diamond, Cora. 2000b. “Ethics, Imagination and the Method of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus”. In The New Wittgenstein, edited by Crary, A. and Read, R.. Abingdon: Routledge, 149–173.Google Scholar
Diamond, Cora. 2002. “Truth before Tarski: After Sluga, after Ricketts, after Geach, after Goldfarb, Hylton, Floyd, and Van Heijenoort”. In From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on Early Analytic Philosophy, edited by Reck, E. H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 252–279.Google Scholar
Diamond, Cora. 2018. “Commentary on José Zalabardo’s ‘the Tractatus on Unity’”. Australasian Philosophical Review 2:272–284.Google Scholar
Diamond, Cora. 2019. Reading Wittgenstein with Anscombe, Going on to Ethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
DiSalle, Robert. 1995. “Spacetime Theory as Physical Geometry”. Erkenntnis 42 (3):317–337.Google Scholar
Dreben, Burton, and Floyd, Juliet. 1991. “Tautology: How Not to Use a Word”. Synthese 87 (1):23–50.Google Scholar
Drury, Maurice O’Connor. 1981. “Some Notes on Conversations with Wittgenstein”. In Ludwig Wittgenstein. Personal Recollections, edited by Rhees, R.. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, 76–96.Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael. 1991. “Frege’s Myth of the Third Realm”. In Frege and Other Philosophers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 249–262.Google Scholar
Eisenthal, Joshua. 2018. “Mechanics without Mechanisms”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 62:42–55.Google Scholar
Eisenthal, Joshua. 2021. “Hertz’s Mechanics and a Unitary Notion of Force”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 90:226–234.Google Scholar
Eisenthal, Joshua. 2022. “Models and Multiplicities”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 60 (2):277–302.Google Scholar
Engelmann, Mauro Luiz. 2021. Reading Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fairhurst, Jordi. 2019. “The Ethical Subject and the Willing Subject in the Tractatus: An Alternative to the Transcendental Reading”. Philosophia 47 (1):75–95.Google Scholar
Floyd, Juliet. 1995. “On Saying What You Really Want to Say: Wittgenstein, Gödel, and the Trisection of the Angle”. In From Dedekind to Gödel: Essays on the Development of the Foundations of Mathematics, edited by Hintikka, J.. Dordrecht: Kluwer 373–425.Google Scholar
Floyd, Juliet. 1998. “The Uncaptive Eye: Solipsism in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus”. In Loneliness, edited by Rouner, L. S.. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 79–108.Google Scholar
Floyd, Juliet. 2000. “Wittgenstein, Mathematics and Philosophy”. In The New Wittgenstein, edited by Read, R. and Crary, A.. London: Routledge, 232–261.Google Scholar
Floyd, Juliet. 2001. “Number and Ascriptions of Number in the Tractatus”. In Future Pasts: Perspectives on the Analytic Tradition in Twentieth Century Philosophy, edited by Floyd, J. and Shieh, S.. New York: Oxford University Press, 145–191.Google Scholar
Floyd, Juliet. 2005. “Wittgenstein on Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics”. In The Oxford Handbook to the Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics, edited by Shapiro, S.. New York: Oxford University Press, 75–128.Google Scholar
Floyd, Juliet. 2007. “Wittgenstein and the Inexpressible”. In Wittgenstein and the Moral Life, edited by Crary, A.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 177–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floyd, Juliet. 2010. “On Being Surprised: Wittgenstein on Aspect Perception, Logic and Mathematics”. In Seeing Wittgenstein Anew: New Essays on Aspect Seeing, edited by Day, W. and Krebs, V. J.. New York: Cambridge University Press, 314–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floyd, Juliet. 2018. “‘Ultimate’ Facts? Zalabardo on the Metaphysics of Truth”. Australasian Philosophical Review 2 (3):299–314.Google Scholar
Frascolla, Pasquale. 1994. Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Mathematics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Frascolla, Pasquale. 1997. “The Tractatus System of Arithmetic”. Synthese 122:353–378.Google Scholar
Frascolla, Pasquale. 2004. “On the Nature of Tractatus Objects”. Dialectica 58 (3):369–382.Google Scholar
Frascolla, Pasquale. 2016. “Wittgenstein’s Early Philosophy of Mathematics”. In A Companion to Wittgenstein, edited by Glock, H.-J. and Hyman, J.. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 305–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Craig. 1985. “D’Alembert’s Principle: The Original Formulation and Application in Jean D’Alembert’s Traité de Dynamique (1743)”. Centaurus 28:31–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1879. Begriffsschrift, Eine Der Arithmetischen Nachgebildete Formelsprache Des Reinen Denkens. Halle: L. Nebert.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1893. Grundgesetze Der Arithmetik. Vol. I. Jena: Verlag Hermann Pohle.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1906. “Über Die Grundlagen Der Geometrie I, II, III”. Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 15:293–309, 377–403, 423–430.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1972. Conceptual Notation and Related Articles. Translated by T. W. Bynum. Edited by Bynum, T. W.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1979a. “Logic in Mathematics”. In Posthumous Writings, edited by Hermes, H., Kambartel, F. and Kaulbach, F.. Oxford: Blackwell, 203–250.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1979b. Posthumous Writings. Translated by P. Long and R. White. Edited by Hermes, H., Kambartel, F. and Kaulbach, F.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1980a. The Foundations of Arithmetic. Translated by J. L. Austin. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1980b. “On Concept and Object”. In Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, edited by Black, M. and Geach, P. T.. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 42–55.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1984. Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy. Edited by McGuinness, B.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 2013. Basic Laws of Arithmetic. Edited by Ebert, P. and Rossberg, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Friedlander, Eli. 2017. “Logic, Ethics and Existence in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus”. In Wittgenstein’s Moral Thought, edited by Dain, E. and Agam-Segal, R.. London: Routledge, 97–131.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 2001. Dynamics of Reason: The 1999 Kant Lectures at Stanford University. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Gabriel, Gottfried. 2017. “Solipsism – The Leitmotif in Wittgenstein’s Life and Philosophy”. Wittgenstein Studien 8:1–14.Google Scholar
Gandon, Sébastien. 2002. Logique Et Langage. Études Sur Le Premier Wittgenstein. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Georgallides, Andreas. 2021. “A Possible Resolution of the Tractarian Paradox”. Open Journal of Philosophy 11 (1):148–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glock, Hans-Johann. 1992. “Cambridge, Jena or Vienna? The Roots of the Tractatus”. Ratio 5 (1):1–23.Google Scholar
Glock, Hans-Johann. 1997. “Kant and Wittgenstein: Philosophy, Necessity and Representation”. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (2):285–305.Google Scholar
Goldfarb, Warren. 1997. “Metaphysics and Nonsense: On Cora Diamond’s The Realistic Spirit”. Journal of Philosophical Research 22:57–74.Google Scholar
Gómez-Alonso, Modesto. 2016. “Wittgenstein on the Will and Voluntary Action”. In Action, Decision-Making and Forms of Life, edited by Padilla Gálvez, J.. Berlin and Boston, MA: De Gruyter, 77–108.Google Scholar
Griffin, James. 1964. Wittgenstein’s Logical Atomism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, Nicholas. 1985. “Russell’s Multiple Relation Theory of Judgement”. Philosophical Studies 47:213–248.Google Scholar
Griffin, Nicholas, ed. 1992. The Selected Letters of Bertrand Russell, Vol. 1: The Private Years (1884–1914). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co.Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S. 1972. Insight and Illusion: Wittgenstein on Philosophy and the Metaphysics of Experience: Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S. 1986. Insight and Illusion: Themes in the Philosophy of Wittgenstein. Rev. ed. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Hancock, Peter, and Martin-Löf, Per. 1975. Syntax and Semantics of the Language of Primitive Recursive Functions. In Research Reports in Mathematics. Preprint 3. Stockholm: Department of Mathematics, University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
Hanslick, Eduard. 1986. On the Musically Beautiful. Translated by G. Payzant. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Hertz, Heinrich. 1899. The Principles of Mechanics Presented in a New Form. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Hyder, David Jalal. 2002. The Mechanics of Meaning: Propositional Content and the Logical Space of Wittgenstein’s “Tractatus”. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hylton, Peter. 1990. Russell, Idealism, and the Emergence of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Janik, Allan. 2000. Wittgenstein’s Vienna Revisited. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Kannisto, Heikki. 1986. Thoughts and Their Subject: A Study of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Helsinki: Philosophical Society of Finland.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1977. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. Translated by P. Carus and J. W. Ellington. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by P. Guyer and A. Wood. Edited by Guyer, P. and Wood, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Translated by P. Guyer and E. Matthews. Edited by Guyer, P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2006. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Translated by R. B. Louden. Edited by Louden, R. B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kjærgaard, Peter C. 2002. “Hertz and Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Science”. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 33 (1):121–149.Google Scholar
Kremer, Michael. 2002. “Mathematics and Meaning in the Tractatus”. Philosophical Investigations 25:272–303.Google Scholar
Kremer, Michael. 2004. “To What Extent Is Solipsism a Truth?”. In Post-Analytic Tractatus, edited by Stocker, B.. London: Routledge, 59–84.Google Scholar
Kremer, Michael. 2007. “The Cardinal Problem of Philosophy”. In Wittgenstein and the Moral Life. Essays in Honour of Cora Diamond, edited by Crary, A.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 143–176.Google Scholar
Kremer, Michael. 2012. “Russell’s Merit”. In Wittgenstein’s Early Philosophy, edited by Zalabardo, J. L.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 195–241.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 2012. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuusela, Oskari. 2011. “The Development of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy”. In The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein, edited by Kuusela, O. and McGinn, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 597–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuusela, Oskari. 2017. “Wittgenstein, Ethics and Philosophical Clarification”. In Wittgenstein’s Moral Thought, edited by Dain, E. and Agam-Segal, R.. London: Routledge, 37–65.Google Scholar
Kuusela, Oskari. 2019. Wittgenstein on Logic as the Method of Philosophy. Re-Examining the Roots and Development of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuusela, Oskari. 2023. “Wittgenstein’s Tractatus and the Epistemology of Logic”. In Wittgenstein’s Tractatus at 100, edited by Stokhof, M. and Tang, H.. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 35–56.Google Scholar
Lanczos, Cornelius. 1962. The Variational Principles of Mechanics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Lebens, Samuel. 2017. Bertrand Russell and the Nature of Propositions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, Béatrice. 2017. I, Me, Mine; Back to Kant, and Back Again. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lützen, Jesper. 2005. Mechanistic Images in Geometric Form: Heinrich Hertz’s ‘Principles of Mechanics’. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacBride, Fraser. 2013. “The Russell-Wittgenstein Dispute: A New Perspective”. In Judgement and Truth in Early Analytic Philosophy and Phenomenology, edited by Textor, M.. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 206–241.Google Scholar
Malcolm, Norman. 1984. Ludwig Wittgenstein. A Memoir with a Biographical Sketch by G.H. Von Wright and Wittgenstein’s Letters to Malcolm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marion, Mathieu. 1998. Wittgenstein’s Finitism and the Foundations of Mathematics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Marion, Mathieu. 2011. “Wittgenstein on the Surveyability of Proofs”. In The Oxford Handbook on Wittgenstein, edited by McGinn, M. and Kuusela, O.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 138–161.Google Scholar
Marion, Mathieu, and Okada, Mitsuhiro. 2018. “Wittgenstein, Goodstein and the Origin of the Uniqueness Rule for Primitive Recursive Arithmetic”. In Wittgenstein in the 1930s. Between the Tractatus and the Investigations, edited by Stern, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 253–271.Google Scholar
McGinn, Marie. 2006. Elucidating the Tractatus: Wittgenstein’s Early Philosophy of Language and Logic. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
McGuinness, Brian. 1966. “The Mysticism of the Tractatus”. Philosophical Review 75 (3):305–328.Google Scholar
McGuinness, Brian. 2002a. Approaches to Wittgenstein. Collected Papers. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuinness, Brian. 2002b. “Solipsism”. In Approaches to Wittgenstein. Collected Papers. London: Routledge, 131–139.Google Scholar
McGuinness, Brian. 2005. Young Ludwig: Wittgenstein’s Life, 1889–1921. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McGuinness, Brian. 2006. “Wittgenstein and Ramsey”. In Cambridge and Vienna: Frank P. Ramsey and the Vienna Circle, edited by Galavotti, M. C.. Vienna and New York: Springer, 19–28.Google Scholar
McGuinness, Brian. ——, ed. 2008. Wittgenstein in Cambridge. Letters and Documents 1911–1951. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuinness, Brian, and von Wright, G. H., eds. 1995. Ludwig Wittgenstein: Cambridge Letters. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Moore, Adrian W. 2003. “Ineffability and Nonsense”. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77 (1):169–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Adrian W. 2013. “Was the Author of the Tractatus a Transcendental Idealist”. In Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: History and Interpretation, edited by Sullivan, P. and Potter, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 239–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Adrian W. 2020. “The Bounds of Nonsense”. In Wittgenstein and the Limits of Language, edited by Appelqvist, H.. New York: Routledge, 27–45.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1901. “Truth and Falsity”. In Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology, edited by Baldwin, J. M.. New York: The Macmillan Company, 716–18.Google Scholar
Munz, Regine. 1995. “Wittgensteins Ehrfurcht”. In Culture and Value / Philosophie Und Die Kulturwissenschaften. Pre-Proceedings of the 18th International Wittgenstein Symposium in Kirchberg Am Wechsel, edited by Johannessen, K. S. and Nordenstam, T.. Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, 68–74.Google Scholar
Myhill, John. 1974. “The Undefinability of the Set of Natural Numbers in the Ramified Principia”. In Bertrand Russell’s Philosophy, edited by Nakhnikian, G.. London: Duckworth, 19–27.Google Scholar
Narboux, Jean-Philippe. 2009. “Négation et totalité dans Le Tractatus De Wittgenstein”. In Lire Le Tractatus De Wittgenstein, edited by Chauviré, C.. Paris: Vrin, 127–176.Google Scholar
Narboux, Jean-Philippe. 2014. “Showing, the Medium Voice, and the Unity of the Tractatus”. Philosophical Topics 42 (2):201–262.Google Scholar
Newton, Isaac. 2004. Issac Newton: Philosophical Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nir, Gilad. 2021. “The Tractatus and the Riddles of Philosophy”. Philosophical Investigations 44 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okada, Mitsuhiro. 2007. “On Wittgenstein’s Remarks on Recursive Proofs: A Preliminary Report”. In Essays in the Foundations of Logical and Phenomenological Studies, edited by Okada, M.. Tokyo: Keio University Press, 121–131.Google Scholar
Oz, Amos. 2003. Sipour Al Ahava Vehoshekh [A Tale of Love and Darkness]. Jerusalem: Keter Publishing House.Google Scholar
Oz, Amos. 2017. A Tale of Love and Darkness. Translated by N. de Lange. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Peano, Giuseppe. 1967. “The Principles of Arithmetic, Presented by a New Method”. In From Frege to Gödel. A Sourcebook in Mathematical Logic. 1879–1931, edited by van Heijenoort, J.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 85–97.Google Scholar
Pilch, Martin. 2016. Wittgenstein Source Prototractatus Tools (PTT). In Wittgensteinsource (www.Wittgensteinsource.org), edited by Pichler, A. and Kathrein, J.. Bergen: Wittgenstein Archives, University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Plato. 1985. “Sophista”. In Platonis Opera, edited by Burnet, J.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Potter, Michael. 2000. Reason’s Nearest Kin. Philosophies of Arithmetic from Kant to Carnap. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Potter, Michael. 2009a. “The Logic of the Tractatus”. In Handbook of the History of Logic. Volume 5. Logic from Russell to Church, edited by Gabbay, D. M. and Woods, J.. Amsterdam: North Holland, 255–304.Google Scholar
Potter, Michael. 2009b. Wittgenstein’s Notes on Logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Potter, Michael. 2020. The Rise of Analytic Philosophy, 1879–1930: From Frege to Ramsey. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Potter, Michael. 2021. “How Substantial Are Tractarian Objects Really?”. Disputatio (Spain) 10:93–107.Google Scholar
Preston, John. 2008. “Hertz, Wittgenstein and Philosophical Method”. Philosophical Investigations 31 (1):48–67.Google Scholar
Proops, Ian. 1997. “The Early Wittgenstein on Logical Assertion”. Philosophical Topics 25 (2):121–144.Google Scholar
Ramsey, Frank. 1926. “The Foundations of Mathematics”. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 25:338–384.Google Scholar
Richter, Duncan. 2018. “Augustine and Wittgenstein on the Will”. In Augustine and Wittgenstein, edited by Paffenroth, K., Eodice, A. R. and Doody, J.. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 169–184.Google Scholar
Ricketts, Thomas. 1996. “Pictures, Logic, and the Limits of Sense in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus”. In The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein, edited by Sluga, H. and Stern, D. G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 59–99.Google Scholar
Ricketts, Thomas. 2002. “Wittgenstein against Frege and Russell”. In From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on Early Analytic Philosophy, edited by Reck, E. H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 227–251.Google Scholar
Rogers, Brian, and Wehmeier, Kai. 2012. “Tractarian First-Order Logic: Identity and the N-Operator”. Review of Symbolic Logic 5 (4):538–573.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1903. The Principles of Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1904. “Meinong’s Theory of Complexes and Assumptions”. Mind 13:204–219, 336–354, 509–524.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1908. “Mathematical Logic as Based on the Theory of Types”. American Journal of Mathematics 30 (3):222–262.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1914. Our Knowledge of the External World. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1918a. Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1918b. “The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. Lectures I–II”. The Monist 28:495–527.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1919a. Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1919b. “The Philosophy of Logical Atomism. Lectures III and IV”. The Monist 29 (1):32–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1927. The Analysis of Matter. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1984. “Theory of Knowledge: The 1913 Manuscript”. In The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell. Vol 7, edited by Eames, E. R. and Blackwell, K.. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1994. “Necessity and Possibility”. In Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell, Vol. 4, Foundations of Logic, 1903–05, edited by Urquhart, A. and Lewis, A. C.. London: Routledge, 507–520.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. 2010. The World as Will and Representation. Edited by Janaway, C., Welchman, A. and Norman, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schopenhauer, Arthur. 2019. On the Basis of Morality. Translated by E. F. J. Payne. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Stewart. 2000. Thinking About Mathematics. The Philosophy of Mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shieh, Sanford. 2014. “In What Way Does Logic Involve Necessity?”. Philosophical Topics 42 (2):298–337.Google Scholar
Shieh, Sanford. 2015. “How Rare Is Chairman Mao?”. In Dummett on Analytical Philosophy, edited by Weiss, B.. London: Macmillan, 84–121.Google Scholar
Shieh, Sanford. 2019. Necessity Lost: Modality and Logic in Early Analytic Philosophy, Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shieh, Sanford. 2021. “What Could Be the Great Debt to Frege? Or, Gottlobius Ab Paene Omni Naevo Vindicatus”. Disputatio. Philosophical Research Bulletin 10 (18):5–62.Google Scholar
Shieh, Sanford. 2022. “On Attempting to Solve the Direction Problem”. Russell: The Journal of the Bertrand Russell Research Centre 42:132–168.Google Scholar
Shieh, Sanford. In press-a. Necessity Regained: Modality and Logic in Early Analytic Philosophy, Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shieh, Sanford. In press-b. Wittgenstein and Russell, Elements of the Philosophy of Ludwig Wittgenstein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skolem, Thoralf. 1967. “The Foundations of Elementary Arithmetic Established by Means of the Recursive Mode of Thought, without Use of Apparent Variables Ranging over Infinite Domains”. In From Frege to Gödel. A Sourcebook in Mathematical Logic. 1879–1931, edited by van Heijenoort, J.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 303–333.Google Scholar
Sölle, Dororthee. 1997. Mystik Und Widerstand: “Du Stilles Geschrei”. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe.Google Scholar
Somavilla, Ilse, ed. 1997. Ludwig Wittgenstein, Denkbewegungen: Tagebucher 1930–1932, 1936–1937 (Ms 183). Innsbruck: Haymon.Google Scholar
Somavilla, Ilse, ——, ed. 2006. Wittgenstein – Engelmann: Briefe, Begegnungen, Erinnerungen. Innsbruck: Haymon.Google Scholar
Spinoza, Baruch. 1992. Ethics. Treatise on the Emendation of the Intellect and Selected Letters. Translated by S. Shirley. Edited by Feldman, S.. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Stebbing, Susan. 1933. “Logical Positivism and Analysis”. Proceedings of the British Academy 19:53–87.Google Scholar
Stegmüller, Wolfgang. 1966. “Eine Modelltheoretische Präzisierung Der Wittgensteinschen Bildtheorie”. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 7 (2):181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenius, Erik. 1960. Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. A Critical Exposition of Its Main Lines of Thought. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Peter. 1994. “The Sense of ‘a Name of a Truth-Value’”. Philosophical Quarterly 44:476–481.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Peter. 1996. “The ‘Truth’ in Solipsism, and Wittgenstein’s Rejection of the a Priori”. European Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):195–219.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Peter. 2011. “Synthesizing without Concepts”. In Beyond the Tractatus Wars: The New Wittgenstein Debate, edited by Read, R. and Lavery, M. A.. New York and Abingdon: Routledge, 171–189.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Peter. 2013. “Idealism in Wittgenstein: A Further Reply to Moore”. In Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: History and Interpretation, edited by Sullivan, P. and Potter, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 256–270.Google Scholar
Sundholm, Göran. 1992. “The General Form of the Operation in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus”. Grazer philosophische Studien 42:57–76.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Peter, and Johnston, Colin. 2018. “Judgments, Facts, and Propositions: Theories of Truth in Russell, Wittgenstein, and Ramsey”. In The Oxford Handbook of Truth, edited by Glanzberg, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 150–192.Google Scholar
Tang, Hao. 2011. “Transcendental Idealism in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus”. The Philosophical Quarterly 61 (244):598–607.Google Scholar
Tejedor, Chon. 2015. The Early Wittgenstein on Metaphysics, Natural Science, Language and Value. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Trybus, Adam. 2020. “Two of a Kind: Setting the Record Straight on Russell’s Exchange with Ladd-Franklin on Solipsism”. Russell 39:101–120.Google Scholar
Urquhart, Alasdair. 2003. “The Theory of Types”. In The Cambridge Companion to Bertrand Russell, edited by Griffin, N.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 286–309.Google Scholar
van der Schaar, Maria. 2018. “Frege on Judgement and the Judging Agent”. Mind 127:225–250.Google Scholar
van der Schaar, Maria. forthcoming, “Russell on Judgment and the Judging Subject”. In Early Analytic Philosophy: Origins and Transformations, edited by Conant, J. F. and Nir, G.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
von Wright, Georg Henrik. 1982. “Modal Logic and the Tractatus”. In Wittgenstein. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 185–200.Google Scholar
Waismann, Friedrich. 1965. “Notes on Talks with Wittgenstein”. The Philosophical Review 74 (1):12–16.Google Scholar
Waismann, Friedrich. 1986. “The Nature of Mathematics: Wittgenstein’s Standpoint”. In Ludwig Wittgenstein. Critical Assessments, edited by Shanker, S.. London: Croom Helm, 60–67.Google Scholar
Weiner, Joan. 2001. “Theory and Elucidation: The End of the Age of Innocence”. In Future Pasts: Perspectives on the Analytic Tradition in Twentieth Century Philosophy, edited by Floyd, J. and Shieh, S.. New York: Oxford University Press, 43–66.Google Scholar
Weininger, Otto. 1903. Geschlecht und Charakter. Eine Prinzipielle Untersuchung. Vienna and Leipzig: Wilhelm Braumüller Verlag.Google Scholar
Weininger, Otto. 1906. Sex and Character. New York and Chicago, IL: A.L. Burt Company Publishers.Google Scholar
Weiss, Max. 2017. “Logic in the Tractatus I: Definability”. Review of Symbolic Logic 10 (1):1–50.Google Scholar
White, Roger M. 2006. Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus: Reader’s Guide. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred North, and Russell, Bertrand. 1910. Principia Mathematica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Alfred North, and Russell, Bertrand. 1925. Principia Mathematica. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1974. “Wittgenstein and Idealism”. In Understanding Wittgenstein, Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures, Vol. 7, 1972–73, edited by Vesey, G.. London: Macmillan, 76–95.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1921. “Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung”. In Annalen der Naturphilosophie, edited by Ostwald, W.. Leipzig: Verlag Unesma, 185–262.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1922. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by C. K. Ogden. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1929. “Some Remarks on Logical Form”. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 9:162–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1965. “A Lecture on Ethics”. The Philosophical Review 74 (1):3–12.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1967. Zettel. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Edited by Anscombe, G. E. M. and von Wright, G. H.. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1969a. The Blue and Brown Books. 2nd ed. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1969b. Briefe an Ludwig Von Ficker. Edited by von Wright, G. H. and Methlagl, W.. Salzburg: Otto Müller Verlag.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1971. Prototractatus. An Early Version of Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by D. Pears and B. F. McGuinness. Edited by McGuinness, B., Nyberg, T. and von Wright, G. H.. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1973. Letters to C. K. Ogden with Comments on the English Translation of the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1974a. Philosophical Grammar. Translated by A. Kenny. Edited by Rhees, R.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1974b. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by D. F. Pears and B. McGuinness. 2nd ed. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1975. Philosophical Remarks. Translated by R. Hargreaves and R. White. Edited by Rhees, R.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1976. Wittgenstein’s Lectures on the Foundations of Mathematics, Cambridge, 1939, from the Notes of R. G. Bosanquet, Norman Malcolm, Rush Rhees, and Yorick Smythies. Edited by Diamond, C.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1979. Notebooks, 1914–1916. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Edited by von Wright, G. H. and Anscombe, G. E. M.. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1989. Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Kritische Edition. Edited by McGuinness, B. and Schulte, J.. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1993. Ludwig Wittgenstein. Philosophical Occasions 1912–1951. Edited by Klagge, J. and Nordmann, A.. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1999. Culture and Value. Translated by P. Winch. Edited by von Wright, G. H.. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2000. Wittgenstein’s Nachlass: Text and Facsimile Version. The Bergen Electronic Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2005. The Big Typescript. Ts 213. Translated by C. G. Luckhardt and M. A. E. Aue. Edited by Luckhardt, C. G. and Aue, M. A. E.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2009. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker and J. Schulte. Edited by Hacker, P. M. S. and Schulte, J.. 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 2016. Wittgenstein: Lectures, Cambridge 1930–1933 from the Notes of G. E. Moore. Edited by Stern, D., Rogers, B. and Citron, G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zalabardo, José L. 2015. Representation and Reality in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zalabardo, José L. 2018a. “Response to Commentaries on ‘The Tractatus on Unity’”. Australasian Philosophical Review 2:343–354.Google Scholar
Zalabardo, José L. 2018b. “The Tractatus on Unity”. Australasian Philosophical Review 2:250–271.Google Scholar