Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T16:58:41.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2022

David R. Olson
David R. Olson
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Making Sense
What It Means to Understand
 , pp. 181 - 192
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amsterdam, J. G. & Bruner, J. S. (2000). Minding the law: How courts rely on storytelling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anton, C. (2017). Alphabetic print-based literacy, hermeneutic sociality, and philosophic culture. Review of Communication, 17, 257–272.Google Scholar
Apperly, I. A. (2008). Beyond simulation-theory and theory-theory: Why social cognitive neuroscience should use its own concepts to study “theory of mind.” Cognition, 107, 266–283.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1954). The crisis in education: Between past and future. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Astington, J. & Gopnik, A. (1988). Knowing you have changed your mind: Children’s understanding of representational change. In Astington, J., Harris, P., & Olson, D. R. (Eds.), Developing theories of mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Astington, J. W. (1996). What is theoretical about the child’s theory of mind? A Vygotskian view of its development. In Carruthers, P. & Smith, P. K. (Eds.), Theories of theories of mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Astington, J. W. (1998). Theory of mind, Humpty Dumpty, and the icebox. Human Development, 41, 30–39.Google Scholar
Astington, J. W., & Baird, J. (2005). Why language matters for theory of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Astington, J. W., Harris, P., & Olson, D. R. (1988). Developing theories of mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Auerbach, E. (1953). Mimesis: The representation of reality in Western literature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baecker, R. (2019). Computers in society. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baillargeon, R. (1986). Representing the existence and the location of hidden objects: Object permanence in 6- and 8-month-old infants. Cognition, 23, 21–41.Google Scholar
Bakhurst, D. (2011). The formation of reason. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Baressi, J., & Moore, C. (1996). Intentional relations and social understanding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 107–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beal, C. (1990). Development of knowledge about the role of inference in text comprehension. Child Development, 61, 1011-1023.Google Scholar
Bellugi, U. (1967). The acquisition of the system of negation in children’s speech. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Harvard University.Google Scholar
Bennett, J. (1971). Locke, Berkeley, Hume: Central themes. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Bogden, R. (2009). Predicative minds: The social ontogeny of propositional thinking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. (1994). Making it explicit: Reasoning, representing and discursive commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. (2009). Reason in philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brantley, R. E. (1984). Locke, Wesley, and the method of English Romanticism. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Brentano, R. (1973). Psychology from an empirical standpoint (Kraus, O., Ed.). London: RKP. (Original published in 1874.)Google Scholar
Brown, A. (1975). The development of memory: Knowing, knowing about knowing, and knowing how to know. In Reese, H. W. (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 10). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (1956). Appendix. In Bruner, J.S., Goodnow, J. & Austin, G. (Ed.), A study of thinking. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J., & Austin, G. (1956). A study of thinking with an appendix by R. Brown. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1973). Beyond the information given: Studies in the psychology of knowing (Anglin, J., Ed.). London: George Allen.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1983). Child’s talk: Learning to use language. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A. (1956). A study of thinking (With an appendix on language by R. W. Brown). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Carpenter, P., & Just, M. (1975). Sentence comprehension: A psycholinguistic processing model of verification. Psychological Review, 82, 45–73.Google Scholar
Carruthers, P. (1996). Language, thought and consciousness: An essay in philosophical psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, X., & Pasquarella, A. (2017). Chinese reading development: The contributions of linguistic and cognitive factors. In Verhoeven, L. & Perfetti, C. (Eds.), Learning to read across languages and writing systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (May 15, 1969). Knowledge of language. Times Literary Supplement, p. 523Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181–204.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Chase, W. G. (1972). On the process of comparing sentences against pictures. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 472–517.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Coltheart, M., & Coltheart, V. (1997). Reading comprehension is not exclusively reliant upon phonological representation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 167–175.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. (1994). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (2001). Subjective, intersubjective, objective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1989). The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness explained. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Derry, J. (2013). Vygotsky philosophy and education. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. (2004). Discourse on method (J. Veitch, Trans.). London: Orion. (Original published in 1637.)Google Scholar
de Waal, F. (1999). Anthromorphism and anthropodeenial: Consistency in our thinking about humans and other animals. Philosophical Topics, 27, 255–280.Google Scholar
Dickson, P. (1981). Children’s oral communication skills. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
diSessa, A. (1985). Learning about knowing. New Directions for Cognitive Development, 28, 997–1024.Google Scholar
Dummett, M. (1993). Frege: Philosophy of language (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Easterly, W. (October 8, 2009). The anarchy of success. New York Review of Books, 56, 28–30.Google Scholar
Egan, K. (1997). The educated mind. How cognitive tools shape our understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Egner, T., Monti, J. M., & Summerfield, C. (2010). Expectation and surprise determine neural population responses in the ventral visual stream. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(49), 16601–16608.Google Scholar
Ehri, L. & Wilce, L. (1980). The influence of orthography on reader’s conceptualization of the phonemic structure of words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1, 371–385.Google Scholar
Engleman, D. (2011). Incognito: The secret lives of the brain. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Erneling, C. (2010). Towards a discursive education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, C. (1987). Thought from language: The linguistic construction of cognitive representations. In Bruner, J. S. & Haste, H. (Eds.), Making sense: The child’s construction of the world. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Ferreiro, E. & Teberosky, A. (1982). Literacy before schooling. New York: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In Dickson, W. P. (Ed.), Children’s oral communication skills. (pp. 35–60) New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Flavell, J. H., Flavell, E. R., & Green, F. L. (1983). Development of the appearance-reality distinction. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 95–120.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1972). Some reflections on L. S. Vygotsky’s Language and Thought. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 83–95.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. (1975). The language of thought. New York: Thomas Crowell.Google Scholar
Francis, N. (2019). Literacy and the language awareness hypothesis. Writing Systems Research, 11(2), 176–187.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and method. London: Sheed & Ward.Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. (1986). Biological dispositions to learn language. In Demopoulos, W. & Marras, A. (Eds.), Language learning and concept acquisition: Foundational Issues. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Gleitman, Lila R. (1990). The structural source of verb meaning. Language Acquisition, 1 (1): 3–55.Google Scholar
Gilbert, D. T. (1991). How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46, 107–119.Google Scholar
Goldman, S. (2006). Simulating minds: The philosophy, psychology and neuroscience of mindreading. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, A., & Shanton, K. (2010). Simulation theory. Wiley Interdisciplinary Review: Cognitive Science, 1(4), 527–538.Google Scholar
Goody, E. N. (1978). Towards a theory of questions. In Goody, E. N. (Ed.), Questions and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A., & Astington, J. (1988). Children’s understanding of representational change and it relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance-reality distinction. Child Development, 59, 26–37.Google Scholar
Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. (1997). Words, thoughts, and theories. Cambridge, MA: Bradford/Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gough, P. B., Hoover, W. A., & Peterson, C. L. (1996). Some observation on a simple view of reading. In Cornoldi, C. & Oakhill, J. (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Green, M. (1996). A rereading of Dewey’s art as experience. In Olson, D. R. & Torrance, N. G. (Eds.), The Handbook of education and human development. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in ways with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, S. (1988). Children’s awareness of their inner world. Unpublished PhD thesis, OISE/University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1996). Normal people. In Olson, D. R. & Torrance, N. (Eds.), Modes of thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, P. L. (2020). The point, the shrug, and the question of clarification. In Butler, L. P., Ronfard, S., and Corriveau, K. H. (Eds.), The questioning child: Insights from psychology and education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Herbart, J. (1898). The application of psychology to the science of education. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
Heath, J. (2011). Following the rules: Practical reasoning and the deontic constraint. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hinton, G. (2007). Learning multiple layers of representation. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 428–434.Google Scholar
Hinton, G. (2014). Where do features come from? Cognitive Science, 38(6), 1078–1101.Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1993). Enquiries concerning human understanding (Steinberg, E., Ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Huttenlocher, J. (1964). Children’s language: Word-phrase relationships. Science, 143, 264–265.Google Scholar
Illich, I. (1991). A plea for research on lay literacy. In Olson, D. & Torrance, N. (Eds.), Literacy and orality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (2012). A users guide to thought and meaning. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacob, P. (1997). What minds can do: Intentionality in a non-intentional world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
James, W. (1890/2007). The principles of psychology. Vol. 1. New York: Cosimo Classics.Google Scholar
Janack, M. (2012). What we mean by experience. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. (1988). Theories of mind and the structure of conscious experience. In Astington, J., Harris, P., & Olson, D. R. (Eds.), Developing theories of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. N., & Maratsos, M. P. (1977). Early comprehensions of mental verbs: Think and know. Child Development, 48, 1743–1747.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. Toronto, ON: Penguin.Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Katz, J., & Fodor, J. (1963). The structure of semantic theory. Language, 39, 170–210.Google Scholar
Kendler, T., & Kendler, H. (1959). Reversal and nonreversal shifts in kindergarten children. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 56–60.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P., & Kiparsky, C. (1970). Fact. In Bierwisch, M. & Heidolph, K. (Eds.), Progress in linguistics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Korzybski, A. (1933). Science and sanity. Lakeville: The International Non-Aristotelian Library Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Kramer, S. (2012). The ‘eye of the mind’ and the eye of the body; Descartes and Leibniz on truth, mathematics and visuality. In Barth, F. G., Deutsch, P. G., & Klein, H. D. (Eds.), Sensory perception: Mind and matter (pp. 369–382). Wien, Austria: Springer.Google Scholar
Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language and Cognitive Neuroscience, 31, 32–59.Google Scholar
Lagemann, E. C. (2000). The elusive science: The troubling history of educational research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. S. (1999). The cognition-emotion debate: A bit of history. In Dalgleish, T. & Power, M. (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion.Google Scholar
Lee, E. (1995). Young children’s representational understanding of intention. Unpublished PhD, OISE, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Lee, C., White, G., & Dong, D. (Eds.). (2021). Executive Summary. Educating for Civic Reasoning and Discourse. Committee on Civic Reasoning and Discourse. Washington: National Academy of Education.Google Scholar
Lee, E., Torrance, N., & Olson, D. R. (2001). Young children and the say/mean distinction: Verbatim and paraphrase recognition in narrative and nursery rhyme contexts. Journal of Child Language, 28, 531–543.Google Scholar
Lemann, N. (2020). Can Journalism be saved? New York Review of Books, LXVII, February 27, 2020.Google Scholar
Lepore, J. (2020). The isolation ward: On loneliness. The New Yorker, April 6, 2020, 62–64.Google Scholar
Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “theory of mind”. Psychological Review, 94, 412–429.Google Scholar
Levesque, H. (2017). Common sense, the Turing Test and the quest for real AI. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levine, T. (2019). Duped: Truth-default theory and the social science of lying and deception. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. (2014). The rise of consciousness and the development of emotional life. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Liublinskaya, A. A. (1957). The development of children’s speech and thought. In Simon, B. (Ed.), Psychology in the Soviet Union. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1829), An essay concerning human understanding. London: Thomas Tegg. (Originally published in 1689).Google Scholar
Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2016). Precursors of metamemory in young children: The role of theory of mind and metacognition vocabulary. Metacognition Learning, 1, 15–31.Google Scholar
MacDonald, P. (2012). Languages of intentionality. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Macnamara, J. (1986). A border dispute: The place of logic in psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B. (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In Ogden, C. K. & Richards, I. A. (Eds.), The meaning of meaning (Supplementary essays). New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Malvestuto-Filice, G. R. (1986). The development of the understanding of the intentional predicates “pretend” and “imagine”. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Markman, E. M. (1976). Children’s difficulty with the word-referent differentiation. Child Development, 47, 742–749.Google Scholar
Markman, E. M. (1977). Realizing you don’t understand: A preliminary investigation. Child Development, 48, 986–992.Google Scholar
Markman, E. M. (1981). Comprehension monitoring. In Dickson, W. P. (Ed.), Children’s oral communication skills. (pp. 61–82). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
McDougall, W. (1911). Body and mind. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (1994). Mind and world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McGinn, C. (1991). The problem of consciousness. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Miller, C. (2018). The death of the gods: A new global power grab. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Miller, G. (1979). Images, models, similes and metaphors. In Ortony, A. (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Misak, S. (2013). The American Pragmatists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Montgomery, D. E. (2005). The developmental origins of meaning for mental terms. In Astington, J. W. & Baird, J. (Eds.), Why language matters for theory of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morrison, K. F. (1990). History as a visual art in the Twelfth-Century Renaissance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83, 435–450.Google Scholar
Nagy, W. E., Herman, P. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1985). Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(2), 233–253.Google Scholar
National Centre for Educational Statistics (2010). The nation’s report card: Graade 12 reading and mathematics 2009 national and pilot state results (NCES 2011-455). Washington, DC: Institute of Educational Sciences, US Department of Education.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. (2005). Language pathways into the community of minds. In Astington, J. W. & Baird, J. A. (Eds.), Why language matters for theory of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2001). Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oatley, K. (1992) Best laid schemes: The psychology of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oatley, K., & Johnson-Laird, P. (1996). The communicative theory of emotions. In Martin, L. & Tesser, A. (Eds.), Striving and feeling: Interactions among goals, affect and self-regulation. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Olson, D. R. (1970). Language and thought: Aspects of a cognitive theory of semantics. Psychological Review, 77(4), 257–273.Google Scholar
Olson, D. R. (1975). Review of Carroll, J. B. & Chall, J. “Toward a literate society”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Education, (Vol. 2, pp. 109–178). Stanford: National Academy of Education.Google Scholar
Olson, D. R. (1977). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 257–281.Google Scholar
Olson, D. R. (1989). Making up your mind: Presidential address to the Canadian Psychological Association. Canadian Psychology, 30, 17–27.Google Scholar
Olson, D. R. (1994). The world on paper. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, D. R. (2003). Psychological theory and educational reform: How school remakes mind and society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, D. R. (2007). The self-ascription of intention: Responsibility, obligation and self-control. Synthese, 159, 297–314.Google Scholar
Olson, D. R. (2016). The mind on paper: Reading, consciousness and rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, D. R., & Astington, J. W. (1986). Children’s acquisition of metalinguistic and metacognitive verbs. In Demopoulos, W. & Marras, A. (Eds.), Language learning and concept acquisition. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
Olson, D. R., & Astington, J. W. (2013). Preschool children conflate pragmatic agreement and semantic truth. First Language, 33, 617–627.Google Scholar
Olson, D. R., & Bruner, J. S. (1996). Folk psychology and folk pedagogy. In Olson, D. R. & Torrance, N. G. (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Olson, D. R., & Campbell, R. (1993). Constructing representations. In Pratt, C. & Garton, A. F. (Eds.), Systems of representation in children: Development and use (pp. 11–26). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Olson, D. R., & Filby, N. (1972). On the comprehension of active and passive sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 3(3), 361–381.Google Scholar
Olson, D. R., & Kamawar, D. (2002). Writing as a form of quotation. In Brockmeier, J., Wang, M. & Olson, D. R. (Eds.), Literacy, narrative and culture. Richmond: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Olson, D. R., & Oatley, K. (2014). The quotation theory of writing. Written Communication, 31, 4–26.Google Scholar
Ong, W. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Papafragou, A. & Musolino, J. (2003). Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantic-pragmatic interface. Cognition, 86, 253-282.Google Scholar
Pea, R. (1980). The development of negation in early childhood. In Olson, D. R. (Ed.), The social foundations of language and thought: Essays in honor of Jerome S. Bruner. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Pearson, P. D. (2014). The reading wars. Educational Policy, 18, 216–222.Google Scholar
Pearson, P. D., Palincsar, A. S., Biancarosa, G., & Berman, A. (Eds.) (2020). Reaping the rewards of the reading for understanding initiative. Washington: National Academy of Education.Google Scholar
Perner, J. (1991). Understanding the representational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Peskin, J., & Astington, J. W. (2004). The effects of adding metacognitive language to story texts. Cognitive Development, 19, 253–273.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 515–526.Google Scholar
Proust, J. (2014). The philosophy of metacognition: Mental agency and self-awareness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z. (1984). Computation and cognition: Toward a foundation for cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ravitch, D. (2011). The death and life of the American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ravitch, D. (2021). The dark history of school choice. New York: New York Review of Books, LXVIII, 36–38.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics & the human sciences. (J. B. Thompson, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, E., Goelman, H., & Olson, D. R. (1983). Children’s understanding of the relationship between expressions (what is said) and intentions (what is meant). British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1, 75–86.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1981). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rozeboom, W. (1972). Problems in the psycho-philosophy of knowledge. In Royce, J. & Rozeboom, W. (Eds.), The psychology of knowing. New York: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
Russell, R. (1948). Human knowledge: Its scope and limitations. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. (2009). The concept of mind. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saussure, F. de (1958). Course in general linguistics (W. Baskin, Trans.). London: Duckworth. (Original published in 1916).Google Scholar
Schachter, S. & Singer, J. (1962). Cognitive, Social, and Physiological Determinants of Emotional State (PDF). Psychological Review, 69(5), 379–399. doi:10.1037/h0046234.Google Scholar
Scherer, K., & Moors, A. (2019). The emotion process: Event appraisal and component differentiation. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 719–745.Google Scholar
Schneider, W. (2008). The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents: Major implications for education. Mind, Brain and Education, 2, 114–121.Google Scholar
Seabrook, J. (2019). The next word: Where will predictive text take us? The New Yorker, October 14, p. 63.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1983). Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. (2017). Language at the speed of sight. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Sellars, W. (1997). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. Introduction by Rorty, R. and study guide by Brandom, R.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Originally published in 1956).Google Scholar
Share, D. (2014). Alphabetism in reading science. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 512.Google Scholar
Sliwa, P. (2015). Understanding and knowing. Proceedings of the Aristotlian Society, CXV, Part I.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In Gentner, D. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the investigation of language and thought (pp. 157–191). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22.Google Scholar
Smith, E. E., Shoben, E. J., & Rips, L. J. (1974). Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. Psychological Review, 1, 214–241.Google Scholar
Smith, F. (1971). Understanding reading. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Spinoza, B. (1677/1901). Improvement of the understanding, ethics and correspondence. Washington: Walter Dunne, Publisher.Google Scholar
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2006). The Turing Test.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. (1999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. (2009). What intelligence tests miss: The psychology of rational thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stock, B. (1983). The implications of literacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, G. (2008). Real materialism and other essays. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Sun, J., Anderson, R. C., Morris, J. A., Lin, T.-J., Miller, B. W., Ma, S., Kim, T., & Scott, T. (2017). Children’s engagement and affect during Collaborative Learning and Direct Instruction. (Unpublished).Google Scholar
Sutscover, I. (2019). Interview. The New Yorker, October 14. (See Seebrook, 2019).Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (2016). The language animal: The full shape of the human linguistic capacity. Cambridge, MA: Belknap/Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2019). Becoming human: A theory of ontogeny. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Torrance, N. G., & Olson, D. R. (1987). Development of the metalanguage and the acquisition of literacy. Interchange, 18, 136–146.Google Scholar
Tunmer, W. E., & Herriman, M. L. (1984). The development of metalinguistic awareness: A conceptual overview. In Tunmer, W. E., Pratt, C., & Herriman, M. L. (Eds.), Metalinguistic awareness in children; theory, research, and implications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Turing, A. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236), 433–460. (p. 442).Google Scholar
Turing Test. (2006). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (Wikipedia).Google Scholar
Turner, N., & Thomas, F.-N. (2011). Clear and simple as the truth: Writing about prose. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
de Villiers, J. G. (2005). Can language acquisition give children a point of view? In Astington, J. W. & Baird, J. (Eds.), Why language matters for theory of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
de Villiers, J. G., & Pyers, J. (2002). Complements to cognition: A longitudinal study of the relationship between complex syntax and false-belief understanding. Cognitive Development, 17, 1037–1060.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (Kozulin, A., Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wason, P. (1980). The verification task and beyond. In Olson, D. R. (Ed.), The social foundations of language and thought. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Weir, R. (1962). Language in the crib. Madison: University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Welllman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory of mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72, 655–684.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. (2000). Vygotsky’s two minds on the nature of meaning. In Bechtel, W. & Graham, G. (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H., Hogrefe, J., & Sodian, B. (1988). A second stage in children’s conception of mental life: Understanding informational accesses as origins of knowledge and belief. In Astington, J., Harris, P., & Olson, D. R. (Eds.), Developing theories of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Winner, E. (1988). The point of words: Children’s understanding of metaphor and irony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wolf, M. (2018). Reader, come home: The reading brain in a digital world. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Zelazo, P., & Jacques, S. (1996). Children’s rules use: Representation, reflection and cognitive control. Annals of Child Development, 12, 119–176.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • David R. Olson, University of Toronto
  • Book: Making Sense
  • Online publication: 21 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009064569.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • David R. Olson, University of Toronto
  • Book: Making Sense
  • Online publication: 21 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009064569.016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • David R. Olson, University of Toronto
  • Book: Making Sense
  • Online publication: 21 April 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009064569.016
Available formats
×