Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:01:15.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - The Protection of Animals in International and Non-international Armed Conflicts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2022

Anne Peters
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, Heidelberg
Jérôme de Hemptinne
Affiliation:
Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights
Robert Kolb
Affiliation:
Université de Genève
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Select Bibliography

Boothby, William H., The Law of Targeting (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram, The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict (3rd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2016).Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Malgosia, Whaling and International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Hemptinne, Jérôme, ‘The Protection of Animals During Warfare’, American Journal of International Law Unbound 111 (2017), 272–6.Google Scholar
Jachec-Neale, Agnieszka, The Concept of Military Objective in International Law and Targeting Practice (London: Routledge 2015).Google Scholar
Nowrot, Karsten, ‘Animals at War: The Status of “Animal Soldiers” under International Humanitarian Law’, Historical Social Research 40 (2015), 128–50.Google Scholar
Peters, Anne, ‘Global Animal Law: What It Is and Why We Need It’, Transnational Environmental Law 5 (2016), 923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redse Johansen, Sigrid, The Military Commander’s Necessity: The Law of Armed Conflict and Its Limits (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2019).Google Scholar
Roscini, Marco, ‘Animals and the Law of Armed Conflict’, Israel Yearbook on Human Rights 47 (2017), 3567.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael N., ‘War and the Environment: Fault Lines in the Prescriptive Landscape’, Archiv des Völkerrechts 37 (1999), 2567.Google Scholar

Select Bibliography

Boer, Ben, ‘The Environment and Cultural Heritage’, in Francioni, Francesco and Vrdoljak, Ana Filipa (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Cultural Heritage Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2020), 318–46.Google Scholar
Dorough, Dalee Sambo and Wiessner, Siegfried, ‘Indigenous Peoples and Cultural Heritage’, in Francioni, Francesco and Vrdoljak, Ana Filipa (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Cultural Heritage Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2020), 407–30.Google Scholar
Fortin, Katharine, The Accountability of Armed Groups under Human Rights Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2017).Google Scholar
Frulli, Micaela, ‘International Criminal Law and the Protection of Cultural Heritage’, in Francioni, Francesco and Vrdoljak, Ana Filipa (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Cultural Heritage Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2020), 100–20.Google Scholar
Gaggioli, Gloria, ‘Joint Blog Series on International Law and Armed Conflict: Are Sieges Prohibited Under Contemporary IHL?’ EJIL: Talk! Blog (30 January 2019).Google Scholar
Heller, Kevin Jon, ‘The Rome Statute’s Flawed Amendment Regime: Starvation in NIAC Edition’, Opinio Juris Blog (7 December 2019).Google Scholar
Murray, Darragh, Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Armed Groups (Oxford: Hart Publishing 2016).Google Scholar
O’Keefe, , Patrick, J., ‘Underwater Cultural Heritage’, in Francioni, Francesco and Vrdoljak, Ana Filipa (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Cultural Heritage Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2020), 295317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Keefe, Roger, The Protection of Cultural Property in Armed Conflict (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006).Google Scholar
O’Keefe, Roger et al., Protection of Cultural Property: Military Manuel (Paris: UNESCO 2016).Google Scholar
O’Keefe, Roger, ‘Cultural Heritage and International Humanitarian Law’, in Francioni, Francesco and Vrdoljak, Ana Filipa (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Cultural Heritage Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2020), 4374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strecker, Amy, ‘Landscape as Cultural Heritage’, in Francioni, Francesco and Vrdoljak, Ana Filipa (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Cultural Heritage Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2020), 272–94.Google Scholar
Sivakumaran, Sandesh, The Law of Non-International Armed Conflict (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2018).Google Scholar

Select Bibliography

Bothe, Michael et al., ‘International Law Protecting the Environment During Armed Conflict: Gaps and Opportunities’, International Review of the Red Cross 92 (2010), 569–92.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Yoran, ‘Protection of the Environment in International Armed Conflict’, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 5 (2001), 523–49.Google Scholar
Droege, Cordula and Tougas, Marie-Louise, ‘The Protection of the Natural Environment in Armed Conflict: Existing Rules and Need for Further Legal Protection’, Nordic Journal of International Law 82 (2013), 2152.Google Scholar
Montaz, Djamchid, ‘Les règles relatives à la protection de l’environnement au cours des conflits armés à l’épreuve du conflit entre l’Irak et le Koweït’, Annuaire français de droit inernational XXXVII (1991), 203–19.Google Scholar
Sands, Philippe and Peel, Jacqueline, Principles of International Environmental Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Michael, ‘Green War: An Assessment of the Environmental Law of Armed Conflict’, Yale Law Journal 22 (1997), 1110.Google Scholar
Smith, Tara, ‘Critical Perspectives on Environmental Protection in Non-International Armed Conflict: Developing the Principles of Distinction, Proportionality and Necessity’, Leiden Journal of International Law 32 (2019), 759–79.Google Scholar
Tignino, Mara, ‘Droit international de l’environnement’, in Van Steenberghe, Raphael (ed.), Droit international humanitaire: un régime spécial de droit international? (Brussels: Bruylant 2013), 267–99.Google Scholar
Tremblay-Huet, Sabrina, ‘Should Environmental Law Learn from Animal Law? Compassion as a Guiding Principle for International Environmental Law Instead of Sustainable Development’, Revue québécoise de droit international 1–1 (2018), 125–44.Google Scholar
Viñuales, Jorge E., ‘Le concept de “régime special” dans les rapports entre droit humanitaire et droit de l’environnement’, Research Paper 12 (Geneva: The Graduate Institute Center for International Environmental Studies 2012), 120.Google Scholar
Vordermayer, Markus, ‘The Extraterritorial Application of Multilateral Environmental Agreements’, Harvard International Law Review 59 (2018), 60124.Google Scholar

Select Bibliography

Bothe, Michael et al., ‘International Law Protecting the Environment During Armed Conflict: Gaps and Opportunities’, International Review of the Red Cross 92 (2010), 569–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braverman, Irus, ‘The Regulatory Life of Threatened Species Lists’, in Braverman, Irus (ed.), Animals, Biopolitics, Law: Lively Legalities (Abingdon: Routledge 2016), 1938.Google Scholar
Brouder, Alan, ‘International Union for Conservation of Nature’, in Tietje, Christian and Brouder, Alan (eds.), Handbook of Transnational Economic Governance Regimes (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff 2009), 953–68.Google Scholar
Desgagné, Richard, ‘The Prevention of Environmental Damage in Time of Armed Conflict: Proportionality and Precautionary Measures’, Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 3 (2000), 109–29.Google Scholar
Dinstein, Yoram, ‘The Principle of Distinction and Cyber War in International Armed Conflicts’, Journal of Conflict & Security Law 17 (2012), 261–77.Google Scholar
García-Ureta, Augustín, ‘Nature Conservation’, in Lees, Emma and Viñuales, Jorge E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Environmental Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2019), 460–88.Google Scholar
Hulme, Karen, ‘Armed Conflict and Biodiversity’, in Bowman, Michael, Davies, Peter, and Goodwin, Edward (eds.), Research Handbook on Biodiversity and Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2016), 245–69.Google Scholar
Pretorius, Jeanique, ‘Enhancing Environmental Protection in Non-international Armed Conflict: The Way Forward’, ZaöRV 78 (2018), 903–32.Google Scholar
Quéguiner, Jean-François, ‘Precautions Under the Law Governing the Conduct of Hostilities’, International Review of the Red Cross 88 (2006), 793821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Nicholas A., ‘IUCN as Catalyst for a Law of the Biosphere: Acting Globally and Locally’, Environmental Law 35 (2005), 249310.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael N., ‘Green War: An Assessment of the Environmental Law of International Armed Conflict’, Yale Journal of International Law 22 (1997), 1110.Google Scholar
Techera, Erika J., ‘Species-Based Conservation’, in Morgera, Elisa and Razzaque, Jona (eds.), Biodiversity and Nature Protection Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2017), 97109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Select Bibliography

Boulanin, Vincent and Verbruggen, Maaike, ‘Article 36 Reviews: Dealing With the Challenges Posed by Emerging Technologies’ (Stockholm: SIPRI 2017), 3, available at https://bit.ly/33ra8MP, accessed 22 February 2022.Google Scholar
Cooper, Jilly, Animals in War (London: Corgi Books 2000).Google Scholar
Hediger, Ryan (ed.), Animals and War: Studies of Europe and North America (Danvers: Brill 2012).Google Scholar
Kistler, John M., Animals in the Military: From Hannibal’s Elephants to the Dolphins of the US Navy (Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO 2011).Google Scholar
Lawand, Kathleen, Coupland, Robin, and Herby, Peter, A Guide to the Legal Review of New Weapons, Means and Methods of Warfare: Measures to Implement Article 36 of Additional Protocol I of 1977 (Geneva: ICRC 2006).Google Scholar
Nowrot, Karsten, ‘Animals at War: The Status of “Animal Soldiers” under International Humanitarian Law’, Historical Social Research 40 (2015), 128–50.Google Scholar

Select Bibliography

Evans, Edward P., The Criminal Prosecution and Capital Punishment of Animals (London: William Heinemann 1906).Google Scholar
Levie, Howard S., Prisoners of War in International Armed Conflict (Newport: Naval War College 1978).Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco International Humanitarian Law, Rules, Controversies, and Solutions to Problems Arising in Warfare (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 2019).Google Scholar
Nowrot, Karsten, ‘Animals at War: The Status of “Animal Soldiers” under International Humanitarian Law’, Historical Social Research 40 (2015), 128–50.Google Scholar
Olson, Laura, ‘Status and Treatment of Those Who Do Not Fulfil the Conditions for Status as Prisoners of War’ in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola, and Sassòli, Marco (eds.), The 1949 Geneva Conventions (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015), 911–37.Google Scholar
Peters, Anne, ‘Animals in International Law’, Collected Courses of The Hague Academy of International Law: Recueil des Cours Vol. 410 (Leiden: Brill 2020).Google Scholar
Sandoz, Yves, Swinarski, Christophe, and Zimmermann, Bruno (eds.), Commentary on the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 (Geneva: ICRC 1987).Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael, ‘War, Technology and the Law of Armed Conflict’ in Helm, Anthony (ed.), The Law of War in the 21st Century: Weaponry and the Use of Force (Newport: Naval War College International Studies 2006), 137–82.Google Scholar
Watts, Sean, ‘Who Is a Prisoner of War?’ in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola, and Sassòli, Marco (eds.), The 1949 Geneva Conventions (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015), 889910.Google Scholar

Select Bibliography

Baratay, Eric, Bêtes de tranchées: Des vécus oubliés (Paris: CNRS éditions 2013).Google Scholar
Bouvier, Antoine, ‘The Use of the Emblem’ in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds.), The 1949 Geneva Conventions (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015), 855–85.Google Scholar
Breitegger, Alexander, ‘The Legal Framework Applicable to Insecurity and Violence Affecting the Delivery of Health Care in Armed Conflicts and Other Emergencies’, International Review of the Red Cross 95 (2013), 83127.Google Scholar
Haeck, Tom, ‘Loss of Protection’ in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds.), The 1949 Geneva Conventions (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015), 839–54.Google Scholar
Liivoja, Rain, ‘Status of Medical Personnel: Clear as Mud?’, ICRC Blog Humanitarian Law and Policy (25 February 2019).Google Scholar
Nowrot, Karsten, ‘Animals at War: The Status of “Animal Soldiers” under International Humanitarian Law’, Historical Social Research 40 (2015), 128–50.Google Scholar
Peters, Anne, ‘Global Animal Law: What It Is and Why We Need It’, Transnational Environmental Law 5 (2016), 1316.Google Scholar
Roscini, Marco, ‘Animals and the Law of Armed Conflict’, Israel Yearbook on Human Rights 47 (2017), 3567.Google Scholar
Schmitt, Michael, ‘War, Technology and the Law of Armed Conflict’ in Helm, Anthony (ed.), The Law of War in the 21st Century: Weaponry and the Use of Force (Newport: Naval War College International Studies 2006).Google Scholar
Schöberl, Katia, ‘Buildings, Material, and Transports’ in Clapham, Andrew, Gaeta, Paola and Sassòli, Marco (eds.), The 1949 Geneva Conventions (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015), 825–38.Google Scholar
Sassòli, Marco, ‘Medical Care in Armed Conflict, Part I’, ICRC Blog Humanitarian Law and Policy (24 January 2019).Google Scholar

Select Bibliography

Corvi, Steven, ‘Men of Mercy: The Evolution of the Royal Army Veterinary Corps and the Soldier-Horse Bond During the Great War’, Journal of the Society for Army Historical Research 76 (1998), 272–84.Google Scholar
Darre, Eric and Dumas, Emmanuel, ‘Vétérinaires et droit international humanitaire: Réflexions sur une controverse’, Military Law and Law of War Review (2004) 43, 111–36.Google Scholar
Fogelman, Vicky et al., ‘The Role of Veterinary Public Health and Preventive Medicine during Mobilization and Deployment’ in Kelley, Patrick (ed.), Military Preventive Medicine: Mobilization and Deployment, Vol. I (Office of the Surgeon General, US Army 2003), 669–81.Google Scholar
Swart, Sandra, ‘Horses in the South African War, c. 1899–1902’, Society and Animals 18(2010), 348–66.Google Scholar
Wijnker, Joris and Gooijer, Judith, ‘The Military Veterinarian: Its Position and Function in the Royal Netherlands Army’, Nederlands Geneeskundig Tijdschrift (January 2014).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×