Avenhaus, R. C., Kremenyuk, V., and Sjöstedt, G. (eds.), Containing the Atom, New York: Lexington Books, 2002.Google Scholar

Ball, P., Serving the Reich: The Struggle for the Soul of Physics under Hitler, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Barass, G., The Great Cold War: A Journey through the Hall of Mirrors, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Beschloss, M., Presidents of War: The Epic Story, from 1807 to Modern Times, New York: Broadway Books, 2019.Google Scholar

Black-Branch, J. L., The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons: Legal Challenges for Military Doctrines and Deterrence Policies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, R., Armageddon and Paranoia: The Nuclear Confrontation, London: Profile Books, 2019.Google Scholar

Brauch, H. G. (ed.), Military Technology, Armaments Dynamics and Disarmament: ABC Weapons, Military Use of Nuclear Energy and of Outer Space and Implications for International Law, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1989.Google Scholar

Breyman, S., Why Movements Matter: The West German Peace Movement and U.S. Arms Control, New York: SUNY Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Burr, W. and Kimball, J. (eds.), Nuclear Weapons, the Vietnam War, and the ‘Nuclear Taboo’, reproduced in National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 195.Google Scholar

Burrows, W. E. and Windrem, R., Critical Mass: The Dangerous Race for Superweapons in a Fragmenting World, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1994.Google Scholar

Casey-Maslen, S., Jus ad Bellum: The Law on Inter-State Use of Force, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2020.Google Scholar

Casey-Maslen, S. (ed.), Weapons under International Human Rights Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Casey-Maslen, S. with Haines, S., Hague Law Interpreted: The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of Armed Conflict, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2018.Google Scholar

Cochran, T. B., Arkin, W. M., and Hoenig, M. M., Nuclear Weapons Databook, Vol. I: U.S. Nuclear Forces and Capabilities, Cambridge, MA: National Resources Defense Council, 1984.Google Scholar

Cochran, T. B., Norris, R. S., and Bukharin, O. A., Making the Russian Bomb: From Stalin to Yeltsin, Boulder: Westview Press, 1995.Google Scholar

DeGroot, G., The Bomb: A Life, London: Jonathan Cape, 2004.Google Scholar

Downing, T., 1983: The World at the Brink, London: Little, Brown, 2018.Google Scholar

Dinstein, Y., The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict, 3rd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Dinstein, Y., Non-international Armed Conflicts in International Law, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Dinstein, Y., War, Aggression and Self-Defence, 6th ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Epstein, W., The Last Chance: Nuclear Proliferation and Arms Control, New York: Free Press, 1976.Google Scholar

FitzGerald, F., Way Out There in the Blue: Reagan, Star Wars, and the End of the Cold War, New York: Touchstone, 2001.Google Scholar

Goldblat, J., Arms Control: The New Guide to Negotiations and Agreements, Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2002.Google Scholar

Gorbachev, M., Memoirs, New York: Doubleday, 1995.Google Scholar

Gottemoeller, R., Negotiating the New START Treaty, New York: Cambria Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Gray, C., International Law and the Use of Force, 4th ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Ham, P., Hiroshima Nagasaki, London: Transworld Publishers, 2013.Google Scholar

Holloway, D., Stalin and the Bomb: The Soviet Union and Atomic Energy, 1939–1956, New Haven: Yale University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Irving, D., The German Atomic Bomb, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1967.Google Scholar

Jacobson, H. K. and Stein, E., Diplomats, Scientists, and Politicians: The United States and the Nuclear Test Ban Negotiations, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1966.Google Scholar

Jungk, R., Brighter than 1000 Suns, trans. J. Cluegh, London: Penguin Books, 1980.Google Scholar

Keegan, J. (ed.), The Times Atlas of the Second World War, 1st ed., London: Times Books, October 1989.Google Scholar

Lavoy, P. R., Sagan, S. D., and Wirtz, J. J. (eds.), Planning the Unthinkable: How Powers Will Use Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Weapons, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Louka, E., Nuclear Weapons, Justice and the Law, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2011.Google Scholar

McCullough, D., Truman, New York: Simon & Schuster, 1992.Google Scholar

Nystuen, G., Casey-Maslen, S., and Bersagel, A. G. (eds.), Nuclear Weapons under International Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

P5 Working Group on the Glossary of Key Nuclear Terms, P5 Glossary of Key Nuclear Terms, 1st ed., Beijing: China Atomic Energy Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Pogany, I. (ed.), Nuclear Weapons and International Law, Aldershot: Avebury, 1987.Google Scholar

Powers, T., Heisenberg’s War: The Secret History of the German Bomb, London: Jonathan Cape, 1993.Google Scholar

Pullman, B., The Atom in the History of Human Thought, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Reed, T. C. and Stillman, D. B., The Nuclear Express: A Political History of the Bomb and Its Proliferation, Minneapolis: Zenith Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Reeves, R., President Nixon, Alone in the White House, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2001.Google Scholar

Reischauer, E., My Life between Japan and America, New York: Harper Collins, 1986.Google Scholar

Rose, P. L., Heisenberg and the Nazi Atomic Bomb Project, 1939–1945: A Study in German Culture, Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Ruys, T., ‘Armed Attack’ and Article 51 of the UN Charter: Evolutions in Customary Law and Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Sandoz, Y., Swinarski, C., and Zimmermann, B. (eds.), Commentary to the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, Geneva: ICRC/Martinus Nijhoff, 1987.Google Scholar

Shaker, M. I., The Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty. Origins and Implementation 1959–1979, 3 vols., London/Rome/New York: Oceana Publications, March 1980.Google Scholar

Shultz, G. P., Turmoil and Triumph: Diplomacy, Power, and the Victory of the American Ideal, New York: Charles Scriber’s Sons, 1993.Google Scholar

Schlosser, E., Command and Control, New York: Penguin, 2014.Google Scholar

Schwartz, S. I. (ed.), Atomic Audit: The Costs and Consequences of U.S. Nuclear Weapons Since 1940, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1998.Google Scholar

Shea, T., Verifying Nuclear Disarmament, 1st ed., New York: Routledge, 2019.Google Scholar

Stahn, C., A Critical Introduction to International Criminal Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Skylark, T., Final Months of the Pacific War, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Speer, A., Inside the Third Reich, London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 2003.Google Scholar

Summers, A., The Arrogance of Power: The Secret World of Richard Nixon, London: Orion Books, 2000.Google Scholar

Weart, S. and Szilard, G., Leo Szilard: His Version of the Facts, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Weintraub, S., MacArthur’s War: Korea and the Undoing of an American Hero, New York: Free Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Wells, H. G., The World Set Free, n.p., 1914.Google Scholar

Wilcox, R. K., Japan’s Secret War, 3rd rev. ed., New York: Permuted Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Wolverton, M., Burning The Sky: Operation Argus and the Untold Story of the Cold War Nuclear Tests in Outer Space, New York: Abrams Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Zaloga, S. J., The Kremlin’s Nuclear Sword: The Rise and Fall of Russia’s Strategic Nuclear Forces, 1945–2000, Washington, DC: Smithsonian Books, 2002.Google Scholar

Allen, T. B. and Polmar, N., ‘The Radio Broadcast That Ended World War II’, The New Atlantic, 7 August 2015.Google Scholar

Allison, D. M. and Herzog, S., ‘“What about China?” and the Threat to US–Russian Nuclear Arms Control’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 76, No. 4 (2020), 200–5.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. V. and Nelson, A. J., ‘The INF Treaty: A Spectacular, Inflexible, Time-Bound Success’, Strategic Studies Quarterly, Summer 2019, 90–122.Google Scholar

Arimuko, A., Sujarwanto, E., and Marsono, A., ‘Measurements of Earthquake Moment Magnitude (Mw) to Estimate Detonation Energy of a Nuclear Bomb as Plutonium-240’, Journal of Physics Conference Series, March 2020.Google Scholar

Barth, K.-H., ‘The Politics of Seismology: Nuclear Testing, Arms Control, and the Transformation of a Discipline’, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 33, No. 5 (October 2003), 743–81.Google Scholar

Bassiouni, M. C., ‘Negotiating the Treaty of Rome on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court’, Cornell International Law Journal, Vol. 32, No. 3 (1999), Symposium Article 3.Google Scholar

Bethe, H. A., ‘The Hydrogen Bomb’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 6, No. 4 (April 1950), 99–104.Google Scholar

Blix, H., ‘Safeguards and Non-proliferation: The IAEA and Efforts to Counteract the Spread of Nuclear Weapons’, IAEA Bulletin, Summer 1985.Google Scholar

Bohr, N. and Wheeler, J. A., ‘The Mechanism of Nuclear Fission’, Physical Review, Vol. 56 (1 September 1939), 426–50.Google Scholar

Bourantonis, D., ‘The Negotiation of the Non-proliferation Treaty, 1965–1968: A Note’, International History Review, Vol. 19, No. 2 (May 1997), 347–57.Google Scholar

Centre for Science and Security Studies of King’s College London and the European Leadership Network, The P5 Process: Opportunities for Success in the NPT Review Conference, London, June 2020.Google Scholar

Charap, S., ‘The Demise of the INF: Implications for Russia-China Relations’, RAND Corporation, Document submitted on 9 April 2019, to the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission as a statement for the record for the hearing on 21 March 2019.Google Scholar

Clarke, M., ‘Does My Bomb Look Big in This?’, International Affairs, Vol. 80, No. 1 (2004).Google Scholar

Cohen, A., ‘Most Favored Nation’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 51, No. 1 (January–February1995), 44–53.Google Scholar

‘Conscience, Arrogation and the Atomic Scientists’, Journal of the Federation of American Scientists, Vol. 47, No. 4 (July/August 1994).Google Scholar

D’Amato, A., ‘Legal Aspects of the French Nuclear Tests’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 61, No. 1 (January 1967), 66–77.Google Scholar

De-Villiers, J. W., Jardine, R., and Reiss, M., ‘Why South Africa Gave Up the Bomb’, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 72, No. 5 (November/December 1993), 98–109.Google Scholar

Eaves, E., ‘Why Is America Getting a New $100 Billion Nuclear Weapon?’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 8 February 2021.Google Scholar

Eddington, A. S., ‘The Internal Constitution of the Stars’, The Scientific Monthly, Vol. 11, No. 4 (October 1920), 297–303.Google Scholar

Enkhsaikhan, J., ‘Mongolia’s Nuclear-Weapon-Free Status: Concept and Practice’, Asian Survey, Vol. 40, No. 2 (2000).Google Scholar

Field, M., ‘As the US, China, and Russia Build New Nuclear Weapons Systems, How Will AI Be Built In?’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 20 December 2019.Google Scholar

Field, M., ‘Strangelove Redux: US Experts Propose Having AI Control Nuclear Weapons’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 30 August 2019.Google Scholar

Firmage, E. B., ‘The Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 63, No. 4 (October 1969), 711–46.Google Scholar

French, B., Funamoto, S., Sugiyama, H., Sakata, R., Cologne, J., Cullings, H. M., Mabuchi, K., and Preston, D. L., ‘Measurement and Impact on Radiation Risk Estimates in the Life Span Study of Atomic Bomb Survivors’, American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 187, No. 8 (August 2018), 1623–29.Google Scholar

Joliot, F., ‘Chemical Evidence of the Transmutation of Elements’, Nobel Lecture, 12 December 1935.Google Scholar

Goldschmidt, B., ‘The Negotiation of the Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT)’, IAEA Bulletin, Vol. 22, Nos. 3/4 (August 1980), 73–80.Google Scholar

Gottemoeller, R., ‘The New START Verification Regime: How Good Is It?’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 21 May 2020.Google Scholar

Grant, R., ‘Dien Bien Phu’, Air Force Magazine, Vol. 87, No. 8 (August 2004).Google Scholar

Gusev, B. I., Abylkassimova, Z. N., and Apsalikov, K. N., ‘The Semipalatinsk Nuclear Test Site: A First Assessment of the Radiological Situation and the Test-Related Radiation Doses in the Surrounding Territories’, Radiation Environmental Biophysics, Vol. 36, No. 3 (September 1997), 201–4.Google Scholar

Halperin, M. H., ‘Nuclear Weapons and Limited War’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 5, No. 2 (June 1961), 146–66.Google Scholar

Harahan, J. P., ‘On-Site Inspections under the INF Treaty, A History of the On-Site Inspection Agency and Treaty Implementation, 1988–1991’, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1993.Google Scholar

Harvey, J. R. and Michalowski, S., ‘Nuclear Weapons Safety: The Case of Trident’, Science & Global Security, Vol. 4, No. 3 (1994), 261–337.Google Scholar

Hill, S., ‘NATO and the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons’, Research Paper, Chatham House, London, January 2021.Google Scholar

Holmes, M. S., ‘Spies Who Spilled Atomic Bomb Secrets’, Smithsonian Magazine, 19 April 2009.Google Scholar

Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on the Conflict in Georgia, Report, Vol. II, September 2009.Google Scholar

International Law Commission (ILC) Draft articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, with commentaries, 2001; text adopted by the ILC at its fifty-third session, in 2001, and submitted to the UN General Assembly as a part of the Commission’s report covering the work of that session, in UN doc. A/56/10.Google Scholar

IPPNW, Radioactive Heaven and Earth: The Health and Environmental Effects of Nuclear Weapons Testing in, on, and above the Earth, New York: Apex Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Kirgis, F. L., ‘North Korea’s Withdrawal from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty’, ASIL Insights, Vol. 8, No. 2 (24 January 2003).Google Scholar

Kirsch, P. and Holmes, J. T., ‘The Rome Conference on an International Criminal Court: The Negotiating Process’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 93, No. 1 (January 1999), 2–12.Google Scholar

Kohl, W. L., ‘Nuclear Sharing in Nato and the Multilateral Force’, Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 80, No. 1 (March 1965), 88–109.Google Scholar

Kristensen, H. M., Norris, R. S., and Diamond, J., ‘Pakistani Nuclear Forces, 2018’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 74, No. 5 (2018), 348–58.Google Scholar

Kristensen, H. M. and Norris, R. S., ‘Russian Nuclear Forces, 2018’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 74, No. 3 (2018), 185–95.Google Scholar

Kristensen, H. M. and Korda, M., ‘Chinese Nuclear Forces, 2020’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 76, No. 6 (November–December 2020), 443–57.Google Scholar

Kristensen, H. M. and Korda, M., ‘French Nuclear Forces, 2019’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 75, No. 1 (2019), 51–55.Google Scholar

McDermott, R., ‘Russia’s Aerospace Forces Prepare Training for Kinzhal Hypersonic Missiles’, Eurasia Daily Monitor, Vol. 17, No. 67 (May 2020).Google Scholar

McDowell, J. C., ‘The Edge of Space: Revisiting the Karman Line’, Acta Astronautica, Vol. 151 (October 2018), 668–77.Google Scholar

Meitner, L. and Frisch, O. R., ‘Disintegration of Uranium by Neutrons: a New Type of Nuclear Reaction’, Letter, Nature, Vol. 143 (1939), 239–40.Google Scholar

Mills, C., ‘Replacing the UK’s Nuclear Deterrent: Progress of the Dreadnought Class’, Research Paper, House of Commons Library, 11 February 2020.Google Scholar

Minor, M. S., ‘China’s Nuclear Development Program’, Asian Survey, Vol. 16, No. 6 (June 1976), University of California Press, 571–79.Google Scholar

Nitze, P. H., ‘The Vladivostok Accord and SALT II’, The Review of Politics, Vol. 37, No. 2 (April 1975), 147–60.Google Scholar

Noddack, I., ‘Über das Element 93’, Angewandte Chemie, Vol. 47, No. 37 (15 September 1934), 653–55.Google Scholar

Norris, R. S. and Kristensen, H. M., ‘Global Nuclear Weapons Inventories, 1945–2010’, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 66, No. 4 (2010), 77–83.Google Scholar

O’Donnell, T., ‘Security Council Resolution 1530, Evidence and the United Nations Security Council’, Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), 29 March–1 April 2006, Vol. 100 (2006), 47–51.Google Scholar

Oestern, G. (ed.), Nuclear Weapons Ban Monitor 2020, Oslo: Norwegian People’s Aid, January 2021.Google Scholar

Persbo, A., ‘A Reflection on the Current State of Nuclear Non-proliferation and Safeguards’, Non-proliferation Papers, No. 8 (February 2012), European Union (EU) Non-proliferation Consortium.Google Scholar

Pivot, S., Baroni, M., Bard, E., and Giraud, X., ‘A Comparison of 36Cl Nuclear Bomb Inputs Deposited in Snow From Vostok and Talos Dome, Antarctica, Using the 36Cl/Cl− Ratio’, Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 124, No. 20 (27 October 2019).Google Scholar

Reif, K. and Bugos, S., ‘U.S., Russia Hit Impasse on New START’, Arms Control Today, October 2020.Google Scholar

Report by the Maralinga Rehabilitation Technical Advisory Committee (MARTAC) on the Rehabilitation of Former Nuclear Test Sites at Emu and Maralinga (Australia), 2003.Google Scholar

Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic, UN doc. A/HRC/27/60, 13 August 2014.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, D. A., ‘American Atomic Strategy and the Hydrogen Bomb Decision’, Journal of American History, Vol. 66, No. 1 (1 June 1979), 62–87.Google Scholar

Rudesill, D. S., ‘MIRVs Matter: Banning Hydra-Headed Missiles in a New START II Treaty’, Stanford Journal of International Law, Vol. 54, No. 1 (Winter 2018), 83–115.Google Scholar

Sand, P. H., ‘Diego Garcia: British–American Legal Black Hole in the Indian Ocean?’, Journal of Environmental Law, Vol. 21, No. 1 (1 January 2009), 113–37.Google Scholar

Sechser, T. S., ‘Sharing the Bomb: How Foreign Nuclear Deployments Shape Nonproliferation and Deterrence’, Nonproliferation Review, Vol. 23, Nos.3–4 (2016), 443–58.Google Scholar

Shapley, D., ‘Nuclear Weapons History: Japan’s Wartime Bomb Projects Revealed’, Science, Vol. 199, No. 4325 (13 January 1978), 152–57.Google Scholar

‘The Position of the United States on Current Law of War Agreements: Remarks of Judge Abraham D Sofaer, Legal Adviser, US Department of State, 22 January 1987’, American University Journal of International Law and Policy, Vol. 2 (1987), 460.Google Scholar

Thielmann, G., ‘The Missile Gap Myth and Its Progeny’, Arms Control Today, May 2011.Google Scholar

Trebes, J. and Lavietes, T., ‘Monitoring a Nuclear Weapon from the Inside’, ‘Monitoring a Nuclear Weapon from the Inside’, Science & Technology Review, July/August 2008, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 12–19.Google Scholar

United States Department of the Air Force, International Law – The Conduct of Armed Conflict and Air Operations, Air Force Pamphlet 110–31, 1976.Google Scholar

United States Department of Defense, Law of War Manual, updated December 2016, Washington, DC, 2016.Google Scholar

United States Department of the Navy, Annotated Supplement to the Commander’s Handbook on the Law of Naval Operations, Doc. NWP 9 (REV. A)/FMFM 1–10, Washington, DC, 1989.Google Scholar

Young, K., ‘The Skybolt Crisis of 1962: Muddle or Mischief?’, Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 27, No. 4 (2004), 614–35.Google Scholar

Walker, J. S., ‘Recent Literature on Truman’s Atomic Bomb Decision: A Search for Middle Ground’, Diplomatic History, Vol. 29, No. 2 (April 2005), 311–34.Google Scholar

Willrich, M., ‘The Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons’, The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 77, No. 8 (July 1968), 1447–519.Google Scholar

Woolf, A. F., ‘The New START Treaty: Central Limits and Key Provisions’, Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC, updated 3 February 2021.Google Scholar

Woolf, A. F., ‘Strategic Arms Control After START: Issues and Options’, Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC, updated 6 May 2010.Google Scholar

Wright, C. M. and De Geer, L.-E., ‘The 22 September 1979 Vela Incident: The Detected Double-Flash’, Science & Global Security, Vol. 25, No. 3 (2017), 95–124.Google Scholar

Wright, C. M. and De Geer, L.-E., ‘The 22 September 1979 Vela Incident: Radionuclide and Hydroacoustic Evidence for a Nuclear Explosion’, Science & Global Security, Vol. 26, No. 1 (2018), 1–35.Google Scholar