Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T23:44:10.168Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

25 - Peers, Affect, and Creativity at School

from Part V - Emotions and Creativity at School and Work

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2023

Zorana Ivcevic
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Jessica D. Hoffmann
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Get access

Summary

This chapter discusses the dynamic interplay of peer relationships and affect: factors that serve as drivers and consequences of creativity in the classroom. A particular focus is put on three problems inspired by research conducted in creativity and educational psychology literature. First, it is analyzed how creative students are perceived by their peers, i.e., whether being creative means being interpersonally attractive in the classroom. The benefits and risks of creative potential and behavior for peer relationships are overviewed based on sociometric and network studies. Second, school and class-based conditions of creative self-concept are analyzed. Drawing on the classic “big-fish-little-pond effect,” which shows that students tend to underestimate their potential in selective classroom environments, this chapter explores the extent to which this effect generalizes to creativity. Third and finally, the role of classroom creative climate, particularly teachers’ support and classroom interaction, to make creativity effective is emphasized.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alves‐Oliveira, P., Arriaga, P., Xavier, C., Hoffman, G., & Paiva, A. (2021). Creativity landscapes: Systematic review spanning 70 years of creativity interventions for children. The Journal of Creative Behavior. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.514Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Barbot, B., & Said‐Metwaly, S. (2021). Is there really a creativity crisis? A critical review and meta‐analytic re‐appraisal. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(3), 696709. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. (2006). Creative self-efficacy: Correlates in middle and secondary students. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 447457. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1804_4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beghetto, R. A. (2016). Creative learning: A fresh look. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15(1), 623. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.15.1.6Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A., & Dilley, A. E. (2016). Creative aspirations or pipe dreams? Toward understanding creative mortification in children and adolescents? New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2016(151), 8595. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20150Google Scholar
Beghetto, R. A., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Toward untangling creative self-beliefs. In Karwowski, M. & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.), The Creative Self: Effect of Beliefs, Self-Efficacy, Mindset, and Identity (pp. 322). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809790-8.00001-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boekhorst, J. A., Halinski, M., & Good, J. R. L. (2021). Fun, friends, and creativity: A social capital perspective. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(4), 970983. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.502Google Scholar
Bonetto, E., Pichot, N., Girandola, F., & Bonnardel, N. (2021). The normative features of creativity: Creative individuals are judged to be warmer and more competent. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(3), 649660. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.477Google Scholar
Byrne, D., Griffitt, W., & Stefaniak, D. (1967). Attraction and similarity of personality characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 8290. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021198CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cattani, G., & Ferriani, S. (2008). A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: Social networks and cinematic achievements in the Hollywood film industry. Organization Science, 19, 824844. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, M.-H., & Agrawal, S. (2017). Do communication barriers in student teams impede creative behavior in the long run? – A time-lagged perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 154167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.008Google Scholar
Chi, N., Liao, H., & Chien, W. (2021). Having a creative day: A daily diary study of the interplay between daily activating moods and physical work environment on daily creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(3), 752768. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.488Google Scholar
Cialdini, R., Borden, B., Avril, R. J., , T., et al. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(3), 366375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.34.3.366Google Scholar
Clegg, H., Nettle, D., & Miell, D. (2008). A test of Miller’s aesthetic fitness hypothesis. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 6(2), 101115. https://doi.org/10.1556/JEP.2008.1009Google Scholar
Conner, T. S., & Silvia, P. J. (2015). Creative days: A daily diary study of emotion, personality, and everyday creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, V. L. (1997). In search of the wild bohemian: Challenges in the identification of the creatively gifted. Roeper Review, 19(3), 148152.Google Scholar
Diedrich, J., Jauk, E., Silvia, P. J., et al. (2018). Assessment of real-life creativity: The Inventory of Creative Activities and Achievements (ICAA). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 12(3), 304316. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driebe, J. C., Sidari, M. J., Dufner, M., et al. (2021). Intelligence can be detected but is not found attractive in videos and live interactions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 42(6), 507516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2021.05.002Google Scholar
Dweck, C. S., & Yeager, D. S. (2019). Mindsets: A view from two eras. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), 481496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618804166Google Scholar
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290309. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5Google Scholar
Feist, G. J., & Barron, F. X. (2003). Predicting creativity from early to late adulthood: Intellect, potential, and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(2), 6288. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00536-6Google Scholar
Gajda, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Exploring creative learning in the classroom: A multi-method approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 250267, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.04.002Google Scholar
Gajda, A., Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Creativity and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(2), 269299. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000133Google Scholar
Gerwig, A., Miroshnik, K., Forthmann, B., et al. (2021). The relationship between intelligence and divergent thinking: a meta-analytic update. Journal of Intelligence, 9, 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence9020023Google Scholar
Glăveanu, V. P., & Beghetto, R. A. (2021). Creative experience: A non-standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 33(2), 7580. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2020.1827606Google Scholar
Gralewski, J., & Karwowski, M. (2013). Polite girls and creative boys? Students’ gender moderates accuracy of teachers’ ratings of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(4), 290304. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.36Google Scholar
Haase, J., Hoff, E. V., Hanel, P. H. P., & Innes-Ker, Å. (2018). A meta-analysis of the relation between creative self-efficacy and different creativity measurements. Creativity Research Journal, 30(1), 116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1411436Google Scholar
Hass, R. W., Katz-Buonincontro, J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2019). The creative self and creative thinking: An exploration of predictive effects using Bayes factor analyses. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(4), 375387. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopp, M. D. S., Zhang, Z. S., Hinch, L., O’Reilly, C., & Ziegler, A. (2019). Creative, thus connected: The power of sociometric creativity on friendship formation in gifted adolescents – a longitudinal network analysis of gifted students. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2019(168), 4773. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20324Google Scholar
Ilha Villanova, A. L., & Pina e Cunha, M. (2021). Everyday creativity: A systematic literature review. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(3), 673695. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.481Google Scholar
Ivcevic, Z. (2007), Artistic and everyday creativity: An act-frequency approach. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 271-290. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01074.xGoogle Scholar
Ivcevic, Z., & Hoffmann, J. (2019). Emotions and creativity: From process to person and product. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (2nd ed., pp. 273295). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.015Google Scholar
Ivcevic, Z., & Hoffmann, J. D. (2021). The creativity dare: Attitudes toward creativity and prediction of creative behavior in school. The Journal of Creative Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.527Google Scholar
Ivcevic, Z., & Mayer, J. D. (2009). Mapping dimensions of creativity in the life-space. Creativity Research Journal, 21(2–3), 152165. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410902855259Google Scholar
Izard, C. E. (1960). Personality similarity and friendship. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 4751. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042147CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jankowska, D. M., & Karwowski, M. (2015). Measuring creative imagery abilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01591CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kao, G., & Jouyner, K. (2004). Do race and ethnicity matter among friends? Activities among interracial, interethnic, and intraethnic adolescent friends. The Sociological Quarterly, 45, 557573. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2004.tb02303.xGoogle Scholar
Karwowski, M. (2014). Creative mindsets: Measurement, correlates, consequences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(1), 6270. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034898Google Scholar
Karwowski, M. (2015). Peer effect on students’ creative self-concept. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 49(3), 211225, https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.102Google Scholar
Karwowski, M. (2019). Classroom creative climate: From a static to a dynamic perspective. In Lebuda, I. & Glăveanu, V. P. (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Social Creativity Research (pp. 487499). Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95498-1_30Google Scholar
Karwowski, M. (2022). School does not kill creativity. European Psychologist, 27(3), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000449Google Scholar
Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2019). Creative behavior as agentic action. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(4), 402415. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karwowski, M., Dul, J., Gralewski, J., et al. (2016). Is creativity without intelligence possible? A necessary condition analysis. Intelligence, 57, 105117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2016.04.006Google Scholar
Karwowski, M., Gralewski, J., & Szumski, G. (2015). Teachers’ effect on students’ creative self-beliefs is moderated by students’ gender. Learning and Individual Differences, 44, 18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.10.001Google Scholar
Karwowski, M., & Lebuda, I. (2016). The big five, the huge two, and creative self-beliefs: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(2), 214232. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000035Google Scholar
Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., & Beghetto, R. A. (2019). Creative self-beliefs. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 396417). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., & Wiśniewska, E. (2018). Measuring creative self-efficacy and creative personal identity. The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 28, 4557.Google Scholar
Karwowski, M., Royston, R. P., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2019). Exploring creative mindsets: Variable and person-centered approaches. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(1), 3648. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000170Google Scholar
Karwowski, M., & Wiśniewska, E. (2021). Creativity in adulthood. In Russ, S. W., Hoffmann, J. D., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Lifespan Development of Creativity (pp. 206232). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108755726.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karwowski, M., Zielińska, A., Jankowska, D. M., et al. (2021). Creative lockdown? A daily diary study of creative activity during pandemics. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 23, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.600076Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Counting the muses: Development of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 298308. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The Four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 112. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., Bromley, M. L., & Cole, J. C. (2007). Insane, poetic, lovable: Creativity and endorsement of the “mad genius” stereotype. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 26, 149161. https://doi.org/10.2190/J207-3U30-R401–446JGoogle Scholar
Kéri, S. (2011). Solitary minds and social capital: Latent inhibition, general intellectual functions and social network size predict creative achievements. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 215221. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022000Google Scholar
Kettler, T., Lamb, K. N., Willerson, A., & Mullet, D. R. (2018). Teachers’ perceptions of creativity in the classroom. Creativity Research Journal, 30(2), 164171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1446503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kharkhurin, A. V. (2014). Creativity.4in1: Four-criterion construct of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26(3), 338352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.929424Google Scholar
Kim, K. H. (2011). The creativity crisis: The decrease in creative thinking scores on the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 23(4), 285295. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2011.627805Google Scholar
Lau, S., & Li, W.-L. (1996). Peer status and perceived creativity: Are popular children viewed by peer and teachers as creative? Creativity Research Journal, 9, 295306. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0904Google Scholar
Lebuda, I., Zielińska, A., & Karwowski, M. (2021). On surface and core predictors of real-life creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, 100973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, N. P., & Kenrick, D. T. (2006). Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: What, whether, and why. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 468489. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.468CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liang, Q., Niu, W., Cheng, L., & Qin, K. (2021). Creativity outside school: The influence of family background, perceived parenting, and after‐school activity on creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.521Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W. (1987). The Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 280295. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.79.3.280Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K.-T. (2003). Big-Fish-Little-Pond Effect on academic self-concept: A cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58(5), 364376. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.5.364Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Pekrun, R., Murayama, K., et al. (2018). An integrated model of academic self-concept development: Academic self-concept, grades, test scores, and tracking over 6 years. Developmental Psychology, 54(2), 263280., https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000393Google Scholar
Marsh, H. W., Pekrun, R., Parker, P. D., et al. (2019). The murky distinction between self-concept and self-efficacy: Beware of lurking jingle-jangle fallacies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(2), 331353. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000281Google Scholar
McKay, A. S., Grygiel, P., & Karwowski, M. (2017). Connected to create: A social network analysis of friendship ties and creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(3), 284294. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000117Google Scholar
McKay, A. S., Karwowski, M., & Kaufman, J. C. (2017). Measuring the muses: Validating the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(2), 216230. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000074Google Scholar
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415Google Scholar
Michael, L. A. H., Hou, S.-T., & Fan, H.-L. (2011). Creative self-efficacy and innovative behavior in a service setting: Optimism as a moderator. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(4), 258272. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01430.xGoogle Scholar
Möller, J., & Marsh, H. W. (2013). Dimensional comparison theory. Psychological Review, 120(3), 544560. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032459Google Scholar
Mueller, J. S., Melwani, S., & Goncalo, J. A. (2012). The bias against creativity: Why people desire but reject creative ideas. Psychological Science, 23, 1317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611421018Google Scholar
Murdock, M. C., & Ganim, R. M. (1993). Creativity and humor: Integration and incongruity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 27(1), 5770. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1993.tb01387.xGoogle Scholar
Nettle, D. (2008). Why is creativity attractive in a potential mate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(3), 275276. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X08004366Google Scholar
Perry-Smith, J. E. (2006). Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 85101. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.20785503Google Scholar
Perry-Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28, 89106. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040691Google Scholar
Proyer, R. T., Tandler, N., & Brauer, K. (2019). Playfulness and creativity: A selective review. In Luria, S. R., Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.), Creativity and Humor (pp. 4360). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813802-1.00002-8Google Scholar
Runco, M. A., Acar, S., & Cayirdag, N. (2017). A closer look at the creativity gap and why students are less creative at school than outside of school. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 24, 242249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.04.003Google Scholar
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 9296. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092Google Scholar
Sawyer, R. K. (2012). Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 361388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410409534549Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J. (2015). Intelligence and creativity are pretty similar after all. Educational Psychology Review, 27(4), 599606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9299-1Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1984). Artistic creativity and interpersonal relationships across and within generations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 12731286. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.46.6.1273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2012). Taking the U.S. Patent Office criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion creativity definition and its implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24(2-3), 97106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.676974Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2014). The mad-genius paradox: Can creative people be more mentally healthy but highly creative people more mentally ill? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 470480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614543973Google Scholar
Snyder, H. T., Sowden, P. T., Silvia, P. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2021). The creative self: Do people distinguish creative self-perceptions, efficacy, and personal identity? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 15(4), 627636. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000317Google Scholar
Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. C. (2002). Liking some things (in some people) more than others: Partner preferences in romantic relationships and friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19(4), 463481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407502019004048Google Scholar
Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In Berkowitz, L (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 21, pp. 181227). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60227-0Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (2004). Great expectations: Creative achievements of the sociometric stars in a 30-year study. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(1), 513. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2004-465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Wilt, F., van der Veen, C., van Kruistum, C., & van Oers, B. (2018). Popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, or average: Do young children of different sociometric groups differ in their level of oral communicative competence? Social Development, 27(4), 793807. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12316Google Scholar
Weisberg, R., Pichot, N., Bonetto, E., et al. , N. (2021). From explicit to implicit theories of creativity and back: The relevance of naive criteria in defining creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(3), 839856. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.492Google Scholar
Westby, E. L., & Dawson, V. L. (1995). Creativity: Asset or burden in the classroom? Creativity Research Journal, 8(1), 110. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj0801_1Google Scholar
Wolff, F., Helm, F., Zimmermann, F., Nagy, G., & Möller, J. (2018). On the effects of social, temporal, and dimensional comparisons on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(7), 10051025. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000248Google Scholar
Wolfradt, U., & Pretz, J. E. (2001). Individual differences in creativity: Personality, story writing, and hobbies. European Journal of Personality, 15, 297310. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.409Google Scholar
Zandi, N., Karwowski, M., Forthmann, B., & Holling, H. (2022). How stable is the creative self-concept? A latent state-trait analysis. Psychology of Creativity, Aesthetics, and the Arts, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000521.Google Scholar
Zielińska, A. (2020). Mapping adolescents’ everyday creativity. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 7(1), 208229. https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2020-0012Google Scholar
Zielińska, A., Lebuda, I., Ivcevic, Z., & Karwowski, M. (2022a). How adolescents develop and implement their ideas? On self-regulation of creative action. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.100998Google Scholar
Zielińska, A., Lebuda, I., & Karwowski, M. (2022b). Scaling creative self: An Item Response Theory analysis of the Short Scale of Creative Self. Creativity Research Journal, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2022.2123139.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×