Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T16:36:47.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Legal Governance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2021

Muhammad Azfar Nisar
Affiliation:
Lahore University of Management Sciences, Pakistan
Get access

Summary

In considering many of the challenges that we face in matters of societal diversity, our inability to have an honest dialogue about how we develop our understanding of group construction and the impact of such construction on policy development keeps us on a road that prolongs ongoing challenges. (Farmbry 2009, viii)

An important way in which the state intersects with lives of marginalized individuals is by adjudicating or deciding on the legal definitions for various categories of individuals. The second half of twentieth century saw the rise of ‘politics of recognition’ (C. Taylor 1994) where marginalized groups tried to improve their social status by seeking formal legal recognition and protection of their identities. In contrast to the first half of the twentieth century, when redistributive justice was the predominant demand of marginalized groups, the primary demand of identity-based movements was recognition of their separate identity-based rights. These movements were based on the idea that by official recognition of their identity and associating rights with that identity, the problem of social marginalization will eventually disappear (McNay 2014). Examples of such recognition-based movements include, but are not limited to, the African American civil rights movement (Kluger 2011; Morris 1984); ethnic minorities’ movements for civil rights (Donato 1997; Rosales 1997); women's rights movements (Kerber 1980; Rhode 1991); gender queer groups’ struggle for recognition (Clendinen and Nagourney 2001; Smith 2008); and of individuals diagnosed with mental illnesses (Fleischer and Zames 2001; Scotch 1988).

However, the politics and consequences of recognition have been contested on multiple fronts in recent years because of persistent social exclusion and marginalization in society. First, Nancy Fraser (1997, 2000) and her colleagues (Fraser and Honneth 2003) have problematized the exclusive focus of identity-based movements on recognition by the state at the expense of redistributive demands. According to Fraser (1995, 2000), the rise of the politics of recognition combined with the fall of communism led to an increase in social injustice in certain societies since regressive economic policies were often not the primary focus of attention of the identity-based movements of marginalized groups. According to Fraser (1995, 2001), redistribution and recognition are equally important and distinct aspects of marginalization and social equity can be achieved only if both these categories of social injustice are addressed.

Type
Chapter
Information
Governing Thirdness
State, Society, and Non-Binary Identities in Pakistan
, pp. 79 - 82
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Legal Governance
  • Muhammad Azfar Nisar, Lahore University of Management Sciences, Pakistan
  • Book: Governing Thirdness
  • Online publication: 10 December 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009030045.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Legal Governance
  • Muhammad Azfar Nisar, Lahore University of Management Sciences, Pakistan
  • Book: Governing Thirdness
  • Online publication: 10 December 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009030045.006
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Legal Governance
  • Muhammad Azfar Nisar, Lahore University of Management Sciences, Pakistan
  • Book: Governing Thirdness
  • Online publication: 10 December 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009030045.006
Available formats
×