Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T10:14:16.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Section 6 - Designing, Leading, and Managing Responses to Emergencies and Pandemics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2024

Richard Williams
Affiliation:
University of South Wales
Verity Kemp
Affiliation:
Independent Health Emergency Planning Consultant
Keith Porter
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Tim Healing
Affiliation:
Worshipful Society of Apothecaries of London
John Drury
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Major Incidents, Pandemics and Mental Health
The Psychosocial Aspects of Health Emergencies, Incidents, Disasters and Disease Outbreaks
, pp. 365 - 422
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Harrald, JR, Mazzuchi, T. Planning for success: a scenario-based approach to contingency planning using expert judgment. J Contingencies Crisis Manag 1993; 1: 189–98.Google Scholar
Alexander, DE. Principles of emergency planning. In Building Safer Communities: Risk Governance, Spatial Planning and Responses to Natural Hazards (ed. Fra Paleo, U): 162–74. IOS Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Calvert, JG, Arbuthnott, G. Failures of State: The Inside Story of Britain’s Battle with Coronavirus. Mudlark, 2021.Google Scholar
UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR). UNISDR Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction. UNDRR, 2009 (www.undrr.org/publication/2009-unisdr-terminology-disaster-risk-reduction).Google Scholar
UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR). Online Glossary (www.undrr.org/terminology).Google Scholar
CIPedia. Emergency (Definitions). Fraunhofer, 2020 (https://websites.fraunhofer.de/CIPedia/index.php/Emergency).Google Scholar
Shaluf, I, Ahmadun, F, Said, AM. A review of disaster and crisis. Disaster Prev Manag 2003; 12: 2432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IFRC. What Is A Disaster? (www.ifrc.org/what-disaster).Google Scholar
Emergency Event Database (EM-DAT). Disasters in Numbers. Emergency Event Database, 2021 (https://reliefweb.int/report/world/2021-disasters-numbers).Google Scholar
Wikipedia. List of Armed Conflicts. Wikipedia, 2022 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ongoing_armed_conflicts).Google Scholar
Kelman, I. Lost for words amongst disaster risk science vocabulary? Int J Disaster Risk Sci 2018; 9: 281–91.Google Scholar
ReliefWeb. Glossary of Humanitarian Terms. ReliefWeb, 2008 (https://reliefweb.int/report/world/reliefweb-glossary-humanitarian-terms-enko).Google Scholar
Alexander, DE. How to Write an Emergency Plan. Dunedin Academic Press, 2016.Google Scholar
UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs and the Inter-Agency Standing Committee. Civil-Military Guidelines and Reference for Complex Emergencies. UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, 2008.Google Scholar
Alexander, DE. From civil defence to civil protection – and back again. Disaster Prev Manag 2002; 11: 209–13.Google Scholar
Moore, D. Offensive Cyber Operations: Understanding Intangible Warfare. Hurst & Company, 2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mykhalovskiy, E, Kazatchkine, C, Foreman-Mackey, A, McClelland, A, Peck, R, Hastings, C, et al. Human rights, public health and COVID-19 in Canada. Can J Public Health 2020; 111: 975–9.Google Scholar
Hararia, S, Vitacca, M. COVID-19 spread: the Italian case. Respir Med Res 2020; 78: 100771.Google Scholar
Lauta, KC. Human rights and natural disasters. In Research Handbook on Disasters and International Law (eds Breau, SC, Samuel, KLH): 91110. Edward Elgar, 2016.Google Scholar
Handmer, J, Dovers, S. Handbook of Disaster Policies and Institutions. Earthscan, 2007.Google Scholar
Kapucu, N, Arslan, T, Demiroz, F. Collaborative emergency management and national emergency management network. Disaster Prev Manag 2010; 19: 452–68.Google Scholar
UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA). Guidelines on the Use of Military and Civil Defence Assets to Support United Nations Humanitarian Activities in Complex Emergencies. MCDA Guidelines. UNOCHA, 2006.Google Scholar
UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UNOCHA). Guidelines on the Use of Foreign Military and Civil Defence Assets in Disaster Relief – Oslo Guidelines (Revision 1.1). UNOCHA, 2007.Google Scholar
NATO. NATO Standard AJP-3.4.3 Allied Joint Doctrine for the Military Contribution to Humanitarian Assistance. NATO Standardization Office, 2016.Google Scholar
Ministry of Defence. Disaster Relief Operations Overseas: The Military Contribution 3rd ed. Ministry of Defence, 2016.Google Scholar
Boland, ST, McInnes, C, Gordon, S, Lillywhite, L. Civil–military relations: a review of major guidelines and their relevance during public health emergencies. BMJ Mil Health 2021; 167: 99106.Google Scholar
Simm, G. Disaster militarism? Military humanitarian assistance and disaster relief. In Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law (eds de Wet, E, Scherr, KM, Wolfrum, R): 347–75. Brill, 2019.Google Scholar
Hallegatte, S, Przyluski, V. The economics of natural disasters. SSRN 2010; 11: 1424.Google Scholar
Pullium, JK, Roble, GS, Raymond, MA. Emergency planning: be prepared. Nature 2014; 514: 430.Google Scholar
O’Brien, A, Read, GJM, Salmon, PM. Situation awareness in multi-agency emergency response: models, methods and applications. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2020; 47: 101634.Google Scholar
Wang, J. Integrated model combined land-use planning and disaster management: the structure, context and contents. Disaster Prev Manag 2012; 21: 110–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, DE. Towards the development of a standard for emergency planning. Disaster Prev Manag 2005; 14: 158–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haddow, GD, Bullock, JA, Coppola, DP. Introduction to Emergency Management 6th ed. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2017.Google Scholar
Canton, LG. Emergency Management: Concepts and Strategies for Effective Programs 2nd ed. Wiley, 2020.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Public Health for Mass Gatherings: Key Considerations. World Health Organization, 2015 (www.who.int/publications/i/item/public-health-for-mass-gatherings-key-considerations).Google Scholar
McCloskey, B, Endericks, T. Learning from London 2012: A Practical Guide to Public Health and Mass Gatherings. Health Protection Agency UK, 2013.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. International Health Regulations, 3rd ed. World Health Organization, 2005 (www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241580496).Google Scholar
Berke, P, Smith, G. Hazard mitigation, planning, and disaster resiliency: challenges and strategic choices for the 21st century. In Building Safer Communities: Risk Governance, Spatial Planning and Responses to Natural Hazards (ed. Paleo, UF): 120. IOS Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Noji, EK, ed. The Public Health Consequences of Disasters. Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Watson, JT, Gayer, M, Conolly, MA. Epidemics after natural disasters. Emerg Infect Dis 2007; 13: 15.Google Scholar
O’Brien, G, O’Keefe, P, Rose, J, Wisner, B. Climate change and disaster management. Disasters 2006; 30: 6480.Google Scholar
Pescaroli, G, Alexander, D. A definition of cascading disasters and cascading effects: going beyond the ‘toppling dominos’ metaphor. Planet@Risk 2015; 3: 5867.Google Scholar
Pescaroli, G, Alexander, D. Understanding compound, interconnected, interacting and cascading risks: a holistic framework. Risk Anal 2018; 38: 2245–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jahangiri, K, Eivazi, M-R, Mofazali, AS. The role of foresight in avoiding systematic failure of natural disaster risk management. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2017; 21: 303–11.Google Scholar
Denkenberger, DC, Pearce, JM. Feeding everyone: solving the food crisis in event of global catastrophes that kill crops or obscure the sun. Futures 2015; 72: 5768.Google Scholar
Prince, S. Catastrophe and Social Change: Based Upon a Sociological Study of the Halifax Disaster. Colombia University Press, 1920.Google Scholar
Barrows, HH. Geography as human ecology. Ann Am Assoc Geogr 1923; 13: 114.Google Scholar
Drabek, TE. Human System Response to Disaster: An Inventory of Sociological Findings. Springer-Verlag, 1986.Google Scholar
Laakso, K, Palomäki, J. The importance of a common understanding in emergency management. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2013; 80: 1703–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Akter, R, Hu, W, Gatton, M, Bambrick, H, Cheng, J, Tong, S. Climate variability, socio-ecological factors and dengue transmission in tropical Queensland, Australia: a Bayesian spatial analysis. Environ Res 2021; 195: 110285.Google Scholar
Coronese, M, Lamperti, F, Keller, K, Chiaromonte, F, Roventini, A. Evidence for sharp increase in the economic damages of extreme natural disasters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2019; 116: 21450–55.Google Scholar
Otto, FEL, Philip, S, Kew, S, Li, S, King, A, Cullen, H. Attributing high-impact extreme events across timescales—a case study of four different types of events. Climatic Change 2018; 149: 399412.Google Scholar
Gallardo, AR, Djalali, A, Foletti, M, Ragazzoni, L, Corte, FD, Lupescu, O, et al. Core competencies in disaster management and humanitarian assistance: a systematic review. Disaster Med Public 2015; 9: 430–39.Google Scholar
Smith, EC, Burkle, FM, Aitken, P, Leggatt, P. Seven decades of disasters: a systematic review of the literature. Prehosp Disaster Med 2018; 33: 418–23.Google Scholar
Wolbers, J, Kuipers, S, Boin, A. A systematic review of 20 years of crisis and disaster research: trends and progress. Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy 2021; 12: 374–92.Google Scholar
Shahrestanaki, YA, Khankeh, H, Masoumi, G, Hosseini, M. What structural factors influencing emergency and disaster medical response teams? A comparative review study. J Educ Health Promot 2019; 8: 110.Google Scholar
Pilbeam, C, Malden, D, Newell, K, Dagens, A, Kennon, K, Michelen, M, et al. Accessibility, inclusivity, and implementation of COVID-19 clinical management guidelines early in the pandemic: a global survey. Wellcome Open Res 2021; 6: 247.Google Scholar
Lipworth, S, Rigby, I, Cheng, V, Bannister, P, Harriss, E, Cook, K, et al. From severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review of the quality and responsiveness of clinical management guidelines in outbreak settings. Wellcome Open Res 2021; 6: 170.Google Scholar
Dagens, A, Sigfrid, L, Cai, E, Lipworth, S, Cheung, V, Harris, E, et al. Scope, quality, and inclusivity of clinical guidelines produced early in the covid-19 pandemic: rapid review. BMJ 2020; 369: m1936.Google Scholar
Kapucu, N, Arslan, T, Demiroz, F. Collaborative emergency management and national emergency management network. Disaster Prev Manag 2010; 19: 452–68.Google Scholar
Balk, D, Montgomery, MR, McGranahan, G, Kim, D, Mara, V, et al. Mapping urban settlements and the risks of climate change in Africa, Asia and South America. In Population Dynamics and Climate Change (eds Guzman, JM, Martine, G, McGranahan, G, Schensul, D, Tacoli, C): 80103. UNFPA, IIED, 2009.Google Scholar
Kedia, T, Ratcliff, J, O’Connor, M, Oluic, S, Rose, M, Freeman, J, et al. Technologies enabling situational awareness during disaster response: a systematic review. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2022; 16: 341–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jha, A, Lin, L, Short, SM, Argentini, G, Gamhewage, G, Savoia, E. Integrating emergency risk communication (ERC) into the public health system response: systematic review of literature to aid formulation of the 2017 WHO Guideline for ERC policy and practice. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0205555.Google Scholar
Kapucu, N, Hu, Q. Understanding multiplexity of collaborative emergency management networks. Am Rev Public Admin 2016; 46: 399417.Google Scholar
Davidson, L, Carter, H, Drury, J, Amlot, R, Haslam, SA. Advancing a social identity perspective on interoperability in the emergency services: evidence from the Pandemic Multi-Agency Response Teams during the UK COVID-19 response. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2022: 77: 103101.Google Scholar
Manninham-Buller, E, Smith, L, Hunter, P, Duffy, B, Greenberg, N, Rubin, J, et al. EPR Health Protection Research Unit Annual Review. Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response at King’s College London, 2022.Google Scholar
Saunders, J. Manchester Arena Inquiry Volume 2: Emergency Response. Home Office, 2022.Google Scholar
JESIP. JOINT DOCTRINE: The Interoperability Framework. Edition 3. JESIP, 2021.Google Scholar
Schilling, S, Armaou, M, Morrison, Z, Carding, P, Bricknell, M, Connelly, V. Understanding teamwork in rapidly deployed interprofessional teams in intensive and acute care: a systematic review of reviews. PLoS One 2022; 17: e0272942.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banwell, N, Rutherford, S, Mackey, B, Street, R, Chu, C. Commonalities between disaster and climate change risks for health: a theoretical framework. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018; 15: 538.Google Scholar
van Berlaer, G, Staes, T, Danschutter, D, Ackermans, R, Zannini, S, Rossi, G, et al. Disaster preparedness and response improvement. Eur J Emerg Med 2017; 24: 382–8.Google Scholar
Mansfield, KE, Mathur, R, Tazare, J, Henderson, AD, Mulick, AR, Carreira, H, et al. Indirect acute effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on physical and mental health in the UK: a population-based study. Lancet Digit Health 2021; 3: e217–30.Google Scholar
Moynihan, R, Sanders, S, Michaleff, ZA, Scott, AM, Clark, J, To, EJ, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on utilisation of healthcare services: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2021; 11: e045343.Google Scholar
Du, L, Feng, Y, Tang, LY, Kang, W, Lu, W. Networks in disaster emergency management: a systematic review. Nat Hazards 2020; 103: 127.Google Scholar
NOAA Science Advisory Board. A Report on Priorities for Weather Research. NOAA Science Advisory Board, 2021.Google Scholar
Szönyi, M, Roezer, V, Deubelli, T, Ulrich, J, MacClune, K, Laurien, F, et al. PERC Floods Following ‘Bernd’. Zurich Insurance Company, 2022.Google Scholar
Stikova, ER. 2.8 Disaster Preparedness. South East Eur J Public Health 2016; Special Volume (A Global Public Health Curriculum).Google Scholar
Subbarao, I, Lyznicki, JM, Hsu, EB, Gebbie, KM, Markenson, D, Barzansky, B, et al. A consensus-based educational framework and competency set for the discipline of disaster medicine and public health preparedness. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2008; 2: 5768.Google Scholar
Seppänen, H, Virrantaus, K. Shared situational awareness and information quality in disaster management. Safety Sci 2015; 77: 112–22.Google Scholar
Floren, LC, Donesky, D, Whitaker, E, Irby, DM, Ten Cate, O, O’Brien, BC. Are we on the same page? Shared mental models to support clinical teamwork among health professions learners: a scoping review. Acad Med 2018; 93: 498509.Google Scholar
McEwan, D, Ruissen, GR, Eys, MA, Zumbo, BD, Beauchamp, MR. The effectiveness of teamwork training on teamwork behaviors and team performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled interventions. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0169604.Google Scholar
Brooks, SK, Dunn, R, Amlôt, R, Greenberg, N, Rubin, GJ. Social and occupational factors associated with psychological distress and disorder among disaster responders: a systematic review. BMC Psychol 2016; 4: 18.Google Scholar
Brooks, SK, Dunn, R, Amlôt, R, Greenberg, N, Rubin, GJ. Training and post-disaster interventions for the psychological impacts on disaster-exposed employees: a systematic review. J Ment Health 2018; 0: 125.Google Scholar
Labrague, LJ, Hammad, K, Gloe, DS, McEnroe-Pettite, DM, Fronda, DC, Obeidat, AA, et al. Disaster preparedness among nurses: a systematic review of literature. Int Nurs Rev 2018; 65: 4153.Google Scholar
Nafar, H, Aghdam, ET, Derakhshani, N, Sani’ee, N, Sharifian, S, Goharinezhad, S. A systematic mapping review of factors associated with willingness to work under emergency conditions. Hum Resour Health 2021; 19: 76.Google Scholar
Geier, MT. Leadership in extreme contexts: transformational leadership, performance beyond expectations? J Leader Organ Stud 2016; 23: 114.Google Scholar
Sweeney, P, Matthews, M, Lester, P. Leadership in Dangerous Situations: A Handbook for the Armed Forces, Emergency Services, and First Responders. Naval Institute Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Kolditz, TA. Research in in extremis settings. Armed Forces Soc 2016; 32: 655–8.Google Scholar
Yammarino, FJ, Mumford, MD, Connelly, MS, Dionne, SD. Leadership and team dynamics for dangerous military contexts. Mil Psychol 2010; 22: S15–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mühlemann, NS, Steffens, NK, Ullrich, J, Haslam, SA, Jonas, K. Understanding responses to an organizational takeover: introducing the social identity model of organizational change. J Pers Soc Psychol 2022; 123: 1004–23.Google Scholar
Schilling, S. Visualizing the ties that bind us: a cross-sectional thematic and visual analysis of cohesion across three British military formations. Armed Forces Soc 2022: 38: 128.Google Scholar
Guastello, SJ, Correro, AN, Marra, DE. Do emergent leaders experience greater workload? The swallowtail catastrophe model and changes in leadership in an emergency response simulation. Group Dyn Theory Res Pract 2018; 22: 200–22.Google Scholar
Edelmann, CM, Boen, F, Fransen, K. The power of empowerment: predictors and benefits of shared leadership in organizations. Front Psychol 2020; 11: 582894.Google Scholar
Weiss, M, Kolbe, M, Grote, G, Spahn, DR, Grande, B. We can do it! Inclusive leader language promotes voice behavior in multi-professional teams. Leader Q 2018; 29: 389402.Google Scholar
Farahani, RZ, Lotfi, MM, Baghaian, A, Ruiz, R, Rezapour, S. Mass casualty management in disaster scene: a systematic review of OR&MS research in humanitarian operations. Eur J Oper Res 2020; 287: 787819.Google Scholar
Ramthun, AJ, Matkin, GS. Leading dangerously: a case study of military teams and shared leadership in dangerous environments. J Leader Organ Stud 2014; 21: 244–56.Google Scholar
Bergman, JZ, Rentsch, JR, Small, EE, Davenport, SW, Bergman, SM. The shared leadership process in decision-making teams. J Soc Psychol 2012; 152: 1742.Google Scholar
Nicola, M, Sohrabi, C, Mathew, G, Kerwan, A, Al-Jabir, A, Griffin, M, et al. Health policy and leadership models during the COVID-19 pandemic: review article. Int J Surg 2020; 81: 122–9.Google Scholar
Milligan-Saville, JS, Tan, L, Gayed, A, Barnes, C, Madan, I, Dobson, M, et al. Workplace mental health training for managers and its effect on sick leave in employees: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry 2017; 4: 850–58.Google Scholar
Brown, AD, Colville, I, Pye, A. Making sense of sensemaking in organization studies. Organ Stud 2015; 36: 265–77.Google Scholar
Gilbar, O, Ben-Zur, H, Lubin, G. Coping, mastery, stress appraisals, mental preparation, and unit cohesion predicting distress and performance: a longitudinal study of soldiers undertaking evacuation tasks. Anxiety Stress Coping 2010; 23: 547–62.Google Scholar

References

World Health Organization. Disability. World Health Organization, 2022 (www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/disability-and-health).Google Scholar
Alexander, D. Disabled Persons in Viral Pandemics: The Example of COVID-19. Council of Europe, 2021 (https://rm.coe.int/publication-disabled-persons-in-viral-pandemics-the-example-of-covid-1/1680a44c46).Google Scholar
United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Treaty Series 2515. United Nations, 2006.Google Scholar
Sphere Association. The Sphere Handbook: Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Response 4th ed. Sphere Association, 2018 (www.spherestandards.org/handbook).Google Scholar
Polack, S, Sheppard, P. Disability. In Handbook of Refugee Health for Healthcare Professionals and Humanitarians Providing Care to Forced Migrants (ed. Orcutt, M): 134–7. CRC Press, 2021.Google Scholar
Kett, M, Cole, E, Beato, L, Carew, M, Ngafuan, R, Konneh, S, et al. The Ebola crisis and people with disabilities’ access to healthcare and government services in Liberia. Int J Equity Health 2021; 20: 247.Google Scholar
World Humanitarian Summit. Charter on Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities in Humanitarian Action. World Humanitarian Summit, Istanbul, 2324 May 2016.Google Scholar
Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC). Guidelines on Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities in Humanitarian Action. IASC Task Team on Inclusion of Persons with Disabilities in Humanitarian Action. Inter-Agency Standing Committee, 2019 (https://interagencystandingcommittee.org/system/files/2020-11/IASC%20Guidelines%20on%20the%20Inclusion%20of%20Persons%20with%20Disabilities%20in%20Humanitarian%20Action%2C%202019_0.pdf).Google Scholar
United Nations. Disability Inclusion Strategy. United Nations, 2019 (www.un.org/en/content/disabilitystrategy/).Google Scholar
International Disability and Development Consortium (www.iddcconsortium.net/).Google Scholar
International Disability and Development Consortium Task Group on Conflict and Emergencies. Emergency & Humanitarian Assistance and the UN Convention on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights and Dignity of Persons with Disabilities. International Disability and Development Consortium, 2007 (www.alnap.org/system/files/content/resource/files/main/iddc-conflict-and-emergencies-taskgroup.pdf).Google Scholar
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2015 (https://sdgs.un.org/publications/transforming-our-world-2030-agenda-sustainable-development-17981).Google Scholar
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, 2015.Google Scholar
Shivji, A. Disability in displacement. Forced Migr Rev 2010; 35: 4.Google Scholar
International Disability Alliance. Through This Conflict in Ukraine, What Happens to Persons with Disabilities? International Disability Alliance, 2022 (www.internationaldisabilityalliance.org/content/through-conflict-ukraine-what-happens-persons-disabilities).Google Scholar
UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Ukraine: 2.7 million people with disabilities at risk, UN committee warns. 14 April 2022 (www.ohchr.org/en/statements/2022/04/ukraine-27-million-people-disabilities-risk-un-committee-warns).Google Scholar
World Health Organization. mhGAP Humanitarian Intervention Guide (mhGAP-HIG). World Health Organization, 2015.Google Scholar
Evans, NG, Berger, ZD, Phelan, AL, Silverman, RD. COVID-19, equity, and inclusiveness. BMJ 2021; 29; n1631.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. COVID-19 and the Social Determinants of Health and Health Equity: Evidence Brief. World Health Organization, 2021 (www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240038387).Google Scholar
Williams, R, Kaufman, KR. Narrative review of the COVID-19, healthcare and healthcarers thematic series. BJPsych Open 2022; 8: e34.Google Scholar
Bagenstos, SR. May hospitals withhold ventilators from COVID-19 patients with pre-existing disabilities? Notes on the law and ethics of disability-based medical rationing. 130 Yale Law Journal Forum, 24 March 2020 (http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3559926).Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. COVID-19 Rapid Guideline: Managing COVID-19. NICE Guideline [NG191]. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2021 (www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng191).Google Scholar
Kuper, H, et al. Disability-inclusive COVID-19 response: what it is, why it is important and what we can learn from the United Kingdom’s response. Wellcome Open Res 2020; 5: 79.Google Scholar
Boyle, CA, et al. The public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic for people with disabilities. Disabil Health J 2020; 13: 100943.Google Scholar
World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean. Protecting People with Disability during the COVID-19 Pandemic. World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean, 2020 (https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/332329).Google Scholar
Abrams, T, Abbott, D. Disability, deadly discourse, and collectivity amid coronavirus (COVID-19). Scand J Disabil Res 2020; 22: 168–74.Google Scholar

References

Coggon, J, Syrett, K, Viens, AM. Public Health Law: Ethics, Governance and Regulation. Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
Montgomery, J, Williams, R. Public health values and evidence-based practice. In Social Scaffolding: Applying the Lessons of Contemporary Social Science to Health and Healthcare (eds Williams, R, Kemp, V, Haslam, A, Haslam, C, Bhui, K, Bailey, S): 227–43. Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
White, DB, Lo, B. A framework for rationing ventilators and critical care beds during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA 2020; 323: 1773–4.Google Scholar
Arie, S. COVID-19: can France’s ethical support units help doctors make challenging decisions? BMJ 2020; 369: m1291.Google Scholar
Emanuel, E, Persad, G, Upshur, R, Thome, B, Parker, M, Glickman, A, et al. Fair location of scarce medical resources in the time of COVID-19. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 2049–55.Google Scholar
UK Faculty of Public Health. Tackling the Social, Professional, and Political Challenges of COVID-19: The Crucial Role of Public Health Ethics. UK Faculty of Public Health, 2020 (www.fph.org.uk/media/2922/fph-statement-of-public-health-ethics-and-covid-19.pdf).Google Scholar
Buccieri, K, Gaetz, S. Ethical vaccine distribution planning for pandemic influenza: prioritizing homeless and hard-to-reach populations. Public Health Ethics 2013; 6: 185–96.Google Scholar
Kaposy, C, Bandrauk, N. Prioritizing vaccine access for vulnerable but stigmatized groups. Public Health Ethics 2012; 5: 283–95.Google Scholar
Lee, C, Rogers, WA, Braunack-Mayer, A. Social justice and pandemic influenza planning: the role of communication strategies. Public Health Ethics 2008; 1: 223–4.Google Scholar
Montgomery, J, Stokes-Lampard, H, Griffiths, M, Gardiner, D, Harvey, D, Suntharalingam, G. Assessing whether COVID-19 patients will benefit from critical care, and an objective approach to capacity challenges during a pandemic: an Intensive Care Society clinical guideline. J Intensive Care Soc 2021; 22: 204–10.Google Scholar
Ortolani, C, Pastorello, EA. Hydroxychloroquine and dexamethasone in COVID-19: who won and who lost? Clin Mol Allergy 2020; 18: 17.Google Scholar
Schwartz, JL, Caplan, AL. Vaccination Ethics and Policy. The MIT Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Harmon, SHE, Faour, DE, MacDonald, NE, Graham, JE, Steffen, C, Henaff, L, et al. Immunization governance: mandatory immunization in 28 Global NITAG Network countries. Vaccine 2020; 38: 7258–67.Google Scholar
Cassimos, DC, Effraimidou, E, Medic, S, Konstantinidis, T, Theodoridou, M, Maltezou, HC. Vaccination programs for adults in Europe, 2019. Vaccines (Basel) 2020; 8: 34.Google Scholar
Grill, K, Dawson, A. Ethical frameworks in public health decision-making: defending a value-based and pluralist approach. Health Care Anal 2017; 25: 291307.Google Scholar
Thompson, AK, Faith, K, Gibson, JL, Upshar, REG. Pandemic preparedness: an ethical framework to guide decision-making. BMC Med Ethics 2006; 7: 12.Google Scholar
Daniels, N. Accountability for reasonableness. BMJ 2000; 321: 1300–301.Google Scholar
Daniels, N. Just Health: Meeting Health Needs Fairly. Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Faust, HS, Upshur, R. Public health ethics. In The Cambridge Textbook of Bioethics (eds Singer, P, Viens, AM): 274–80. Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Gostin, L. Public Health Law: Power, Duty, Restraint 2nd ed. University of California Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Kass, N. An ethics framework for public health. Am J Public Health 2001; 91: 1776–82.Google Scholar
Childres, J, Faden, R, Gaare, R, Gostin, L, Kahn, J, Richard, B, et al. Public health ethics: mapping the terrain. J Law Med Ethics 2002; 30: 169–77.Google Scholar
Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Public Health Ethics. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2007.Google Scholar
Upshur, R. Principles for the justification of public health interventions. Can J Public Health 2002; 93: 101–3.Google Scholar
Coggon, J. What Makes Health Public? Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Department of Health and Cabinet Office. Responding to Pandemic Influenza: The Ethical Framework for Policy and Planning. Department of Health, 2007.Google Scholar
Kaufman, KR, Petkova, E, Bhui, KS, Schulze, TG. A global needs assessment in times of a global crisis: world psychiatry response to the COVID-19 pandemic. BJPsych Open 2020; 6: e48.Google Scholar
Public Health England. COVID-19: Review of Disparities in Risks and Outcomes. Public Health England, 2020 (www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-review-of-disparities-in-risks-and-outcomes).Google Scholar
Office for National Statistics. Deaths Involving COVID-19 by Local Area and Socioeconomic Deprivation: Deaths Occurring between 1 March and 17 April 2020. Office for National Statistics, 2020 (www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/deathsinvolvingcovid19bylocalareasanddeprivation/latest).Google Scholar
Bennet, B, Carney, T. Vulnerability: an issue for law and policy in pandemic planning? In Law and Global Health (eds Freeman, M, Hawkes, S, Bennett, B): 121–32. Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Venkatapuram, S. Health Justice: An Argument from the Capabilities Approach. Polity Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Wolff, J. The Human Right to Health. WW Norton & Company, 2012.Google Scholar
Tasioualas, J. Minimum Core Obligations: Human Rights in the Here and Now. World Bank, 2017 (https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/29144).Google Scholar
European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies. Statement on European Solidarity and the Protection of Fundamental Rights in the COVID-19 Pandemic. European Group on Ethics in Science and New Technologies, 2020 (https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/research_and_innovation/ege/ec_rtd_ege-statement-covid-19.pdf).Google Scholar
Wellcome Trust. Wellcome Global Monitor: How Does the World Feel About Science and Health? Wellcome Trust, 2019.Google Scholar
Newton, K. Government communications, political trust and compliant social behaviour: the politics of COVID‐19 in Britain. Polit Q 2020; 91: 502–13.Google Scholar
Lynas, M. COVID: Top 10 Current Conspiracy Theories. Alliance for Science, 2020 (https://allianceforscience.cornell.edu/blog/2020/04/covid-top-10-current-conspiracy-theories/).Google Scholar
Vosoughi, S, Roy, D, Aral, S. The spread of true and false news online. Science 2018; 359 : 1146–51.Google Scholar
Allington, D, Duffy, B, Wessely, S, Dhavan, N, Rubin, J. Health-protective behaviour, social media usage and conspiracy belief during the COVID-19 public health emergency. Psychol Med 2021; 51: 1763–9.Google Scholar
Freeman, D, Waite, F, Rosebrock, L, Petit, A, Causier, C, East, A, et al. Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England. Psychol Med 2022; 52: 251–63.Google Scholar
Service, RF. Coronavirus antigen tests: quick and cheap, but too often wrong? Science 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc9586.Google Scholar
US Food and Drug Administration. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Update: FDA Revokes Emergency Use Authorization for Chembio Antibody Test. US Food and Drug Administration, 2020 (www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-revokes-emergency-use-authorization-chembio-antibody-test.).Google Scholar
Deeks, JJ, Brookes, AJ, Pollock, AM. Operation Moonshot proposals are scientifically unsound. BMJ 2020; 370: m3699.Google Scholar
Liddell, K, Skopek, J, Palmer, S, Martin, S, Anderson, J, Sagar, A. Who gets the ventilator? Important legal rights in a pandemic. J Med Ethics 2020; 46: 421–6.Google Scholar
Newdick, C, Sheehan, M, Dunn, M. Tragic choices in intensive care during the COVID-19 pandemic: on fairness, consistency and community. J Med Ethics 2020; 46: 646–51.Google Scholar
Age UK. Joint Statement on the Rights of Older People in the UK to Treatment During This Pandemic. Age UK, 2020 (www.ageuk.org.uk/latest-press/articles/2020/03/rights-of-older-people-during-pandemic/).Google Scholar
Popescu, D, Marcoci, A. Coronavirus: allocating ICU beds and ventilators based on age is discriminatory. The Conversation, 22 April 2020 (https://theconversation.com/coronavirus-allocating-icu-beds-and-ventilators-based-on-age-is-discriminatory-136459).Google Scholar
Luthi, S. Trump administration steps in as advocacy groups warn of Covid ‘death panels’. POLITICO, 10 August 2020 (www.politico.com/news/2020/08/10/coronavirus-treatment-death-panels-392463).Google Scholar
Wilkinson, D, Zohny, H, Kappes, A, Sinnot-Armstrong, W, Savalescu, J. Which factors should be included in triage? An online survey of the attitudes of the UK general public to pandemic triage dilemmas. BMJ Open 2020; 10: e045593.Google Scholar
Lincoln, M. A special self-image is no defence against COVID-19. Nature 2020; 585: 325.Google Scholar
Montgomery, J. Bioethics as a governance practice. Health Care Anal 2016; 24: 323.Google Scholar
Fidler, D. SARS, Governance and the Globalisation of Disease. Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Report of the Ebola Interim Assessment Panel. World Health Organization, 2015 (www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/ebola/report-by-panel.pdf).Google Scholar
Onzivu, W. Reinforcing global health normative frameworks and legal obligations: can adaptive governance help? In Global Health and International Community: Ethical, Political and Regulatory Challenges (eds Coggon, J, Gola, S): 233–48. Bloomsbury, 2013.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Ethics and COVID-19: Resource Allocation and Priority-Setting. World Health Organization, 2020 (www.who.int/ethics/publications/ethics-and-covid-19-resource-allocation-and-priority-setting/en/).Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Ethical Standards for Research During Public Health Emergencies: Distilling Existing Guidance to Support COVID-19 R&D. World Health Organization, 2020 (www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-RFH-20.1).Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Ethical Considerations to Guide the Use of Digital Proximity Tracking Technologies for COVID-19 Contact Tracing. World Health Organization, 2020 (www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-Ethics_Contact_tracing_apps-2020.1).Google Scholar
International Bioethics Committee and World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology. Statement on COVID-19: Ethical Considerations from a Global Perspective. UNESCO, 2020 (https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373115).Google Scholar
Comite Consultatif National d’Ethique. Ethical Issues in the Face of a Pandemic. Comite Consultatif National d’Ethique, 2020 (www.ccne-ethique.fr/en/publications/contribution-french-national-consultative-ethics-committee-covid-19-crisis-ethical).Google Scholar
Deutsher Ethikrat. Immunity Certificates During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Deutsher Ethikrat, 2020 (www.ethikrat.org/fileadmin/Publikationen/Stellungnahmen/englisch/opinion-immunity-certificates.pdf).Google Scholar
Comitato Nazionale per la Bioetica. COVID-19: Clinical Decision-Making in Conditions of Resource Shortage and the ‘Pandemic Emergency Triage’ Criterion. Comitato Nazionale per la Bioética, 2020 (http://bioetica.governo.it/en/opinions/opinions-responses/covid-19-clinical-decision-making-in-conditions-of-resource-shortage-and-the-pandemic-emergency-triage-criterion/).Google Scholar
Comitato Nazionale per la Bioética. COVID-19: Public Health, Individual Freedom, Social Solidarity. Comitato Nazionale per la Bioética, 2020 (http://bioetica.governo.it/en/opinions/opinions-responses/covid-19-public-health-individual-freedom-social-solidarity/).Google Scholar
Hine, D. The 2009 Influenza Pandemic: An Independent Review of the UK Response to the 2009 Influenza Pandemic. Cabinet Office, 2010.Google Scholar
Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Research in Global Health Emergencies. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2020.Google Scholar
Whittall, H. COVID, Transparency and Trust. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2020 (www.nuffieldbioethics.org/blog/covid-transparency-and-trust).Google Scholar
Gadd, E. Is the Government Using its Own Ethical Framework? Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2020 (www.nuffieldbioethics.org/blog/is-the-government-using-its-own-ethical-framework).Google Scholar
Rutter, A, Bell, D, Cole, S. COVID-19 Guidance: Ethical Advice and Support Framework. Scottish Government, 2020 (www.gov.scot/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-ethical-advice-and-support-framework/).Google Scholar
Welsh Government. Coronavirus: Ethical Values and Principles for Healthcare Delivery Framework: Guidance for Healthcare Services When Making Decisions During the Coronavirus Outbreak. Welsh Government, 2020 (https://gov.wales/coronavirus-ethical-values-and-principles-healthcare-delivery-framework-html).Google Scholar
Hawker, L. Take that, Macron! French President’s ‘ludicrous’ Oxford vaccine claims brutally backfire. Daily Express, 3 February 2021 (www.express.co.uk/news/world/1392542/Emmanuel-macron-news-covid-Vaccine-oxford-AstraZeneca-jab-coronavirus-uk).Google Scholar
Bieniasz, P. Musings of an anonymous, pissed off virologist. Virology Blog, 5 January 2021 (https://twitter.com/PaulBieniasz/status/1345195420033691648).Google Scholar
Safi, M. Vaccine diplomacy: west falling behind in race for influence. The Guardian, 19 February 2021 (www.theguardian.com/world/2021/feb/19/coronavirus-vaccine-diplomacy-west-falling-behind-russia-china-race-influence).Google Scholar
Gostin, L. Global Health Security: A Blueprint for the Future. Harvard University Press, 2022 .Google Scholar

References

Google LLC. COVID-19 Community Mobility Reports. Google LLC, 2021 (www.google.com/covid19/mobility/).Google Scholar
Haischer, MH, Beilfuss, R, Hart, MR, Opielinski, L, Wrucke, D, Zirgaitis, G, et al. Who is wearing a mask? Gender-, age-, and location-related differences during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0240785.Google Scholar
Usher, K, Jackson, D, Durkin, J, Gyamfi, N, Bhullar, N. Pandemic-related behaviours and psychological outcomes; a rapid literature review to explain COVID-19 behaviours. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2020; 29: 1018–34.Google Scholar
Gollwitzer, A, Martel, C, Marshall, J, Höhs, JM, Bargh, JA. Connecting self-reported social distancing to real-world behavior at the individual and U.S. state level. Soc Psychol Pers Sci 2021; 13: 113.Google Scholar
Machida, M, Nakamura, I, Saito, R, Nakaya, T, Hanibuchi, T, Takamiya, T, et al. Incorrect use of face masks during the current COVID-19 pandemic among the general public in Japan. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 6484.Google Scholar
Hahn, U, Chater, N, Lagnado, D, Osman, M, Raihani, N. Why a group of behavioural scientists penned an open letter to the U.K. government questioning its coronavirus response. Behavioral Scientist, 16 March 2020 (https://behavioralscientist.org/why-a-group-of-behavioural-scientists-penned-an-open-letter-to-the-uk-government-questioning-its-coronavirus-response-covid-19-social-distancing/).Google Scholar
Reicher, S, Drury, J. Pandemic fatigue? How adherence to COVID-19 regulations has been misrepresented and why it matters. BMJ 2021; 372: n137.Google Scholar
Ayre, J, Cvejic, E, McCaffery, K, Copp, T, Cornell, S, Dodd, RH, et al. Contextualising COVID-19 prevention behaviour over time in Australia: patterns and long-term predictors from April to July 2020 in an online social media sample. PLos One 2021; 16: e0253930.Google Scholar
Petherick, A, Goldszmidt, R, Andrade, EB, Furst, R, Hale, T, Pott, A, et al. A worldwide assessment of changes in adherence to COVID-19 protective behaviours and hypothesized pandemic fatigue. Nat Hum Behav 2021; 5: 1145–60.Google Scholar
Wright, L, Steptoe, A, Fancourt, D. Trajectories of compliance with COVID-19 related guidelines: longitudinal analyses of 50,000 UK adults. Ann Behav Med 2022; 56: 781–90.Google Scholar
Breakwell, GM, Fino, E, Jaspal, R. The COVID-19 Preventive Behaviors Index: development and validation in two samples from the United Kingdom. Eval Health Prof 2021; 44: 7786.Google Scholar
Brouard, S, Vasilopoulos, P, Becher, M. Sociodemographic and psychological correlates of compliance with the COVID-19 public health measures in France. Can J Polit Sci 2020; 53: 16.Google Scholar
Tomczyk, S, Rahn, M, Schmidt, S. Social distancing and stigma: association between compliance with behavioral recommendations, risk perception, and stigmatizing attitudes during the COVID-19 outbreak. Front Psychol 2020; 11: 1821.Google Scholar
Wright, L, Steptoe, A, Fancourt, D. Patterns of compliance with COVID-19 preventive behaviours: a latent class analysis of 20,000 UK adults. J Epidemiol Community Health 2022; 76: 247–53.Google Scholar
Mantzari, E, Rubin, GJ, Marteau, TM. Is risk compensation threatening public health in the COVID-19 pandemic? BMJ 2020; 370: m2913.Google Scholar
Yan, Y, Bayham, J, Richter, A, Fenichel, EP. Risk compensation and face mask mandates during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sci Rep 2021; 11: 3174.Google Scholar
Kovacs, R, Dunaiski, M, Tukiainen, J. Compulsory Face Mask Policies Do Not Affect Community Mobility in Germany. Aboa Centre for Economics, 2020.Google Scholar
Marchiori, M. COVID-19 and the social distancing paradox: dangers and solutions. University of Padova, 2020 (http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.12446).Google Scholar
Reiber, C, Shattuck, EC, Fiore, S, Alperin, P, Davis, V, Moore, J. Change in human social behavior in response to a common vaccine. Ann Epidemiol 2010; 20: 729–33.Google Scholar
YouGov. YouGov/Sky Survey Results. YouGov, 2020.Google Scholar
Wright, L, Steptoe, A, Mak, HW, Fancourt, D. Do people reduce compliance with COVID-19 guidelines following vaccination? A longitudinal analysis of matched UK adults. J Epidemiol Community Health 2022; 76: 109–15.Google Scholar
Noone, C, Warner, NZ, Byrne, M, Durand, H, Lavoie, KL, McGuire, BE, et al. A scoping review of research on the determinants of adherence to social distancing measures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Psychol Rev 2021; 15: 350–70.Google Scholar
Rosenstock, IM, Strecher, VJ, Becker, MH. Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Educ Q 1988; 15: 175–83.Google Scholar
Harper, CA, Satchell, LP, Fido, D, Latzman, RD. Functional fear predicts public health compliance in the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Ment Health Addict 2021; 19: 1875–88.Google Scholar
Coroiu, A, Moran, C, Campbell, T, Geller, AC. Barriers and facilitators of adherence to social distancing recommendations during COVID-19 among a large international sample of adults. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0239795.Google Scholar
Bish, A, Michie, S. Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: a review. Br J Health Psychol 2010; 15: 797824.Google Scholar
Perra, N. Non-pharmaceutical interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic: a review. Phys Rep 2021; 913: 152.Google Scholar
Moran, KR, Valle, SYD. A meta-analysis of the association between gender and protective behaviors in response to respiratory epidemics and pandemics. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0164541.Google Scholar
Bodas, M, Peleg, K. Income assurances are a crucial factor in determining public compliance with self-isolation regulations during the COVID-19 outbreak – cohort study in Israel. Isr J Health Policy Res 2020; 9: 54.Google Scholar
Wright, L, Paul, E, Steptoe, A, Fancourt, D. Facilitators and barriers to compliance with COVID-19 guidelines: a structural topic modelling analysis of free-text data from 17,500 UK adults. BMC Public Health 2022; 22: 34.Google Scholar
Smith, LE, Potts, HWW, Amlôt, R, Fear, NT, Michie, S, Rubin, GJ. Adherence to the test, trace, and isolate system in the UK: results from 37 nationally representative surveys. BMJ 2021; 372: n608.Google Scholar
Murphy, K, Williamson, H, Sargeant, E, McCarthy, M. Why people comply with COVID-19 social distancing restrictions: self-interest or duty? Aust N Z J Criminol 2020; 53. Available at https://doi.org/10.1177/0004865820954484.Google Scholar
Wright, L, Fancourt, D. Do predictors of adherence to pandemic guidelines change over time? A panel study of 22,000 UK adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Prev Med 2021; 153: 106713.Google Scholar
Barrios, JM, Benmelech, E, Hochberg, YV, Sapienza, P, Zingales, L. Civic capital and social distancing during the Covid-19 pandemic. J Public Econ 2021; 193: 104310.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, F, Bor, A, Petersen, MB. Compliance without fear: individual‐level protective behaviour during the first wave of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Br J Health Psychol 2021; 26: 679–96.Google Scholar
Bargain, O, Aminjonov, U. Trust and compliance to public health policies in times of COVID-19. J Public Econ 2020; 192: 104316.Google Scholar
Wright, L, Steptoe, A, Fancourt, D. Predictors of self-reported adherence to COVID-19 guidelines. A longitudinal observational study of 51,600 UK adults. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2021; 4: 100061.Google Scholar
Askitas, N, Tatsiramos, K, Verheyden, B. Estimating worldwide effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 incidence and population mobility patterns using a multiple-event study. Sci Rep 2021; 11: 1972.Google Scholar
Ananyev, M, Poyker, M, Tian, Y. The safest time to fly: pandemic response in the era of Fox News. J Popul Econ 2021; 34: 775802.Google Scholar
Ajzenman, N, Cavalcanti, T, Da Mata, D. More than words: leaders’ speech and risky behavior during a pandemic. Am Econ J 2020. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3582908.Google Scholar
Plohl, N, Musil, B. Modeling compliance with COVID-19 prevention guidelines: the critical role of trust in science. Psychol Health Med 2021; 26: 112.Google Scholar
Brooks, SK, Webster, RK, Smith, LE, Woodland, L, Wessely, S, Greenberg, N, et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet 2020; 395: 912–20.Google Scholar
Aknin, L, De Neve, J-E, Dunn, E, Fancourt, D, Goldberg, E, Helliwell, J, et al. Mental health during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic: a review and recommendations for moving forward. Perspect Psychol Sci 2022; 17: 915–36.Google Scholar
Pierce, M, Hope, H, Ford, T, Hatch, S, Hotopf, M, John, A, et al. Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population. Lancet Psychiatry 2020; 7: 883–92.Google Scholar
Murphy, J, Spikol, E, McBride, O, Shevlin, M, Hartman, TK, Hyland, P, et al. The psychological wellbeing of frontline workers in the United Kingdom during the COVID-19 pandemic: first and second wave findings from the COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study (www.researchgate.net/publication/342251558_The_psychological_wellbeing_of_frontline_workers_in_the_United_Kingdom_during_the_COVID-19_pandemic_First_and_second_wave_findings_from_the_COVID-19_Psychological_Research_Consortium_C19PRC_Study).Google Scholar
Ayling, K, Jia, R, Chalder, T, Massey, A, Broadbent, E, Coupland, C, et al. Mental health of keyworkers in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional analysis of a community cohort. BMJ Open 2020; 10: e040620.Google Scholar
Iob, E, Frank, P, Steptoe, A, Fancourt, D. Levels of severity of depressive symptoms among at-risk groups in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3: e2026064.Google Scholar
Kwong, AS, Pearson, RM, Adams, MJ, Northstone, K, Tilling, K, Smith, D, et al. Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in two longitudinal UK population cohorts. Br J Psychiatry 2021; 218: 334–43.Google Scholar
Cai, Q, Feng, H, Huang, J, Wang, M, Wang, Q, Lu, X, et al. The mental health of frontline and non-frontline medical workers during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: a case-control study. J Affect Disord 2020; 275: 210–15.Google Scholar
Rossi, R, Socci, V, Pacitti, F, Di Lorenzo, G, Di Marco, A, Siracusano, A, et al. Mental health outcomes among frontline and second-line health care workers during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Italy. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3: e2010185.Google Scholar
Paul, E, Mak, HW, Fancourt, D, Bu, F. Comparing the mental health trajectories of four different types of keyworkers with non-keyworkers: a 12-month follow-up observational study of 21,874 adults in England during the COVID-19 pandemic. Br J Psychiatry 2022; 220: 18.Google Scholar
Cutler, DM, Huang, W, Lleras-Muney, A. Economic Conditions and Mortality: Evidence from 200 Years of Data. National Bureau of Economic Research, 2016.Google Scholar
Brewer, M, Cominetti, N, Henehan, K, McCurdy, C, Sehmi, R, Slaughter, H. Jobs, Jobs, Jobs: Evaluating the Effects of the Current Economic Crisis on the UK Labour Market. Resolution Foundation, 2020.Google Scholar
Ipsos. Most Britons continue to say they are following coronavirus rules; almost half believe lockdown measures are not strict enough. Ipsos, 17 January 2021 (www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/most-britons-continue-say-they-are-following-coronavirus-rules-almost-half-believe-lockdown).Google Scholar

References

Cohen, SK. The Black Death Transformed: Disease and Culture in Early Renaissance Europe. Oxford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Foa, A. The Jews of Europe after the Black Death (trans. Grover, A). University of California Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Oshinsky, DM. Polio: An American History. Oxford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Hobfoll, SE. Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am Psychol 1989; 44 : 513–24.Google Scholar
Hobfoll, SE. Traumatic stress: a theory based on rapid loss of resources. Anxiety Res 1991; 4: 187–97.Google Scholar
Hobfoll, SE. Stress, Culture, and Community: The Psychology and Philosophy of Stress. Plenum, 1998.Google Scholar
Hobfoll, SE. Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Rev Gen Psychol 2002; 6; 307–24.Google Scholar
Benight, CC, Ironson, G, Klebe, K, Carver, CS, Wynings, C, Burnett, K, et al. Conservation of resources and coping self-efficacy predicting distress following a natural disaster: a causal model analysis where the environment meets the mind. Anxiety Stress Coping 1999; 12: 107–26.Google Scholar
Freedy, JR, Shaw, DL, Jarrell, MP, Masters, CR. Towards an understanding of the psychological impact of natural disasters: an application of the conservation resources stress model. J Trauma Stress 1992; 5: 441–54.Google Scholar
Norris, FH, Perilla, JL, Riad, JK, Kaniasty, K, Lavizzo, EA. Stability and change in stress, resources, and psychological distress following natural disaster: findings from Hurricane Andrew. Anxiety Stress Coping 1999; 12: 363–96.Google Scholar
Hobfoll, SE, Canetti-Nisim, D, Johnson, RJ. Exposure to terrorism, stress-related mental health symptoms, and defensive coping among Jews and Arabs in Israel. J Consult Clin Psychol 2006; 74: 207-18.Google Scholar
Hobfoll, SE, Canetti-Nisim, D, Johnson, RJ., Palmieri, PA, Varley, JD, Galea, S. The association of exposure, risk, and resiliency factors with PTSD among Jews and Arabs exposed to repeated acts of terrorism in Israel. J Trauma Stress 2008; 21: 921.Google Scholar
Wikipedia. COVID-19 Pandemic by Country and Territory. Wikipedia, 2021 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_by_country_and_territoryopened4-5-21).Google Scholar

References

Keim, ME, Noji, E. Emergent use of social media: a new age of opportunity for disaster resilience. Am J Disaster Med 2011; 6: 4754.Google Scholar
We Are Social. Digital 2022. We Are Social, 2022 (https://wearesocial.com/uk/blog/2022/01/digital-2022/).Google Scholar
Shahbaz, A, Funk, A. Freedom on the Net 2019: The Crisis of Social Media. Freedom House, 2019 (https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/2019/crisis-social-media).Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. Smartphone Ownership and Internet Usage Continues to Climb in Emerging Economies. Pew Research Center, 2016 (www.pewglobal.org/2016/02/22/smartphone-ownership-and-internet-usage-continues-to-climb-in-emerging-economies/).Google Scholar
We Are Social. Digital 2021: April Global Snapshot Report. We Are Social, 2021 (https://wearesocial.com/blog/2021/04/60-percent-of-the-worlds-population-is-now-online).Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. Social Media Use in 2021. Pew Research Center, 2021 (www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/04/07/social-media-use-in-2021/).Google Scholar
Alexander, DE. Social media in disaster risk reduction and crisis management. Sci Eng Ethics 2014; 20: 717–33.Google Scholar
Irons, D, Paton, D, Lester, L, Scott, J, Martin, A. Social media, crisis communication and community-led response and recovery: an Australian case study. In Proceedings of the Research Forum of the Bushfire and Natural Hazards CRC and AFAC Conference, Wellington, New Zealand, 2 September 2014.Google Scholar
Dufty, N. Twitter turns ten: its use to date in disaster management. Aust J Emerg Manag 2016; 31: 5054.Google Scholar
Lindsay, BR. Social Media and Disasters: Current Uses, Future Options, and Policy Considerations. Congressional Research Service, 2011 (https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc93902/).Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. News Use Across Social Media Platforms in 2020. Pew Research Center, 2020 (www.journalism.org/2021/01/12/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-in-2020/).Google Scholar
Benis, A, Khodos, A, Ran, S, Levner, E, Ashkenazi, S. Social media engagement and influenza vaccination during the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional survey study. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23: e25977.Google Scholar
Hossain, L, Kam, D, Kong, F, Wigand, R, Bossomaier, T. Social media in Ebola outbreak. Epidemiol Infect 2016; 144: 2136–43.Google Scholar
Househ, M. Communicating Ebola through social media and electronic news media outlets: a cross-sectional study. Health Inform J 2016; 22: 470–78.Google Scholar
Tsao, S-F, Chen, H, Tisseverasinghe, T, Yang, Y, Li, L, Butt, ZA. What social media told us in the time of COVID-19: a scoping review. Lancet Digit Health 2021; 3: e175–94.Google Scholar
Roy, M, Moreau, N, Rousseau, C, Mercier, A, Wilson, A, Atlani-Duault, L. Ebola and localized blame on social media: analysis of Twitter and Facebook conversations during the 2014–2015 Ebola epidemic. Cult Med Psychiatry 2019; 44: 5679.Google Scholar
Abd-Alrazaq, A, Alhuwail, D, Househ, M, Hamdi, M, Shah, Z. Top concerns of tweeters during the COVID-19 pandemic: infoveillance study. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22: e19016.Google Scholar
Cinelli, M, Quattrociocchi, W, Galeazzi, A, Valensise, CM, Brugnoli, E, Schmidt, AL, et al. The COVID-19 social media infodemic. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 16598.Google Scholar
Lee, K, Agrawal, A, Choudhary, A. Forecasting influenza levels using real-time social media streams. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI), Park City, UT, USA, 23–26 August 2017.Google Scholar
Kumar, S, Xu, C, Ghildayal, N, Chandra, C, Yang, M. Social media effectiveness as a humanitarian response to mitigate influenza epidemic and COVID-19 pandemic. Ann Oper Res 2022; 319: 823–51.Google Scholar
Ahmed, N, Quinn, SC, Hancock, GR, Freimuth, VS, Jamison, A. Social media use and influenza vaccine uptake among White and African American adults. Vaccine 2018; 36: 7556–61.Google Scholar
Bonnevie, E, Rosenberg, SD, Kummeth, C, Goldbarg, J, Wartella, E, Smyser, J. Using social media influencers to increase knowledge and positive attitudes toward the flu vaccine. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0240828.Google Scholar
Dufty, N. Using social media to build community disaster resilience. Aust J Emerg Manag 2012; 27: 4045.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. J Democr 1995; 6: 6578.Google Scholar
Aldrich, DP. Building Resilience: Social Capital in Post-Disaster Recovery. University of Chicago Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Page-Tan, C. The role of social media in disaster recovery following Hurricane Harvey. J Homel Secur Emerg Manag 2021; 18: 93123.Google Scholar
Fraser, T, Aldrich, DP, Page-Tan, C. Bowling alone or distancing together? The role of social capital in excess death rates from COVID-19. Soc Sci Med 2021; 284: e114241.Google Scholar
Pitas, N, Ehmer, C. Social capital in the response to COVID-19. Am J Health Promot 2020; 34: 942–4.Google Scholar
Wong, AS, Kohler, JC. Social capital and public health: responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. Global Health 2020; 16: 88.Google Scholar
Newberry, C. How to Use Social Media in Healthcare: A Guide for Health Professionals. Hootsuite, 2021 (https://blog.hootsuite.com/social-media-health-care/).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×