Abu-Lughod, L. (1993). Writing women’s worlds: Bedouin stories. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Ahern, L. M. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology 30, 109–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Akomfrah, J. (2013). (Film director). The Stuart Hall project. Revolution, politics, culture and the new left experience. Documentary. Release date September 6, 2013 (UK). Released on BFI DVD on January 20, 2014.Google Scholar

Alaimo, S., and Hekman, S., eds. (2008). Material feminisms. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Alexander, J. C. (1995). Fin de siècle social theory: Relativism, reduction and the problem of reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Alexander, R. J. (2011). Legacies, policies and prospects: One year on from the Cambridge primary review. Forum 53(1), 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, G. E. (2001). Essays on science and society: Is a new eugenics afoot? Science 294(5540), 59–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Allman, P. (1999). Revolutionary social transformation: Democratic hopes, political possibilities and critical education (1st ed.). Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar

Allman, P. (2007). On Marx: An introduction to the revolutionary pedagogy of Karl Marx. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allport, G. (1992). Preface. In Frankl, Viktor, Man’s search for meaning (4rth ed., pp. 7–11). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Altman, I., and Rogoff, B. (1987). World views in psychology: Trait, interactional, organismic, and transactional perspectives. In Stokols, D. and Altman, I. (eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (vol. 1, pp. 7–40). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Amsler, S. S. (2008). Pedagogy against “dis-utopia”: From conscientization to the education of desire. In Dahms, H. F. (ed.) No social science without critical theory (Current Perspectives in Social Theory, vol. 25, pp. 291–325). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, K. (1993). On Hegel and the rise of social theory: A critical appreciation of Herbert Marcuse’s reason and revolution, fifty years later. Sociological Theory 11(3), 243–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, M. L. (2003). Embodied cognition: A field guide. Artificial Intelligence 149, 91–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, N. H. (1997). Functional memory versus reproductive memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20(1), 19–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anokhin, P. K. (1974). Biology and neurophysiology of the conditioned reflex and its role in adaptive behavior. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Anzaldúa, G. (1990). La conciencia de la mestiza: Toward a new consciousness. In Anzaldúa, G. (ed.), Making face, making soul/ Haciendo caras: Creative and critical perspectives by women of color (pp. 377–89). San Francisco: Aunt Lute.Google Scholar

Anzaldúa, G. (2006). Entering into the serpent. In Gilb, D. (ed.), Hecho en Tejas: An anthology of Texas-Mexican literature (pp. 253–261). Southwestern Writers Collection Series. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press and the Southwestern Writers Collection, Texas State University.Google Scholar

Anzaldúa, G. (2007). Borderlands/La frontera: The new mestiza (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.Google Scholar

Appadurai, A. (2000). Grassroots globalization and the research imagination. Public Culture 12(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Apperley, A. (1997). Foucault and the problem of method. In Lloyd, M. and Thacker, A. (eds.), The impact of Michel Foucault on the social sciences and humanities (pp. 10–28). Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Appiah, K. A. (2006). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a world of strangers. London: Allen Lane Penguin.Google Scholar

Appiah, K. A. (2008). Experiments in ethics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Appiah, K. A. (2015). The Complexities of Black folk. New York Times, April 16. http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/04/16/kwame-anthony-appiah-the-complexities-of-black-folk/?_r=0 (accessed May 20, 2015).Google Scholar

Apple, M. (1990). Ideology and curriculum. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Apple, M. W. (1996). Cultural politics and education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Apple, M. W. (2010). A response to Zeus Leonardo’s “Critical empiricism: Reading data with social theory.” Educational Researcher 39(2), 160–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arendt, H. (1971/1977). The life of the mind. San Diego, CA: A Harvest Book, Harcourt.Google Scholar

Arievitch, I. M. (2003). A potential for an integrated view of development and learning: Galperin’s contribution to sociocultural psychology. Mind, Culture, and Activity 10, 278–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arievitch, I. M. (2008). Exploring the links between external and internal activity from a cultural-historical perspective. In van Oers, B., Wardekker, W., Elbers, E., and van der Veer, R. (eds.), The transformation of learning: Advances in cultural-historical activity theory (pp. 38–58). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arievitch, I. M., and Haenen, J. P. P. (2005). Connecting socio-cultural theory and educational practice: Galperin’s approach. Educational Psychologist 40(3), 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arievitch, I. M., and Stetsenko, A. (2000). The quality of cultural tools and cognitive development: Galperin’s perspective and its implications. Human Development 43, 69–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arievitch, I. M., and Stetsenko, A. (2014). The magic of signs: Developmental trajectory of cultural mediation. In Yasnitsky, A., van der Veer, R., and Ferrari, M. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of cultural-historical psychology (pp. 217–244). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arievitch, I. M., and van der Veer, R. (1995). Furthering the internalization debate: Galperin’s contribution. Human Development 38, 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Arievitch, I. M., and van der Veer, R. (2004). The role of non-automatic processes in activity regulation: From Lipps to Galperin. History of Psychology 7(2), 154–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aronowitz, S., and Bratsis, P. (2005). Situations manifesto. Situations 1(1), 7–14.Google Scholar

Artiles, A. J. (2012). Toward an interdisciplinary understanding of educational inequity and difference: The case of the racialization of ability. Educational Researcher 40(9), 431–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Asante, M. K. (2015). Why Afrocentricity? New York Times, May 7. http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/05/07/molefi-kete-asante-why-afrocentricity/?_r=0 (accessed September 9, 2015).Google Scholar

Au, W. (2007). Epistemology of the oppressed: The dialectics of Paulo Freire’s theory of knowledge. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies 5(2), www.jceps.com/?pageID=article&articleID=100 (accessed September 15, 2013).Google Scholar

Avis, J. (2007). Engeström’s version of activity theory: A conservative praxis? Journal of Education and Work 20(3), 161–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Four Essays (Emerson, C. and Holquist, M., trans.; Holquist, M., ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (Emerson, C., trans. and ed.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (McGee, V., trans.; Emerson, C. and Holquist, M., eds.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. (1990). Art and answerability: Early philosophical essays by M. M. Bakhtin (M. Holquist and V. Liapunov, eds.; V. Liapunov, trans. and notes; K. Brostrom, supplement trans.). Austin: Texas University Press.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act (Liapunov, V., trans.; Liapunov, V. and Holquist, M., eds.). Austin: University of Texas Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakhurst, D. (1991). Consciousness and revolution in Soviet philosophy: From Bolsheviks to Evald Ilyenkov. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakhurst, D. (2009). Reflections on activity theory. Educational Review 61, 197–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bakhurst, D., and Padden, C. (1991). The Meshcheryakov experiment: Soviet work on the education of deafblind children. Learning and Instruction 1, 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baldwin, J. (1955/1984). Notes of a native son. Boston: Beacon Books.Google Scholar

Baldwin, J. (1961/1993). Nobody knows my dream. New York: Vintage books.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology (vol. 52, pp. 1–26). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.Google Scholar

Bannerji, H. (2005). Building from Marx: Reflections on class and race. Social Justice 32(4), 144–160.Google Scholar

Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barone, T. (2006 ). Making educational history: Qualitative inquiry, artistry, and the public interest. In Ladson-Billings, G. and Tate, W. F. (eds.), Education research in the public interest: Social justice, action, and policy. New York: Teachers College.Google Scholar

Barone, T. (2009). Narrative researchers as witnesses of injustice and agents of social change? Educational Researcher 38(8), 591–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. San Francisco: Chandler.Google Scholar

Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar

Benhabib, S. (1999). Sexual difference and collective identities: The new constellation. In O’Farrell, M. A. and Vallone, L. (eds.), Virtual gender: Fantasies of subjectivity and embodiment (pp. 217–243). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Benhabib, S. (2001). From identity politics to social feminism. In Melzer, A. M., Weinberger, J., and R. Zinman, M. (eds.), Turn of the century (pp. 27–41). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Bennett, M. R., and Hacker, P. M. S. (2003). Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar

Bergson, H. (1911). Matter and memory (Paul, N. M. and Palmer, W. S., trans.). London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Berman, M. (1983). All that is solid melts into air: The experience of modernity (2nd ed.). London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar

Bernstein, N. N. (1966). Essays on the physiology of movement and physiology of activity [Oчерки по физиологии движения и физиологии активности]. Moscow: Nauka Press.Google Scholar

Beyer, L. E., and Liston, D. P. (1992). Discourse of moral action? A critique of postmodernism. Educational Theory 42(4), 371–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bickhard, M. H. (2012). A process ontology of persons and their development. In Martin, J. and Bickhard, M. H. (eds.), The new psychology of personhood [Special Issue]. New Ideas in Psychology 28, 107–119.Google Scholar

Bidell, T. (1999). Vygotsky, Piaget and the dialectic of development. In Peter Lloyd and Charles Fernyhough (eds.), Lev Vygotsky: Critical assessments, vol. 1 (pp. 261–281). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Biesta, G. (2007). Why “what works” won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory 57(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Biesta, G. J. J. (2012). Doing emancipation differently: Transgression, equality and the politics of learning. Civitas Educationis: Education, Politics and Culture 1(1), 15–30.Google Scholar

Biesta, G. J. J., and Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults 39, 132–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackledge, P. (2008). Marixsm and ethics. International Socialism: A Quarterly Review of Socialist Theory 120. October 6. http://isj.org.uk/marxism-and-ethics/#120blackledge58 (accessed September 23, 2015).Google Scholar

Blanton, E. W., Moorman, G., and Trathen, W. (1998). Telecommunications and teacher education: A social constructivist review. Review of Research in Education 23, 235–275.Google Scholar

Bloch, E. (1954). The principle of hope (vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Bodrova, E., and Leong, D. J. (2007). Tools of the mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education. New York: Merrill/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Bottomore, T. (1975). Marxist sociology. London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice (Nice, Richard, trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1995). Physical space, social space, and habitus. Talk delivered at the University of Oslo, Norway, May 15, 1995. http://archives.library.illinois.edu/erec/University%20Archives/2401001/Production_website/pages/StewardingExcellence/Physical%20Space,%20Social%20Space%20and%20Habitus.pdf (accessed July 12, 2016).Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P., and Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in education, society, and culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, P., and Wacquant, L. J. D. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Boutte, G. S. (2016). Educating African American students: And how are the children? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Bradley, B. S. (2008). Commentary: The Vygotskian family in the supreme court of practice. Culture and Psychology 14, 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bratus, B. S. (1988). Abnormalities of personality. Moscow: Mysl.Google Scholar

Bredo, E. (1994). Reconstructing educational psychology: Situated cognition and Deweyian pragmatism. Educational Psychologist 29(1), 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bredo, E. (1998). Evolution, psychology, and John Dewey’s critique of the reflex arc concept. The Elementary School Journal 98(5), 447–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bremner, J. G., and Slater, A. (2003). Theories of infant development. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Bretherton, I. (1992). The origins of attachment theory: John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth. Developmental Psychology 28, 759–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Toward an experimental ecology of human development. American Psychologist 32, 513–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bronfenbrenner, U. (2004). Making human beings human: Bioecological perspectives on human development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Bronowski, J. (1976). The ascent of man. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar

Brown, R., and Renshaw, P. (2006). Positioning students as actors and authors: A chronotopic analysis of collaborative learning activities. Mind, Culture, and Activity 13(3), 247–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bruner, J. (1987). Life as narrative. Social Research 54, 11–32.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Burbules, N., and Berk, R. (1999). Critical thinking and critical pedagogy: Relations, differences and limits. In Popkewitz, T. and Fendler, L. (eds.), Critical theories in education: Changing terrains of knowledge and politics (pp. 45–65). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Burke, K. (1973). The philosophy of literary form (3rd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burkitt, I. (2008). Social selves: Theories of self and society (2nd ed.). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burman, E. (1994). Deconstructing developmental psychology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Burman, E. (1997). Minding the gap: Positivism, psychology, and the politics of qualitative methods. Journal of Social Issues 53( 4), 78–101.Google Scholar

Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cahan, E. D. (1992). John Dewey and human development. Developmental Psychology 28, 205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cahan, E. D., and White, S. H. (1992). Proposals for a second psychology. American Psychologist 47, 224–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calhoun, D., LiPuma, E., and Postone, M. (1993). Bourdieu: Critical perspectives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Cammarota, J., and Fine, M. (2008). Youth participatory action research: A pedagogy for transformational resistance. In Cammarota, J. and Fine, M. (eds.), Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion (pp. 1–12). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Campbell, J. L., and Pedersen, O. K., eds. (2001). The rise of neoliberalism and institutional analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Camus, A. (2013). Algerian chronicles. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. (Originally published in 1958.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carpendale, J. I. M., and Lewis, C. (2004). Constructing an understanding of mind: The development of children’s social understanding within social interaction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27, 79–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Carpenter, S. (2012). Centering Marxist-feminist theory in adult learning. Adult and Education Quarterly 62(1), 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carr, W. (2007). Educational research as a practical science. International Journal of Research and Method in Education 30, 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Castañeda, C. (2002). Figurations: Child, bodies, worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Castells, M. (1997). The power of Identity. Malden, MA, and Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Cavanagh, C. (1995). Osip Mandelstam and the modernist creation of tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chaiklin, S. (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky’s analysis of learning and instruction. In Kozulin, A., Gindis, B., Ageyev, V. S., and Miller, S. M. (eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 39–64). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charney, E. (2012). Behavior genetics and post genomics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35(6), 331–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheah, P. (2008). Nondialectical materialism. Diacritics 38(1–2), 143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chomsky, N., and Foucault, M. (2006). The Chomsky-Foucault debate on human nature. New York and London: The New Press.Google Scholar

Children’s Defense Fund (2008). State of America’s children. www.childrensdefense.org/childresearch-data-publications/data/state-americas-children-2005-chpt5-child-welfare.html.Google Scholar

Christians, C. (2005). Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S. (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 139–164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Christopher, J. C., and Bickhard, M. H. (2007). Culture, self and identity: Interactivist contributions to a metatheory for cultural psychology. Culture and Psychology 13(3), 259–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clancey, W. J. (1991). Review of Rosenfield’s “The Invention of Memory.” Artificial Intelligence 50(2), 241–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clancey, W. J. (1997). Situated cognition: On human knowledge and computer representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Clancey, W. J. (2009). Scientific antecedents of situated cognition. In Robbins, P. and Aydede, M. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 11–34). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting mind, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. New York: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, A., and Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis 58, 10–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, K., and Holquist, M. (1984). Mikhail Bakhtin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, K. B. (1989). Dark ghetto: Dilemmas of social power (2nd ed.). Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar

Cobb, P., and Yackel, E. (1998). A constructivist perspective on the culture of the mathematics classroom. In Seeger, F., Voigt, J., and Waschescio, U. (eds.), The culture of the mathematics classroom (pp. 158–190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Colapietro, V. M. (1989). Peirce’s approach to the self: A semiotic perspective on human subjectivity. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Cole, M. (1985). The zone of proximal development: Where culture and cognition create each other. In Wertsch, J. V. (ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 146–161). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Cole, M. (2003). Vygotsky and context. Where did the connection come from and what difference does it make? http://communication. ucsd.edu/lchc/People/MCole/lsvcontext.htm (accessed December 14, 2014).Google Scholar

Cole, M. (2009). The perils of translation: A first step in reconsidering Vygotsky’s theory of development in relation to formal education. [Editorial]. Mind, Culture and Activity, 16(4), 291–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cole, M., and Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In Salomon, G. (ed.), Distributed cognitions (pp. 1–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cole, M., Levitin, K., and Luria, A. R. (2010). The autobiography of Alexander Luria: A dialogue with the making of mind. New York and London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Cole, M., and Wertsch, J. V. (1996). Beyond the individual-social antinomy in discussions of Piaget and Vygotsky. Human Development 39, 250–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collins, C. (2011). Reflections on CHAT and Freire’s participatory action research from the West of Scotland: Praxis, politics, and the “struggle for meaningful life.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 18, 98–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Collis, B., and Moonen, J. (2001). Flexible learning in a digital world: Experiences and expectations. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar

Coole, D., and Frost, S., eds. (2010). New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Connelly, J., and Costall, A. (2000). R. G. Collingwood and the idea of an historical psychology. Theory and Psychology 10, 147–170.Google Scholar

Connery, C. M., John-Steiner, V. P., and Marjanovic-Shane, A. (eds.). (2010). Vygotsky and creativity: A cultural-historical approach to play, meaning making, and the arts. New York: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Costall, A. (2004). From Darwin to Watson (and cognitivism) and back again: The principle of animal-environment mutuality. Behavior and Philosophy 32, 179–195.Google Scholar

Costall, A. (2006). “Introspectionism” and the mythical origins of scientific psychology. Consciousness and Cognition 15, 634–654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Costall, A. (2007). The windowless room: “Mediationism” and how to get over it. In Valsiner, J. and Rosa, A. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (pp. 109–123). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Costall, A., and Leudar, I. (2007). Getting over “the problem of other minds”: Communication in context. Infant Behavior and Development 30, 289–295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Crapanzano, V. (2004). Imaginative horizons: An essay in literary-philosophical anthropology. London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Crick, F. (1994). The astonishing hypothesis: The scientific search for the soul. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar

Crook, S. (2003). Change, uncertainty and the future of sociology. Journal of Sociology 39(1), 7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cross, W. E., Jr. (1991). Shades of black: Diversity in African-American identity. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Damasio, A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar

Danforth, S. (2006). From epistemology to democracy: Pragmatism and the reorientation of disability research. Remedial and Special Education 27(6), 337–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and pedagogy. London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar

Daniels, H., Edwards, A., Engeström, Y., Gallagher, T., and Ludvigsen, S., eds. (2009). Activity theory in practice: Promoting learning across boundaries and agencies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Dannefer, D. (1999). Freedom isn’t free: Power, alienation, and the social consequences of action. In Brandstädter, J. and Lerner, R. M. (eds.), Action and self-development (pp. 105–132). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Danziger, K. (1993). Psychological objects, practice and history. Annals of Theoretical Psychology 8, 15–47 and 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Darling-Hammond, L. (2007). Race, inequality and educational accountability: The irony of “No Child Left Behind.” Race, Ethnicity and Education 10, 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dar-Nimrod, I., and Heine, S. J. (2011). Genetic essentialism: On the deceptive determinism of DNA. Psychological Bulletin 137(5), 800–818.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Daston, L., and Galison, P. (1992). The image of objectivity. Representations 40, 81–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davis, B., and Sumara, D. J. (1997). Enactivist theory and community learning: Towards a complexified understanding of action research. Educational Action Research 5, 403–422.Google Scholar

Davis, R., and Freire, P. (1981). Education for awareness: A talk with Paulo Freire. In Mackie, R. (ed.), Literacy and revolution: the pedagogy of Paulo Freire (pp. 57–69). New York: The Continuum Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Davydov, V. (1983). Leontiev’s theory of the connection between activity and mental reflection [Учение Леонтьев о взаимосвязи деятельностии психического отражения]. In Zaporozhets, A., Zinchenko, V., Ovchinnikova, O., and Tikhomirov, O. (eds.), A. N. Leontiev and contemporary psychology [Леонтьев и современная психология] (pp. 128–140). Moscow: Moscow University.Google Scholar

Davydov, V. V. (1990). Types of generalizations in instruction. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar

Davydov, V. V. (1998). The last talks [Последние выступления]. Riga: Polet.Google Scholar

Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F. (1977). Anti-Oedipus (Hurley, R., Seem, M., and Lane, H. R., trans.). New York: Viking.Google Scholar

Deleuze, G., and Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar

Delgado, R., and Stefancic, J. (2001). Critical race theory: An introduction. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Delpit, L. (1995). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (1981). Positions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Derrida, J. (1994). Specters of Marx: The state of the debt, the work of mourning, and the new international (Kamuf, Peggy, trans.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

DeVries, R. (2000). Vygotsky, Piaget, and education: A reciprocal assimilation of theories and educational practices. New Ideas in Psychology 18, 187–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dewey, J. (1896). The reflex arc concept in psychology. Psychological Review 3(4), 357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dewey, J. (1908). Does reality possess practical character. In E. L. Thorndike (ed.), Essays in honor of William James (pp. 53–81). New York: Longmans.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1910). The influence of Darwinism on philosophy. In J. Dewey, The influence of Darwin on philosophy and other essays in contemporary thought (pp. 1–19). New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1916/1922). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: McMillan.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1920/1948). Reconstruction in philosophy (enlarged edition). Boston MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1925/1958). Experience and nature. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1929/1960). The quest for certainty: A study on the relation between knowledge and action. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1931). Science and society. From John Dewey: The later works (LW), 1925–1953 (vol. 6: 1931–1932, ed. J. A. Boydston, pp. 53–63). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1938). Progressive organization of subject matter. LW (vol. 13, 1938–1939, ed. J. A. Boydston, pp. 48–60). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Dewey, J., and Bentley, A. F. (1949). Knowing and the known. Boston: The Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Diamond, A., Barnett, W. S., Thomas, J., and Munro, S. (2007). Preschool program improves cognitive control. Science 318, 1387–1388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Diggins, J. P. (1994). The promise of pragmatism: Modernism and the crisis of knowledge and authority. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, R. A., and Lerner, R. M. (1999). History and systems in developmental psychology. In Bornstein, M. H. and Lamb, M. E. (eds.), Developmental psychology: An advanced textbook (4th ed., pp. 3–45). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Dobzhansky, T. (1962). Mankind evolving: The evolution of the species. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Donald, M. (2001). A mind so rare: The evolution of human consciousness. New York and London: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. L., and Rabinow, P. (1982). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dreyfus, H. L. (1991). Being-in-the-world: A commentary on Heidegger’s being and time. Cambridge, MA, and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Eagleton, T. (2000). The idea of culture. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Eagleton, T. (2003). Kettles boil, classes struggle: Review of “A defence of ‘History and class consciousness’: Tailism and the dialectic” by Lukács, Georg (Leslie, Esther, trans.), Verso, June 2002. London Review of Books 25(4), 17–18.Google Scholar

Eagleton, T. (2007). I contain multitudes (review of Mikhail Bakhtin: The word in the world by Pechey, G.). London Review of Books 29(12), 13–15.Google Scholar

Eagleton, T. (2011) Why Marx was right. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Edelman, G. M. (2006). Second nature: Brain science and human knowledge. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Eisenhart, M. A., and Howe, K. R. (1992). Validity in educational research. In M. D. LeCompte, W. L. Millroy, and J. Preissle (eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 643–680). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Emerson, C. (1996). The outer word and inner speech: Bakhtin, Vygotsky, and the internalization of language. In Daniels, H. (ed.), An introduction to Vygotsky (pp. 123–142). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Emirbayer, M., and Schneiderhan, E. (2013). Dewey and Bourdieu on Democracy. In Gorski, P. (ed.), Bourdieu and historical analysis (pp. 131–157). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emirbayer, M., and Mische, A. (1998). “What is agency?” American Journal of Sociology 103, 962–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engels, F. (1873–1883/1961). Dialectics of nature [Диалектика природы] (including Chapter “The part played by labour in the transition from ape to man”). Collected works of K. Marx and F. Engels (vol. 20, 2nd ed., pp. 339–626). Moscow: State Publisher of Political Literature.Google Scholar

Engels, F. (1886). Ludwig Feuerbach and the end of classical German philosophy. www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/Marx_Ludwig_Feurbach_and_the_End_of_German_Classical_Philosop.pdf (accessed May 5, 2016).Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (1990). Learning, working and imagining: Twelve studies in activity theory. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., and Punamaki, R.-L. (eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work 14(1), 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Engeström, Y. (2005). Developmental work research: Expanding activity theory in practice. Berlin: Lehmanns Media.Google Scholar

Engeström, Y., and Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review 5, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erikson, E. (2013). Formalist and relationalist theory in social network analysis. Sociological Theory 31, 219–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fay, B. (1987). Critical social science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar

Feuer, L (1959). John Dewey and the back to the people movement. Journal of the History of Ideas 20, 545–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fine, M., and McClelland, S. I. (2006). Sexuality education and desire: Still missing after all these years. Harvard Educational Review 76(3): 297–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fine, M., Weis, L., Weseen, S., and Wong, L. (2000). For whom? Qualitative research, representations, and social responsibilities. In Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. S (eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 107–132). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Fish, S. (2010). Pragmatism’s Gift. New York Times, Opinionator, March 15. http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/15/pragmatisms-gift/ (accessed March 20, 2010).Google Scholar

Fivush, R., Habermas, T., Waters, T. E. A., and Zaman, W. (2010). The making of autobiographical memory: Intersections of culture, narratives and identity. International Journal of Psychology 46, 321–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977 (Gordon, Colin, ed.). New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1988). The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom. In J. Bernauer and G. Rasmussen (eds.), The final Foucault (pp. 1–20). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1990). An aesthetics of existence. In Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews and other writings, 1977–1984 (ed. with an introduction by L. D. Kritzman, pp. 47–56). New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1993). About the beginnings of the hermeneutics of the self. Political Theory 21(3), 198–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fowers, B. J., and Richardson, F. C. (1996). Why is multiculturalism good? American Psychologist 51, 609–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fox, S., Levitt, P., and Nelson, C. A. (2010). How the timing and quality of early experiences influence the development of brain architecture. Child Development 81, 28–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Frankl, V. E. (1992). Man’s search for meaning (4rth ed.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Fraser, N. (1995). False antitheses: A response to Seyla Benhabib and Judith Butler. In Feminist Contentions: A Philosophical Exchange (pp. 59–74). New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Fraser, N. (2002). Recognition without ethics. In Lash, S. and Featherstone, M. (eds.), Recognition and difference: Politics, identity, multiculture (pp. 21–42). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fraser, N., and Nicholson, L. J. (1990). Social criticism without philosophy: An encounter between feminism and postmodernism. In Nicholson, L. J. (ed.), Feminism/post-modernism (pp. 19–38). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Frawley, W. (1997). Vygotsky and cognitive science: Language and the unification of the social and computational mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freund, A. M., and Riediger, M. (2O06). Goals as building blocks of personality and development in adulthood. In Mroszek, D. K. and Little, T. D. (eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 353–372). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum. (30th anniversary edition published in 2005.)Google Scholar

Freire, P. (1982a). Education as the practice of freedom (Ramos, M. B., trans.). In Education for critical consciousness (pp. 1–84). New York: The Continuum Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Freire, P. (1982b). Extension or communication (Bigwood, L. and Marshall, M., trans.). In Education for critical consciousness (pp. 93–164). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Freire, P. (1985). The politics of education: Culture, power, and liberation. South Hadley, MA: Bergin and Garvey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freire, P. (1994). Pedagogy of hope: Reliving pedagogy of the oppressed (Barr, R. R., trans., 2004 ed.). New York: Continuum Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Freire, P. (1998). Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy and civic courage. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar

Frye, M. (1990). A response to lesbian ethics. Hypatia 5(3), 132–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fuchs, C., and Hofkirchner, W. (2009). Autopoiesis and critical social systems theory. In Magalhães, R. and Sanchez, R. (eds.), Autopoiesis in organization theory and practice (pp. 111–129). Bingley, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar

Gallagher, S. (2009). Philosophical antecedents to situated cognition. In Robbins, P. and Aydede, M. (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 35–51). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Galperin [Gal’perin], P. Ia. (1985). Methods of instruction and mental development of the child [Методы обучения и умственное развитие ребенка]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo MGU.Google Scholar

Galperin [Gal’perin], P. Ia. (1989). Study of the intellectual development of the child. Soviet Psychology 27, 26–44. (Originally published in 1969).Google Scholar

Gardiner, M. (2000). “A very understandable horror of dialectics”: Bakhtin and Marxist phenomenology. In Brandist, C. and G. Tihanov (eds.), Materializing Bakhtin: The Bakhtin circle and social theory (pp. 119–141). London: Palgrave and MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garfinkel, H. (2006). Principal theoretical notions. Seeing sociologically: The routine grounds of social action (Rawls, A., ed.) (pp. 101–189). Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar

Garrison, J. (1994). Realism, Deweyan pragmatism, and educational research. Educational Researcher 23(1), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garrison, J. (2001). An introduction to Dewey’s theory of functional “trans-action”: An alternative paradigm for activity theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity 8, 275–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gergen, K. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist 40, 266–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gergen, K. J. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gergen, K. J., Josselson, R., and Freeman, M. (2015). The promise of qualitative inquiry. The American Psychologist 70, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar

Gibson, E. J. (1991). An odyssey in learning and perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Gibson, J. J., and Gibson, E. J. (1955). Perceptual learning: Differentiation or enrichment? Psychological Review 62, 32–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Giroux, H. A. (1983a). Critical perspectives in social theory: Theory and resistance in education: A pedagogy for the opposition. New York: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar

Giroux, H. A. (1983b). Ideology and agency in the process of schooling. Journal of Education 165, 12–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Giroux, H. (1994). Doing cultural studies: Youth and the challenge of pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review 64(3), 278–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gitlin, A. (2005 ). Inquiry, imagination, and the search for a deep politic. Educational Researcher 34( 3), 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glass, R. D. (2001). On Paulo Freire’s philosophy of praxis and the foundations of liberation education. Educational Researcher 30(2), 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glassman, M. (2001). Dewey and Vygotsky: Society, experience, and inquiry in educational practice. Educational Researcher 30, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gottlieb, G. (2003). On making behavioral genetics truly developmental. Human Development 46, 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gottlieb, G. (2006). Developmental neurobehavioral genetics: Development as explanation. In Jones, B. C. and Mormède, P. (eds.), Neurobehavioral genetics: Methods and applications (2nd ed., pp. 17–27). New York: Taylor and Francis Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gottlieb, G., Wahlsten, D., and Lickliter, R. (2006). The significance of biology for human development: A developmental psychobiological systems view. In Damon, W. and Lerner, R. M. (eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol 1. Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 210–257). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Gould, C. C. (1978). Marx’s social ontology: Individuality and community in Marx’s theory of social reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Gould, C. C. (1994). Marx after Marxism. In Artifacts, representations and social practice (pp. 377–396). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, S. J. (1988). The case of the creeping fox terrier clone. Natural History 96, 16–24.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. (1993). Eight little piggies. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

Gould, S. J. (1995). Dinosaur in a haystack. New York: Harmony Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gould, S. J. (1996). The mismeasure of man (2nd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar

Gouldner, A. W. (1982). The two Marxisms: Contradictions and anomalies in the development of theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (selected and translated by Hoare, Q. and Smith, G. N.). London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar

Grant, T., and Woods, A. (2003). Reason in revolt. Vol. II: Dialectical philosophy and modern science. New York: Algora Publishing.Google Scholar

Great Writers of Fairy Tales (2006). Available at http://glinks.ru/gianni-rodari.html (accessed June 2, 2015).Google Scholar

Gredler, M. E. (2012). Understanding Vygotsky for the classroom: Is it too late? Educational Psychology Review 24(1), 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Greene, M. (1988). The dialectic of freedom. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts and social change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Greene, M. (1997). Teaching as possibility: A light in dark times. The Journal of Pedagogy, Pluralism and Practice 1, 1–11.Google Scholar

Greene, M. (2000). Lived spaces, shared spaces, public spaces. In Weis, L. and Fine, M. (eds.), Construction sites: Excavating race, class, and gender among urban youth (pp. 293–304). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Greiffenhagen, C., and Sharrock, W. (2008). School mathematics and its everyday other? Revisiting Lave’s “Cognition in Practice.” Educational Studies in Mathematics 69 (1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guattari, F. (1984) Molecular revolution: Psychiatry and politics. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar

Guba, E. G., and Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S (eds.) Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Guignon, C. (2002). Hermeneutics, authenticity, and the aims of psychotherapy. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 22, 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guignon, C. (2004). On being authentic. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gustavsen, B. (2001). Theory and practice: The mediating discourse. In Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. (eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 17–26). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Gutiérrez, K. D. (2002). Studying cultural practices in urban learning communities. Human Development 45, 312–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gutiérrez, K. D., and Larson, J. (2007). Discussing expanded spaces for learning. Language Arts 85, 69–77.Google Scholar

Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano-Lopez, P., and Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity 41, 286–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gutiérrez, R. (2010). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 41, 1–32.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (1994). Struggles for recognition in the democratic constitutional state. In Taylor, C. and Gutman, A. (eds.), Multiculturalism: Examining the politics of recognition (pp. 107–148). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Habermas, J. (2001). The liberating power of symbols: Philosophical essays (Dews, P., trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, J. (2003). The future of human nature. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Habermas, T., and Bluck, S. (2000). Getting a life: The emergence of the life story in adolescence. Psychological Bulletin 126(5), 748–769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hacking, I. (1995). Rewriting the soul: Multiple personality and the sciences of memory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hacking, I. (2002). Historical ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Hallward, P. (2006). Out of this world: Deleuze and the philosophy of creation. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar

Harding, S. (1992). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is “strong objectivity”? In Alcoff, L. and Potter, E. (eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 49–82). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Harding, S. (2004). A socially relevant philosophy of science? Resources from standpoint theory’s controversiality. Hypathia 19(1), 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harré, R. (1986). The social construction of emotions. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Harré, R. (2002). Material objects in social worlds. Theory, Culture and Society 19(5–6), 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harré, R., and Moghaddam, F. M. (2003). The self and others: Positioning individuals and groups in personal, political, and cultural contexts. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Harrist, S., and Richardson, F. C. (2012). Disguised ideologies in counseling and social justice work. Counseling and Values 57, 38–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartsock, N. C. M. (1998). The feminist standpoint revisited and other essays. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Harvey, D. (1996a). Justice, nature and the geography of difference. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Harvey, D. (1996b). Cities or urbanization? Cities 1–2, 38–62.Google Scholar

Haslam, N. (2011). Genetic essentialism, neuroessentialism, and stigma: Commentary on Dar-Nimrod and Heine. Psychological Bulletin 137, 819–824.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hatfield, G. (1995). Remaking the science of mind: Psychology as natural science. In Fox, C., Porter, R., and Wokler, R. (eds.), Inventing human science: Eighteenth-century domains (pp. 184–231). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Haug, W. F. (2001). From Marx to Gramsci – from Gramsci to Marx: Historical materialism and the philosophy of praxis. Rethinking Marxism 13(1), 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hay, C. (2011). The obligation to resist oppression. The Journal of Social Philosophy 42, 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hedegaard, M. (1990). The zone of proximal development as a basis for instruction. In Moll, L. (ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 349–371). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hedegaard, M., and Fleer, M. (2013). Play, learning, and children’s development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heft, H. (2001). Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the legacy of William James’s radical empiricism. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hermans, H. J. M. (2002). The dialogical self as a society of mind. Theory and Psychology 12(2), 147–160.Google Scholar

Heron, J., and Reason, P. (1997). A participatory inquiry paradigm. Qualitative Inquiry 3(3), 274–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hicks, D. (2000). Self and other in Bakhtin’s early philosophical essays: Prelude to a theory of prose consciousness. Mind, Culture, and Activity 7, 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hill Collins, P. (1991/2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hirst, E. W. (2004). The diverse social contexts of a second language classroom and the construction of identity. In K. M. Leander and M. Sheehy (eds.), Space matters: Assertions of space in literacy practice and research (pp. 39–66). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Hodges, D. C. (1998). Participation as dis-identification with/in a community of practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity 5(4), 272–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hodkinson, P., Biesta, G., and James, D. (2007). Understanding learning cultures. Educational Review 59(4), 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Højgaard, L., and Søndergaard, D. M. (2011). Theorizing the complexities of discursive and material subjectivity: Agential realism and poststructural analyses. Theory & Psychology 21, 338–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holland, D., and Lave, J. (2009). Social practice theory and the historical production of persons. Actio: An International Journal of Human Activity Theory 2, 1–15.Google Scholar

Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., and Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Holquist, M. (1982). Bakhtin and Rablais: Theory as praxis. Boundary 2 11, 5–19.Google Scholar

Holquist, M., and Kliger, I. (2005). Minding the gap: Toward a historical poetics of estrangement. Poetics Today 26(4), 613–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holzkamp, K. (2013). Psychology: Social self-understanding on the reasons for action in the conduct of everyday life. In Schraube, E. and Osterkamp, U. (eds.), Psychology from the standpoint of the subject: Selected writings of Klaus Holzkamp (pp. 233–351). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Homskaya, E. D. (2001). Alexander Romanovich Luria: A scientific biography. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Honneth, A. (2004). Recognition and justice: Outline of a plural theory of justice. Acta Sociologica 47(11), 351–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution as recognition: A response to Nancy Fraser. In N. Fraser and A. Honneth, Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange (pp. 110–197). New York: Verso.Google Scholar

Hook, D. (2007). Foucault, psychology and the analytics of power. Basingstoke, UK, and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horkheimer, M., and Adorno, T. W. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments (Noeri, G., ed.; Jephcott, E., trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Howe, K. R. (2003). Closing methodological divides: Toward democratic educational research. Boston: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar

Howe, K. R. (2009). Positivist dogmas, rhetoric, and the education science question. Educational Researcher 38(6), 428–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hruby, G. G. (2012). Three requirements for justifying an educational neuroscience. British Journal of Educational Psychology 82(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Huttenlocher, P. R. (2002). Neural plasticity: The effect of environment on the development of cerebral cortex. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Iljichev, L. F. (1983). Philosophic encyclopedic dictionary [Философский энциклопедический словарь]. Мoscow: Soviet Encyclopedia.Google Scholar

Ilyenkov, E. V. (1977). Dialectical logic: Essays on its history and theory. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar

Ilyenkov, E. V. (2009/2012). The dialectic of the ideal. Historical Materialism 20(2), 149–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ingold, T. (2000). Perception of the environment: Essays in livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ingold, T. (2004). Learning through doing and understanding in practice: CSAP Project Report. Birmingham, UK: C-SAP, The Higher Education Academy Subject Network for Sociology, Anthropology and Politics. www.c-sap.bham.ac.uk/CSAP/media/com_projectlog/docs/31_A_03.pdf (accessed July 2, 2016).Google Scholar

Ingold, T. (2007). The trouble with evolutionary biology. Anthropology Today 23(2), 13–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ingold, T. (2008). Bindings against boundaries: Entanglements of life in an open world. Environment and Planning A 40, 1796–1810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ivic, I. (1994). Lev S. Vygotsky. Prospects: The Quarterly Review of Comparative Education 24(3–4), 471–485.Google Scholar

James, W. (1907). Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking. www.gutenberg.org/files/5116/5116-h/5116-h.htm (accessed July 10, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

James, W. (1890/1950). The principles of psychology (vol. 1). New York: Dover.Google Scholar

James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (vol. 2). New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar

Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Jameson, F. (2006). Foreword. In Jean Paul Sartre: Critique of Dialectical Reason. Vol. 2 (A. Elkaim-Sartre, ed.; Q. Hoare, trans.; pp. ix–xxv). London and New York: Verso. (Originally published in 1985.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jaramillo, N. (2011). Dialogic action for critical democracy. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies 9, 72–94.Google Scholar

Johansson, L. (2013). The occurrence of the not-yet-seen in education – linearity, becoming and difference. Paper presented at NERA 2013 in Reykjavik, March 7–9.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. H., Grossmann, T., and Cohen-Kadosh, K. (2009). Mapping functional brain development: Building a social brain through interactive specialization. Developmental Psychology 45, 151–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Johnston, A. (2004). Against embodiment: The material ground of the immaterial subject. International Journal of Lacanian Studies 2, 230–254.Google Scholar

Johnston, A. (2010). Badiou, Žižek and political transformations: The cadence of change. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Jonathan, R. (1997). Illusory freedoms: Liberalism, education and the market. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Jones, P. E. (2001). The ideal in cultural–historical activity theory: Issues and perspectives. In Chaiklin, S. (ed.), The theory and practice of cultural–historical psychology (pp. 283–315). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University.Google Scholar

Jones, P. E. (2003). New clothes for an old emperor: “Evolutionary psychology” and the cognitive counter-revolution. Mind, Culture, and Activity 10(2), 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, P. (2008). Language in cultural-historical perspective. In Van Oers, B., Wardekker, W., Elbers, E., and Van der Veer, R. (eds.), The transformation of learning: Advances in cultural-historical activity theory (pp. 76–99). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jones, P. E. (2009). Breaking away from Capital? Theorising activity in the shadow of Marx. Outlines: Critical Practice Studies 1, 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jones, P. E., ed. (2011). Marxism and education: Renewing the dialogue, pedagogy, and culture. London: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaika, M. (2005). City of flows. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Kaptelinin, V., and Nardi, B. A. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Karpov, Y. V. (2005). The neo-Vygotskian approach to child development. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kellner, D. (2004). Cultural Marxism and cultural studies. www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/essays/culturalmarxism.pdf (accessed December 12, 2010).Google Scholar

Kemmis, S. (2010). Research for praxis: Knowing doing. Pedagogy, Culture and Society 18( 1), 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

King, M. L., Jr. (1965). Commencement address for Oberlin College, June, 1965. Oberlin, Ohio. www.oberlin.edu/external/EOG/BlackHistoryMonth/MLK/CommAddress.html (accessed July 10, 2016).Google Scholar

King, M. L., Jr. (1968). The role of the behavioral scientist in the Civil Rights movement. American Psychologist 23(3), 180–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kirschner, S. R., and Martin, J. (2010). The sociocultural turn: An introduction and an invitation. In Kirschner, S. R. and Martin, J. (eds.), The sociocultural turn in psychology (pp. 1–27). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Kitchener, R. F. (1996). The nature of the social for Piaget and Vygotsky. Human Development 39, 243–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Knox, J. E. (1993). Translator’s introduction. In Vygotsky, L. S. and Luria, A. R., Studies on the history of behavior: Ape, primitive, and child (Golod, V. I. and Knox, J. E., eds. and trans.) (pp. 1–35). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Kohn, A. (2000). The case against standardized testing: Raising the scores, ruining the schools. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar

Kolb, B., and Gibb, R. (2011). Brain plasticity and behaviour in the developing brain. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 20(4), 265–276.Google ScholarPubMed

Kontopodis, M. (2012). Neoliberalism, pedagogy and human development: Exploring time, mediation and collectivity in contemporary schools. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koriat, A., and Goldsmith, M. (1995). Memory metaphors and the real-life/laboratory controversy: Correspondence versus storehouse conceptions of memory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19, 167–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kozulin, A. (1986). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. American Psychologist 41, 264–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kucsera, J., and Orfield, G. (2014). New York State’s extreme school segregation: Inequality, inaction and a damaged future. Los Angeles: UCLA, The Civil Rights Project.Google Scholar

Kumpulainen, K., and Renshaw, P. (2007). Culture and learning: A special theme issue. International Journal of Educational Research 46(3–4), 109–15.Google Scholar

Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher 35(7), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladson-Billings, G., and Donnor, J. (2005). The moral activist role of critical race theory scholarship. In Denzin, Norman K. and Lincoln, Yvonna S. (eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 279–301). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Langemeyer, I. (2006). Contradictions in expansive learning: Towards a critical analysis of self-dependent forms of learning in relation to contemporary socio-technological change. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung 7(1), Art. 12 – January. www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/ (accessed August 5, 2015).Google Scholar

Lantolf, J., ed. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lantolf, J., and Thorne, S. (2006). Sociocultural approach to second language learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lantolf, J. P., and Pavlenko, A. (2001). (S)econd (L)anguage (A)ctivity theory: Understanding second language learners as people. In Breen, M. P. (ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 141–158). Essex, UK: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

Larkin, M., Eatough, V., and Osborn, M. (2011). Interpretative phenomenological analysis and embodied active situated cognition. Theory and Psychology 21(3), 318–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larrain, A., and Hayes, A. (2012). Discursive analysis of experience: Alterity, positioning, and tension. Discourse and Society 23(5), 596–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lather, P. (2003). Applied Derrida: (Mis)Reading the work of mourning in educational research. Educational Philosophy and Theory 35(3), 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lather, P. (2009). Getting lost: Social science and/as philosophy. 2007 Kneller Lecture, AESA. Educational Studies 45, 342–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lather, P. (2012a). Rancière as post-Foucauldian. In M. Whittaker (Chair), Taking Rancière to school: An impossible curriculum. Symposium conducted at 2012 American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, BC. Extended abstract retrieved from AERA’s online repository. www.aera.net/ (accessed June 5, 2016).Google Scholar

Lather, P. (2012b). The ruins of neoliberalism and the construction of a new (scientific) subjectivity. Cultural Studies of Science Education 7, 1021–1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (2004). How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body and Society 10(2–3), 205–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Latour, B. (2005a). What is given in experience? A Review of Isabelle Stengers “Penser avec Whitehead.” Boundary 32(2), 222–237.Google Scholar

Latour, B. (2005b). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Boston, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lave, J. (1993). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin and J. Lave (eds.). Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity 3, 149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lave, J., and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, C., and Smagorinsky, P., eds. (2000). Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lee, C. D., Spencer, M. B., and Harpalani, V. (2003). “Every shut eye ain’t asleep”: Studying how people live culturally. Educational Researcher 32, 6–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (Nicolson-Smith, Donald, trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lehrman, D. S. (1953). Critique of Konrad Lorenz’s theory of instinctive behavior. The Quarterly Review of Biology 28(4), 337–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lehrman, D. S. (1970). Semantic and conceptual issues in the nature-nurture problem. In Aronson, L. R., Tobach, E., Lehrman, D. S., and Rosenblatt, J. S. (eds.), Development and evolution of behavior: Essays in memory of T. C. Schneirla (pp. 17–52). San Francisco: Freeman.Google Scholar

Lemke, J. (1997). Cognition, context, and learning: A social semiotic perspective. In Kirshner, D. and Whitson, J. A. (eds.), Situated cognition: Social, semiotic, and psychological perspectives (pp. 37–56). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Lemke, J. (2002). Becoming the village: Education across lives. In Wells, G. and Claxton, G. (eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of Education (pp. 34–45). London: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leonard, S. (2014). Back to utopia. Dissent (Winter), 30–32.Google Scholar

Leonardo, Z. (2004). Critical social theory and transformative knowledge: The functions of criticism in quality education. Educational Researcher 33(6), 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leontiev, A. A. (2001). Active mind [Деятельный ум]. Мoscow: Smysl.Google Scholar

Leontiev [Leont’ev], A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. (Russian edition published 1975.)Google Scholar

Leontiev [Leont’ev], A. N. (1981a). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar

Leontiev [Leont’ev], A. N. (1981b). The problem of activity in psychology. In Wertsch, J. V. (ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37–71). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar

Lerner, R. M. (1991). Changing organism-context relations as the basic process of development: A developmental-contextual perspective. Developmental Psychology 27, 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lerner, R. M. (2002). Concepts and theories of human development (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Lerner, R. M. (2004). Diversity in individual-context relations as the basis for positive development across the life span: A developmental systems perspective for theory, research, and application. Research in Human Development 1, 327–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lerner, R. M. (2006). Developmental science, developmental systems, and contemporary theories of human development. In Damon, W. and Lerner, R. M. (editors-in-chief) and Lerner, R. M. (vol. ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 1–17). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Lerner, R. M., and Overton, W. F. (2008). Exemplifying the integrations of the relational developmental system: Synthesizing theory, research, and application to promote positive development and social justice. Journal of Adolescent Research 23, 245–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levinas, E. (1989). The Levinas reader (Hand, S., ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Lewis, M. D. (2000). The promise of dynamic systems approaches for an integrated account of human development. Child Development 71, 36–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Lewontin, R. 1995. Genes, environment, and organisms. In Silvers, R., ed. Hidden histories of science (pp. 115-138). New York: New York Review of Books Publishers.Google Scholar

Li, S. H. (2013). Neuromodulation and developmental contextual influences on neuraland cognitive plasticity across the lifespan. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 37, 2201–2208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lickliter, R., and Honeycutt, H. (2003). Evolutionary approaches to cognitive development: Status and strategy. Journal of Cognition and Development 4, 459–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Linehan, C., and McCarthy, J. (2001). Reviewing the “community of practice” metaphor: An analysis of control relations in a primary school classroom. Mind, Culture, and Activity 8(2), 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liss, J. E. (1998). Diasporic identities: The science and politics of race in the work of Franz Boas and W. E. B. Du Bois, 1894–1919. Cultural Anthropology 13(2), 127–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lompscher, J. (2004). Lernkultur und Kompetenzentwicklung aus kulturhistoricher Sicht: Lernen Erwachsener im Arbeitsprozess [Learning culture and competence development in a cultural–historical perspective: Adult learning in the process of work]. Berlin: Lehmanns Media.Google Scholar

Lorde, A. (1984). Sister outsider. Trumansburg, NY: Crossing.Google Scholar

Lövdén, M., Bäckman, L., Lindenberger, U., Schaefer, S., and Schmiedek, F. (2010). A theoretical framework for the study of adult cognitive plasticity. Psychological Bulletin 136, 659–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lubovskij, D. V. (2007). Introduction into methodological foundations of psychology [Введение в методологические основы психологии]. Moscow: МОДЭК. http://lib100.com/book/common_psychology/meth_foundations_l/html/ (accessed December 28, 2015).Google Scholar

Ludlow, P. (2012). The dynamic lexicon. www.princeton.edu/~harman/Courses/PHI534-2012–13/Ludlow/Dynamic_Lexicon.docx (accessed January 2, 2015).Google Scholar

Luria, A. R. (1973). The working brain: An introduction to neuropsychology (Haigh, B., trans.). New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Luria, A. R. (1982). Language and cognition. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Luttrell, W. (1996). Becoming somebody in and against school: Toward a psychocultural theory of gender and self-making. In Levinson, B. A., Foley, D. E., and Holland, D. C. (eds.), The cultural production of the educated person (pp. 93–117). Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar

Luttrell, W., and Parker, C. (2001). High school students’ literacy practices and identities, and the figured world of school. Journal of Research in Reading 24(3), 235–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lynch, K. (1999). Equality studies, the academy and the role of research in emancipatory social change. The Economic and Social Review 30(1), 41–69.Google Scholar

Lyotard, J. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

MacIntyre, A. (1983). After virtue: A study in moral theory (2nd ed.). London: Duckworth.Google Scholar

MacMurray, J. (1961). The form of the personal. Vol. 2: Persons in relation. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar

Malik, K. (2001). Review of Louis Menand, The metaphysical club. New Statesman, October 22. www.kenanmalik.com/reviews/menand_metaphysical.html (accessed December 12, 2006).Google Scholar

Marcuse, H. (1969). Repressive tolerance. In Wolff, R. P., Moore, B. Jr., and Marcuse, H. (eds.), A critique of pure tolerance (pp. 95–137). Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Marcuse, H. (1972). Counterrevolution and revolt. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Margolis, J. (2010). Pragmatism’s advantage: American and European philosophy at the end of the twentieth century. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marková, I. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations: the dynamics of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Marková, I. (2012). Objectification in common sense thinking. Mind, Culture, and Activity 19, 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, J. (2004). The educational inadequacy of conceptions of self in educational psychology. Interchange 35, 185–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, J. (2005). Perspectival selves in interaction with others: Re-reading G. H. Mead’s social psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 35(3), 231–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, J., and McLellan, A.-M. (2013). The education of selves: How psychology transformed students. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, J., and Sugarman, J. (1999). The psychology of human possibility and constraint. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Martin, J., and Sugarman, J. (2001). Interpreting human kinds: Beginnings of a hermeneutic psychology. Theory and Psychology 11, 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, J., Sugarman, J., and Thompson, J. (2003). Psychology and the question of agency. Albany: State University of New York Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marx, K. (1844/1978a). Economic and philosophical manuscripts. In Tucker, R. C. (ed.), Marx/Engels reader (2nd ed., pp. 66–125). New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1844/1978b). For a ruthless criticism of everything existing. In Tucker, R. C. (ed.), Marx/Engels reader (2nd ed., pp. 12–15). New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1845/1978). Theses on Feuerbach. In Tucker, R. C. (ed.), Marx/Engels reader (2nd ed., pp. 143–145). New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1852/1978). The eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In Tucker, R. C. (ed.), Marx/Engels reader (2nd ed., pp. 594–617). New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Marx, K. (1891/1978). Wage-labour and capital. In Tucker, R. C. (ed.), Marx/Engels reader (2nd ed., pp. 203–217). New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Marx, K., and Engels, F. (1845–1846/1978). The German ideology. In Tucker, R. C. (ed.), Marx/Engels reader (2nd ed., pp. 146–200). New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Marx, K., and Engels, F. (1848/1978). Manifesto of the Communist party. In Tucker, R. C. (ed.), Marx/Engels reader (2nd ed., pp. 473–500). New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Massumi, B. (1987). Realer than real: The simulacrum according to Deleuze and Guattari. Copyright 1, 90–96.Google Scholar

Mattson, M., and Kemmis, S. (2007). Praxis-related research: Serving two masters? Pedagogy, Culture and Society 15, 185–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McDermott, R., and Varenne, H. (1995). Culture as disability. Anthropology and Education Quarterly 26(3), 324–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLaren, P. (1994). Multiculturalism and the postmodern critique: Toward a pedagogy of resistance and transformation. In H. Giroux and P. McLaren (eds.), Between borders: Pedagogy and the politics of cultural studies (pp. 192–222). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

McLaren, P., and Jaramillo, N. (2007). Pedagogy and praxis in the age of empire: Towards a new humanism. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McLean, K.C., Pasupathi, M., and Pals, J. L. (2007). Selves creating stories creating selves: A process model of self-development. Personality and Social Psychology Review 11, 262–278.Google Scholar

McNay, L. (1999). Subject, psyche and agency: The work of Judith Butler. Theory, Culture, Society 16, 175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McNay, L. (2000). Gender and agency: Reconfiguring the subject in feminist and social theory. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar

McQueen, K. (2013). The terrorist teachers of Lev Vygotsky. History of Education Review 42(2), 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meacham, J. (1997). Autobiography, voice, and developmental theory. In Amsel, E. and Renninger, K. (eds.), Change and development: Issues of theory, method, and application (pp. 43–60). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Means, A. (2011). Jacques Rancière: Education and the art of citizenship. Review of Pedagogy, Education, and Cultural Studies 33, 28–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Medin, D., Lee, C. D., and Bang, M. (2014). Point of view affects how science is done. Scientific American, October 1. www.scientificamerican.com/article/point-of-view-affects-how-science-is-done/ (accessed June 16, 2015).Google Scholar

Menand, L. (2001). The metaphysical club: A story of ideas in America. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception (Smith, C., trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Sense and non-sense. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The visible and the invisible (Lingis, A., trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar

Mertens, D. M. (2003). Mixed methods and the politics of human re-search: The transformative-emancipatory perspective. In Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. (eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 135–164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Meshcheryakov, A. (1979). Awakening to life: Forming behaviour and the mind in deaf-blind children. Moscow: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar

Miceli, M., and Castelfranchi, C. (2002). The mind and the future: The (negative) power of expectations. Theory and Psychology 12, 335–366.Google Scholar

Miettinen, R. (2001). Artifact mediation in Dewey and in cultural–historical activity theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity 8(4), 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar