Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T15:46:19.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 4 - Risk Assessment and Management Approaches with Adolescent Offenders

from Section 2 - Assessment and Needs of Young Offenders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2017

By
James Millington  and
Charlotte Lennox
Edited by
Susan Bailey ,
Paul Tarbuck  and
Prathiba Chitsabesan
Susan Bailey
Affiliation:
Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (AOMRC), London
Paul Tarbuck
Affiliation:
University of Central Lancashire, Preston
Prathiba Chitsabesan
Affiliation:
Stepping Hill Hospital, Stockport
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Forensic Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Meeting the Needs of Young Offenders
 , pp. 55 - 67
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abidin, Z., Davoren, M., Naughton, L. et al. (2013). Susceptibility (risk and protective) factors for in-patient violence and self-harm: prospective study of structured professional judgement instruments START and SAPROF, DUNDRUM-3 and DUNDRUM-4 in forensic mental health services. BMC Psychiatry, 13, 197.Google Scholar
Augimeri, L., Webster, C., Koegl, C. et al. (2001). Early Assessment Risk List for Boys: EARL-20B, Version 2. Toronto: Earlscourt Child and Family Centre.Google Scholar
Borum, R., Bartel, P. and Forth, A. (2003). Manual for the Structured Assessment for Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) Version 1.1. Tampa: Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida.Google Scholar
de Vries Robbé, M., de Vogel, V., Douglas, K. S. et al. (2015a). Changes in dynamic risk and protective factors for violence during inpatient forensic psychiatric treatment: Predicting reductions in postdischarge community recidivism. Law and Human Behavior, 39(1), 53–61.Google Scholar
de Vries Robbé, M., de Vogel, V., Koster, K. et al. (2015b). Assessing protective factors for sexually violent offending with the SAPROF. Sex Abuse, 27(1), 51–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Vries Robbé, M., Geers, M., Stapel, M. et al. (2015c). SAPROF: Youth Version. Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence risk – Guidelines for the Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk. Netherlands: Van der Hoeven Kliniek.Google Scholar
Dolan, M. C. and Rennie, C. E. (2008). The structured assessment of violence risk in youth as a predictor of recidivism in a United Kingdom cohort of adolescent offenders with conduct disorder. Psychological Assessment, 20, 35–46.Google Scholar
Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D. et al. (2013). HCR- 20V3: Assessing Risk for Violence – User Guide. Burnaby, Canada: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
Enebrink, P., Långström, N. and Gumpert, C. H. (2006a). Predicting aggressive and disruptive behaviour in referred 6–12 year-old boys: prospective validation of the EARLB-20B risk/needs checklist. Assessment, 13, 356–367.Google Scholar
Enebrink, P., Långström, N., Hultén, A. et al. (2006b). Swedish validation of the Early Assessment Risk List for boys (EARL-20B), a decision-aid for use with children presenting with 239 conduct-disordered behaviour. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 60, 438–446.Google Scholar
Forth, A., Kosson, D. and Hare, R. (2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version, Technical Manual. New York: Multi-Health Systems, Inc.Google Scholar
Gammelgård, M., Koivisto, A. M., Eronen, M. et al. (2008). The predictive validity of the structured assessment of violence risk in youth (SAVRY) among institutionalised adolescents. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 19(3), 352–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gammelgård, M., Koivisto, A. M., Eronen, M. et al. (2015). Predictive validity of the structured assessment of violence risk in youth: a 4-year follow-up. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 25(3), 192–206.Google Scholar
Hart, S. D. and Logan, C. (2011). Formulation of violence risk using evidence-based assessments: the structured professional judgment approach. In Sturmey, P. and McMurran, M. Editors. Forensic Case Formulation (pp. 83–106). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hart, S., Sturmey, P., Logan, C. et al. (2011) Forensic case formulation. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10, 118–128.Google Scholar
Hilterman, E. L., Nicholls, T. L. and van Nieuwenhuizen, C. (2014). Predictive validity of risk assessments in juvenile offenders: comparing the SAVRY, PCL: YV and YLS/CMI with unstructured clinical assessments. Assessment 21(3), 324–339.Google Scholar
Hoge, R. and Andrews, D. (2002). The Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
Johnstone, L. (2013). Working with complex cases: mental disorder and violence. In Logan, C. and Johnstone, L. Editors. Managing Clinical Risk: A Guide to Effective Practice (pp. 56–88). Oxford, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Levene, K. S., Augimeri, L. K., Pepler, D. J. et al. (2001). Early Assessment Risk List for Girls (EARL-21 G), Version 1, Consultation Edition. Toronto: Earlscourt Child and Family Centre.Google Scholar
Logan, C. (2013). The HCR-20 version 3: a case study in risk formulation. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13, 1–9.Google Scholar
McGowan, M. R., Horn, R. A. and Mellott, R. N. (2011). The predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth in secondary educational settings. Psychological Assessment, 23(2), 478–86.Google Scholar
Olver, M. E. Stockdale, K. C. and Wormith, J. S. (2009). Risk assessment with young offenders: a meta-analysis of three assessment measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 329–353.Google Scholar
Otto, R. and Douglas, K. (2010). Handbook of Violence Risk Assessment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Penney, R. S., Lee, Z. and Moretti, M. M. (2010). Gender differences in risk factors for violence: an examination of the predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in youth. Aggressive Behaviour, 36, 390–404.Google Scholar
Rennie, C. and Dolan, M. (2010). Predictive validity of the youth level of service/case management inventory in custody sample in England. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 21(3), 407–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwalbe, C. S. (2007). Risk assessment for juvenile justice: a meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 449–462.Google Scholar
Singh, J. P., Grann, M. and Fazel, S. (2011). A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: a systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 participants. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 499–513.Google Scholar
Sturmey, P. and McMurran, M. (2011). Forensic Case Formulation. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viljoen, J., Beneteau, J., Gulbransen, E. et al. (2012). Assessment of multiple risk outcomes, strengths, and change with the START: AV: a short-term prospective study with adolescent offenders. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11, 165–180.Google Scholar
Viljoen, J., Nicholls, K., Cruise, K. et al. (2014). Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability: Adolescent Version (START: AV). Vancouver, British Columbia: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
Welsh, J. L., Schmidt, F., McKinnon, L. et al. (2008). A comparative study of adolescent risk assessment instruments: predictive and incremental validity. Assessment, 15, 104–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weerasekera, P. (1996). Multiperspective Case Formulation: A Step toward Treatment Integration. Malabar, FL: Krieger.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×