Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T19:26:26.232Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Exploring preconception health and nutrition beliefs amongst adults of childbearing age in Northern Ireland: a qualitative analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2021

L. McGowan
Affiliation:
Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Science, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
E. Lennon-Caughey
Affiliation:
Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
C. Chun
Affiliation:
National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
M.C. McKinley
Affiliation:
Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Science, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
J.V. Woodside
Affiliation:
Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Science, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK Institute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2021

‘Preconception health’ (PCH) is a term used to describe the health status of males and females prior to pregnancy. There is compelling evidence for the role of PCH behaviours such as diet, smoking and alcohol consumption in determining successful pregnancy outcomes and regarding the health of mother and baby(Reference Stephenson, Heslehurst and Hall1). PCH strategies aim to optimise the health of future offspring via improved parental health for planned/unplanned pregnancies. Greater emphasis is being placed upon PCH amongst research and public health, yet there is limited evidence on PCH from the perspective of adults in Northern Ireland (NI). Objective: This research qualitatively explored beliefs, knowledge and attitudes on PCH amongst adults of childbearing age in NI.

A descriptive qualitative focus group study was undertaken with healthy males and females (18–45 years) October 2018-July 2019. Five groups were held (n = 2 rural; n = 3 urban), with a range of males and females, with and without children. A semi-structured topic guide was devised based on previous literature(Reference Bortolus, Oprandi and Morassutti2). All groups were conducted with two researchers trained in qualitative research methods. Focus groups explored understanding/prior knowledge of PCH, beliefs and attitudes towards PCH support, and personal views on what's important for PCH. Focus groups were transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis(Reference Braun and Clarke3). Full ethical approval was granted from Queen's University Belfast, School of Biological Sciences Research Ethics Committee.

Twenty-one males and females of childbearing age participated in the research; with young single females representing the largest demographic (62% female; 52% aged 18–25 years). Discussions revealed a lack of awareness of the importance of PCH and a sense of reluctance to visit a doctor regarding PCH, favouring online/internet approaches. Five themes identified included: PCH education, PCH awareness, wider knowledge networks/support, optimal parental health (including diet/nutrition beliefs, often inaccurate), and attitudes/emotions towards PCH. The role of males in PCH was not well understood e.g., ‘the woman has to do all that…[PCH]’.

This study highlighted a lack of detailed awareness surrounding the importance of PCH per se, despite general agreement that health and nutrition status should be optimal at this time. It identified a willingness to learn more about PCH, creating an opportunity to improve PCH awareness via evidence-based education, social media campaigns, and within healthcare systems in a life-course approach.

Acknowledgements

Thanks to all participants involved in this study for taking the time to share their personal views.

References

Stephenson, J, Heslehurst, N, Hall, J, et al. (2018) The Lancet 391, 18301841.10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30311-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bortolus, R, Oprandi, N & Morassutti, F (2017) BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 17.Google Scholar
Braun, V & Clarke, V (2006) Qual Res Psychol 3, 7710110.1191/1478088706qp063oaCrossRefGoogle Scholar