Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T20:31:09.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Should social psychologists create a disciplinary affirmative action program for political conservatives?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2015

Richard A. Shweder
Richard A. Shweder*
Affiliation:
Department of Comparative Human Development, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637. rshd@uchicago.eduhttps://humdev.uchicago.edu/directory/richard-shweder
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Freely staying on the move between alternative points of view is the best antidote to dogmatism. Robert Merton's ideals for an epistemic community are sufficient to correct pseudo-empirical studies designed to confirm beliefs that liberals (or conservatives) think deserve to be true. Institutionalizing the self-proclaimed political identities of social psychologists may make things worse.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 38 , 2015 , e158
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Shils, E., Chandrasekhar, S., Childers, R., Franklin, J.H., Friedman, A., Getzels, J.W., Johnson, H.G., MacLane, S., Rosenheim, E., Simpson, J., Straus, L.P., William-Ashman, H.G. (1972) A Report of the University of Chicago Committee on the Criteria of Academic Appointment. Available at: http://provost.uchicago.edu/pdfs/shilsrpt.pdf.Google Scholar
Shweder, R. A. (2004) Tuskegee re-examined. Spiked, January 8, 2004. Available at: http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/14972#.VE2UPBZpKno Google Scholar
Shweder, R. A. (2013) The goose and the gander: The genital wars. Global Discourse: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Current Affairs and Applied Contemporary Thought 3(2):348–66. [Special Issue: Circumcision, public health, genital autonomy and cultural rights] Available at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23269995.2013.811923#.VOaYhfnF9qU Google Scholar
Shweder, R. A. (2015) To follow the argument where it leads: An antiquarian view of the aim of academic freedom at the University of Chicago. In: Who's afraid of academic freedom, ed. Bilgrami, A. & Cole, J. R., pp.190–238. Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar