Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T04:24:00.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

101+ Square meals: evaluation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2011

E. Hughes
Affiliation:
Safefood, 7 Eastgate, Avenue Eastgate, Little island, Co. Cork, Republic of Ireland
M. Hennessy
Affiliation:
Safefood, 7 Eastgate, Avenue Eastgate, Little island, Co. Cork, Republic of Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2011

Food poverty is a multidimensional experience, referring to the lack of a nutritionally adequate diet and the related effects on health, culture and social participation(Reference Dowler1).

101+ Square meals, a recipe book based on healthy eating and budget, was published by the Money, Advice and Budgeting Service (MABS) and Health Service Executive (HSE) in 1998. The recipe book is a well-recognised resource in the Republic of Ireland and it is widely used by Community Dietitians and MABS personnel. The aim of the cookery book is to provide recipes that are: easy-to-prepare, low-budget, yet highly nutritious. The resource also contains useful tips on shopping, home freezing and food safety. In 2008, safe food funded a re-print of 101+ Square Meals and extended its dissemination to Family Resources Centres (FRC) and Citizens Information Services (CIS). The aim of this evaluation was to certify that the target audience benefit from a cookery book aimed at providing low budget yet nutritious recipes and to ensure that the resource meets all the needs of its user (individuals, families and those delivering home management educational programmes in the community). These findings would then inform the possible development of a resource that would be suitable for the Island of Ireland.

Community dietitians (n 5) and FRC (n 2) were invited to participate in the initial stages of this evaluation, which involved a semi-structured telephone interview. The aim was to gather their thoughts and opinions on the resource in order to inform a wider quantitative survey. A questionnaire consisting of twelve questions; multiple choice questions and one open-ended question was then developed based on the results of the telephone interviews and was distributed to FRC (n 38), CIS (n 15), MAB (n 60) and community dietitian managers (n 12).

There were eighty-two responses to the questionnaire. All respondents rated the recipe book very highly and considered it an invaluable resource especially in the current recessionary climate. The respondents described the resource being used with a wide range of people, primarily low-income families/people and lone parents, among others and participants would like to see more copies available. The recipes within the resource were rated highly. All of the 82 respondents agreed that the recipes were easy to follow and the ingredients were easy to access. 96% (n 79) agreed the recipes were inexpensive to make and 94% (n 77) agreed the recipes were healthy. The table outlines participant suggestions for improvement of the recipe book.

References

1.Dowler, E (1997) Nutr Soc 56, 51139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar