Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T14:57:33.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Higher dietary protein, hsCRP levels and polygenic risk scores of genetically predisposed overweight and obese Malaysian adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2021

P.Y. Tan ,
F. Amini  and
S.R. Mitra
P.Y. Tan
Affiliation:
School of Food Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
F. Amini
Affiliation:
School of Healthy Aging, Medical Aesthetics & Regenerative Medicine, UCSI University, KL Campus, Malaysia
S.R. Mitra
Affiliation:
School of Biosciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Nottingham Malaysia, Semenyih, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Abstract
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 80 , Issue OCE3: Irish Section Conference, 22–24 June 2021, Nutrition, health and ageing — translating science into practice – Part A , 2021 , E94
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2021

Evidence suggests that dietary nutrients may interact with gene variants and modulate inflammatory status in obese individuals(Reference Phillips1). This study, aimed to investigate the combined effect of FTO (rs9930506, rs9930506 and rs9932754) and ADRB2 (rs1042713) gene variants on high-sensitive C reactive protein (hsCRP) levels using polygenic risk scores (PRS). Modulatory effects of dietary nutrients on the above associations were investigated as well.

128 overweight and obese Malaysian (57 Malay, 24 Chinese and 47 Indian) adults were recruited. Dietary, physical activity, anthropometric and blood biochemical parameters were collected. Elevated hsCRP level was defined as hsRCP >3mg/L, indicating higher inflammatory status and risk of cardiovascular events(Reference Yousuf, Mohanty and Martin2). The risk allele of each SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) was captured from published GWAS studies(Reference Mitra, Tan and Amini3–Reference Mitra, Tan and Amini4), including FTO rs9930501 (G allele), rs9930506 (G allele) and rs9932754 (C allele) and ADRB2 rs1042713 (G allele). The odds ratio (OR) of obesity for each SNP was computed. Genetic predisposition to obesity was assessed by PRS. PRS was computed as the sum of individual's risk alleles across the 4 SNPs, weighted by the effect size of each risk allele using their respective natural log of OR for obesity. Participants were stratified into tertiles of first (0–0.64), second (0.65–3.59) and third (3.60–8.18) PRS. Ethical approval was obtained from the Science and Engineering Research Ethics Committee, University of Nottingham Malaysia. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Statistics: Binary logistic regression was performed to determine the effect of PRS on the odds of elevated hsCRP level. Gene-diet interaction on hsCRP level was conducted by using general linear model after adjusting for covariates. Dietary protein was dichotomized to 2 groups using the median value of 14%/day, for analysis.

51% of our study participants were found to have elevated hsCRP levels. hsCRP levels were significantly associated with higher body weight (p = 0.025), BMI (p = 0.003), WC (p < 0.001), WHR (p = 0.033), fat mass (p = 0.001) and percent body fat (p < 0.001). Logistic regression revealed that second tertile (0.65–3.58) and third tertile (3.59–8.18) PRS were significantly associated with increased odds of elevated hsCRP level, 7.56 (CI = 1.98–28.80; adjusted p = 0.003) and 3.87 (CI = 1.10–13.60; adjusted p = 0.035) respectively, compared to the first tertile PRS (0–0.64). Higher number of Malaysian Indians were categorised under third tertile PRS (42% vs 32% and 21%), (p = 0.016). Gene-diet interaction analysis revealed that individuals in the third tertile PRS had significantly lower hsCRP levels (4.61 ± 1.3mg/L vs 9.60 ± 2.6mg/L, p = 0.019) with consumption of high percent energy from dietary protein (≥14%/day), compared to low percent energy from dietary protein.

Highest PRS was significantly associated with increased odds of hsCRP. In individuals with high PRS, higher intake of dietary protein may alleviate inflammatory status of individuals and reduce hsCRP levels systemically.

References

Phillips, CM (2013) Nutrients 5, 2–57.10.3390/nu5010032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yousuf, O, Mohanty, BD, Martin, SS, et al. (2013) J Am Coll Cardiol 62, 397–408.10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitra, SM, Tan, PY & Amini, F (2018) J Hum Nutr Diet 31, 758–772.10.1111/jhn.12593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitra, SM, Tan, PY & Amini, F (2019) J Nutr Metab e8718795.Google Scholar