Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T02:27:15.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rationalization: Why, when, and what for?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

Rebecca Saxe Open the ORCID record for Rebecca Saxe [Opens in a new window]  and
Daniel Nettle Open the ORCID record for Daniel Nettle [Opens in a new window]
Rebecca Saxe
Affiliation:
Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, CambridgeMA02139. saxe@mit.edusaxelab.mit.edu
Daniel Nettle
Affiliation:
Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, NewcastleNE2 4HH, UK. daniel.nettle@newcastle.ac.ukdanielnettle.org.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this commentary, we ask when rationalization is most likely to occur and to not occur, and about where to expect, and how to measure, its benefits.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 43 , 2020 , e45
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gershman, S. J., Gerstenberg, T., Baker, C. L. & Cushman, F. A. (2016) Plans, habits, and theory of mind. PLOS ONE 11(9):e0162246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffiths, T. L., Lieder, F. & Goodman, N. D. (2015) Rational use of cognitive resources: Levels of analysis between the computational and the algorithmic. Topics in Cognitive Science 7(2):217–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawton, K., Witt, K. G., Salisbury, T. L. T., Arensman, E., Gunnell, D., Hazell, P., Townsend, E. & van Heeringen, K. (2016) Psychosocial interventions following self-harm in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Psychiatry 3(8):740–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kashdan, T. B., Ferssizidis, P., Collins, R. L. & Muraven, M. (2010) Emotion differentiation as resilience against excessive alcohol use: An ecological momentary assessment in underage social drinkers. Psychological Science 21(9):1341–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, K. A. & Pronin, E. (2008) When disagreement gets ugly: Perceptions of bias and the escalation of conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34(6):833–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mercier, H. & Sperber, D. (2011) Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34(2):57–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2000) The role of rumination in depressive disorders and mixed anxiety/depressive symptoms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 109(3):504–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pond, R. S. Jr, Kashdan, T. B., DeWall, C. N., Savostyanova, A., Lambert, N. M. & Fincham, F. D. (2012) Emotion differentiation moderates aggressive tendencies in angry people: A daily diary analysis. Emotion 12(2):326–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trapnell, P. D. & Campbell, J. D. (1999) Private self-consciousness and the five-factor model of personality: Distinguishing rumination from reflection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76(2):284–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trivers, R. (2000) The elements of a scientific theory of self-deception. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 907(1):114–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zaki, L. F., Coifman, K. G., Rafaeli, E., Berenson, K. R. & Downey, G. (2013) Emotion differentiation as a protective factor against nonsuicidal self-injury in borderline personality disorder. Behavior Therapy 44(3):529–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed