Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T08:02:23.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Elite Communication and the Popular Legitimacy of International Organizations – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2021

Lisa M. Dellmuth  and
Jonas Tallberg
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Keywords

elitescommunicationcueingpublic opinioninternational organizationslegitimacylegitimationcorrigendum
Type
Corrigendum
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , July 2021 , pp. 1314
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2021

In two places, the article incorrectly summarizes the comparison across international organizations. The correct summary in the abstract and the introduction should read: “Fourthly, comparing across IOs indicates that elite communication is more often effective in relation to the IMF, UN and WTO, than the EU and NAFTA.”

References

Dellmuth, LM and Tallberg, J (2020) Elite Communication and the Popular Legitimacy of International Organizations. British Journal of Political Science. Published by Cambridge University Press, 17 February 2020. doi: 10.1017/S0007123419000620.Google Scholar