Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T15:31:57.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of an over 60's exercise programme: a mixed methods study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2024

M. Burke
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK
O. Murray
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK
G. Stratford
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK
T. Butler
Affiliation:
Faculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK Cardiorespiratory research centre, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Global life expectancy is increasing and in the UK there are almost 11 million individuals over the age of 65(1). Ageing has a substantial impact on both physical and mental health of older adults(Reference Rivadeneira, Mendieta and Villavicencio2,Reference D'Onofrio, Kirschner and Prather3,Reference Atalay, Barrett and Staneva4) . However regular exercise has been shown to improve musculoskeletal health, cognitive functioning and overall quality of life in this age group(Reference De Oliveira, Souza and Rodrigues5). However, with many older adults living alone there is potential for group-based exercise classes to not only improve physical wellbeing, but also help improve mental health, too. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate quality of life in those adults attending a community-based over 60's exercise class, and explore the role that attending the class had on the physical and mental health.

Participants were sampled from an over 60s exercise class in the North West of the UK. Those meeting entry criteria of being over 60 years of age were eligible for the study. Quality of life was assessed using the EQ- 5D-5L questionnaire EQindex and EQ VAS was also calculated. EQindex was compared against age- and sex-matched values(Reference McNamara, Schneider and Love-Koh6). Participants also completed semi-structured interviews that explored their experiences of being part of the group. Data from interviews were analysed using a thematic approach as outlined by Braun and Clarke(Reference Braun and Clarke7). All procedures were approved by the Health Research Ethics Committee at Edge Hill University.

From a total of 60 participants, 45 expressed interested in the study with one not meeting the inclusion criteria (aged <60 years). Twenty one participants completed the quality of life assessment and 13 completed the interviews. Mean EQ-VAS for the group was 83.9 ± 18.5. Mean EQindex was significantly greater in the study participants when compared to age- and sex-matched controls (0.902 ± 0.131 vs. 0.767 ± 0.026, p < 0.001). Five mains themes were identified from the interviews: socialisation, exercise for better health, supporting behaviour change, mental health, and convenience. Some participants attended for both exercise and socialisation; P4 stated “I think just exercising with other people [is better] as opposed to doing exercise by yourself”. The theme of supporting behavior change was reported by many participants. For some it has impacted their health outside of the class, like P8 who stated “I sleep better, I eat better”’ implying that attending the class led to important health benefits in their general life. Participants also reported benefits in mental health, too, with one participant stating “rather than being in on your own it's good for your mental health’” to attend the class.

We observed an important effect of attending a weekly exercise class on the physical and mental wellbeing of older adults. Greater emphasis should be placed on such activities to promote healthy ageing in communities.

Acknowledgments

All participants involved in the study and Mr Paul Corless who runs the exercise programme.

References

Rivadeneira, MF, Mendieta, MJ, Villavicencio, J et al. (2021) BMC Geriatr 21, 111.10.1186/s12877-021-02548-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Onofrio, G, Kirschner, J, Prather, H et al. (2023) Prog Cardiovasc Dis.Google Scholar
Atalay, K, Barrett, GF & Staneva, A (2019) J Health Econ 66, 3753.10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.04.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Oliveira, LSSCB, Souza, EC, Rodrigues, , et al. (2019) Trends Psychiatry Psychother 41, 3642.10.1590/2237-6089-2017-0129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, S, Schneider, PP, Love-Koh, J et al. (2023) Value in Health 26, 163–9.10.1016/j.jval.2022.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, V & Clarke, V (2006) Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 77101.10.1191/1478088706qp063oaCrossRefGoogle Scholar