Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T07:07:39.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the dual nature of creativity: Same same but different?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2024

Mathias Benedek Open the ORCID record for Mathias Benedek [Opens in a new window]
Mathias Benedek*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria mathias.benedek@uni-graz.at https://creativecognitionlab.uni-graz.at/
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The creativity literature is replete with dualistic constructs, suggesting shared mechanisms but also tempting overinterpretation of their interrelations. An explicit list of relevant concept associations indicates substantial commonality, yet also exposes certain inconsistencies. Dual-process accounts (A and B is relevant) hold promise in resolving discrepancies to the extent that we understand the relative contributions and conditions of A and B.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 47 , 2024 , e95
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134(6), 779–806. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012815CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benedek, M., Beaty, R. E., Schacter, D. L., & Kenett, Y. N. (2023). The role of memory in creative ideation. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2(4), 246–257. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00158-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedek, M., & Jauk, E. (2014). Creativity – Lost in simplification? Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 1(2), 213–219. https://doi.org/10.15290/ctra.2014.01.02.06CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedek, M., & Jauk, E. (2018). Spontaneous and controlled processes in creative cognition. In Fox, K. C. R. & Christoff, K. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of spontaneous thought (pp. 285–298). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Benedek, M., & Jauk, E. (2019). Creativity and cognitive control. In Kaufman, J. C. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 200–223). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979839.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedek, M., Nordtvedt, N., Jauk, E., Koschmieder, C., Pretsch, J., Krammer, G., & Neubauer, A. C. (2016). Assessment of creativity evaluation skills: A psychometric investigation in prospective teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boot, N., Baas, M., van Gaal, S., Cools, R., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2017). Creative cognition and dopaminergic modulation of fronto-striatal networks: Integrative review and research agenda. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 78, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.04.007CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67(6), 380–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040373CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Dreu, C. K. W., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood–creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(5), 739–756. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, A. S. (2016). Innovativeness as an emergent property: A new alignment of comparative and experimental research on animal innovation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371(1690), 20150544. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0544CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, Y., Goldberg, H., Striem-Amit, E., Mayo, A. E., Noy, L., & Alon, U. (2018). Creative exploration as a scale-invariant search on a meaning landscape. Nature Communications, 9(1), 1–11. Article 5411. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07715-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hills, T. T., Jones, M. N., & Todd, P. M. (2012). Optimal foraging in semantic memory. Psychological Review, 119(2), 431–440. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027373CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karwowski, M., Czerwonka, M., & Kaufman, J. (2020). Does intelligence strengthen creative metacognition? Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, 14(3), 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. World Book.Google Scholar
Kenett, Y. N., Kraemer, D. J. M., Alfred, K. L., Colaizzi, G. A., Cortes, R. A., & Green, A. E. (2020). Developing a neurally informed ontology of creativity measurement. NeuroImage, 221, 117166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117166CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2014). The cognitive neuroscience of insight. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115154CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lebuda, I., & Benedek, M. (2023). A systematic framework of creative metacognition. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/s793qCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuberg, S. L., & Newsom, J. T. (1993). Personal need for structure: Individual differences in the desire for simpler structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.1.113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nijstad, B. A., De Dreu, C. K. W., Rietzschel, E. F., & Baas, M. (2010). The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. European Review of Social Psychology, 21(1), 34–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463281003765323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ovando-Tellez, M., Benedek, M., Kenett, Y. N., Hills, T., Bouanane, S., Bernard, M., … Volle, E. (2022). An investigation of the cognitive and neural correlates of semantic memory search related to creative ability. Communications Biology, 5(1). Article 604. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03547-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ovando-Tellez, M., Kenett, Y. N., Benedek, , M., Hills, T. T., Beranger, B., … Volle, E. (2023). Switching, fast and slow: Deciphering the dynamics of memory search, its brain connectivity patterns, and its role in creativity. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3826172/v1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, J., Huang, F., Zhou, Y., Zhuang, L., Xu, J., Gao, C., … Luo, J. (2020). The function of the hippocampus and middle temporal gyrus in forming new associations and concepts during the processing of novelty and usefulness features in creative designs. NeuroImage, 214, 116751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116751CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubinstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E., & Evans, J. E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(4), 763–797. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.27.4.763Google ScholarPubMed
Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2015). The science of mind wandering: Empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 487–518. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015331CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, S. M., & Blankenship, S. E. (1991). Incubation and the persistence of fixation in problem solving. The American Journal of Psychology, 104(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.2307/1422851CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sowden, P. T., Pringle, A., & Gabora, L. (2015). The shifting sands of creative thinking: Connections to dual-process theory. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(1), 40–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2014.885464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troyer, A. K., Moscovitch, M., & Winocur, G. (1997). Clustering and switching as two components of verbal fluency: Evidence from younger and older healthy adults. Neuropsychology, 11(1), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.11.1.138CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zabelina, D. L., & Robinson, M. D. (2010). Creativity as flexible cognitive control. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(3), 136–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, M. (1984). Sensation seeking: A comparative approach to a human trait. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(3), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00018938CrossRefGoogle Scholar