Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:14:14.573Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnesium intake, insulin resistance and markers of endothelial function among women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2021

Narges Ghorbani Bavani
Affiliation:
Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran Food Security Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Parvane Saneei
Affiliation:
Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran Food Security Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Ammar Hassanzadeh Keshteli
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
Ahmadreza Yazdannik
Affiliation:
Department of Critical Care Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Ebrahim Falahi
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, School of Health and Nutrition, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
Omid Sadeghi
Affiliation:
Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, P.O. Box 14155-6117, Iran
Ahmad Esmaillzadeh*
Affiliation:
Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran Food Security Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, P.O. Box 14155-6117, Iran Obesity and Eating Habits Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Molecular-Cellular Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
*
*Corresponding author: Email a-esmaillzadeh@tums.ac.ir
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

We investigated the association of dietary Mg intake with insulin resistance and markers of endothelial function among Iranian women.

Design:

A cross-sectional study.

Setting:

Usual dietary intakes were assessed using a validated FFQ. Dietary Mg intake was calculated by summing up the amount of Mg in all foods. A fasting blood sample was taken to measure serum concentrations of glycemic indices (fasting plasma glucose and insulin) and endothelial function markers (E-selectin, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1) and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1). Insulin resistance and sensitivity were estimated using the Homeostasis Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), Homeostasis Model Assessment β-cell function (HOMA-β) and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI).

Participants:

Iranian female nurses (n 345) selected by a multistage cluster random sampling method.

Results:

The Mg intake across energy-adjusted quartiles was 205 (se 7), 221·4 (se 8), 254·3 (se 7) and 355·2 (se 9) mg/d, respectively. After adjustments for potential confounders, QUICKI level was significantly different across quartiles of Mg intake (Q1: 0·34 (se 0·02), Q2: 0·36 (se 0·01), Q3: 0·40 (se 0·01), and Q4: 0·39 (se 0·02), P = 0·02); however, this association disappeared after considering markers of endothelial function, indicating that this relation might be mediated through endothelial dysfunction. After controlling for all potential confounders, Mg intake was inversely, but not significantly, associated with serum concentrations of sICAM (Q1: 239 (se 17), Q2: 214 (se 12), Q3: 196 (se 12), and Q4: 195 (se 17), P = 0·29). There was no other significant association between dietary Mg intake and other indicators of glucose homoeostasis or endothelial markers.

Conclusions:

Higher dietary Mg intake was associated with better insulin sensitivity in Iranian females. This linkage was mediated through reduced endothelial dysfunction.

Type
Research paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

Endothelial dysfunction is involved in the aetiology of insulin resistance, atherosclerosis, hypertension and some cancers(Reference Dandona, Aljada and Chaudhuri1Reference Tappel6). Insulin resistance is fundamental to the aetiology of diabetes and is linked to a wide range of chronic diseases(Reference Sloten, Henry and Dekker5,Reference Miniello, Faienza and Scicchitano7Reference Kawaguchi, Taniguchi and Itou10) . These non-communicable diseases (NCD) are the main causes of morbidity and mortality and impose enormous financial and social burden on Iranian population(11,Reference Aminorroaya, Fattahi and Azadnajafabad12) . In Iran, 287 000 deaths in the year 2016 were from NCD and the number of NCD-related deaths has drastically increased during the past decade. The absolute number of years of life loss and disability-adjusted life years of NCD in Iran have accordingly grown by 98 % and 48 % from 1990 to 2017(Reference Aminorroaya, Fattahi and Azadnajafabad12). Improving the nutrition and diet would be an applicable strategy towards reducing the growing NCD burden(Reference Bussel, Soedamah-Muthu and Henry13). Dietary intakes of whole grains, fish and n-3 rich foods, fruits and green leafy vegetables could improve insulin sensitivity and endothelial function, while red meat intake was linked to abnormal glucose homoeostasis and endothelial dysfunction(Reference Bussel, Soedamah-Muthu and Henry13Reference Mello, Schwab and Kolehmainen19). The favourable association of these foods and chronic conditions might be mediated through their high content of fibre and antioxidants; however, they are also good sources of Mg. Nuts, legumes, seeds, whole grains, banana, avocado, leafy greens and some fatty fish such as halibut are rich sources of Mg in the diet. Earlier studies have indicated that Mg intake is associated with a lower risk of insulin resistance, hypertension, atherosclerosis and CVD(Reference Kanbay, Yilmaz and Apetrii20Reference Song, Li and Dam23). It is unknown if the beneficial effect of Mg intake on these conditions could be mediated through influencing endothelial function(Reference Chacko, Song and Nathan22).

Limited data are available linking Mg intake and endothelial function. We are aware of only two observational studies that examined Mg intake in relation to biomarkers of endothelial function(Reference Chacko, Song and Nathan22,Reference Song, Li and Dam23) . Chacko et al. found that high Mg intake was associated with lower concentrations of soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1) and E-selectin in 3713 post-menopausal women in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study(Reference Chacko, Song and Nathan22). Song et al. reported the same association between Mg with E-selectin and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (sICAM) in the Nurses’ Health Study(Reference Song, Li and Dam23). Both studies have been done in Western countries and it is unknown if these associations could be extrapolated to developing countries, in particular to the Middle Eastern population. Finding the association between Mg intake and endothelial function is particularly important for Middle Eastern countries, where dietary intake is mostly on the basis of low-Mg foods. In addition, other dietary behaviours of these populations are different from developed nations. Middle Eastern populations consume large amount of refined starches (white rice and bread), saturated fats and hydrogenated fats along with low amount of fruits, vegetables, legumes and nuts, as the main dietary sources of Mg(Reference Bahreynian and Esmaillzadeh24). Given the lack of any evidence in this part of the world, this study was done to investigate the association of Mg intake with insulin resistance and markers of endothelial function in Iranian women.

Methods and materials

Study procedure and subjects

This cross-sectional study was carried out among a representative sample of Iranian female nurses with the age range of 23–54 years, who were selected by a multistage cluster random sampling method. Seven hospitals were randomly selected based on the number of public and private hospitals. The required sample size for the present study was calculated using serum insulin level (sd: 6·54), as the key dependent variable, in the standard formula suggested for observational studies. Given the 80 % power, type I error of 5 % and the size of effect of 0·71 (5 % insulin level), a sample size of 326 participants was needed. Considering the high dropouts in epidemiologic investigations, we invited 510 female nurses working in the hospitals to participate in this study; 480 women agreed to do so. We did not include women with a prior history of CVD, diabetes, cancer, stroke (n 26) and current antibiotic use (n 7). In addition, those who had left ≥70 items blank on the FFQ (n 2), or reported total daily energy intake outside the range of 800–4200 kcal (n 9), or those who were taking medications affecting glucose homoeostasis (n 16) were excluded. After these exclusions (n 60) and also excluding individuals with incomplete data (n 75), the current analysis was done on 345 individuals. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant. This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki and all procedures involving research study participants were approved by the University of Medical Sciences.

Assessment of dietary intakes

Usual dietary intakes were assessed using a self-administered validated 106-item dish-based semi-quantitative FFQ(Reference Keshteli, Esmaillzadeh and Rajaie25). The FFQ contained information on frequency of consumption of foods or dishes over the last year, along with common portion sizes used in Iran. Daily intakes of Mg for each participant were calculated by summing up the amount of Mg in all kinds of foods in the FFQ using the Nutritionist IV software (First Databank, San Bruno), whose nutrient database was based on the US Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) food composition table, modified for Iranian foods. Our earlier studies have indicated that data on foods and food groups’ intake as well as nutrients intake from this FFQ provided reasonably valid data of long-term dietary intakes(Reference Barak, Falahi and Keshteli16,Reference Saneei, Fallahi and Barak26) .

Assessment of biomarkers

To quantify serum concentrations of insulin, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), lipid profile and adhesion molecules (E-selectin, sICAM-1 and sVCAM-1), a 12-h fasting blood sample was taken from each participant. FPG concentration was measured on the day of blood collection with an enzymatic colorimetric method using glucose oxidase (Pars Azmoon commercial kits) and biochemical autoanalyser (Alpha Classic, Sanjesh Company). The blood samples were then centrifuged within 30–45 min of collection and serum was frozen at −70°C until analysis. Measurement of serum insulin was done using ELISA kits and an ELISA reader (Diagnostic Biochem Canada Inc.). Measurement of serum adhesion molecules was done using available commercial ELISA kits and standards (BioSource International) and (Bender MedSystems Diagnostica GmbH) and an ELISA reader (Diagnostic Biochem Canada Inc.). The sensitivity of the assays for sICAM-1, sVCAM-1 and E-selectin was 0·6, 2·3 and 0·3 mg/l, respectively. Inter- and intra-assay CV for all biomarkers were <10 %. Serum TAG concentrations were assayed with the use of TAG kits by enzymatic colorimetric tests with glycerol phosphate oxidase (Pars Azmoon commercial kits) and a biochemical autoanalyser (Alpha Classic, Sanjesh Company). Serum levels of HDL-C were measured with phosphotungstic acid, after precipitation of the apo B-containing lipoproteins (Pars Azmoon commercial kits) and a biochemical autoanalyser (Alpha Classic, Sanjesh Company). Insulin resistance and sensitivity were estimated using the homoeostasis model assessment (Homeostasis Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) and Homeostasis Model Assessment β-cell function (HOMA-β) and the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI), respectively. HOMA indexes were measured according to these formulas: HOMA-IR = (fasting insulin (mU/l) × fasting glucose (mmol/l)/22·5) and HOMA-β = 20 × fasting insulin (mU/l)/fasting glucose (mmol/ml) − 3·5.

Assessment of other variables

Weight was measured using digital scales while participants were wearing light clothes, without shoes and recorded to the nearest 0·1 kg. Height measurement was made while subjects were standing in a normal position without shoes by means of a tape measure. BMI was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height squared (m2). Daily physical activity was assessed using the short form of a validated International Physical Activity Questionnaire(Reference Booth27) and was expressed as metabolic equivalent tasks-hours per week (MET-h/wk). Blood pressure of participants was measured by the standard method in a seated position through a standard mercury sphygmomanometer by a trained nurse. Measurements were repeated after 5-min interval, and the average of the two readings was considered as the individual’s blood pressure. Socio-economic status was defined through a validated questionnaire(Reference Garmaroudi and Moradi28) which included educational level, income, family size, being owner of a house or renting a house, house area, being owner of a car, number and type of cars, and number of bedrooms in house. Additional covariate information regarding age, smoking habits, marital status, education levels, menopausal situation, medical history, and current use of medications and supplements was obtained using self-administered questionnaires.

Statistical methods

First, energy-adjusted intakes of Mg based on residual method were calculated(Reference Willett29). Energy-adjusted Mg intakes were used to categorise participants into quartiles. One-way ANOVA and chi-square tests were used for comparing continuous and categorical data, across quartiles of Mg intake, respectively. To assess food groups and nutrient intakes across quartiles of Mg intake, we used ANCOVA. Logarithmically transformed values of adhesion molecules in all statistical analyses were used due to the skewness of the distribution of these variables. Furthermore, we applied ANCOVA with Bonferroni correction to examine means of glycemic and endothelial markers across categories of Mg intake in different models. The covariates were chosen based on earlier publications(Reference Chacko, Song and Nathan22,Reference Song, Li and Dam23) . Adjustments for age and total energy intake (kcal/d) were done in Model I. Further adjustment was made for physical activity (MET-h/wk), current corticosteroid use (yes or no), oral contraceptive pill use (yes or no), marital status (single, married, divorce and widow), menopausal status (yes or no), systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and socio-economic status (low, medium and high socio-economic status) in Model П. Further control was done for dietary intakes of fibre, total fat, carbohydrate, refined grains and Na in Model Ш. Additional adjustments were performed for BMI in Model IV. In case of variables related to glucose metabolism, we further controlled for markers of endothelial dysfunction to test the hypothesis that the effect of Mg intake on insulin resistance is mediated through endothelial dysfunction. Finally, for serum concentrations of adhesion molecules, we added FPG, serum TAG, serum total cholesterol, HDL and LDL cholesterol concentrations (all as continuous) in Model V. All statistical analyses were done using SPSS (SPSS, version 18). P-values less than 0·05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Results

General characteristics of study participants across quartiles of energy-adjusted dietary Mg intake are presented in Table 1. There was no significant difference in terms of weight, BMI, waist circumference, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and physical activity across different categories of Mg intake. Furthermore, distribution of participants according to marital status, menopausal status, socio-economic status, overweight and obesity, use of oral contraceptive pill and corticosteroids was not significantly different across quartiles of dietary Mg intake.

Table 1 General characteristics of study participants across quartiles of dietary magnesium intake*

* Q, quartile; MET-h/wk, metabolic equivalent-hour per week.

Values obtained from ANOVA for continuous variable and chi-square for categorical variables.

High-socio-economic status was defined based on educational level, income, family size, being owner of the house or renting the house, house area, being owner of the car and number and kind of the car(s), number of bedrooms, and determination of who was in charge of the family.

§ Values defined as BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2.

Dietary intakes of study participants across quartiles of Mg intake are illustrated in Table 2. Subjects with high dietary Mg intake had greater intakes of vegetables, fruits, low-fat dairy, nuts and legumes, K and folic acid compared with those with the lowest dietary Mg intake. Individuals in the top quartile of dietary Mg intake had lower intake of refined grains and whole grains compared with those in the bottom quartile. Furthermore, dietary intakes of white meat, high-fat dairy, energy, carbohydrates, Ca, Zn and total dietary fibre were significantly different across quartiles of Mg intake. No significant difference was found in terms of other dietary variables across different levels of dietary Mg intake.

Table 2 Dietary intakes (food group and nutrient) of study participants across quartiles of dietary magnesium intake*

a P < 0.05 for pairwise comparison; b P < 0.05 for pairwise comparison; c P < 0.05 for pairwise comparison. In other words, values that shared a superscript letter are significantly different.

* Q, quartile.

Values obtained from ANOVA.

Multivariable-adjusted means (±se) for biomarkers of glucose metabolism (FPG, serum insulin, HOMA-IR, HOMA-β and QUICKI indexes) across quartiles of dietary Mg intake are presented in Table 3. After adjustments for potential confounders including dietary intakes in Model III, QUICKI level was significantly different across quartiles of Mg intake (Q1: 0·34 (se 0·01), Q2: 0·36 (se 0·01), Q3: 0·39 (se 0·01) and Q4: 0·39 (se 0·02), P = 0·03). This difference remained significant even after further controlling for BMI in Model IV (Q1: 0·34 (se 0·02), Q2: 0·36 (se 0·01), Q3: 0·40 (se 0·01) and Q4: 0·39 (se 0·02), P = 0·02); however, it became non-significant after further adjustment for markers of endothelial dysfunction in Model V, indicating that the effect of Mg intake on insulin function might be mediated through endothelial dysfunction. In addition, high dietary Mg intake was associated with lower serum insulin levels after adjustment for confounders in Model II (Q1: 11·0 (se 1·37), Q2: 10·3 (se 1·24), Q3: 7·0 (se 1·23) and Q4: 6·8 (se 1·35) mU/l, P = 0·04). This relationship did not quite reach statistical significance after further adjustments for dietary intakes and BMI in Model IV (Q1: 11·8 (se 1·73), Q2: 10·1 (se 1·29), Q3: 6·4 (se 1·28) and Q4: 6·7 (se 1·76) mU/l, P = 0·08). This association disappeared when other potential confounders including markers of endothelial dysfunction were taken into account in Model V. No significant association was found between dietary Mg intake and other biomarkers of glucose metabolism.

Table 3 Multivariable-adjusted means of glycemic variables across quartiles of dietary magnesium intake*

Q, quartile; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HOMA-IR, homoeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; HOMA-β, homoeostatic model assessment of beta-cell function; QUICKI, quantitative insulin sensitivity check index; MET-h/wk, metabolic equivalent tasks-hours per week.

a P < 0.05 for pairwise comparison. In other words, values in a row that shared a superscript letter of ‘a’ are significantly different.

* All values are means ± se.

Values obtained from ANCOVA.

Model I: adjusted for age and energy intake.

§ Model II: further adjusted for physical activity (MET-h/wk), current corticoid steroids use (yes or no), current use of oral contraceptive pill (yes or no), marital status (categorical), menopausal status (yes or no), systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and socio-economic status (categorical).

|| Model III: further adjusted for intakes of fibre, total fat, carbohydrate, refined grains and Na.

Model IV: further adjusted for BMI.

** Model V: additionally adjusted for markers of endothelial function (E-selectin, sICAM-1 and sVCAM-1).

Multivariable-adjusted means (±se) for markers of endothelial function (E-selectin, sICAM-1 and sVCAM-1) across quartiles of dietary Mg intake are indicated in Table 4. Concentrations of sICAM-1 were significantly different across categories of Mg intake in the crude model (Q1: 206 (se 8), Q2: 196 (se 8), Q3: 200 (se 8) and Q4: 227 (se 8), P = 0·04). After taking all potential confounders into account, this association reversed, such that more dietary Mg intake was associated with lower sICAM levels (Q1: 239 (se 17), Q2: 214 (se 12), Q3: 196 (se 12) and Q4: 195 (se 17), P = 0·29), although this difference was not significant in fully adjusted model. No other significant difference was seen in other markers of endothelial function across quartiles of Mg intake.

Table 4 Multivariable-adjusted means for endothelial function indexes across quartile of dietary magnesium intake

E-selectin, endothelial selectin; Q, quartile; sICAM-1, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1; sVCAM-1, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1; MET-h/wk, metabolic equivalent tasks-hours per week.

a P < 0.05 for pairwise comparison. In other words, values in a row that shared a superscript letter of ‘a’ are significantly different.

* Values obtained from ANCOVA.

Model I: adjusted for age and energy intake.

Model II: further adjusted for physical activity (MET-h/wk), current corticoid steroids use (yes or no), current use of oral contraceptive pill (yes or no), marital status (categorical), menopausal status (yes or no), systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and socio-economic status (categorical).

§ Model III: further adjusted for intakes of fibre, total fat, carbohydrate, refined grains and Na.

|| Model IV: further adjusted for BMI.

Model V: additionally adjusted for blood lipids (serum TAG, serum total cholesterol, HDL and LDL-cholesterol) and glucose.

Discussion

In the present study, individuals with more Mg intake had higher QUICKI compared with those with low intake; this relation might be mediated through endothelial dysfunction. Furthermore, Mg intake was associated with higher serum concentrations of sICAM. When all potential confounders were taken into account, this association reversed, such that higher Mg intake was related to lower sICAM concentrations, although this relation was not statistically significant. None of the other glucose homoeostasis indices (FPG, HOMA-IR, HOMA-B and serum insulin) or endothelial function biomarkers (E-selectin and sVCAM) was associated with dietary Mg intake. To the best of our knowledge, the current study is the first investigation that examined the association of dietary Mg intake with insulin resistance and markers of endothelial function in the Middle East.

The mean intake of Mg in our study population was 259 mg/d (sd: 93), which seems to be lower than general Iranian population. Another cross-sectional study in Iran (the third phase of Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (2006–2008)) has reported an average Mg intake of 336 mg/d (sd: 107) in Iranian females(Reference Mirmiran, Shab-Bidar and Hosseini-Esfahani30). Also, Mg intake in the current study was less than the estimated average requirement for Mg in women (265 mg/d), indicating that more than half of the participants might be Mg-deficient.

Endothelial dysfunction and insulin resistance are among the most important factors involved in aetiology of diabetes and CVD. These diseases are the leading causes of death in many developing and developed countries(Reference Dandona, Aljada and Chaudhuri1,Reference Davignon and Ganz3) . Diet, as a modifiable risk factor, has an important role in developing endothelial dysfunction and insulin resistance. Prior studies have assessed the association of different foods or nutrients intakes with endothelial dysfunction and insulin resistance. Previous research emphasised that a diet rich in Mg could affect glucose homoeostasis and endothelial function(Reference Lopez-Garcia, Schulze and Fung31,Reference Paolisso and Barbagallo32) .

Based on our findings, after considering potential confounders, those with higher dietary Mg intake had lower sICAM concentration, in a non-significant manner. It had been shown that adherence to a diet poor in Mg was positively associated with sICAM concentrations(Reference Lopez-Garcia, Schulze and Fung31). In contrast, no significant association was reported between dietary Mg intake and sICAM concentrations in a prospective study(Reference Chacko, Song and Nathan22). A cross-sectional study has also reported no significant association between a Mg-rich diet and sICAM concentrations(Reference Lopez-Garcia, Schulze and Fung31). Conflicting findings on the association between dietary Mg intake and sICAM concentrations might be explained by different study design and populations, adjusting for energy intake and other covariates and diversity in methods used to assess dietary intakes and blood markers. Therefore, finding the independent effects of dietary Mg can be a challenge.

Although independent effects of Mg intake on endothelial function are biologically plausible according to experimental evidence(Reference Paolisso and Barbagallo32,Reference Malpuech-Brugère, Nowacki and Daveau33) , any causal effects of Mg intake on inflammation and endothelial function warrant further investigation. The biological mechanism underlying the inverse association between dietary Mg intake and sICAM concentrations is unknown. An experimental study had shown that Mg deficiency may promote an inflammatory response(Reference Malpuech-Brugère, Nowacki and Daveau33). Inflammation can adversely affect endothelial function and increase the concentrations of sICAM. Moreover, Mg increases glutathione synthesis which might limit or begin to resolve the inflammatory response and might result in lower circulating sICAM and inflammatory biomarkers concentrations. High level of sICAM and other inflammatory biomarkers could cause insulin resistance(Reference Paolisso and Barbagallo32Reference Cahill, Shahidi and Shea34).

In the current study, we found that higher Mg intake was associated with higher QUICKI values. This relationship was mediated by endothelial dysfunction. Also, it should be considered that QUICKI, HOMA-IR and HOMA-β were calculated from the same fasting values of insulin and glucose. HOMA-B is a measure of pancreatic β-cell function, whereas the two other measures are indices of insulin sensitivity via slightly different calculations. A previous validation study(Reference Mather, Hunt and Steinberg35) has proposed that QUICKI, as a logarithmic transformed index, could produce a normal distribution of data, could be preferable to the other measures and was more generalisable to the full range of metabolic conditions (including the relationship between Mg intake and insulin resistance). Our results might also suggest a support for the superiority of QUICKI over the two other indices of insulin resistance in Iranian women, although we could not evaluate correlations of these measures with hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp, as the gold standard of insulin resistance. In line with our findings, several studies have shown that adherence to diets rich in Mg can increase insulin sensitivity(Reference Priebe, Binsbergen and Vos36,Reference Dam, Hu and Rosenberg37) . It has been shown that a diet rich in Mg, particularly whole grain, is associated with a substantially lower risk of insulin resistance and type II diabetes(Reference Dam, Hu and Rosenberg37). Another study has shown that adherence to a diet rich in Mg and whole grains is associated with improved insulin sensitivity(Reference McKeown38). High serum Mg was also associated with a reduced risk of diabetes in a prospective study(Reference Fang, Wang and Wu39). Inverse associations between serum Mg levels and serum glucose and insulin levels were also reported in a cross-sectional study(Reference Bertinato, Wang and Hayward40). Furthermore, intakes of other types of Mg-rich foods including dairy products, legumes and nuts have been linked to decreased risk of diabetes in prospective studies(Reference Dam, Hu and Rosenberg37).

Mg is required for glucose utilisation and insulin signalling. Lower intake of foods rich in Mg might lead to metabolic alterations in cellular Mg and affect the development of insulin resistance by altering the glucose entry into the cell(Reference Fung, Manson and Solomon41,Reference Belin and He42) Phosphorylation of the tyrosine kinase enzyme of the insulin receptor, required for post-receptor insulin sensitivity and subsequent insulin-mediated glucose uptake, is dependent on adequate intracellular concentrations of Mg(Reference Barbagallo and Dominguez43). A Mg-deficient diet caused a significant impairment of insulin-mediated glucose uptake(Reference Matsunobu, Terashima and Senshu44). In addition, dietary Mg is highly correlated with other micronutrients and dietary components believed to affect insulin sensitivity, such as K, Ca, vegetables, fruits and fibre. Thus, it is very difficult to separate their independent effects(Reference Rumawas, McKeown and Rogers45,Reference Villegas, Gao and Dai46) . Furthermore, the reliability of serum Mg levels, as the marker of Mg deficiency, is unclear. Although intracellular Mg concentrations are believed to provide a more accurate estimation of Mg status, the technique of cell isolation and Mg measurement is not easily available(Reference Lima, Cruz and Rodrigues47).

Our study has several limitations. The major one is its cross-sectional nature, which would not allow conferring causality. However, the appropriate analysis of cross-sectional data would represent a valuable initial step in identifying diet–disease relations. Other limitations included self-reported diet associated with large measurement errors that could distort or attenuate the investigated associations. Potentially health conscious study population might also limit the range of Mg intake as well as the range of the outcome variables. In addition, our findings cannot be extrapolated to the general population, especially to men, due to its restriction to female nurses. Although we controlled for several lifestyle factors associated with dietary Mg intake, residual confounding due to unknown confounding factors cannot be excluded.

In conclusion, we found that higher dietary Mg intake was associated with better insulin sensitivity in Iranian females. This linkage was mediated through reduced endothelial dysfunction. Further investigations, particularly with prospective design, are required to confirm these findings.

Acknowledgements

Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank the Board of Directors of Isfahan Nursing Organization for their great cooperation in conducting this study. The authors also appreciate the cooperation we received from Samira Mahdavi, Maryam Pozveh, Marzie Heidari, Shokouh Onvani and Simin Shahvazi in data collection. The authors are also thankful to the staff of the selected hospitals who took part in the current study. Financial support: The study is supported by Food Security Research Center (FSRC), Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran, in conjunction with Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran. The funders had no contribution in the design, conducting, writing, analysis and final approval of the manuscript. Conflicts of interest: The authors declared no personal or financial conflicts of interest. Authorship: NGB, PS, AHK, AY, EF, OS and AE contributed in conception, design, statistical analysis, data collection and manuscript drafting. AE supervised the study. This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures involving research study participants were approved by the Food Security Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran, in conjunction with the research council of Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Footnotes

Parvane Saneei is the Co-first author.

References

Dandona, P, Aljada, A, Chaudhuri, A et al. (2004) Endothelial dysfunction, inflammation and diabetes. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 5, 189197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, JA, Montagnani, M, Koh, KK et al. (2006) Reciprocal relationships between insulin resistance and endothelial dysfunction; molecular and pathophysiological mechanisms. Circulation 113, 18881904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davignon, J & Ganz, P (2004) Role of endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerosis. Circulation 109, III27III32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shao, Y, Cheng, Z, Li, X et al. (2014) Immunosuppressive/anti-inflammatory cytokines directly and indirectly inhibit endothelial dysfunction – a novel mechanism for maintaining vascular function. J Hematol Oncol 7, 80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sloten, TT, Henry, RM, Dekker, JM et al. (2014) Endothelial dysfunction plays a key role in increasing cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes: the Hoorn study. Hypertension 64, 12991305.Google Scholar
Tappel, A (2007) Heme of consumed red meat can act as a catalyst of oxidative damage and could initiate colon, breast and prostate cancers, heart disease and other diseases. Med Hypotheses 68, 562564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miniello, VL, Faienza, MF, Scicchitano, P et al. (2014) Insulin resistance and endothelial function in children and adolescents. Int J Cardiol 174, 343347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Semenkovich, CF (2006) Insulin resistance and atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest 116, 18131822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swan, JW, Anker, SD, Walton, C et al. (1997) Insulin resistance in chronic heart failure: relation to severity and etiology of heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 30, 527532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kawaguchi, T, Taniguchi, E, Itou, M et al. (2011) Insulin resistance and chronic liver disease. World J Hepatol 3, 99107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Global burden of Diseases (2014) Washington, Institute of Health Metric and Evaluation; available at http://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/ (accessed September 2016).Google Scholar
Aminorroaya, A, Fattahi, N, Azadnajafabad, S et al. (2020) Burden of non-communicable diseases in Iran: past, present, and future. J Diabetes Metab Disord [Epub a head of print].Google Scholar
Bussel, BC, Soedamah-Muthu, SS, Henry, RM et al. (2013) Unhealthy dietary patterns associated with inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in type 1 diabetes: the EURODIAB study. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 23, 758764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montero, D, Walther, G, Stehouwer, CD et al. (2014) Effect of antioxidant vitamin supplementation on endothelial function in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Obes Rev 15, 107116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mark, H (2014) The role of nutrition and nutraceutical supplements in the treatment of hypertension. World J Cardiol 6, 3866.Google Scholar
Barak, F, Falahi, E, Keshteli, AH et al. (2015) Red meat intake, insulin resistance, and markers of endothelial function among Iranian women. Mol Nutr Food Res 59, 315322.Google ScholarPubMed
Lopez-Garcia, E, Schulze, MB, Manson, JB et al. (2004) Consumption of (n-3) fatty acids is related to plasma biomarkers of inflammation and endothelial activation in women. J Nutr 134, 18061811.Google Scholar
Bussel, BC, Henry, RM, Schalkwijk, CG et al. (2011) Fish consumption in healthy adults is associated with decreased circulating biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction and inflammation during a 6-year follow-up. J Nutr 14, 17191725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mello, VD, Schwab, U, Kolehmainen, M et al. (2011) A diet high in fatty fish, bilberries and wholegrain products improves markers of endothelial function and inflammation in individuals with impaired glucose metabolism in a randomised controlled trial: the Sysdimet study. Diabetologia 54, 27552767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanbay, M, Yilmaz, MI, Apetrii, M et al. (2012) Relationship between serum magnesium levels and cardiovascular events in chronic kidney disease patients. Am J Nephrol 36, 228237.Google ScholarPubMed
Maier, JA (2012) Endothelial cells and magnesium: implications in atherosclerosis. Clin Sci (Lond) 122, 397407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chacko, SA, Song, Y, Nathan, L et al. (2010) Relations of dietary magnesium intake to biomarkers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in an ethnically diverse cohort of postmenopausal women. Diabetes Care 33, 304310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, Y, Li, TY, Dam, RM et al. (2007) Magnesium intake and plasma concentrations of markers of systemic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in women. Am J Clin Nutr 85, 10681074.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bahreynian, M & Esmaillzadeh, A (2012) Quantity and quality of carbohydrate intake in Iran: a target for nutritional intervention. Arch Iran Med 15, 648649.Google ScholarPubMed
Keshteli, AH, Esmaillzadeh, A, Rajaie, S et al. (2014) A dish-based semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire for assessment of dietary intakes in epidemiologic studies in Iran: design and development. Int J Prev Med 5, 2936.Google ScholarPubMed
Saneei, P, Fallahi, E, Barak, F et al. (2015) Adherence to the DASH diet and prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among Iranian women. Eur J Nutr 54, 421428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Booth, M (2000) Assessment of physical activity: an international perspective. Res Q Exerc Sport 71, 114120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garmaroudi, GR & Moradi, A (2010) Socio-economic status in Iran: a study of measurement index. Payesh 9, 137144. [in Farsi] URL: http://payeshjournal.ir/article-1-573-fa.html.Google Scholar
Willett, WC (1998) Nutritional Epidemiology, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mirmiran, P, Shab-Bidar, S, Hosseini-Esfahani, F et al. (2012) Magnesium intake and prevalence of metabolic syndrome in adults: tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Public Health Nutr 15, 693701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopez-Garcia, E, Schulze, MB, Fung, TT et al. (2004) Major dietary patterns are related to plasma concentrations of markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. Am J Clin Nutr 80, 10291035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paolisso, G & Barbagallo, M (1997) Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and insulin resistance: the role of intracellular magnesium. Am J Hypertens 10, 346355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malpuech-Brugère, C, Nowacki, W, Daveau, M et al. (2000) Inflammatory response following acute magnesium deficiency in the rat. Biochim Biophys Acta 1501, 9198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cahill, F, Shahidi, M, Shea, J et al. (2013) High dietary magnesium intake is associated with low insulin resistance in the newfound land population. PLoS One 8, e58278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mather, KJ, Hunt, AE & Steinberg, HO (2001) Repeatability characteristics of simple indices of insulin resistance: implications for research applications. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86, 54575464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Priebe, MG, Binsbergen, JJ, Vos, R et al. (2008) Whole grain foods for the prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Databases Syst Rev 23, CD006061.Google Scholar
Dam, RM, Hu, FB, Rosenberg, L et al. (2006) Dietary calcium and magnesium, major food sources, and risk of type 2 diabetes in U.S. Diabetes Care 29, 22382243.Google ScholarPubMed
McKeown, NM (2004) Whole grain intake and insulin sensitivity: evidence from observational studies. Nutr Rev 62, 286291.Google ScholarPubMed
Fang, C, Wang, X, Wu, W et al. (2016) Association of serum magnesium level with odds of prediabetes and diabetes in a southern Chinese population: a prospective nested case–control study. Biol Trace Elem Res 172, 307314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertinato, J, Wang, KC & Hayward, S (2017) Serum magnesium concentrations in the canadian population and associations with diabetes, glycemic regulation, and insulin resistance. Nutrients 9, E296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fung, TT, Manson, JE, Solomon, CG et al. (2003) The association between magnesium intake and fasting insulin concentration in healthy middle-aged women. J Am Coll Nutr 22, 533538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belin, RJ & He, K (2007) Magnesium physiology and pathogenic mechanisms that contribute to the development of the metabolic syndrome. Magnes Res 20, 107129.Google ScholarPubMed
Barbagallo, M & Dominguez, LJ (2007) Magnesium metabolism in type 2 diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance. Arch Biochem Biophys 458, 4047.Google ScholarPubMed
Matsunobu, S, Terashima, Y, Senshu, T et al. (1990) Insulin secretion and glucose uptake in hypomagnesemic sheep fed a low magnesium, high potassium diet. J Nutr Biochem 1, 167171.Google ScholarPubMed
Rumawas, ME, McKeown, NM, Rogers, G et al. (2006) Magnesium intake is related to improved insulin homeostasis in the Framingham offspring cohort. J Am Coll Nutr 25, 486492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villegas, R, Gao, YT, Dai, Q et al. (2009) Dietary calcium and magnesium intakes and the risk of type 2 diabetes: the Shanghai Women’s Health Study. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 10591067.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lima, L, Cruz, T, Rodrigues, LE et al. (2009) Serum and intracellular magnesium deficiency in patients with metabolic syndrome– evidences for its relation to insulin resistance. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 83, 257262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 General characteristics of study participants across quartiles of dietary magnesium intake*

Figure 1

Table 2 Dietary intakes (food group and nutrient) of study participants across quartiles of dietary magnesium intake*

Figure 2

Table 3 Multivariable-adjusted means of glycemic variables across quartiles of dietary magnesium intake*

Figure 3

Table 4 Multivariable-adjusted means for endothelial function indexes across quartile of dietary magnesium intake