No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The scientific value of explanation and prediction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 December 2023
Abstract
Deep neural network models have revived long-standing debates on the value of explanation versus prediction for advancing science. Bowers et al.'s critique will not make these models go away, but it is likely to prompt new work that seeks to reconcile explanatory and predictive models, which could change how we determine what constitutes valuable scientific knowledge.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Breiman, L. (2001). Statistical modeling: The two cultures (with comments and a rejoinder by the author). Statistical Science, 16(3), 199–231. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1009213726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, I. W., Bissett, P. G., Zeynep Enkavi, A., Li, J., MacKinnon, D. P., Marsch, L. A., & Poldrack, R. A. (2019). Uncovering the structure of self-regulation through data-driven ontology discovery. Nature Communications, 10(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10301-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hempel, C. G., & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15(2), 135–175. https://doi.org/10.1086/286983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofman, J. M., Watts, D. J., Athey, S., Garip, F., Griffiths, T. L., Kleinberg, J., … Yarkoni, T. (2021). Integrating explanation and prediction in computational social science. Nature, 595(7866), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03659-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, H., Werner, K. M., & Inzlicht, M. (2021). Promises and perils of experimentation: The mutual-internal-validity problem. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 854–863. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620974773CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yarkoni, T., & Westfall, J. (2017). Choosing prediction over explanation in psychology: Lessons from machine learning. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1100–1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617693393CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Target article
Deep problems with neural network models of human vision
Related commentaries (29)
Explananda and explanantia in deep neural network models of neurological network functions
A deep new look at color
Beyond the limitations of any imaginable mechanism: Large language models and psycholinguistics
Comprehensive assessment methods are key to progress in deep learning
Deep neural networks are not a single hypothesis but a language for expressing computational hypotheses
Even deeper problems with neural network models of language
Fixing the problems of deep neural networks will require better training data and learning algorithms
For deep networks, the whole equals the sum of the parts
For human-like models, train on human-like tasks
Going after the bigger picture: Using high-capacity models to understand mind and brain
Implications of capacity-limited, generative models for human vision
Let's move forward: Image-computable models and a common model evaluation scheme are prerequisites for a scientific understanding of human vision
Modelling human vision needs to account for subjective experience
Models of vision need some action
My pet pig won't fly and I want a refund
Neither hype nor gloom do DNNs justice
Neural networks need real-world behavior
Neural networks, AI, and the goals of modeling
Perceptual learning in humans: An active, top-down-guided process
Psychophysics may be the game-changer for deep neural networks (DNNs) to imitate the human vision
Statistical prediction alone cannot identify good models of behavior
The model-resistant richness of human visual experience
The scientific value of explanation and prediction
There is a fundamental, unbridgeable gap between DNNs and the visual cortex
Thinking beyond the ventral stream: Comment on Bowers et al.
Using DNNs to understand the primate vision: A shortcut or a distraction?
Where do the hypotheses come from? Data-driven learning in science and the brain
Why psychologists should embrace rather than abandon DNNs
You can't play 20 questions with nature and win redux
Author response
Clarifying status of DNNs as models of human vision