Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T17:52:14.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Once more with feeling: On the explanatory limits of the GANE model and the missing role of subjective experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2017

Jeffrey R. Huntsinger  and
Justin Storbeck
Jeffrey R. Huntsinger
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60660jhuntsinger@luc.eduhttp://jeffreyhuntsinger.weebly.com/index.html
Justin Storbeck
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Queens College, and the Graduate Center, City University of New York (CUNY), Flushing, NY 11367justin.storbeck@qc.cuny.eduhttp://www.queensaffectiveneuroscience.com/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We applaud Mather and colleagues' model, which emphasizes the neurobiological pathways by which affective arousal tunes attention and memory. This commentary offers a friendly discussion of several potential limitations of the theory. We suggest the model is strong when predicting task-driven demands but is limited when predicting the impact of individual biases, interpretations, and experiential feelings.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 39 , 2016 , e212
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cantor, J. R., Zillmann, D. & Bryant, J. (1975) Enhancement of experienced sexual arousal in response to erotic stimuli through misattribution of unrelated residual excitation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32(1):69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clore, G. L. & Huntsinger, J. R. (2007) How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11(9):393–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craik, F. I. & Lockhart, R. S. (1972) Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11(6):671–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, D. G. & Aron, A. P. (1974) Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 30(4):510–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hahn, U. (2011) The problem of circularity in evidence, argument, and explanation. Perspectives on Psychological Science 6(2):172–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loftus, E. F. (1975) Leading questions and the eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology 7(4):560–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, J. D., Nadel, L., Allen, J. J. B., Thomas, K. & Jacobs, J. (2002) The effects of experimentally induced stress on false recognition. Memory 10:1–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roediger, H. L. & McDermott, K. B. (1995) Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21(4):803.Google Scholar
Storbeck, J. & Clore, G. L. (2008) Affective arousal as information: How affective arousal influences judgments, learning, and memory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2(5):1824–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed