Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:59:42.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

History, Pedagogy, Data and New Directions: An Introduction to the Educational Technology Issue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2019

Trude Heift ,
Alison Mackey  and
Bryan Smith
Trude Heift
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University
Alison Mackey
Affiliation:
Georgetown University
Bryan Smith
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 39 , March 2019 , pp. 1 - 7
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bax, S. (2003). CALL—Past, present and future. System, 31(1), 13–28.Google Scholar
Bax, S. (2011). Normalisation revisited: The effective use of technology in language education. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 1–15.Google Scholar
Chun, D. (2016). The role of technology in SLA research. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 98–115.Google Scholar
Common Sense. (2018). Social media, social life: Teens reveal their experiences. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/y9c5gcmfGoogle Scholar
Fischer, R. (2007). How do we know what students are actually doing? Monitoring students’ behavior in CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(5), 409–442.Google Scholar
Kramsch, C., & Whiteside, A. (2008). Language ecology in multilingual settings: Towards a theory of symbolic competence. Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 645–671.Google Scholar
Otto, S. (2017). From past to present: A hundred years of technology for L2 learning. In Chapelle, C. & Sauro, S. (Eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 10–25). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Smith, B. (2008). Methodological hurdles in capturing CMC data: The case of the missing self-repair. Language Learning and Technology, 12(1), 85–103.Google Scholar
Thorne, S. L. (2013). Language learning, ecological validity, and innovation under conditions of superdiversity. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 6(2), 1–27.Google Scholar
van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Vyatkina, N., & Boulton, A. (2017). Corpora in language learning and teaching. Language Learning & Technology, 21(3), 1–8.Google Scholar
Warschauer, M. (2004). Technological change and the future of CALL. In Fotos, S. & Brown, C. (Eds.), New perspectives on CALL for second language classrooms (pp. 27–38). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar