Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:44:52.866Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigation into the acute effects of intermittent energy restriction on postprandial substrate metabolism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2016

R. Antoni
Affiliation:
Nutrition, Metabolism and Diabetes Research Group, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
K.L. Johnston
Affiliation:
Lighterlife UK Ltd, Cavendish House, Parkway, Harlow Business Park, Essex, UK
A. Collins
Affiliation:
Nutrition, Metabolism and Diabetes Research Group, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
M.D. Robertson
Affiliation:
Nutrition, Metabolism and Diabetes Research Group, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2016 

This abstract was awarded the student prize for best oral original communication

The intermittent energy restriction (IER) approach to weight-loss involves short periods of substantial energy restriction (ER) followed by non-restricted intake(1). Little is known about the acute effects of total and partial ER on postprandial substrate metabolism within overweight/obese populations, which forms the main objective of this study. Secondary outcomes included subsequent energy compensation.

Ten (three female) healthy, overweight/obese (36 ± 5y; 29·0 ± 1·1kg/m2) subjects were recruited into this three-way, cross-over dietary investigation. Subjects completed three one-day dietary interventions in a randomized order with a one-week washout: isoenergetic intake, partial 75 % ER (using LighterLife FoodPacks) and total 100 % ER. Postprandial responses to a liquid test-meal were assessed the following day via serial blood measurements. Subjects also completed dietary diaries for two subsequent days of ad libitum intake. Data were analysed using repeated measures ANOVA and presented as mean ± SEM.

Relative to the isoenergetic control leg, postprandial glucose tended to be higher after partial ER (p = 0·089), and was significantly increased following total ER with a delay in the time to peak (both p < 0·05) (Fig 1A). Postprandial triacylglycerol was reduced after partial and total ER, by 22 and 39 % respectively (both p < 0·05) (Fig 1B). Fasting and postprandial hepatic production of 3-β-hydroxybutyrate (3-βOHB) were elevated after both ER interventions (both p < 0·05) (Fig 1C). Cumulative 3-day energy intakes remained significantly lower after both total and partial ER interventions, with subjects sustaining comparable energy deficits of −28 ± 5 % and −30 ± 3 % respectively (all p < 0·001 vs iso).

Figure 1A-C. Postprandial substrate responses

Total 100 % ER (), partial 75 % ER (), isoenergetic control diet ()

One day of substantial (75–100 %) ER was sufficient to produce acute improvements in postprandial triacylglycerol, which we hypothesise was driven by a shift in hepatic fatty-acid partitioning towards oxidation. By allowing some food intake, partial ER was able to mitigate the increase in postprandial glycaemia found with total fasting whilst furthermore producing a comparable three-day energy deficit. Findings of this acute study highlight the potential utility of IER as a treatment strategy for hyperlipidaemia, but now requires translation over chronic timescales.

References

Antoni, R, Johnston, K, Collins, A and Robertson, MD (2014) Res Endocrinol. 2014 Article ID: 459119Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1A-C. Postprandial substrate responsesTotal 100 % ER (), partial 75 % ER (), isoenergetic control diet ()