Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T06:41:18.594Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Apparent Influence of Simazine on Nitrogen Nutrition of Peach and Apple Trees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

S. K. Ries ,
R. P. Larsen  and
A. L. Kenworthy
S. K. Ries
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan
R. P. Larsen
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan
A. L. Kenworthy
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan
Get access

Abstract

Peach trees treated with the herbicide mixture of 2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)-s-triazine (simazine) and 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole plus ammonium thiocyanate (amitrole-T) had higher leaf nitrogen and more growth than trees where the weeds were controlled by hand hoeing or a black plastic mulch. Apple trees had higher leaf nitrogen and more growth when treated with simazine and amitrole-T than with no weed control. In both peaches and apples more growth and higher leaf nitrogen resulted from the herbicide treatments than from supplemental nitrogen treatments, indicating that the herbicide influenced the nitrogen metabolism of these trees.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , October 1963 , pp. 270 - 273
Copyright
Copyright © 1963 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bingham, S. W. and Upchurch, R. P. 1959. Some interactions between nutrient level (N,P,K,Ca) and diuron in the growth of cotton and Italian ryegrass. Weeds 7:167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Burnside, O. C., Schmidt, E. L., and Behrens, R. 1961. Dissipatation of simazine from the soil. Weeds 9:477–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Chandra, Purna, Furtick, W. R., and Bollen, W. B. 1960. The effects of four herbicides on microorganisms in nine Oregon soils. Weeds 8:589–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Cooke, A. R. 1955. Effect of CMU on biochemical composition of several legumes. Res. Report NCWCC. 12:181–182.Google Scholar
5. Hale, M. G., Hulcher, F. H., and Chappell, W. E. 1957. The effects of several herbicides on nitrification in a field soil under laboratory conditions. Weeds 5:331–341.Google Scholar
6. Kenworthy, A. L. 1961. Interpreting the balance of nutrient elements in leaves of fruit trees. Am. Inst. of Biol. Sci. Publ. No. 8:28–41.Google Scholar
7. Meggitt, W. F. 1960. The influence of cultivation on corn yields when weeds are controlled by herbicides. Proc. NEWCC 14:241–246.Google Scholar
8. Peters, E. J., Davis, F. S., Klingman, D. L., and Larsen, R. E. 1961. Interrelationships of cultivations, herbicides, and methods of application for weed control in soybeans. Weeds 9:639–645.Google Scholar
9. Vorob'ev, F. K. and Ch'a, J. P. 1960. Effect of simazine and 2,4-D on nitrogen metabolism of plants. Doklady Moskov, Sel'skhokhoz. Akad. K.A. Timirjazeva, 57:63–69.Google Scholar