Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T23:36:56.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Use of the Recirculating Sprayer to Control Tall Weed Escapes in Crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

D. R. Carlson
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583
O. C. Burnside
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted with the recirculating sprayer (RCS) at Lincoln, Nebraska from 1974 through 1978. Different spray pressures, spray nozzles, and spray volumes with the RCS showed no significant differences in shattercane [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] control or soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] injury when herbicides were applied at three stages of weed growth. When shattercane was treated in a grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] field, poor weed control and excessive crop injury occurred during treatment at the early growth stage as compared with treatments applied 2 weeks later. The final treatment date gave selective weed control in grain sorghum, but many of the shattercane heads had already developed viable seed. A weed-to-crop height differential of at least 45 cm resulted in maximum weed control with minimum crop injury. Common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca L.) control in soybeans varied considerably, but treatments giving over 80% control were glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] at 1.1 to 4.5 kg/ha applied through the RCS. Other herbicides were less effective. Volunteer corn (Zea mays L.) was controlled selectively at 75 to 100% in soybeans with glyphosate or paraquat (1,1′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium ion) when applied through the RCS. Shattercane was controlled 95 to 100% in soybeans with glyphosate at 3.4 kg/ha. Unless spray drift and splash can be prevented when using the RCS, glyphosate and paraquat will not give selective control when applied to weeds growing in grain sorghum. Glyphosate applied through the RCS, however, can be a selective method of controlling weed escapes in soybeans because soybeans are not as sensitive to glyphosate as is sorghum.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baird, D. D., Upchurch, R. P., Homesley, W. B., and Fronz, J. E. 1971. Introduction of a new broadspectrum postemergence herbicide class with utility for herbaceous perennial weed control. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 26:64.Google Scholar
2. Barrentine, W. L. and McWhorter, C. G. 1966. New spray techniques for directed postemergence weed control in row crops. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. p. 104.Google Scholar
3. Burnside, O. C. 1979. Soybean (Glycine max) growth as affected by weed removal, cultivar, and row spacing. Weed Sci. 27:562565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Burnside, O. C. and Wicks, G. A. 1967. The effect of weed removal treatments on sorghum growth. Weeds 15:204207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Burnside, O. C. and Wilson, R. G. Jr. 1979. Weed escapes – your future problems. Nebraska Farm, Ranch and Home Quart. 24(3):78.Google Scholar
6. Crafts, A. S. 1975. Modern Weed Control. Pages 377386. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
7. Evetts, L. L. and Burnside, O. C. 1973. Competition of common milkweed with sorghum. Agron. J. 65:931932.Google Scholar
8. Evetts, L. L. and Burnside, O. C. 1973. Milkweed – a persistant perennial that reduces yield. Nebraska Farm, Ranch, and Home Quart. 20(1):1215.Google Scholar
9. McWhorter, C. G. 1970. A recirculating spray system for postemergence weed control in row crops. Weed Sci. 18:285287.Google Scholar
10. Van Valkenburg, W. 1973. Pesticide Formulations. Pages 377386. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, NY.Google Scholar
11. Vesecky, J. F., Feltner, K. C., and Vanderlip, R. L. 1973. Wild cane and forage sorghum competition in grain sorghum. Weed Sci. 21:2832.Google Scholar