Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T17:45:27.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Translocation of 14C-Glyphosate and 14CO2-Labeled Photoassimilates in Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Ray S. McAllister
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Path., Seed and Weed Sci., Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011 Dep. Agron., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583
Lloyd C. Haderlie
Affiliation:
Aberdeen Res. and Ext. Center, Univ. of Idaho, Aberdeen, ID 83210 Dep. Agron., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583

Abstract

Translocation of 14CO2-labeled photoassimilates was compared to movement of 14C-glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] in Canada thistle [Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. ♯ CIRAR] under field and controlled-environment conditions. Field-grown Canada thistle plants were treated on mature upper leaves at the midflower stage in mid-June and harvested 8 days later. No differences were found in glyphosate and assimilate distribution, and movement was primarily basipetal. Of the glyphosate and photoassimilates translocated from the treated leaves, 25 and 31%, respectively, were recovered from the roots, while 59 and 58%, respectively, were found in the shoot tissue below the treated leaf. Concentration of labeled glyphosate in the roots as much as 95 cm from the treated shoot was as high as at the base of the treated shoot. Photoperiods that induce flowering (15 h) or maintain vegetative growth (13 h) did not differentially affect the distribution of photoassimilates or glyphosate in 7-week-old Canada thistle plants in the growth chamber. In growth chamber-grown plants equivalent amounts of glyphosate and assimilates were translocated out of treated leaves; however, relatively more glyphosate than photoassimilates accumulated in the roots.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © 1985 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ashton, F. M. and Crafts, A. S. 1981. Phenoxies. Absorption and translocation. Pages 276280 in Ashton, F. M. and Crafts, A. S. Mode of action of herbicides. 2nd ed. Wiley-Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
2. Baradari, M. R., Haderlie, L. C., and Wilson, R. G. 1980. Chlorflurenol effects on absorption and translocation of dicamba in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 28:197200.Google Scholar
3. Bingham, S. W., Segura, J., and Foy, C. L. 1978. Susceptibility of several grasses to glyphosate. Weed Sci. 28:579585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Bostock, S. J. and Benton, R. A. 1979. The reproductive strategies of five perennial Compositae. J. Ecol. 67:91107.Google Scholar
5. Coupland, D. and Caseley, J. C. 1979. Presence of 14C activity in root exudates and guttation fluid from Agropyron repens treated with 14C-labelled glyphosate. New Phytol. 83:1722.Google Scholar
6. Coupland, D. and Peabody, D. V. 1981. Absorption, translocation, and exudation of glyphosate, fosamine, and amitrole in field horsetail (Equisetum arvense). Weed Sci. 29:556560.Google Scholar
7. Dewey, S. A. and Appleby, A. P. 1983. A comparison between glyphosate and assimilate translocation patterns in tall morningglory (Ipomoea purpurea). Weed Sci. 31:308314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Gigax, D. R. and Messersmith, C. G. 1978. Field bindweed control with fall applied glyphosate and 2,4-D. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 33:153158.Google Scholar
9. Gottrup, O., Sullivan, P. A., Schraa, R. J., and Vanden Born, W. H. 1976. Uptake, translocation, metabolism and selectivity of glyphosate in Canada thistle and leafy spurge. Weed Res. 16:197201.Google Scholar
10. Gougler, J. A. and Geiger, D. R. 1981. Uptake and distribution of N-phosphonomethylglycine in sugarbeet plants. Plant Physiol. 68:668672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Haderlie, L. C. 1980. Glyphosate uptake by roots. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am., no. 198.Google Scholar
12. Kirkland, K. J. 1977. Glyphosate for the control of Canada thistle on summer fallow. Can. J. Plant Sci. 57:10151017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. McAllister, R. S. and Haderlie, L. C. 1985. Seasonal variations in Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) root bud growth and root carbohydrate reserves. Weed Sci. 33:4449.Google Scholar
14. Muller, F. 1969. [Translocation of 14C-labelled MCPA in perennial weeds in relation to developmental stage and reserve material content.] Angew. Bot. 43:125147.Google Scholar
15. Messersmith, C. G. 1978. Canada thistle control with spring-and fall-applied glyphosate. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 33:107. Can. J. Plant Sci. 53:397–401.Google Scholar
16. Sandberg, C. L., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1980. Absorption, translocation and metabolism of 14C-glyphosate in several weed species. Weed Res. 20:195200.Google Scholar
17. Schultz, M. E. and Burnside, O. C. 1980. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of 2,4-D and glyphosate in hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum). Weed Sci. 28:1320.Google Scholar
18. Segura, J., Bingham, S. W., and Foy, C. L. 1978. Phytotoxicity of glyphosate to Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) and red clover (Trifolium repens). Weed Sci. 26:3236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Sprankle, P., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1975. Absorption, action, and translocation of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 23:235240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Stroup, W. W. 1982. Use of SAS to analyze experiments conducted over time with multivariate responses and autocorrelated errors. Pages 660665 in Proc. 7th Ann. Statistical Analysis System User's Group Int. Conf.Google Scholar
21. Tyree, M. T., Peterson, C. A., and Edgington, L. V. 1979. A simple theory regarding ambimobility of xenobiotics with special reference to the nematicide, oxamyl. Plant Physiol. 63:367374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Wyrill, J. B. III, and Burnside, O. C. 1976. Absorption, translocation and metabolism of 2,4-D and glyphosate in common milkweed and hemp dogbane. Weed Sci. 24:557566.Google Scholar