Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T02:02:45.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surface Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Residues, Giant Foxtail (Setaria faberi), and Soybean (Glycine max) Yield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Ribas A. Vidal  and
Thomas T. Bauman
Ribas A. Vidal
Affiliation:
Dep. of Botany and Plant Path., Purdue Univ., W. Lafayette, IN 47907-1155
Thomas T. Bauman
Affiliation:
Dep. of Botany and Plant Path., Purdue Univ., W. Lafayette, IN 47907-1155
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were conducted from 1992 through 1994 to determine the effect of 0 to 12 Mg ha−1 of surface wheat residues (SWR) on giant foxtail density and crown node length, and soybean yield. Giant foxtail density decreased as SWR increased from 0 to 12 Mg ha−1. SWR of 6 to 12 Mg ha−1 reduced giant foxtail density by 2 to 50 % compared to bare soil. The crown node of giant foxtail was 2 cm above the soil surface with 12 Mg ha−1 of SWR. Frost in 1992 injured soybean more than weeds in plots with SWR while soybean in soil with no SWR was not injured. In absence of frost in 1993 and 1994, yield of weedy soybean increased 20 to 29%, respectively, with the increase of SWR from 0 to 6 Mg ha−1. In weed-free plots, soybean yield was similar across all SWR levels. These results confirm the hypothesis that high levels of SWR increased soybean yield in weedy plots because of decreased giant foxtail infestation.

Keywords

Giant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm. ♯ SETFAsoybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Resnik’wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Clark.’Conservation tillagecover cropcrop rotationdouble-cropno-tillweed interference
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 44 , Issue 4 , December 1996 , pp. 939 - 943
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Almeida, F. S. L. 1985. Effect of some winter mulches on the soil weed infestation. Proc. of the Brit. Crop Prot. Conf.-Weeds 2: 651–659.Google Scholar
2. Archibold, O. W. 1991. Straw residues in wild rice (Zizania palustris L.) stands in northern Saskatchewan. Canadian J. of Plant Sci. 71: 337–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Breakwell, D. P. and Turco, R. F. 1989. Nutrient and phytotoxic contributions of residue to soil in no-till continuous-corn ecosystems. Biol. and Fertility of Soils 8: 328–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Buchanan, G. A. and Hauser, E. W. 1980. Influence of row spacings on competitiveness and yield of peanuts (Arachis hypogea). Weed Sci. 28: 401–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Buhler, D. D. and Daniel, T. C. 1988. Influence of tillage systems on giant foxtail and velvetleaf density and control in corn. Weed Sci. 36: 642–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Buhler, D. D. and Oplinger, E. S. 1990. Influence of tillage systems on annual weed densities and control in solid-seeded soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 38: 158–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Burnside, O. C. 1979. Soybean (Glycine max) growth as affected by weed removal, cultivar, and row spacing. Weed Sci. 27: 562–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Cassini, P., Vecchio, V., and Pasten, W. 1994. Green manuring and mulching in the Bolivian amazon. Pages 662–663 in Borin, M. and Sattin, M., eds. Proc. Third Congr. of European Cong. of Agron., Abano-Padova, Italy.Google Scholar
9. Cochran, V. L., Elliot, L. F., and Papendick, R. I. 1977. The production of phytotoxins from surface crop residues. Soil Sci. Soc. of Am. J. 41: 903–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Crutchfield, D. A., Wicks, G. A., and Burnside, O. C. 1985. Effect of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw mulch on weed control. Weed Sci. 34: 110–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Gill, K. S., Arshad, M. A., Chivunda, B. K., Phiri, B., and Gumbo, M. 1992. Influence of residue mulch, tillage, and cultural practices on weed mass and corn yield from three field experiments. Soil Tillage Res. 24: 211–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Griffith, D. R., Kladivko, E. J., Mannering, J. V., West, T. D., and Parsons, S. D. 1988. Long term tillage and rotation effect on corn growth and yield on high and low organic matter, poorly drained soils. Agron. J. 80: 599–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Jury, W. A., Gardner, W. R., and Gardner, W. H. 1991. Pages 168–169 in Soil Physics. 5th ed. Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.Google Scholar
14. Knake, E. L. 1977. Giant foxtail, the most serious annual grass weed in the Midwest. Weeds Today, 9: 19–20.Google Scholar
15. Knake, E. L. 1990. Giant foxtail (Setaria faberi Herrm.). Univ. Illinois, Champaign, IL. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. No. 803. 22 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Mester, T. C. and Buhler, D. D. 1991. Effects of soil temperature, seed depth, and cyanazine on giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) seedling development. Weed Sci. 39: 204–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Mohler, C. L. and Teasdale, J. R. 1993. Response of weed emergence to rate of Viccia villosa Roth and Secale cereale L. residue. Weed Res. 33: 487–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Murray, J. S., Schreiber, M. M., and Guard, A. T. 1967. Anatomy of the first internode of giant foxtail. Weeds 15: 347–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Patterson, D. T. and Flint, E. P. 1979. Effects of chilling on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti), and spurred anoda (Anoda cristata). Weed Sci. 27: 473–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Phihar, S. S., Sandhu, K. S., and Khera, K. L. 1975. Maize (Zea mays L.) and weed growth, as affected by levels of straw mulching with and without herbicide under conventional and minimum tillage. Indian J. of Ecol. 2: 13–22.Google Scholar
21. Schaefer, K. P. 1985. The influence of temperature and seedbed tillage on the emergence and early growth of corn and two weed species, giant foxtail (Setaria faberi Herrm.) and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medic). Dissertation Abstr. Int. 45: 1975–B (order no. DA8423742).Google Scholar
22. Smith, H. 1986. The perception of light quality. Pages 187–217 in Kendrick, R. E. and Kronenberg, G. H. M. (eds.) Photomorphogenesis in plants. Martinius Nijhoff/Junk Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Stott, D. E., Stroo, H. F., Elliot, L. F., Papendick, R. I., and Unger, P. W. 1990. Wheat residue loss from fields under no-till management. Soil Sci. Soc. of Am. J. 54: 92–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Taylorson, R. B. 1986. Water stress-induced germination of giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) seeds. Weed Sci. 34: 871–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Teasdale, J. R. and Mohler, C. L. 1993. Light transmitance, soil temperature, and soil moisture under residue of hairy vetch and rye. Agron. J. 85: 673–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Teasdale, J. R., Beste, C. E., and Potts, W. E. 1991. Response of weeds to tillage and cover crop residue. Weed Sci. 39: 195–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Wicks, G. A., Crutchfield, D. A., and Burnside, O. C. 1994. Influence of wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw mulch and metolachlor on corn (Zea mays) growth and yield. Weed Sci. 42: 141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar