Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T11:20:35.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

s-Triazine Effects on Seed Germination and Hypocotyl Hook Opening

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

C. G. P. Pillai
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Microbiol., Auburn Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta., Auburn, AL 36830
D. E. Davis
Affiliation:
Dep. Bot. and Microbiol., Auburn Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta., Auburn, AL 36830

Abstract

The effects of seven s-triazines on the opening of the hypocotyl hook of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘DPL Smooth Leaf’) and the germination of lettuce seed (Lactuca sativa L. ‘Grand Rapids’) were investigated. The s-triazines used were ametryne [2-(ethylamino)-4-(isopropylamino)-6-(methylthio)-s-triazine], atrazine [2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine], cyprazine [2-chloro-4-(cyclopropylamino)-6-(isopropylamino)-s-triazine], prometone [2,4-bis (isopropylamino)-6-methoxy-s-triazine], prometryne [2,4-bis (isopropylamino)-6-(methylthio)-s-triazine], propazine [2-chloro-4,6-bis(isopropylamino)-s-triazine], and simazine [2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)-s-triazine]. All triazines except cyprazine stimulated germination of lettuce seed given 4 min of dim red light but none were stimulatory in the dark. Maximum stimulation occurred with 1 X 10-8 to 1 X 10-12 M s-triazine. All triazines except atrazine and cyprazine stimulated the opening of cotton hypocotyl hooks given 2 hr of dim red light of the s-triazines tested. Prometryne and ametryne were the most stimulatory to hook opening in the light and the most inhibitory in the dark. Their effects paralleled those of kinetin.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Abeles, F. B. and Lonski, J. 1969. Stimulation of lettuce seed germination by ethylene. Plant Physiol. 44:277280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Chiesura, F. R. and Lorenzoni, G. G. 1964. The effect of temperature on young maize plants treated with simazine. G. Bot. Ital. 71:638639.Google Scholar
3. Copping, L. G. and Davis, D. E. 1972. Effect of atrazine on chlorophyll retention in corn leaf discs. Weed Sci. 20:8689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Copping, L. G., Davis, D. E., and Pillai, C. G. P. 1972. Growth regulator-like activity of atrazine and ametryne. Weed Sci. 20:274277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Ebert, E. and Van Assche, C. J. 1969. Influence of atrazine (2-chloro-4-ethylamino-6-isopropylamino-s-triazine) on auxin metabolism of plants. Experientia 25:758759.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Exer, B. 1958. Uber Pflanzenwachstumregulatoren. Der einfluss von simazin auf den Pflanzenstofwechsel. Experientia 14:135137.Google Scholar
7. Freney, J. R. 1965. Increased growth and uptake of nutrients by corn plants treated with low levels of simazine. Aust. J. Agr. Res. 16:257263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Goeschel, J. D., Pratt, H. K., and Bonner, B. A. 1967. An effect of light on the production of ethylene and the growth of the plumular portion of etiolated pea seedlings. Plant Physiol. 42:10771080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Gysin, H. and Knusli, E. 1960. Chemistry and herbicidal properties of triazine derivatives. Pages 289358. in Metcalf, R. L. (ed.) Advances in Pest Control Research. Vol. III. Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
10. Hamilton, R. H. 1964. Tolerance of several grass species to 2-chloro-s-triazine herbicides in relation to degradation and content of benzoxazinone derivatives. J. Agr. Food Chem. 12:1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Jordan, L. S., Murashige, T., Mann, J. D., and Day, B. E. 1966. Effect of photosynthesis-inhibiting herbicides on non-photosynthetic tobacco callus tissue. Weeds 14:134136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Kang, B. G. and Ray, P. M. 1969. Role of growth regulators in the bean hypocotyl hook opening response. Planta 87:193205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Kang, B. G., Yocum, C. S., Burg, S. P., and Ray, P. M. 1967. Ethylene and carbon dioxide: Mediation of hypocotyl hook-opening response. Science 156:958959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Khan, A. A. 1971. Cytokinins: Permissive role in seed germination. Science 171:853859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Klein, R. M. 1965. Photomorphogenesis of the bean plumular hook. Physiol. Plant. 18:10261033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Klein, W. H., Withrow, R. B., and Elstad, V. B. 1956. Response of the hypocotyl hook of bean seedlings to radiant energy and other factors. Plant Physiol. 31:289294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Leff, J. 1964. Interaction between kinetin and light on germination of ‘Grand Rapids’ lettuce seed. Plant Physiol. 39:299303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Lorenzoni, G. G. 1962. The stimulatory effect of simazine at high dilutions. Estratto da Maydica 7:115124.Google Scholar
19. Mastakov, S. M. and Prohorcik, F. A. 1962. An investigation of triazine products as regulators of plant growth. 2. The effect of simazine and atrazine on the content of chlorophyll in the leaves of crop plants. Dokl. Adak. Nauk. Beloruss. SSR. 6:517520.Google Scholar
20. McDaniel, L. and Frans, R. E. 1969. Soybean mitochondrial response to prometryne and fluometuron. Weed Sci. 17:192196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Miller, C. O. 1958. The relationship of the kinetin and red-light promotions of lettuce seed germination. Plant Physiol. 33:115117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Moreland, D. E., Gentner, W. A., Hilton, J. L., and Hill, K. L. 1959. Studies on the mechanism of herbicidal action of 2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)-s-triazine. Plant Physiol. 34:432435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Moreland, D. E. and Hill, K. L. 1962. Interference of herbicides with the Hill reaction of isolated chloroplasts. Weeds 10:229237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Powell, R. D. and Morgan, P. W. 1970. Factors involved in the opening of the hypocotyl hook of cotton and beans. Plant Physiol. 45:548552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Ries, S. K., Chmiel, H., Dilley, R. D., and Filner, P. 1967. The increase in nitrate reductase activity and protein content of plants treated with simazine. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 58:526532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Rubenstein, B. 1971. Auxin and red light in the control of hypocotyl hook opening in beans. Plant Physiol. 48:187192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Thompson, O. C., Truelove, B., and Davis, D. E. 1970. Effects of s-triazine herbicides on isolated mitochondria. Proc. S. Weed Sci. Soc. 23:318.Google Scholar