Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T02:33:13.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Species Differences in Site of Shoot Uptake and Tolerance to EPTC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

G. N. Prendeville ,
L. R. Oliver  and
M. M. Schreiber
G. N. Prendeville
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University
L. R. Oliver
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture
M. M. Schreiber
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Lafayette, Indiana
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We determined the effects of ethyl N,N-dipropylthiocarbamate (EPTC) in soil placed at different shoot zones of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), oats (Avena sativa L.), and sorghum (Sorghum vulgare Pers.) below the soil surface after emergence. A wax-barrier allowed separate exposure of the shoot zones to treated soil. Wheat, barley, and oats were severely injured when treated at the coleoptilar internode. Exposure of the remaining shoot did not affect growth. Sorghum was severely injured regardless of the shoot zone exposed. On this basis, sorghum was the most susceptible, while wheat, barley, and oats were equally tolerant. Uptake of 14C-EPTC from the soil by the sorghum shoots was double that of wheat, a fact which might explain the differential susceptibilities. These studies indicate that growth responses of species to EPTC applied to shoots is dependent on the stage of plant development at which treatment occurs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , October 1968 , pp. 538 - 540
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Crafts, A. S. and Yamacuchi, Shogo. 1964. The Autoradiography of Plant Materials. California Agr. Exp. Sta. Manual 35. 143 p.Google Scholar
2. Friesen, H. A., Banting, J. D., and Walker, D. R. 1962. The effect of placement and concentration of 2,3-DCDT on the selective control of wild oats in wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 42:91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Oliver, L. R., Prendeville, G. N., and Schreiber, M. M. 1968. Species differences in site of root uptake and tolerance to EPTC. Weed Sci. 16:534–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Parker, C. 1963. Factors affecting the selectivity of 2,3-dichloroallyl-diisopropylthiolcarbamate (diallate) against Avena spp. in wheat and barley. Weed Res. 3:259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Prendeville, G. N. 1968. Shoot zone uptake of soil applied herbicides. Weed Res. 8:106–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar