Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T16:55:29.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selectivity of Benazolin in Wild Mustard and Rape Species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

D. E. Schafer  and
E. H. Stobbe
D. E. Schafer
Affiliation:
Univ. of Manitoba. Now Senior Research Biologist, Monsanto Company, St. Louis, Mo. 63166
E. H. Stobbe
Affiliation:
Univ. of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 2N2
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The selectivity of 4-chloro-2-oxobenzothiazolin-3-ylacetic acid (benazolin) in wild mustard [Brassica kaber (DC.) L. C. Wheeler var. pinnatifida (Stokes) L. C. Wheeler], turnip rape (Brassica campestris L. ‘Echo’), and rape (Brassica napus L. ‘Target’) was studied. On an ED50 basis wild mustard was 19 and 32 times more susceptible to foliar-applied benazolin than was turnip rape and rape, respectively. The addition of surfactant increased the toxicity of benazolin to the Brassica species. Benazolin was less selective when applied via roots. Selectivity was further studied on the bases of differential spray retention and foliar penetration. Rape retained less spray than did wild mustard and turnip rape. The inclusion of surfactants in formulations increased spray retention by rape. Less 14C-benazolin penetrated leaves of the rape species as compared to wild mustard. Surfactant enhanced penetration of 14C-benazolin into leaves of the three species. Leaf surface features which resulted in high spray retention and rapid penetration of benazolin partly explained the susceptibility of wild mustard. The variation in tolerance between the two rape species was attributed to differential spray retention.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , January 1973 , pp. 45 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Blackman, G. E., Bruce, R. S. and Holly, K. 1958. Studies in the principles of phytotoxicity. V. Interrelationships between specific differences in spray retention and selective toxicity. J. Exp. Bot. 9:175–205.Google Scholar
2. Leafe, E. L. 1964. 4-Chloro-2-oxobenzothiazolin-3-ylacetic acid, a new plant growth substance herbicide. Proc. Brit. Weed Contr. Conf. 7:32–34.Google Scholar
3. Lewis, D. K. 1969. Residue studies using 14C-benazolin, with special reference to its persistence on foliage under glasshouse conditions. J. Sci. Food Agr. 20:185–190.Google Scholar
4. Lush, G. B., Mayes, A. J. and Rea, B. L. 1966. Field experience with benazolin in admixture with other herbicides. Proc. Brit. Weed Contr. Conf. 8:197–199.Google Scholar
5. Lush, G. B., Mayes, A. J. and Rea, B. L. 1968. Work on a new herbicidal mixture based on MCPA, dicamba and benazolin. Proc. Brit. Weed Contr. Conf. 9:228–232.Google Scholar
6. Molberg, F. S. and Ashraff, M. A. 1971. Benazolin for selective weed control in wheat and oilseed crops. Can. J. Plant Sci. 51:371–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Sargent, J. A. and Blackman, G. E. 1962. Studies on foliar penetration. I. Factors controlling entry of 2,4-D. J. Exp. Bot. 13:348–368.Google Scholar
8. Schafer, D. E. and Stobbe, E. H. 1973. Translocation and metabolism of benazolin in wild mustard and rape species. Weed Sci. 21:48–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar