Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T11:10:30.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Selective Control of Downy Brome in Alfalfa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

George Kapusta
Affiliation:
Superientendent and Crops Testing Tech. Plant and Soil Sci. Dep. Res. Sta., Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901
C. F. Strieker
Affiliation:
Superientendent and Crops Testing Tech. Plant and Soil Sci. Dep. Res. Sta., Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901

Abstract

Selective control of downy brome (Bromus tectorum L.) in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) was studied in 1971 and 1972. Herbicidal efficacy and alfalfa tolerance, yield, and percent and total protein were observed. The weed population was composed of almost 100% downy brome in 1971 and 1972. Herbicide treatments were applied early and late winter when both alfalfa and downy brome were dormant. Five herbicides afforded virtually complete downy brome control in 1971: pronamide [3,5-dichloro-N-(1,1-dimethyl-2-propynyl) benzamide] at 0.84 and 1.40 kg/ha, simazine [2-chloro-4,6-bis(ethylamino)-s-triazine] at 1.12 kg/ha, terbacil (3-tert-butyl-5-chloro-6-methyluracil) at 0.84 kg/ha, paraquat (1–1′-dimethyl-4,4′-bipyridinium ion) at 0.56 kg/ha and cyanazine {2-[[4-chloro-6-(ethylamino)-s-triazin-2-yl] amino]-2-methylpropionitrile} at 3.4 kg/ha. All herbicide treatments reduced downy brome yields in 1972. Significantly higher alfalfa yields were closely related with lower downy brome yields. In 1972, alfalfa treated with propham (isopropyl carbanilate), cyanazine, pronamide and terbacil also was higher in second cutting yields than the control. Twelve of the 23 treatments, including all triazine herbicides, increased first harvest alfalfa protein percentage in 1972 although differences were not observed in 1971. Alachlor [2-chloro-2′,6′-diethyl-N-(methoxymethyl)-acetanilide] spring-applied in 1971 at 5.62 kg/ha was the only treatment causing visual alfalfa injury.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1975 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1971. Agricultural Statistics. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 639 pp.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous. 1955. Official methods of analysis, 8th ed., Assoc. Offic. Agr. Chem. Washington, D.C. 1008 pp.Google Scholar
3. Arnold, W.E. and O'Neal, W.B. 1972. Downy brome control in established alfalfa. N. Cent. Weed Contr. Conf. Res. Rpt. 29:19.Google Scholar
4. Arnold, W.E. and O'Neal, W.B. 1973. Downy brome control in established alfalfa. N. Cent. Weed Contr. Conf. Res. Rpt. 30:78.Google Scholar
5. Cords, H.P. 1973. Weeds and alfalfa hay quality. Weed Sci. 21:400401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Fenster, C.R., Wicks, G.A., and Robison, L.R. 1970. Know and control downy brome. Nebr. Coop. Ext. Service Bull. 188, 10 pp.Google Scholar
7. Kapusta, G. 1973. Common chickweed control in established alfalfa. Weed Sci. 21:119122.Google Scholar
8. Peters, R.A. and O'Leary, R.M. 1967. Herbicidal response of white cockle and other winter weeds associated with alfalfa. Proc. Northeast. Weed Contr. Conf. 21:299302.Google Scholar
9. Schreiber, M.M. 1967. Effect of density and control of Canada thistle on production and utilization of alfalfa pasture. Weeds 15:138142.Google Scholar
10. Swan, D.G. 1972. Effect of herbicides on alfalfa and subsequent crops. Weed Sci. 20:335337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar