Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T07:47:35.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Selective Action of Terbacil on Peppermint and Ivyleaf Morningglory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. L. Barrentine
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture
G. F. Warren
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture

Abstract

The herbicide 3-tert-butyl-5-chloro-6-methyluracil (terbacil) applied in an isoparaffinic oil caused, in susceptible ivyleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea (L.) Jacq.), rapid and nearly complete inhibition of photosynthesis, from which it never recovered. Photosynthesis in peppermint (Mentha peperita L.), a tolerant species, was decreased only temporarily. Terbacil was readily absorbed by leaves of both species; however, there was little or no movement out of the treated peppermint leaves. Terbacil was translocated out of the treated leaves of ivyleaf morningglory to the untreated leaves and shoot apex. It was metabolized in both species but at a higher rate in peppermint. Therefore, it appears that foliarly-applied terbacil may be bound in peppermint leaves and this, together with the higher rate of metabolism, may contribute to the tolerance of peppermint. Terbacil was readily taken up and translocated to the foliage of both species when applied to the roots. Again, it was metabolized in both plants but at a higher rate in peppermint. However, the rate of metabolism alone did not appear to be sufficient to account for peppermint tolerance to root-applied terbacil.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1970 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barrentine, J. L. and Warren, G. F. 1970. Isoparaffinic oil as a carrier for chlorpropham and terbacil. Weed Sci. 18:365372.Google Scholar
2. Burrill, L. C. and Appleby, A. 1969. Postemergence applications of terbacil to peppermint. Res. Pro. Rept. West. Soc. of Weed Sci. p. 78.Google Scholar
3. Colby, S. R. and Warren, G. F. 1965. Selective action of solan on tomato and eggplant. Weeds 13:257263.Google Scholar
4. Couch, R. W. and Davis, D. E. 1966. Effect of atrazine, bromacil, and diquat on 14CO2 fixation in corn, cotton, and soybeans. Weeds 14:251255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Crafts, A. S. and Yamaguchi, S. 1963. The Autoradiography of Plant Materials. California Agr. Expt. Sta. and Ext. Serv. Manual 35. 143 p.Google Scholar
6. Gardiner, J. A., Rhodes, R. C., Adams, J. B. Jr., and Soboczensik, E. J. 1969. Synthesis and studies with 2-C14-labeled bromacil and terbacil. J. of Agr. and Food chem. 17:980986.Google Scholar
7. Hamilton, R. H. and Moreland, D. E. 1963. Fate of ipazine in cotton plants. Weeds 11:213217.Google Scholar
8. Hilton, J. L., Monaco, T. J., Moreland, D. E., and Gentner, W. A. 1964. Mode of action of substituted uracil herbicides. Weeds 12:129131.Google Scholar
9. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. California Agr. Exp Sta. Circ. 347. 32 p.Google Scholar
10. Hoffman, C. E., McGahen, J. W., and Sweester, P. B. 1964. Effect of substituted uracil herbicides on photosynthesis. Nature 202:577578.Google Scholar
11. Hogue, E. J. and Warren, G. F. 1968. Selectivity of linuron on tomato and parsnip. Weed Sci. 16:5154.Google Scholar
12. Sikka, H. C. and Davis, D. E. 1968. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of prometryne in cotton and soybeans Weed Sci. 16:474477.Google Scholar
13. Swann, C. W. and Buchholtz, K. P. 1966. Control and carbohydrate reserves of quackgrass as influenced by uracil herbicides. Weeds 14:103105.Google Scholar
14. Van Oorschot, J. L. P. 1965. Selectivity and physiological inactivation of some herbicides inhibiting photosynthesis. Weed Res. 5:8497.Google Scholar