Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T16:10:40.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Responses of Soybean (Glycine max) and Three C4 Grass Weeds to CO2 Enrichment During Drought

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David T. Patterson
David T. Patterson*
Affiliation:
U.S. Dep. Agric., Dep. Bot., Duke Univ., Durham, NC 27706
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In controlled-environment chambers at 29/33 C day/night and 1000 μE·m-2·s-1 photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD), increasing the CO2 concentration from 350 to 675 ppm (v/v) did not affect leaf area or total dry weight of well-watered plants of barnyardgrass [Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. # ECHCG], goosegrass [Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. # ELEIN], or southern crabgrass [Digitaria ciliaris (Retz.) Koel. # DIGSP] after 30 days. However, the whole plant transpiration rate per unit leaf area decreased, and the water use efficiency increased, in response to CO2 enrichment. In a subsequent experiment, with water availability limited by an imposed drought, CO2 enrichment reduced the effects of water stress and significantly increased leaf area and total dry weight of the three C4 grasses and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Ransom’]. Growth enhancement in response to CO2 enrichment was greater in soybean than in the C4 grasses. By improving their water economy, CO2 enrichment can increase the growth of both C3 and C4 plants under water stress. However, growth stimulation can be expected to be greater in C3 plants.

Keywords

Water stressECHCGELEINDIGSP
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , March 1986 , pp. 203 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Akita, S. and Tanaka, I. 1973. Studies on the mechanism of differences in photosynthesis among species. IV. The differential response in dry matter production between C3 and C4 species to atmospheric carbon dioxide enrichment. Proc. Crop Sci. Soc. Jpn. 42:288–295.Google Scholar
2. Baker, D. N. and Enoch, H. Z. 1983. Plant growth and development. Pages 107–130 in Lemon, E. R., ed. CO2 and Plants. The Response of Plants to Rising Levels of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
3. Bazzaz, F. A. and Carlson, R. W. 1984. The response of plants to elevated CO2. I. Competition among an assemblage of annuals at different levels of soil moisture. Oecologia (Berlin) 62:196–198.Google Scholar
4. Black, C. C., Chen, T. M., and Brown, R. H. 1969. Biochemical basis for plant competition. Weed Sci. 17:338–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Carlson, R. W. and Bazzaz, F. A. 1982. Photosynthetic and growth response to fumigation with SO2 at elevated CO2 for C3 and C4 plants. Oecologia (Berlin) 54:50–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Downs, R. J. and Hellmers, H. 1975. Environment and the Experimental Control of Plant Growth. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
7. Edwards, J. A., Reilly, J., Trabalka, J. R., and Reichle, D. E. 1984. An analysis of possible future atmospheric retention of fossil fuel CO2. Dep. Energy Rep. TR013, N.T.I.S., Dep. Commerce, Springfield, VA. 97 pp.Google Scholar
8. Hansen, H., Johnson, D., Lacis, A., Lebedeff, S., Lee, P., Rind, D., and Russel, G. 1981. Climate impact of increasing carbon dioxide. Science 213:957–966.Google Scholar
9. Hellmers, H. and Giles, L. J. 1979. Carbon dioxide: Critique I. Pages 229–234 in Tibbitts, T. W. and Kozlowski, T. T., eds. Controlled Environment Guidelines for Plant Research. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
10. Idso, S. B. 1980. The climatological significance of a doubling of earth's atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration. Science 207:1462–1463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Imai, K. and Murata, Y. 1979. Effect of carbon dioxide concentration on growth and dry matter production of crop plants. VII. Influence of light intensity and temperature on the effect of carbon dioxide-enrichment in some C3 and C4 species. Jpn. J. Crop Sci. 48:409–417.Google Scholar
12. Kimball, B. A. 1983. Carbon dioxide and agricultural yield: An assemblage and analysis of 770 prior observations. WCL Rpt. 14, USDA/ARS, U.S. Water Conservation Lab., Phoenix, AZ. 71 pp.Google Scholar
13. Kimball, B. A. and Idso, S. B. 1983. Increasing atmospheric CO2: Effects on crop yield, water use and climate. Agric. Water Manage. 7:55–72.Google Scholar
14. Kvet, J., Ondok, J. P., Necas, J., and Jarvis, P. G. 1971. Methods of growth analysis. Pages 343–391 in Sestak, Z., Catsky, J., and Jarvis, P. G., eds. Plant Photosynthetic Production: Manual of Methods. Dr. W. Junk, N.V., The Hague.Google Scholar
15. Manabe, S. and Wetherald, R. T. 1980. On the distribution of climate change resulting from an increase in CO2 content of the atmosphere. J. Atmos. Sci. 37:99–118.Google Scholar
16. Morison, J.I.L. and Gifford, R. M. 1984. Plant growth and water use with limited water supply in high CO2 concentrations. II. Plant dry weight, partitioning and water use efficiency. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 11:375–384.Google Scholar
17. Patterson, D. T. 1985. Comparative ecophysiology of weeds and crops. Pages 101–129 in Duke, S. O., ed. Weed Physiology. Vol. I. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
18. Patterson, D. T. and Flint, E. P. 1980. Potential effects of global atmospheric CO2 enrichment on the growth and competitiveness of C3 and C4 weed and crop plants. Weed Sci. 28:71–75.Google Scholar
19. Patterson, D. T. and Flint, E. P. 1982. Interacting effects of CO2 and nutrient concentration. Weed Sci. 30:389–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Patterson, D. T. and Flint, E. P. 1983. Comparative water relations, photosynthesis, and growth of soybean (Glycine max) and seven associated weeds. Weed Sci. 31:318–323.Google Scholar
21. Patterson, D. T., Flint, E. P., and Beyers, J. L. 1984. Effects of CO2 enrichment on competition between a C4 weed and a C3 crop. Weed Sci. 32:101–105.Google Scholar
22. Pearcy, R. W. and Bjorkman, O. 1983. Physiological effects. Pages 65–105 in Lemon, E. R., ed. CO2 and Plants. The Response of Plants to Rising Levels of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
23. Potvin, C. and Strain, B. R. 1985. Effects of CO2 enrichment and temperature on growth of 2 C4 weeds, Echinochloa crus-galli and Eleusine indica . Can. J. Bot. 63:1495–1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Rogers, H. H., Thomas, J. F., and Bingham, G. E. 1983. Response of agronomic and forest species to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. Science 220:428–429.Google Scholar
25. Scholander, P. F., Hammel, H. T., Hemmingsen, E. A., and Bradstreet, E. D. 1984. Hydrostatic pressure and osmotic potential in leaves of mangroves and some other plants. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 52:119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Sionit, N. and Patterson, D. T. 1984. Responses of C4 grasses to atmospheric CO2 enrichment. I. Effect of irradiance. Oecologia (Berlin) 65:30–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. Sionit, N. and Patterson, D. T. 1985. Responses of C4 grasses to atmospheric CO2 enrichment. II. Effect of water stress. Crop Sci. 25:533–537.Google Scholar
28. Strain, B. R. and Bazzaz, F. A. 1983. Terrestrial plant communities. Pages 177–222 in Lemon, E. R., ed. CO2 and Plants. The Response of Plants to Rising Levels of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
29. Wong, S. C. 1980. Elevated atmospheric partial pressure of CO2 and plant growth. I. Interactions of nitrogen nutrition and photosynthetic capacity in C3 and C4 plants. Oecologia (Berlin) 44: 68–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar