Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T19:41:38.956Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Rotational Crops to Soil Residues of Chlorsulfuron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Mark A. Peterson  and
W. Eugene Arnold
Mark A. Peterson
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, SD 57007
W. Eugene Arnold
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., South Dakota State Univ., Brookings, SD 57007
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The response of corn (Zea mays L. ‘Sokota TS 46’), flax (Linum usitatissimum L. ‘Culbert 79’), grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Merr. ‘Sokota 466’), soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Corsoy 79’], and sunflowers (Helianthus annuus L. ‘Sokata 4000’) to soil residues 12 and 24 months after application of 17, 34, and 68 g ai/ha chlorsulfuron {2-chloro-N-[[(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl) amino] carbonyl] benzenesulfonamide} was determined at two locations, Redfield and Watertown, in eastern South Dakota. All crops at Redfield were injured significantly at 17 g/ha, 12 months after application as determined by plant dry weight and visual evaluations. Corn and sorghum were the most susceptible while flax was the least susceptible. Injury at Watertown was significantly less than at Redfield. Differences in carryover were related to a lower soil pH at Watertown.

Keywords

Zea maysLinum usitatissimumSorghum bicolorGlycine maxHelianthus annuussoil pH
Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Information
Weed Science , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , January 1986 , pp. 131 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Aandahl, A. R. 1982. Soils of the Great Plains; Land Use, Crops and Grasses. Univ. of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NB, and London. 282 pp.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous. 1983. Herbicide Handbook, 5th ed., Weed Science Society of America, Champaign, IL. 515 pp.Google Scholar
3. Anonymous. 1972. Soil survey laboratory methods and procedures for collecting soil samples. Soil Cons. Serv., USDA, Washington, DC. 63 pp.Google Scholar
4. Armstrong, D. E. and Chesters, G. 1968. Adsorption catalyzed chemical hydrolysis of atrazine. Environ. Sci. Tech. 2:683–689.Google Scholar
5. Brewster, B. D. and Appleby, A. P. 1983. Response of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and rotation crops to chlorsulfuron. Weed Sci. 31:861–865.Google Scholar
6. Burnside, O. C., Fenster, C. R., and Wicks, G. A. 1963. Dissipation and leaching of monuron, simazine, and atrazine in Nebraska soils. Weeds 11:209–213.Google Scholar
7. Dyer, W. E. and Fay, P. K. 1984. The effect of chlorsulfuron soil residues on 11 crops, 36 months after herbicide application. Res. Prog. Rep., West. Soc. Weed Sci. Page 226.Google Scholar
8. Dyer, W. E. and Fay, P. K. 1983. The effect of chlorsulfuron soil residues on seven rotational crops grown in Montana. Res. Prog. Rep., West. Soc. Weed Sci. Pages 156–157.Google Scholar
9. Harter, R. D. and Ahlrichs, J. L. 1967. Determination of clay surface acidity by infrared spectroscopy. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 31:30–33.Google Scholar
10. Helling, C. S. 1976. Dinitroaniline herbicides in soils. J. Environ. Qual. 5:1–15.Google Scholar
11. Hiltbold, A. E. and Buchanan, G. A. 1977. Influence of soil pH on persistence of atrazine in the field. Weed Sci. 25:515–520.Google Scholar
12. Li, Gwo-Chem and Felbeck, G. T. 1972. Atrazine hydrolysis as catalyzed by humic acids. Soil Sci. 114:201–209.Google Scholar
13. Merkle, M. G., Bovey, R. W., and Davis, F. S. 1967. Factors affecting the persistence of picloram in soil. Agron. J. 59:413–415.Google Scholar
14. Meikle, R. W., Youngson, C. R., Hedlund, R. T., Goring, C.A.I., Hamaker, J. W., and Addington, W. W. 1973. Measurement and prediction of picloram disappearance rates from soil. Weed Sci. 21:546–555.Google Scholar
15. Nalewaja, J. D. and Miller, S. D. 1981. Weed control in flax. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res. Rep. 38:125.Google Scholar
16. Norwood, C. A. 1983. Broadleaf weed control with postemergence herbicides. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. Res Rep. 40:60.Google Scholar
17. Norwood, C. A. 1983. Effect of chlorsulfuron on grain sorghum. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 38:108.Google Scholar
18. Roeth, F. W., Lavy, T. L., and Burnside, O. C. 1969. Atrazine degradation in two soil profiles. Weed Sci. 17:202–205.Google Scholar
19. Sampson, T. C., Thill, D. C., and Callihan, R. H. 1982. Effect of chlorsulfuron soil persistence on biomass production of five crops. Res. Prog. Rep., West. Soc. Weed Sci. Pages 229–231.Google Scholar
20. Shea, P. J. 1982. Soil adsorption characteristics of chlorsulfuron. Proc. North Cent. Weed Con. Conf. 37:54.Google Scholar
21. Thill, D. C., Zamora, D. L., and Salhoff, C. R. 1982. The persistence of several soil residual herbicides under irrigated conditions. Res. Prog. Rep., West. Weed Sci. Soc. Pages 232–234.Google Scholar