Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T23:56:02.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Cucumber (Cucumis sativus) to Annual Weeds and Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. M. Menges  and
Simon Tamez
R. M. Menges
Affiliation:
Subtrop. Fruit and Veg. Res., Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric., Weslaco, TX 78596
Simon Tamez
Affiliation:
Subtrop. Fruit and Veg. Res., Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric., Weslaco, TX 78596
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weed and cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. ‘Poinsett’) growth was studied where herbicides were soil-applied or applied to emerged weeds in the established crop. Cucumber yields were decreased at least 36% in 2 of 5 yr when weeds interfered for 4 weeks after emergence. Sequential applications of bensulide [O,O-diisopropyl phosphorodithioate S-ester with N-(2-mercaptoethyl)benzenesulfonamide] applied preplant and incorporated (PPI) + trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine) applied postemergence and incorporated (POI) were outstanding and controlled Japanese millet (Echinochloa crus-galli Link. var. frumentacea), Texas panicum (Panicum texanum Buckl.), Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.), and common purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) without affecting the growth or yield of cucumber. Compared with bensulide, the selectivity of soil-incorporated butralin [4-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-N-(1-methylpropyl)-2,6-dinitrobenzenamine] with cucumber was limited. Laboratory bioassays showed that under warm field soil conditions, PPI applications of 1.7 kg/ha of butralin persisted more than 2 months, but were dissipated after 4 months. Ethalfluralin [N-ethyl-N-(2-methyl-2-propenyl)-2,6-dinitro-4-(trifluoromethyl)benzenamine] reduced cucumber yields only when it was soil-incorporated to the crop-seed depth at planting. Applications to soil of bensulide + DCPA (dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate) stunted cucumber plants, reduced leaf area, increased leaf thickness, and caused higher near-infrared (0.75 to 1.34 μm) leaf reflectance.

Keywords

Herbicide selectivityadjuvantAmaranthusEchinochloabioassay
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , March 1981 , pp. 200 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Allen, W. A. and Richardson, A. J. 1971. Calibration of laboratory spectrophotometer for specular light by means of stacked glass plates. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 42:1813–1817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Ashley, R. A. 1973. Evaluation of herbicides and herbicide combinations for weed control in seeded cucumbers and summer squash. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 27:226–231.Google Scholar
3. Beste, C. E. 1979. Herbicide evaluations for cucumbers (Abstr.) Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 33:157.Google Scholar
4. Blumenfeld, T. and Kleifeld, Y. 1976. Effects of method and time of application on the herbicidal activity of dinitroaniline herbicides on cucurbits (Abstr.) Phytoparasitica 4:2.Google Scholar
5. Burgis, D. S. 1965. Evaluation of herbicides on crookneck squash and cucumber. Proc. South. Weed Conf. 18:257–262.Google Scholar
6. Glaze, N. C. 1975. Weed control in cucumber and watermelon. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 100:207–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Heilman, M. D., Gonzales, C. L., Swanson, W. A., and Rippert, W. J. 1968. Adaptation of a linear transducer for measuring leaf thickness. Agron. J. 60:578–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Hodges, L. and Talbert, R. E. 1977. New herbicides for high density cucumbers. Pages 41–42 in Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Google Scholar
9. Ivany, J. A. and Sweet, R. D. 1971. Muskmelon and cucumber response to dinoseb and other herbicides. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 25:175–179.Google Scholar
10. Jacques, G. L. and Harvey, R. G. 1979. Dinitroaniline herbicide phytotoxicity as influenced by soil moisture and herbicide vaporization. Weed Sci. 27:536–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Kennedy, J. M. and Talbert, R. E. 1977. Comparative persistence of dinitroaniline type herbicides on the soil surface. Weed Sci. 25:373–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Lange, A. 1968. Weed control in cucurbits. Calif. Agric. 22:8–9.Google Scholar
13. LeBaron, H. M. 1964. Chemical weed control in cucurbits. Proc. Northeast. Weed Contr. Conf. 18:45–49.Google Scholar
14. Lynd, J. Q., Rieck, C. E., and Santelmann, P. W. 1966. Soil components determining bensulide phytotoxicity. Agron. J. 58:508–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Locascio, S. J. 1978. Weed control in cucurbits with ethalfluralin, oryzalin, and pendimethalin. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 13:152–158.Google Scholar
16. Menges, R. M. and Hubbard, J. L. 1968. Influence of soil incorporation and climate on herbicides in cantaloup. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 92:446–454.Google Scholar
17. Menges, R. M. and Hubbard, J. L. 1970. Phytotoxicity of bensulide and trifluralin in several soils. Weed Sci. 18:244–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Menges, R. M., Longbrake, T. D., and Tamez, S. 1972. Effect of soil incorporation on selectivity, movement, and persistence of herbicides in watermelon plantings. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 97:168–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Monaco, T. J. and Miller, C. H. 1972. Herbicide activity in close-spaced, pickling cucumbers. Weed Sci. 20:545–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Monaco, T. J. and Miller, C. H. 1976. Evaluation of herbicides from cucurbits. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 28:224–231.Google Scholar
21. Noll, C. J. 1977. Weed control in cucumbers in a conventional planting and in a stale seedbed. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 31:248–251.Google Scholar
22. Ogle, W. L. 1969. A further report on chemical weed control in cucumbers, cantaloups, watermelons. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 22:215–222.Google Scholar
23. Wilson, H. P., Regan, J. B., Smith, N., and Ilnicki, R. D. 1967. Weed control in cucumbers – a progress report. Proc. Northeast. Weed Control Conf. 21:72–75.Google Scholar
24. Woolley, J. T. 1971. Reflectance and transmittance of light by leaves. Plant Physiol. 47:656–662.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv. 1965. Pages 62–63 in Losses in agriculture. U.S. Dep. Agric. Handbook 291.Google Scholar