Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T19:24:12.753Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Resistance of Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense) Ecotypes to a Rust Pathogen (Puccinia obtegens)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Sherry K. Turner
Affiliation:
Agric. Exp. Stn., Montana State Univ., Bozeman 59717
Peter K. Fay
Affiliation:
Agric. Exp. Stn., Montana State Univ., Bozeman 59717
Eugene L. Sharp
Affiliation:
Agric. Exp. Stn., Montana State Univ., Bozeman 59717
David C. Sands
Affiliation:
Agric. Exp. Stn., Montana State Univ., Bozeman 59717

Abstract

Puccinia obtegens (Link) Tul., an autoecious rust pathogen, is a potential biological control agent of Canada thistle [Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.]. Ten ecotypes of Canada thistle were inoculated with uredospores of P. obtegens and sporulation was observed on all ecotypes. Infection types varied among and within ecotypes, indicating that host-resistance is one factor limiting rust infection. No correlation was found between Canada thistle susceptibility to the rust and host plant ecotype classification, stomatal density, amount of leaf pubescence, or spore germinability on leaf surfaces.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Andres, L. A., Davis, C. J., Harris, P., and Wapshere, A. J. 1976. Biological control of weeds. In Huffaker, C. B. and Messenger, P. S., eds. Theory and Practice of Biological Control. Academic Press, New York. 788 pp.Google Scholar
2. Arthur, J. C. 1934. Manual of the Rusts in the United States and Canada. Purdue Res. Foundation. Lafayette, Indiana. 438 pp.Google Scholar
3. Bell, A. A. 1974. Biochemical bases of resistance of plants to pathogens. In Maxwell, G. and Harris, F. A., eds. Proceedings of the Summer Institute on Biological Control of Plant Insects and Diseases. The University Press of Mississippi. 647 pp.Google Scholar
4. Boyette, C. D., Templeton, G. E., and Smith, R. J. Jr. 1979. Control of winged waterprimrose (Jussiaea decurrens) and northern jointvetch (Aeschynomene virginica) with fungal pathogens. Weed Sci. 27:497501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Buller, A. H. R. 1950. A review of cytological work on the sexual process in heterothallic Uredinales. Pages 313320 in Researches on Fungi, Vol VII. The Univ. of Toronto Press, Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Cullen, J. M., Kable, P. K. and Catt, M. 1973. Epidemic spread of a rust imported for biological control. Nature 244:462464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Delp, D. J. 1954. Effect of temperature and humidity on the grape powdery mildew fungus. Phytopathology 44:615626.Google Scholar
8. Detmers, F. 1927. Canada thistle, Cirsium arvense Tourn. Ohio Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull No. 414. Wooster, Ohio. 45 pp.Google Scholar
9. Halsted, B. D. 1894. Weeds and their most common fungi. New Jersey Exp. Stn. Rep. 1002.Google Scholar
10. Johnson, H. B. 1975. Plant pubescence: An ecological perspective. Bot. Rev. 41:233258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Moore, R. J. 1975. The biology of Canadian weeds. 13. Cirsium arvense (L.). Scop. Can. J. Plant Sci. 55:10331048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Stakman, E. C. and Harrar, J. G. 1957. Principles of Plant Pathology. The Ronald Press Co., New York. 581 pp.Google Scholar
13. Wilson, C. L. 1969. Use of plant pathogens in weed control, Ann. Rev. Phytopath. 7:411433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar