Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-04T12:04:10.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phytotoxicity and Translocation of Glyphosate in the Potato (Solanum tuberosum) Prior to Tuber Initiation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

D. Smid
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic. and Landscape Arch., Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164. Correspondence should be addressed to L. K. H.
L. K. Hiller
Affiliation:
Dep. Hortic. and Landscape Arch., Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164. Correspondence should be addressed to L. K. H.

Abstract

Field and greenhouse experiments were conducted to observe and measure the phytotoxicity of glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] to potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L. ‘Russet Burbank’) applied at different stages of growth and to determine if glyphosate was translocated into the original mother tuber (seed piece) prior to initiation of daughter tubers. Glyphosate injury symptoms appeared 1 day after treatment and at least 50% of the foliage was necrotic within 7 days. Significant decreases in plant height, shoot and root dry matter content, and daughter tuber production were recorded at the 0.28- and 0.56-kg/ha rates. Higher rates of 1.12 and 2.24 kg/ha did not give further significant reductions. Maximum levels of 14C activity accumulated in all plant parts 4 days after application of the 14 C-glyphosate. The 14 C-glyphosate accumulated primarily in the apical meristem and roots. Extremely low levels of 14 C activity were detected in the mother tuber regardless of plant age when treated. Phytotoxic effects on the eyes of the mother tuber increased in severity with increasing rates of glyphosate as evidenced by abnormal sprouting.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Baur, J. R., Bovey, R. W., and Veech, J. A. 1977. Growth responses in sorghum and wheat induced by glyphosate. Weed Sci. 25:238240.Google Scholar
2. Claus, J. S. and Behrens, R. 1976. Glyphosate translocation and quackgrass rhizome bud kill. Weed Sci. 24:149152.Google Scholar
3. Cox, T. I. 1974. Control of volunteer potatoes with glyphosate. Proc. N. Z. Weed Pest Control Conf. 27:167168.Google Scholar
4. Denny, F. E. 1929. Role of mother tuber in growth of potato plant. Bot. Gaz. 87:157194.Google Scholar
5. Fernandez, C. H. and Bayer, D. E. 1977. Penetration of glyphosate in bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon . Weed Sci. 25:396400.Google Scholar
6. Fernow, K. H. 1959. Chemical elimination of volunteer potatoes. Am. Potato J. 36:407409.Google Scholar
7. Gottrup, O., O'Sullivan, P. A., Schraa, R. H., and Vanden Born, W. H. 1976. Uptake, translocation, metabolism, and selectivity of glyphosate in Canada thistle and leafy spurge. Weed Res. 16:197201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Haderlie, L. C., Slife, F. W., and Butler, H. S. 1978. 14C-glyphosate absorption and translocation in germinating maize (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max) seeds and in soybean plants. Weed Res. 18:269273.Google Scholar
9. Headford, D. W. R. 1962. Sprout development and subsequent plant growth. Eur. Potato J. 5:1422.Google Scholar
10. Hiller, L. K. and Koller, D. C. 1979. Potato growth responses in arcillite and sand. HortScience 14:534536.Google Scholar
11. Jordan, T. N. 1977. Effects of temperature and relative humidity on the toxicity of glyphosate to bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon . Weed Sci. 25:448451.Google Scholar
12. Kells, J. J. and Rieck, C. E. 1979. Effects of illuminance and time on accumulation of glyphosate in johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense . Weed Sci. 27:235237.Google Scholar
13. Lumkes, L. M. 1974. Research on the control of volunteer potatoes in The Netherlands. Proc. Br. Weed Control Conf. 12: 10311040.Google Scholar
14. Lutman, P. J. W. 1974. Experiments examining the potential of ten residual herbicides for the control of volunteer potatoes. Proc. Br. Weed Control Conf. 12:293299.Google Scholar
15. Lutman, P. J. W. 1977. Investigations into some aspects of the biology of potatoes as weeds. Weed Res. 17:123132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Lutman, P. J. W. 1978. The activity of glyphosate and aminotriazole against volunteer potato plants and their daughter tubers. Weed Res. 18:6570.Google Scholar
17. Moorby, J. 1968. The influence of carbohydrate and mineral nutrient supply on the growth of potato tubers. Ann. Bot. 32: 5768.Google Scholar
18. Putnam, A. R. 1976. Fate of glyphosate in deciduous fruit trees. Weed Sci. 24:425430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Sprankle, P., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1975. Absorption, action, and translocation of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 23:235240.Google Scholar
20. Thomas, P. E. and Smith, D. R. 1978. Control of potato volunteers to achieve virus control. Am. Potato J. 55:397.Google Scholar
21. Van der Zaag, D. E. 1977. The importance of groundkeepers and volunteer potato plants. Symp. Control Volunteer Potato Plants, Wageningen, The Netherlands. 47 pp.Google Scholar
22. Wills, G. D. 1978. Factors affecting toxicity and translocation of glyphosate in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum . Weed Sci. 26: 509513.Google Scholar
23. Wyrill, J. B. and Burnside, O. C. 1976. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of 2,4-D and glyphosate in common milkweed and hemp dogbane. Weed Sci. 24:557566.Google Scholar
24. Zandstra, B. H. and Nishimoto, R. K. 1977. Movement and activity of glyphosate in purple nutsedge. Weed Sci. 25:268274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar