Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T06:51:41.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Physiological assessment of non–target site restistance in multiple-resistant junglerice (Echinochloa colona)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2019

Christopher E. Rouse Open the ORCID record for Christopher E. Rouse [Opens in a new window] ,
Nilda Roma-Burgos Open the ORCID record for Nilda Roma-Burgos [Opens in a new window]  and
Bianca Assis Barbosa Martins
Christopher E. Rouse
Affiliation:
Research Scientist, FMC Corporation, Newark, DE, USA; Former Graduate Assistant, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA
Nilda Roma-Burgos*
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA
Bianca Assis Barbosa Martins
Affiliation:
BASF SE, Limburgerhof, Germany
*
Author for correspondence: Nilda Roma-Burgos, Altheimer Laboratory, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, 1366 W. Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704. Email: nburgos@uark.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Herbicide-resistant Echinochloa species are among the most problematic weeds in agricultural crops globally. Recurring herbicide selection pressure in the absence of diverse management practices has resulted in greater than 20% of sampled Echinochloa populations from rice (Oryza sativa L.) fields demonstrating multiple resistance to herbicides in Arkansas, USA. We assessed the resistance profile and potential mechanisms of resistance in a multiple herbicide–resistant junglerice [Echinochloa colona (L.) Link] (ECO-R) population. Whole-plant and laboratory bioassays were conducted to identify the potential mechanisms of non–target site resistance in this population. ECO-R was highly resistant to propanil (>37,800 g ha−1) and quinclorac (>17,920 g ha−1) and had elevated tolerance to cyhalofop (R/S = 1.9) and glufosinate (R/S = 1.2) compared to the susceptible standard. The addition of glufosinate (590 g ha−1) to cyhalofop (314 g ha−1), propanil (4,500 g ha−1), or quinclorac (560 g ha−1) controlled ECO-R 100%. However, cyhalofop applied with propanil (48% control) or quinclorac (15% control) was antagonistic. The application of the known metabolic enzyme inhibitors malathion, carbaryl, and piperonyl butoxide increased control of ECO-R with propanil (>75%) but not with other herbicides. Neither absorption nor translocation of [14C]cyhalofop or propanil was different between ECO-R and ECO-S. [14C]Quinclorac absorption was also similar between ECO-R and ECO-S; however, translocation of quinclorac into tissues above the treated leaf of ECO-R was >20% higher than that in ECO-S. The abundance of metabolites was higher (∼10%) in the treated leaves of ECO-R than in ECO-S beginning 48 h after treatment. The activity of β-cyanoalanine synthase, which detoxifies hydrogen cyanide, was not different between ECO-R and ECO-S following quinclorac treatment. Resistance to propanil was due to herbicide detoxification by metabolic enzymes. Resistance to quinclorac was due to a detoxification mechanism yet to be understood. The reduction in sensitivity to cyhalofop and glufosinate might be a secondary effect of the mechanisms conferring high resistance to propanil and quinclorac.

Keywords

Franck E. Dayan, Colorado State Universityβ-cyanoalanine synthasecyanide detoxificationcyhalofopglufosinateelevated tolerancemetabolic resistancemultiple resistanceresistance preconditioningquinclorac metabolismxenobiotic detoxification
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 67 , Issue 6 , November 2019 , pp. 622 - 632
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alarcón-Reverte, R, García, A, Urzúa, J, Fischer, AJ (2013) Resistance to glyphosate in junglerice (Echinochloa colona) from California. Weed Sci 61:48–54 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnwell, P, Cobb, AH (1994) Graminicide antagonism by broadleaf weed herbicides. Pest Manag Sci 41:77–85 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, SCH (1983) Crop mimicry in weeds I. Econ Bot 37:255–282 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckie, HJ, Tardif, FJ (2012) Herbicide cross resistance in weeds. Crop Prot 35:15–28 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgos, NR, Rouse, CE, Tseng, TM, Abugho, SB, Hussain, T, Salas, RA, Singh, V, Singh, S (2015) resistance profiles of Echinochloa colona in Arkansas. Page 22 in 68th Southern Weed Science Society Annual Meeting. Savannah, GA: Southern Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Carey, VF III, Hoagland, RE, Ronald, ET (1995) Verification and distribution of propanil-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in Arkansas. Weed Technol 9:366–372 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, VF III, Hoagland, RE, Talbert, RE (1997) Resistance mechanism of propanil-resistant barnyardgrass: II. In-vivo metabolism of the propanil molecule. Pestic Sci 49:333–338 3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, BS, Jabran, K, Mahajan, G (2017) Rice Production Worldwide. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. 563 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colby, S (1967) Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations Weeds 15:20–22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darmency, H, Menchari, Y, Le Corre, V, Délye, C (2015) Fitness cost due to herbicide resistance may trigger genetic background evolution. Evolution 69:271–278 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Délye, C (2013) Unravelling the genetic bases of non-target-site-based resistance (NTSR) to herbicides: a major challenge for weed science in the forthcoming decade. Pest Manag Sci 69:176–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, MD, Shukla, A (2000) Altered target sites as a mechanism of herbicide resistance. Crop Prot 19:881–889 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, AJ, Bayer, DE, Carriere, MD, Ateh, CM, Yim, K-O (2000) Mechanisms of resistance to bispyribac-sodium in an Echinochloa phyllopogon accession. Pestic Biochem Physiol 68:156–165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint, J, Cornelius, P, Barrett, M (1988) Analyzing herbicide interactions: a statistcal treatment of Colby’s method. Weed Technol 23:304–309 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, SN, Gressel, J, Mangel, M (1998) A revolving dose strategy to delay the evolution of both quantitative vs major monogene resistances to pesticides and drugs. Int J Pest Manag 44:161–180 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossmann, K, Kwiatkowski, J (1995) Evidence for a causative role of cyanide, derived from ethylene biosynthesis, in the herbicidal mode of action of quinclorac in barnyardgrass. Pestic Biochem Physiol 51:15–160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossmann, K, Kwiatkowski, J (2000) The mechanism of quinclorac selectivity in grasses. Pestic Biochem Physiol 66:83–91 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossmann, K, Scheltrup, F (1997) Selective induction of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) synthase activity is involved in the selectivity of the auxin herbicide quinclorac between barnyardgrass and rice. Pestic Biochem Physiol 58:145–153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I (2014) Global perspective of herbicide-resistant weeds. Pest Manag Sci 70:1306–1315 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heap, I (2019) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. www.weedscience.org. Accessed: July 26, 2019Google Scholar
Hoagland, RE, Graf, G, Handel, ED (1974) Hydrolysis of 3’,4’-dichloropropionanilide by plant aryl acylamidases. Weed Res 14:371–374 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoagland, RE, Norsworthy, JK, Carey, F, Talbert, RE (2004) Metabolically based resistance to the herbicide propanil in Echinochloa species. Weed Sci 52:475–486 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreuz, K, Tommasini, R, Martinoia, E (1996) Old enzymes for a new job. Plant Physiol 111:349–353 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lovelace, ML, Talbert, RE, Hoagland, RE, Scherder, EF (2007) Quinclorac absorption and translocation characteristics in quinclorac-and propanil-resistant and-susceptible barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) biotypes. Weed Technol 21:683–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malik, M, Burgos, N, Talbert, R (2010) Confirmation and control of propanil-resistant and quinclorac-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in rice. Weed Technol 24:226–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nandula, VK, Vencill, WK (2015) Herbicide absorption and translocation in plants using radioisotopes. Weed Sci 63:140–151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW, Barrett, M (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci 60:31–62 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasad, R, Shivay, YS, Kumar, D (2017) Current status, chllenges, and oppurtunities in rice production. Pages 1–32 in Chauhan, BS, Jabran, K, Mahajan, G, eds. Rice Production Worldwide. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Google Scholar
Rouse, CE, Roma-Burgos, N, Norsworthy, JK, Tseng, TM, Starkey, C, Scott, RC (2018) Echinochloa resistance to herbicides continues to increase in Arkansas rice fields. Weed Technol 32:34–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherder, EF, Talbert, RE, Lovelace, ML (2005) Antagonism of cyhalofop grass activity by halosulfuron, triclopyr, and propanil. Weed Technol 19:934–941 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbert, RE, Burgos, NR (2007) History and management of herbicide-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in Arkansas rice. Weed Technol 21:324–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valverde, BE, Riches, CR, Caseley, JC (2000) Prevention and management of herbicide resistant weeds in rice: experiences from Central America with Echinochloa colona. San José, Costa Rica: Cámara de Insumos Agropecuarios. 139 pGoogle Scholar
Van Wychen, L (2017) 2017 Survey of the most common and troublesome weeds in grass crops, pasture and turf in the United States and Canada. Weed Science Society of America National Weed Survey Dataset. http://wssa.net/wp-content/uploads/2017-Weed-Survey_Grass-crops.xlsx. Accessed: September 9, 2019Google Scholar
Vila-Aiub, MM, Neve, P, Powles, SB (2009) Fitness costs associated with evolved herbicide resistance genes in plants. New Phytol 184:751 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wailes, EJ, Chavez, EC (2012) World Rice Outlook International Rice Baseline with Deterministic and Stochastic Projections. https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/123203. Accessed: September 9, 2019Google Scholar
Workman, D (2018) Rice Exports by Country. WTex. http://www.worldstopexports.com/rice-exports-country. Accessed: September 9, 2019Google Scholar
Yang, X, Fuller, DQ, Huan, X, Perry, L, Li, Q, Li, Z, Zhang, J, Ma, Z, Zhuang, Y, Jiang, L, Ge, Y, Lu, H (2015) Barnyardgrasses were processed with rice around 10000 years ago. Sci Rep 5:16251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yasuor, H, Milan, M, Eckert, JW, Fischer, AJ (2012) Quinclorac resistance: a concerted hormonal and enzymatic effort in Echinochloa phyllopogon . Pest Manag Sci 68:108–115 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Rouse et al. supplementary material

Rouse et al. supplementary material

Download Rouse et al. supplementary material(File)
File 29.6 KB