Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T15:49:28.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Olathe’ Pinto Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) Response to Postemergence Imazethapyr and Bentazon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Troy A. Bauer ,
Karen A. Renner  and
Donald Penner
Troy A. Bauer
Affiliation:
Mich. State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824-1325
Karen A. Renner
Affiliation:
Mich. State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824-1325
Donald Penner
Affiliation:
Mich. State Univ., East Lansing, MI 48824-1325
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dry bean producers have limited postemergence broadleaf weed control options. The purpose of this research was to determine whether bentazon increased dry edible bean tolerance to postemergence imazethapyr applications. Imazethapyr and bentazon were applied with a petroleum oil adjuvant to ‘Olathe’ pinto bean in the field and greenhouse. Imazethapyr injured pinto bean 7 DAT in the field and greenhouse. Chlorophyll a content, a quantitative measure of bean chlorosis, decreased compared to the untreated control following imazethapyr application. When 840 g ha−1 of bentazon was tank-mixed with 53 g ha−1 of imazethapyr, bean injury decreased and chlorophyll a increased compared to imazethapyr alone. Fifty three g ha−1 of imazethapyr delayed physiological maturity by 8 and 15 d compared to the untreated control in 1991 and 1992, respectively. Pinto bean seed yields were not reduced compared to the untreated control. When 840 g ha−1 of bentazon was tank-mixed with 53 g ha−1 of imazethapyr, maturity was not delayed. 14C-Imazethapyr absorption decreased by more than 40% and translocation of 14C from the treated leaf decreased by more than 50% when 14C-imazethapyr was tank-mixed with bentazon compared to 14C-imazethapyr alone. The addition of 20 mM Na-acetate inhibited absorption of 14C-imazethapyr, but did not inhibit translocation of 14C. The decreased absorption and translocation of imazethapyr when tank-mixed with bentazon likely accounts for the safening effect observed in greenhouse and field studies.

Keywords

Dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) #3 PHAVUbentazon, [3-(1-methylethyl)-(1H)-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-(4(3H)-one 2,2 dioxide]imazethapyr,2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-5-ethyl-3-pyridinecarboxylic acidInteractionantagonismPHAVUAMAREABUTH
Type
Weed Management
Information
Weed Science , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , June 1995 , pp. 276 - 282
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

1. Bauer, T. A., Renner, K. A., and Penner, D. 1994. Response of selected weed species to postemergence imazethapyr and bentazon. Weed Technol. (In press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bauer, T. A., Renner, K. A., Penner, D., and Kelly, J. K. 1994. Pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) varietal tolerance to postemergence imazethapyr. Weed Sci. (In press).Google Scholar
3. Cambell, J. R. and Penner, D. 1982. Compatibility of diclofop and BAS 9052 with bentazon. Weed Sci. 30:458–462.Google Scholar
4. Cantwell, J. R., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Imazethapyr for weed control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 3:596–601.Google Scholar
5. Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:20–22.Google Scholar
6. Cole, T. A., Wehtje, G. R., Wilcut, J. W., and Hicks, T. V. 1989. Behavior of imazethapyr in soybeans (Glycine max), peanuts (Arachis hypogaea), and selected weeds. Weed Sci. 37:639–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Devine, M. D., Bestman, H. D., and Vanden Born, W. H. 1990. Physiological basis for different phloem mobilities of chlorsulfuron and clopyralid. Weed Sci. 38:1–9.Google Scholar
8. Fuerst, E. P. and Norman, M. A. 1991. Interactions of herbicides with photosynthetic electron transport. Weed Sci. 39:458–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Hartzler, K. K. and Foy, C. L. 1983. Compatibility of BAS 9052 OH with acifluorfen and bentazon. Weed Sci. 31:597–599.Google Scholar
10. Inskeep, W. P. and Bloom, P. R. 1985. Extinction coefficients of chlorophyll a and b in N,N-dimethylformamide and 80% acetone. Plant Physiol. 77:483–485.Google Scholar
11. Mahoney, M. D. and Penner, D. 1975. Bentazon translocation and metabolism in soybean and navy bean. Weed Sci. 23:265–270.Google Scholar
12. Penner, D. 1989. The impact of adjuvants on herbicide antagonism. Weed Technol. 3:227–231.Google Scholar
13. Renner, K. A. and Powell, G. E. 1988. Dry edible bean tolerance to postemergence herbicides. Proc. North Cent. Weed Cont. Conf. 43:36.Google Scholar
14. Rhodes, G. N. and Coble, H. D. 1984. Influence of bentazon on absorption and translocation of sethoxydim in goosegrass (Eleusine indica L.). Weed Sci. 32:595–597.Google Scholar
15. Sorensen, V. M., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1987. The interaction of acifluorfen and bentazon in herbicidal combinations. Weed Sci. 35:449–456.Google Scholar
16. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Analysis of Variance III: Factorial Experiments. Page 336–376 in Principles and procedures of statistics: biometrical approach. 2nd ed. Google Scholar
17. Suwanketnikon, R., Hatzios, K. K., and Penner, D. 1982. The site of electron transport inhibition of bentazon (3-isopropyl-1H-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-(4)3H-one 2,2-dioxide) in isolated chloroplasts. Can. J. Bot. 60:409–412.Google Scholar
18. Vencill, W. K., Wilson, H. P., Hines, T. E., and Hatzios, K. K. 1990. Common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) and rotational crop response to imazethapyr in pea (Pisum sativum) and snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Technol. 4:39–43.Google Scholar
19. Wanamarta, G., Penner, D., and Kells, J. J. 1989. The basis of bentazon antagonism on sethoxydim absorption and activity. Weed Sci. 37:400–404.Google Scholar
20. Wilson, R. G. and Miller, S. D. 1991. Dry edible bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) response to imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 5:22–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Wilson, R. G. 1989. New herbicides for weed control in established alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Weed Technol. 3:523–526.Google Scholar
22. WSSA Herbicide Handbook Committee. 1989. Herbicide Handbook. 6th ed. Champaign, IL.Google Scholar