Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T10:39:26.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Morphological Development and Germination of Dwarf Spikerush (Eleocharis coloradoensis)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Richard R. Yeo*
Affiliation:
Sci. Ed. Admin., U.S. Dep. Agric., Davis, CA 95616

Abstract

Dwarf spikerush [Eleocharis coloradoensis (Britt.) Gilly] is an aquatic plant that will displace waterweeds. It was studied to obtain information that will help to manage unwanted vegetation in natural aquatic situations. The morphology of seed and tubers was examined at the light- and scanning-electron microscope levels. Inflorescences were found to bear 3 to 12 florets that matured acropetally. The pericarp was made up largely of rows of annulated cells covered with a water-soluble, waxlike substance that leached away when stored in water at 4 to 6 C. The seed coat consisted of three layers. Each layer contained lipids, giving evidence that they were composed of cutin. When the seed germinated, the cotyledonary sheath emerged first, followed by the culms. Tubers formed and matured in about 30 days. The shoot apices of tubers each had two buds that were protected by five to seven overlapping membraneous leaf scales. When tubers sprouted the longest bud grew first. The second bud contained the culm meristem.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Benes, K. 1964. Detection of lipids in the plant meristematic cell with the aid of Sudan Black staining. Biol. Plant. 6:142151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Esau, K. 1965. Plant Anatomy. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York. 767 pp.Google Scholar
3. Foster, A. S. and Gifford, E. M. 1974. Comparative morphology of vascular plants. 2nd ed. W. H. Freeman and Co. San Francisco. 751 pp.Google Scholar
4. Gilly, C. 1941. The status of Eleocharis parvula var. anacheata (Torr.) Svenson. Midl. Nat. 26:6568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Pearse, A. J. 1961. Histochemistry: Theoretical and Applied. 2nd ed. Little, Brown and Co., Boston, Massachusetts. 998 pp.Google Scholar
6. Sass, J. E. 1958. Botanical Microtechnique. 3rd ed. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, Iowa 228 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Shah, C. K. 1964. Embryo development of Eleocharis palustris L. Nat. Can. 11:4149.Google Scholar
8. Yeo, R. R. and Dow, R. J. 1977. Germination of seed of dwarf spikerush. Weed Sci. 26:425431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Yeo, R. R. and Fisher, T. W. 1970. Progress and potential for biological control with fish, pathogens, competitive plants, and snails. Pages 450463 in Holston, J. T., ed. Technical Papers of the FAO International Conference on Weed Control. WSSA, Champaign, Illinois.Google Scholar