Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T06:10:43.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Light and Temperature Requirements for Common Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) Germination During After-Ripening under Field Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

J. K. Norsworthy  and
M. J. Oliveira
J. K. Norsworthy*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soils, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, 1366 West Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704
M. J. Oliveira
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Soils, and Plants Sciences, Clemson University, 277 Poole Agricultural Center, Clemson, SC 29634
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: jnorswor@uark.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were conducted in 2002 and 2003 to determine the influence of soil thermal amplitude on common cocklebur emergence. Additionally, common cocklebur achenes were collected in fall of 2003 and of 2004 to assess changes in light and temperature requirements for germination over a 12-mo period under field conditions. Common cocklebur germination in response to the light environment and to constant and fluctuating temperatures were evaluated under controlled conditions following achene retrieval from the field. There was a linear inverse relationship between shade intensity and soil thermal amplitude, which explained 77% of the variability in emergence in the field over 2 yr. Emergence decreased as soil thermal amplitude declined, with 95% shading resulting in a 72 to 88% reduction in emergence. Neither red nor far-red light had much effect on germination, and burial did not induce a light requirement. Germination of achenes retrieved from the soil surface or buried in soil generally was not affected by red or far-red light, and the achenes did not acquire a red-light requirement following burial. Daily exposure to natural greenhouse light at 24 to 30 C was essential for germination immediately following achene maturation, whereas no germination occurred in darkness. A thermal fluctuation of 15 C increased germination percentages over those at constant temperatures regardless of time after maturation or retrieval-depth of achenes. The mean fluctuating temperature over all sample dates that was generally optimal for germination was 25 C (17.5/32.5 C low/high temperatures; 15 C daily fluctuation) in April or May and July or August in both years. Germination was generally optimum at constant temperatures of 35 or 40 C. The higher mean temperature requirement for germination at constant temperatures than at fluctuating temperatures likely contributes to reduced emergence in spring and summer months, when earlier emerging weed species or crops have already become established, and the thermal fluctuation requirement for germination reduces the likelihood of emergence in an environment where light availability is diminished.

Keywords

Common cockleburXanthium strumarium L. XANSTLight qualityshadingthermal amplitudeweed emergence
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , June 2007 , pp. 227 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ballare, C. L. and Casal, J. J. 2000. Light signals perceived by crop and weed plants. Field Crops Res. 67:149–160.Google Scholar
Bararpour, M. T. and Oliver, L. R. 1998. Effect of tillage and interference on common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) and sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) population, seed production, and seedbank. Weed Sci. 46:424–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrentine, W. L. 1974. Common cocklebur competition in soybean. Weed Sci. 22:600–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, J. M. and Baskin, C. C. 1985. The annual dormancy cycle in buried weeds seeds: a continuum. Bioscience. 35:492–498.Google Scholar
Batlla, D., Kruk, B. C., and Benech-Arnold, R. L. 2000. Very early detection of canopy presence by seeds through perception of subtle modifications in R : FR signals. Funct. Ecol. 14:195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, D. T., Rokich, D. P., McChesney, C. J., and Plummer, J. A. 1995. Effects of temperature, light and gibberellic acid on the germination of seeds of 43 species native to Western Australia. J. Veg. Sci. 6:797–806.Google Scholar
Bello, I. A., Owen, M. D. K., and Hatterman-Valenti, H. M. 1995. Effect of shade on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) growth, seed production, and dormancy. Weed Technol. 9:452–455.Google Scholar
Benech-Arnold, R. L., Ghersa, C. M., Sanchez, R. A., and Garcia Fernandez, A. E. 1988. The role of fluctuating temperatures in the germination and establishment of Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. regulation of germination under leaf canopies. Funct. Ecol. 2:311–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benech-Arnold, R. L., Ghersa, C. M., Sanchez, R. A., and Insausti, P. 1990. Temperature effects on dormancy release and germination rate in Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. seeds: a quantitative analysis. Weed Res. 30:81–89.Google Scholar
Bosza, R. C. and Oliver, L. R. 1993. Shoot interference and root interference of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 41:34–47.Google Scholar
Botto, J. F., Scopel, A. L., Ballare, C. L., and Sanchez, R. A. 1998. The effect of light during and after soil cultivation with different tillage implements on weed seedling emergence. Weed Sci. 46:351–357.Google Scholar
Bridges, D. C. and Bauman, P. C. 1992. Weeds causing losses in the United States. Pages 75–147. in Bridges, D.C. ed. Crop Losses Due to Weeds in the United States, 1992. Champaign, IL Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Conley, S. P., Binning, L. K., Boerboom, C. M., and Stoltenberg, D. E. 2002. Estimating giant foxtail cohort productivity in soybean based on weed density, leaf area, or volume. Weed Sci. 50:72–78.Google Scholar
Deregibus, V. A., Casal, J. J., Jacobo, E. J., Gibson, D., Kauffman, M., and Rodriguez, A. M. 1994. Evidence that heavy grazing may promote the germination of Lolium multiflorum seeds via phytochrome-mediated perception of high red/far-red ratios. Funct. Ecol. 8:536–542.Google Scholar
Esashi, Y., Ishihara, N., Kuraishi, R., and Kodama, H. 1983. Light actions in the germination of cocklebur seeds, I: differences in the light responses of the upper and lower seeds. J. Exp. Bot. 34:903–914.Google Scholar
Esashi, Y., Oota, H., Saitoh, H., and Kodama, H. 1985. Light actions in the germination of cocklebur seeds, III: Effects of pre-treatment temperature on germination responses to far-red light and on dark germination in the red light-requiring upper seeds. J. Exp. Bot. 36:1465–1477.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Quintanilla, C., Barroso, J., Recasens, J., Sans, X., Torner, C., and Sanchez Del Arco, M. J. 2000. Demography of Lolium rigidum in winter barley crops: analysis of recruitment, survival, and reproduction. Weed Res. 40:281–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forcella, F., Benech-Arnold, R. L., Sánchez, R., and Ghersa, C. M. 2000. Modeling seedling emergence. Field Crops Res. 67:123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, R. S. and Cardina, J. 1998a. Phytochrome-mediated Amaranthus germination: effect of seed burial and germination temperature. Weed Sci. 46:48–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, R. S. and Cardina, J. 1998b. The effect of light environment during tillage on the recruitment of various summer annuals. Weed Sci. 46:214–216.Google Scholar
Ghersa, C. M., Benech-Arnold, R., and Martinez-Ghersa, M. A. 1992. The role of fluctuating temperatures in germination and establishment of Sorghum halepense. Regulation of germination at increasing depths. Funct. Ecol. 6:460–468.Google Scholar
Gorski, T. 1975. Germination of seeds in the shadow of plants. Physiol. Plant. 34:342–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartzler, R. G., Battles, B. A., and Nordby, D. 2004. Effect of common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) emergence date on growth and fecundity in soybean. Weed Sci. 52:242–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennig, L., Stoddart, W. M., Dieterle, M., Whitelam, G. C., and Schäfer, E. 2002. Phytochrome E controls light-induced germination of Arabidopsis . Plant Physiol. 128:194–200.Google Scholar
Holmes, M. G. 1981. Spectral distribution of radiation within plant canopies. Pages 147–158. in Smith, H. ed. Plants and the daylight spectrum. London Academic.Google Scholar
[ISTA] International Seed Testing Association 1985. International rules for seed testing 1985. Seed Sci. Technol. 13:327–483.Google Scholar
Kegode, G. O., Pearce, R. B., and Bailey, T. B. 1998. Influence of fluctuating temperatures on emergence of shattercane (Sorghum bicolor) and giant foxtail (Setaria faberi). Weed Sci. 46:330–335.Google Scholar
King, T. J. 1975. Inhibition of seed germination under leaf canopies in Arenaria serpyllifolia, Veronica arvensis and Cerastum holosteoides . New Phytol. 75:87–90.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K. 2003. Use of soybean production surveys to determine weed management needs of South Carolina farmers. Weed Technol. 17:195–201.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K. 2004. Soybean canopy formation effects on pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa), common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium), and sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) emergence. Weed Sci. 52:954–960.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K., Jha, P., and Bridges, W. Jr. 2007. Sicklepod survival and fecundity in wide- and narrow-row glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 55:252–259.Google Scholar
Oliveira, M. J., Norsworthy, J. K., Jha, P., Malik, M. S., and Bangarwa, S. K. 2006. Common cocklebur temporal emergence is influenced by tillage and canopy formation. Proc. South. Weed Sci. 59:69.Google Scholar
Rajapakse, N. C., McMahon, M. J., and Kelly, J. W. 1993. End of day far-red light reverses height reduction of chrysanthemum induced by CuSO4 spectral filters. Sci. Hortic. 53:249–259.Google Scholar
Regnier, E. E., Stoller, E. W., and Nafziger, E. D. 1989. Common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) root and shoot interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 37:308–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS 1990. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 8.02. Cary, NC SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Scopel, A. L., Ballare, C. L., and Sanchez, R. A. 1991. Induction of extreme light sensitivity in buried weed seeds and its role in the perception of soil cultivation. Plant Cell Environ. 14:501–508.Google Scholar
Shinomura, T., Nagatani, A., Chory, J., and Furuya, M. 1994. The induction of seed germination in Arabidopsis thaliana is regulated principally be phytochrome B and secondarily by phytochrome A. Plant Physiol. 104:363–371.Google Scholar
Silvertown, J. 1980. Leaf-canopy-induced seed dormancy in a grassland flora. New Phytol. 85:109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoller, E. W. and Wax, L. M. 1974. Dormancy changes and fate of some annual weed seeds in the soil. Weed Sci. 22:151–155.Google Scholar
Taylor, I. N., Peters, N. C. B., Adkins, S. W., and Walker, S. R. 2004. Germination response of Phalaris paradoxa L. seed to different light qualities. Weed Res. 44:254–264.Google Scholar
Taylorson, R. B. 1972. Phytochrome controlled changes in dormancy and germination of buried weed seeds. Weed Sci. 20:417–422.Google Scholar
Thompson, K. and Grime, J. P. 1983. A comparative study of germination in response to diurnally fluctuating temperatures. J. Appl. Ecol. 20:141–156.Google Scholar
Thompson, K., Grime, J. P., and Mason, G. 1977. Seed germination in responses to diurnal fluctuations of temperature. Nature. 267:147–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Washitani, I. 1985. Field fate of Amaranthus patulus seeds subjected to leaf-canopy inhibition of germination. Oecologia. 66:338–342.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. and Coble, H. D. 1997. Changes in the weed species composition of the southern United States: 1974 to 1995. Weed Technol. 11:308–317.Google Scholar
Zhou, J., Deckard, E. L., and Messersmith, C. G. 2005. Factors affecting eastern black nightshade (Solanum ptycanthum) seed germination. Weed Sci. 53:651–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar