Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T19:34:20.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intraspecific Differential Response of Wild Oat and Barley to Barban

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Ruben Jacobsohn
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron. and Plant Genetics, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota
Robert N. Andersen
Affiliation:
Plant Sci. Res. Div., Agr. Res. Serv., U. S. Dep. of Agr., Dep. of Agron. and Plant Genetics, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101

Abstract

Two wild oat (Avena fatua L.) biotypes and two barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) varieties known to have intraspecific differential response to foliarly-applied 4-chloro-2-butynyl m-chlorocarbanilate (barban) were studied. When barban was applied to the roots, the intraspecific differential response (measured by shoot retardation) was maintained in both species but to a much lesser extent than previously observed with foliar application. Wild oat maintained a greater differential response than barley. Therefore, the factors causing the differential response to foliarly-applied barban may reside primarily in the leaves of both species but to some extent elsewhere (perhaps at the plant apex) in the wild oat biotypes and to a lesser extent elsewhere in the barley varieties. Differential response to foliar applications was not caused by differential uptake, but may be caused primarily by the susceptible biotype or variety's reduced ability to degrade barban beyond 3-chloroaniline. This might cause the greater build-up of compound X (a water-soluble 3-chloroaniline-containing metabolite of barban) observed in the susceptible biotype or variety. Compound X appeared to be nonphytotoxic. The build-up of compound X in turn may reduce the rate of metabolism of barban resulting in the greater amount of free barban found in the treated leaf of the susceptible biotype or variety 12 to 24 hr after treatment. This greater amount of free barban in the leaf of the susceptible biotype or variety may be responsible for the differential response to foliar applications of barban. Evidence for this partial explanation of the differential response was better for barley than for wild oat.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Foy, Chester L. 1961. Uptake of radioactive 4-chloro-2-butynyl N-(3-chlorophenyl) carbamate (barban) and translocation of 14C in Hordeum vulgare and Avena spp. Res. Prog. Rep. West. Weed Contr. Conf. p. 9697.Google Scholar
2. Foy, Chester L. and Smith, Leon W. 1963. Volatility of various herbicides under laboratory conditions. Res. Prog. Rep. West. Weed Contr. Conf. p. 8182.Google Scholar
3. Friesen, H. A. 1961. Some factors affecting the control of wild oat with barban. Weeds 9:185194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Hayes, J. D., Pfeiffer, R. K., and Rana, M. S. 1965. The genetic response of barley to DDT and barban and its significance in crop protection. Weed Res. 5:191206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. California Agr. Exp. Sta. Circ. 347: 32 p.Google Scholar
6. Hodgson, J. M., Thrasher, E. P., and Eslick, R. F. 1964. Effect of herbicides on yields of barley and wheat varieties. Crop. Sci. 4:307310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Jacobsohn, Ruben and Andersen, Robert N. 1968. Differential response of wild oat lines to diallate, triallate, and barban. Weed Sci. 16:491494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. James, C. S. and Prendeville, G. N. 1969. Metabolism of chloropropham (isopropyl m-chlorocarbanilate) in various plant species. J. Agr. Food Chem. 17:12571260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Riden, Joseph R. and Hopkins, T. R. 1961. Decline and residue studies on 4-chloro-2-butynyl N-(3-chlorophenyl) carbamate. J. Agr. Food Chem. 9:4749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Riden, J. R. and Hopkins, T. R. 1962. Formation of a water-soluble 3-chloroaniline-containing substance in barban-treated plants. J. Agr. Food Chem. 10:455458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar